Hanger9 Corsair
#2
RE: Hanger9 Corsair
Easy Flier,
Lets see it has 1.2 CID. I have a Satio 100 4 stroke on mine and that is plenty of power for typical warbird flying. Thinking that might be a bit too much motor. Also you will want to keep your receiver and batteries a foot away from the electronic ignition. Not sure how that will affect your CG.
John
Lets see it has 1.2 CID. I have a Satio 100 4 stroke on mine and that is plenty of power for typical warbird flying. Thinking that might be a bit too much motor. Also you will want to keep your receiver and batteries a foot away from the electronic ignition. Not sure how that will affect your CG.
John
#3
My Feedback: (2)
RE: Hanger9 Corsair
Pretty sure you'll need to beef up the firewall and use sierra gear, and shove everything as far back as you can to balance. I dont have the corsiar, but I have the hell cat and P-40. Both fly nice on .91 4-strokes. Not barn burners but nice and scale. Both are built stock using the stock retracts, which I dont really endorse. You have to keep them light for them to hold up at all. And they take a lot of maintenance to stay functional.
Edwin
Edwin
#5
My Feedback: (9)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sherman,
SD
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Hanger9 Corsair
I have a RCGF 20 on a top flight Sea Fury kit that I built. (It's the 60 size kit.) I am very happy with the performance. I didn't add any weight anywhere. Ignition battery is as far foward as I can get it and the flight battery is right behind the firewall. Since it was a kit I always build the firewall plenty strong.