Unofficial "NQD" Tear into Jetboat Thread
#2301
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Surrey, BC, CANADA
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Unofficial
ORIGINAL: Stein
I'm looking for a coupler 2.3mm to 3.17 for this motor [link]http://www.hobbypartz.com/07e-c-sl-10t-2848-blue.html[/link]. Anyone know where I can get one or should I just drill out the stock on?
Thanks
I'm looking for a coupler 2.3mm to 3.17 for this motor [link]http://www.hobbypartz.com/07e-c-sl-10t-2848-blue.html[/link]. Anyone know where I can get one or should I just drill out the stock on?
Thanks
Graupner u-joint: Scroll 3/4 of the way down the page... it's part # 355.4, and I drill out the 2mm part on a lathe with a 3/32" drill bit to make it 2.3mm exactly. If you don't have access to a lathe, just drill as straight as you can. doesn't hurt to buy 2 of them... they're cheap and take a bit to come from the UK.
http://www.cornwallmodelboats.co.uk/...-graupner.html
#2302
RE: Unofficial
2.3 to 3 or 3.17mm couplers are pretty much non-existent for some reason. If you're not equipped to enlarge holes properly, email Jeff Wohlt ([email protected]) about making you a custom coupler. Or better yet - get several, sell the others on this forum for a little profit to lessen the cost of yours. I had Jeff make some for me a while back that had 3 setscrews around the perimeter so I could eliminate any possible wobble by judicial tightening of the 3 opposed screws. He did a great job. I'm still running those couplers on some ABC Hobby Jet Ski's that we set up for racing (with that same 3900kv motor, by the way).
#2303
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Surrey, BC, CANADA
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Unofficial
ORIGINAL: sundogz
2.3 to 3 or 3.17mm couplers are pretty much non-existent for some reason. If you're not equipped to enlarge holes properly, email Jeff Wohlt ([email protected]) about making you a custom coupler. Or better yet - get several, sell the others on this forum for a little profit to lessen the cost of yours. I had Jeff make some for me a while back that had 3 setscrews around the perimeter so I could eliminate any possible wobble by judicial tightening of the 3 opposed screws. He did a great job. I'm still running those couplers on some ABC Hobby Jet Ski's that we set up for racing (with that same 3900kv motor, by the way).
2.3 to 3 or 3.17mm couplers are pretty much non-existent for some reason. If you're not equipped to enlarge holes properly, email Jeff Wohlt ([email protected]) about making you a custom coupler. Or better yet - get several, sell the others on this forum for a little profit to lessen the cost of yours. I had Jeff make some for me a while back that had 3 setscrews around the perimeter so I could eliminate any possible wobble by judicial tightening of the 3 opposed screws. He did a great job. I'm still running those couplers on some ABC Hobby Jet Ski's that we set up for racing (with that same 3900kv motor, by the way).
#2304
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Henley on Thames, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Unofficial
Some help please - I have 2 Tear Into's, both with the same motor (but different ESCs) however they sound very different - one is much louder (and a bit faster). What could be causing this ? Is it down to spacing of the impeller ??
Thanks Mike.
Thanks Mike.
#2305
RE: Unofficial
The loudness might be caused by impeller clearance. But the one with the highest pitch (note) should be fastest. If not it may have a slipping coupler. I don't think the speed controls are the reason for the difference in sound.
#2306
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Henley on Thames, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Unofficial
ORIGINAL: sundogz
The loudness might be caused by impeller clearance. But the one with the highest pitch (note) should be fastest. If not it may have a slipping coupler. I don't think the speed controls are the reason for the difference in sound.
The loudness might be caused by impeller clearance. But the one with the highest pitch (note) should be fastest. If not it may have a slipping coupler. I don't think the speed controls are the reason for the difference in sound.
#2307
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Blue Bell,
PA
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Unofficial
I know this may seem a bit daft, but are both escs propperly callibrated? If not, then that could also be a reason for the speed difference (I had a 2-prop boat with the same problem, caused me many headaches untill I realised my stupid mistake). Or it could be that one of the escs is rated for less amps, and is struggling to deliver the amount of amps the motor requires. These are just two suggestions (if sundogz's suggestion doesn't fix the problem)
**Edit: timing can make them sound different - an increase in timing can make a motor go faster, but must be done carefully as it may cause unnnecesary amp draw/heat build up and sync loss with the esc
**Edit: timing can make them sound different - an increase in timing can make a motor go faster, but must be done carefully as it may cause unnnecesary amp draw/heat build up and sync loss with the esc
#2308
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Saint John,
NB, CANADA
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Unofficial
ORIGINAL: TheOtherSide
Valid... if anyone needs a Graupner one modded... let me know and I'll be happy to buz one up for you. I currently have four 355.4's ready to be modded for anyone...
ORIGINAL: sundogz
2.3 to 3 or 3.17mm couplers are pretty much non-existent for some reason. If you're not equipped to enlarge holes properly, email Jeff Wohlt ([email protected]) about making you a custom coupler. Or better yet - get several, sell the others on this forum for a little profit to lessen the cost of yours. I had Jeff make some for me a while back that had 3 setscrews around the perimeter so I could eliminate any possible wobble by judicial tightening of the 3 opposed screws. He did a great job. I'm still running those couplers on some ABC Hobby Jet Ski's that we set up for racing (with that same 3900kv motor, by the way).
2.3 to 3 or 3.17mm couplers are pretty much non-existent for some reason. If you're not equipped to enlarge holes properly, email Jeff Wohlt ([email protected]) about making you a custom coupler. Or better yet - get several, sell the others on this forum for a little profit to lessen the cost of yours. I had Jeff make some for me a while back that had 3 setscrews around the perimeter so I could eliminate any possible wobble by judicial tightening of the 3 opposed screws. He did a great job. I'm still running those couplers on some ABC Hobby Jet Ski's that we set up for racing (with that same 3900kv motor, by the way).
I just order 2 but if you can get me one modded for a good price shipped to Canada I would take one. I have this motor [link]http://www.hobbypartz.com/07e-c-sl-10t-2848-blue.html.[/link] How much for one modded and shipped to New Brunswick Canada?
Thanks,
#2309
RE: Unofficial
Mike: check to see if the impeller is contacting the stator or sides of the intake cavity. If so, remove the offending plastic - or better yet, run it until it wears down (more fun). You didn't say if that was the one that was faster.
ISIRC10: It may be so, but I've never compared identical esc's set to different timing side by side. I don't see where different timing would sound any different - they are just 'firing' at different times during the cycle is all. But your suggestion of them not being initially calibrated would be valid if the trigger was held to a different position when initially plugged in, or a different TX was used when initially fired up. But I don't think that is the case.
Stein: You're talking to the wrong person. Write Jeff Wohlt at the email address I posted. Hopefully, he can help you.
ISIRC10: It may be so, but I've never compared identical esc's set to different timing side by side. I don't see where different timing would sound any different - they are just 'firing' at different times during the cycle is all. But your suggestion of them not being initially calibrated would be valid if the trigger was held to a different position when initially plugged in, or a different TX was used when initially fired up. But I don't think that is the case.
Stein: You're talking to the wrong person. Write Jeff Wohlt at the email address I posted. Hopefully, he can help you.
#2310
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Henley on Thames, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Unofficial
ORIGINAL: sundogz
Mike: check to see if the impeller is contacting the stator or sides of the intake cavity. If so, remove the offending plastic - or better yet, run it until it wears down (more fun). You didn't say if that was the one that was faster.
ISIRC10: It may be so, but I've never compared identical esc's set to different timing side by side. I don't see where different timing would sound any different - they are just 'firing' at different times during the cycle is all. But your suggestion of them not being initially calibrated would be valid if the trigger was held to a different position when initially plugged in, or a different TX was used when initially fired up. But I don't think that is the case.
Stein: You're talking to the wrong person. Write Jeff Wohlt at the email address I posted. Hopefully, he can help you.
Mike: check to see if the impeller is contacting the stator or sides of the intake cavity. If so, remove the offending plastic - or better yet, run it until it wears down (more fun). You didn't say if that was the one that was faster.
ISIRC10: It may be so, but I've never compared identical esc's set to different timing side by side. I don't see where different timing would sound any different - they are just 'firing' at different times during the cycle is all. But your suggestion of them not being initially calibrated would be valid if the trigger was held to a different position when initially plugged in, or a different TX was used when initially fired up. But I don't think that is the case.
Stein: You're talking to the wrong person. Write Jeff Wohlt at the email address I posted. Hopefully, he can help you.
#2311
RE: Unofficial
ORIGINAL: MikeHRC
The noisier one is faster. I'll check the impeller. They sound different throughout the throttle range, not just top end, I'm not convinced that they are calibrated perfectly - I have 2 different Tx's and no manual for the Traxxas one - it is a bit of a guess
The noisier one is faster. I'll check the impeller. They sound different throughout the throttle range, not just top end, I'm not convinced that they are calibrated perfectly - I have 2 different Tx's and no manual for the Traxxas one - it is a bit of a guess
ISIRC10: I take that back; if the timing is different it could effect the sound since the motor would have the potential to run at a higher top end (all things considered). I should have thought that through. Sorry Ivan, my bad. Good observation.
#2313
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SydneyNSW, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Unofficial
I had a drive of my new boat with the standard 9.6v and then 7.4v and 11.1v and it is night and day with responsiveness and power. I actully dont mind the amount of grunt it has with the stock motor. I just need to upgrade the ESC, servo and receiver to something more usable as I been reading that some people have been having issues tracking down a coupler to adapt brushless motors to the outdrive.
Is there a cheap brushed ESC out there that people have been using as the only one i can see is one from Traxxas.
Thanks James
Is there a cheap brushed ESC out there that people have been using as the only one i can see is one from Traxxas.
Thanks James
#2314
RE: Unofficial
Proboat makes a nice [link=http://www.ebay.com/itm/Pro-Boat-Waterproof-ESC-Reverse-4-8-12V-PRB2314-/130566218456?pt=Radio_Control_Parts_Accessories&hash=item1e665a62d8]40A esc[/link] that won't need water cooling, but the stock motor won't handle a 3S lipo very long. Better get some [link=http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mabuchi-Electric-Motor-RC-Tools-Car-Etc-RS-380PH-/230538474989?pt=Radio_Control_Parts_Accessories&hash=item35ad29f5ed]spares[/link] - they are cheap enough. And put some holes in the transom to facilitate easy replacement of the motor with a screwdriver or long hex wrench. You can cover the holes with hatch tape.
#2315
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SydneyNSW, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Unofficial
Thanks for the headz up sundogz I will have a look at that ESC. looks easy. Still have to cut the main hole in the top to get at eveythings.
thanks James
thanks James
#2316
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SydneyNSW, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Unofficial
Hi All,
I have decided to go all out.
My thought and would love peoples opinion.
2040SL 4800kv Brushless Inrunner http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/s...Cooled%5F.html
Turnigy Marine 35A Brushless Boat ESC http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/s...idProduct=7377
Traxxas High Torque Servo Waterproof http://www.amainhobbies.com/product_...rvo-Waterproof
the reason for the 2040 inrunner is i don't need a coupling.
Also another question. With both the ESC and motor it requires water cooling. Were have you placed the jet (in and out) and which one have other people used for it.
Thanks James
I have decided to go all out.
My thought and would love peoples opinion.
2040SL 4800kv Brushless Inrunner http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/s...Cooled%5F.html
Turnigy Marine 35A Brushless Boat ESC http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/s...idProduct=7377
Traxxas High Torque Servo Waterproof http://www.amainhobbies.com/product_...rvo-Waterproof
the reason for the 2040 inrunner is i don't need a coupling.
Also another question. With both the ESC and motor it requires water cooling. Were have you placed the jet (in and out) and which one have other people used for it.
Thanks James
#2317
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Hobart TAS, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Unofficial
Hello to the brains trust
a few questions people may already haver the answers for:
the brass bushing at the end of the prop shaft seems to have reamed out of its housing, slid down the shaft and allowed to impeller to wobble and shred itself on the sides of the intake .... tried super glue but no good, so cut a few notches on the outside of the bush with a hacksaw blade and set it in using a 2 part body filler, seems to have worked ok just wondering if this is common or if there is a better way to avoid it happening in the first place?
Has anyone tried fitting the intake for the motor & esc cooling inside the water intake housing rather than the jet outlet? ie: an intake either side aft of underneath the coupling? So that the impeller draws water into the cooling tubes rather than possibly reducing thrust by diverting it through the cooling tubes after it passes the prop?
Also the stock coupling seems a little short with a new motor if the shaft is set back into the brass bushing far enough to not come out? Is there an easily available longer 2.3mm coupling? I am assuming the coupling should be fitted so that it rests against the seals at the rear of the jet unit? (unsure exactly what these seals are or whether they should be replaced?) seems about 5mm longer would be handy or a better alternative?
thanks in advance for any help
a few questions people may already haver the answers for:
the brass bushing at the end of the prop shaft seems to have reamed out of its housing, slid down the shaft and allowed to impeller to wobble and shred itself on the sides of the intake .... tried super glue but no good, so cut a few notches on the outside of the bush with a hacksaw blade and set it in using a 2 part body filler, seems to have worked ok just wondering if this is common or if there is a better way to avoid it happening in the first place?
Has anyone tried fitting the intake for the motor & esc cooling inside the water intake housing rather than the jet outlet? ie: an intake either side aft of underneath the coupling? So that the impeller draws water into the cooling tubes rather than possibly reducing thrust by diverting it through the cooling tubes after it passes the prop?
Also the stock coupling seems a little short with a new motor if the shaft is set back into the brass bushing far enough to not come out? Is there an easily available longer 2.3mm coupling? I am assuming the coupling should be fitted so that it rests against the seals at the rear of the jet unit? (unsure exactly what these seals are or whether they should be replaced?) seems about 5mm longer would be handy or a better alternative?
thanks in advance for any help
#2318
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Eastry, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Unofficial
Well in my water cooling system I have done as you say, but with a slight modification. I also drilled a hole in the jet drive outlet and attached the tube there, but without actually putting a pickup on; the tube is just on the hole. This way the pressure from the jet outlet and the swirling water causing centrifugal force both work together to force water through the pipe. Then the vacuum pressure from the outlet hose (as the impeller is sucking water, just like you were saying) adds to the flow of the water cooling further. But the best thing about it is it hardly effects thrust!
#2319
RE: Unofficial
That has been tried before. You don't want to draw water from the intake area as that is negative pressure and will not flow water (it actually draws water!). That is maybe why Hqdby1 had to resort to adding pressure from the nozzle to get some flow. Adding a pickup in the nozzle doesn't seem to lower thrust appreciably - at least none that you can tell by running it. I've done it both ways. And to see that stream from the outlet is reassuring that things are getting sufficient cooling. The 'o-ring' is to help keep grease in the shaft bore and as you found when fitting an aftermarket motor the coupler is too short to hold it in place. A longer coupler would be handy here. Let us know if you find a source.
#2321
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SydneyNSW, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Unofficial
Hi aum-offshore,
wow. that is awesome. I don’t suppose you have an English version or maybe even if you like email me the editable version of yours and I can get it converted.
Did i mention that is awesome.
Thanks James
wow. that is awesome. I don’t suppose you have an English version or maybe even if you like email me the editable version of yours and I can get it converted.
Did i mention that is awesome.
Thanks James
#2322
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Halifax, NS, CANADA
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Unofficial
I had the same issue with my stock coupler. with the new motor it shortened it and I ended up destroying a prop and shaft (check out the damage on pg. 91). What i've done now is file the flat spot on the shaft all the way to the top so you can get an extra 4ish milimeters.
#2325
RE: Unofficial
ORIGINAL: swervyn
Hello to the brains trust
a few questions people may already haver the answers for:
the brass bushing at the end of the prop shaft seems to have reamed out of its housing, slid down the shaft and allowed to impeller to wobble and shred itself on the sides of the intake
Hello to the brains trust
a few questions people may already haver the answers for:
the brass bushing at the end of the prop shaft seems to have reamed out of its housing, slid down the shaft and allowed to impeller to wobble and shred itself on the sides of the intake