Plettenberg Advance 30-10 Inrunner Test Data!
#101
RE: Plettenberg Advance 30-10 Inrunner Test Data!
Hello Chester and all Advance 30/10 users,
just two questions to the Advance 30/10:
can you please give me the weight of the Advance with and without prop-adapter and could you please tell me if the rear support is necessary - according to plettenberg a front mount with 4-8 screws is enough.
thanks,
Christian
just two questions to the Advance 30/10:
can you please give me the weight of the Advance with and without prop-adapter and could you please tell me if the rear support is necessary - according to plettenberg a front mount with 4-8 screws is enough.
thanks,
Christian
#102
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: petch tekva, ISRAEL
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Plettenberg Advance 30-10 Inrunner Test Data!
Hello Christian.
the Advance with Screw ,washer & prop-adapter is 583 gram
without 568
But without a firewall
I use a reinforcement ring to the nose
without rear support
3 Screws, the same as the extra 30 10 evo
But there is a little more noise when the uneven flow on the propeller such as a knife edge flight and snap rolls
could be that because there is no back support but it works for over 100 flights 30% of them F 11
I made more interesting experiments that put thes motor in a compar with the Q80 13 in propellers and rpm it uses
20x10.5 cf ULSAMER 7500 rpm 2500 watts
20x11 apc 7600rpm 2700 watts
the Advance with Screw ,washer & prop-adapter is 583 gram
without 568
But without a firewall
I use a reinforcement ring to the nose
without rear support
3 Screws, the same as the extra 30 10 evo
But there is a little more noise when the uneven flow on the propeller such as a knife edge flight and snap rolls
could be that because there is no back support but it works for over 100 flights 30% of them F 11
I made more interesting experiments that put thes motor in a compar with the Q80 13 in propellers and rpm it uses
20x10.5 cf ULSAMER 7500 rpm 2500 watts
20x11 apc 7600rpm 2700 watts
#104
RE: Plettenberg Advance 30-10 Inrunner Test Data!
Having just taken delivery of an Advance 30-10 I am aiming to mount it in an Extreme Flight Vanquish 2M. The space available if very tight and as the Vanquish is designed around a rear mounted outrunner I am having to think carefully about how best to mount the motor. I ordered and received the F3A Unlimited/Chad Northeast mounts - and they are excellent - but before I develop my own mounting scheme are there any others who have mounted an Advance 30-10 in a 2M Vanquish? If yes, could you be so kind as to explain what you did and perhaps post a photograph. I should say that I am very excited about this combination and hope that it will enable me to move to the next level in my F3A flying.
#107
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
RE: Plettenberg Advance 30-10 Inrunner Test Data!
ORIGINAL: nonstoprc
On a different subject about the motor.
What kind of maintenance work is needed for the motor? I have both a geared motor and an outer runner. The outer runner is pretty maintenance free.
On a different subject about the motor.
What kind of maintenance work is needed for the motor? I have both a geared motor and an outer runner. The outer runner is pretty maintenance free.
#110
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
RE: Plettenberg Advance 30-10 Inrunner Test Data!
I don't think you should need to worry about the bearings for a couple of years, unless you have a crash or other damage.
I personally have never replaced a bearing on any of my Pletty's, but our climate is rather cool and dry, which probably aids a lot to longevity.
I personally have never replaced a bearing on any of my Pletty's, but our climate is rather cool and dry, which probably aids a lot to longevity.
ORIGINAL: nonstoprc
Thanks. That what I hoped :-)
I saw replacement bearings listed on Chris's f3a unlimited website for other Plettenberg motors. Just wonder if there is a need to replace the bearings for the Advance at some intervals.
Thanks. That what I hoped :-)
I saw replacement bearings listed on Chris's f3a unlimited website for other Plettenberg motors. Just wonder if there is a need to replace the bearings for the Advance at some intervals.
#111
RE: Plettenberg Advance 30-10 Inrunner Test Data!
Hi Guys
One word about the Setup with the Schulze fut 32-80 KA for the Pletti Advanced. The Dip switch 4 is for outrunners OFF. For Inrunners ON. The Advanced is a Inrunner. Is this correct.
SR
andreas
One word about the Setup with the Schulze fut 32-80 KA for the Pletti Advanced. The Dip switch 4 is for outrunners OFF. For Inrunners ON. The Advanced is a Inrunner. Is this correct.
SR
andreas
#112
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NETHERLANDS
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Plettenberg Advance 30-10 Inrunner Test Data!
This is the setting for a low rpm Plettenberg motor (both EVO and Advance)
http://www.electric-f3a.com/Shulze.htm
Switch 1 + 5 on for high rpm like Hacker C50
http://www.electric-f3a.com/Shulze.htm
Switch 1 + 5 on for high rpm like Hacker C50
#113
My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Plettenberg Advance 30-10 Inrunner Test Data!
We have been running the Advance motor using the same settings as an outrunner and it works perfectly. Same settings at you would for the Plettenberg 30-10 EVO. This applies for Schulze, Castle, and YGE controllers.
Even though the Advance is an inrunner, it turns 1:1 like an outrunner and not many times faster like a geared inrunner.
Even though the Advance is an inrunner, it turns 1:1 like an outrunner and not many times faster like a geared inrunner.
#114
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
RE: Plettenberg Advance 30-10 Inrunner Test Data!
ORIGINAL: crazyf3a
Hi Guys
One word about the Setup with the Schulze fut 32-80 KA for the Pletti Advanced. The Dip switch 4 is for outrunners OFF. For Inrunners ON. The Advanced is a Inrunner. Is this correct.
SR
andreas
Hi Guys
One word about the Setup with the Schulze fut 32-80 KA for the Pletti Advanced. The Dip switch 4 is for outrunners OFF. For Inrunners ON. The Advanced is a Inrunner. Is this correct.
SR
andreas
As mentioned by Chris and Hans, same settings as you would use for the Evo (#1 ON, all others OFF).
Advance is an inrunner, but still has 20 poles, so timing etc. must be set to what is normally used for high pole outrunners.
#115
RE: Plettenberg Advance 30-10 Inrunner Test Data!
Hi Chad,
Do you know if Schulze will start producing ESCs for F3A any time soon? With the 32.80KA out of production there are currently no ESCs available with a proportional break, as I know of. I have two Advance motors and only one 32.80KA. The other one went up in flames at the last WC.
Regards,
Henning
Do you know if Schulze will start producing ESCs for F3A any time soon? With the 32.80KA out of production there are currently no ESCs available with a proportional break, as I know of. I have two Advance motors and only one 32.80KA. The other one went up in flames at the last WC.
Regards,
Henning
#117
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
RE: Plettenberg Advance 30-10 Inrunner Test Data!
Hi Henning,
I know they had planned to have a new 32.80 ready for last year that had some more features, but partway through the year the sliped the date to 2012. I have not asked recently if they still plan to produce those controllers or not. If I hear anything about it I will post it to RCU.
I know they had planned to have a new 32.80 ready for last year that had some more features, but partway through the year the sliped the date to 2012. I have not asked recently if they still plan to produce those controllers or not. If I hear anything about it I will post it to RCU.
#118
My Feedback: (90)
RE: Plettenberg Advance 30-10 Inrunner Test Data!
Two slightly different questions on the topic of mounting.
The prop shaft of the Advance, where the backplate of spinner and the prop are mounted, has a length of 11.33mm. At this length, I figure the prop can not go all the way to the shaft. Just like to know at what extent a portion of the prop can be off the tip of the shaft.
A consequence of short prop shaft is that the motor needs to be mounted very close to the nose, where the fuse may not be very strong. Like to know if one layer of CF cloth is sufficient. If so, how heavy should the CF cloth be?
Thanks.
The prop shaft of the Advance, where the backplate of spinner and the prop are mounted, has a length of 11.33mm. At this length, I figure the prop can not go all the way to the shaft. Just like to know at what extent a portion of the prop can be off the tip of the shaft.
A consequence of short prop shaft is that the motor needs to be mounted very close to the nose, where the fuse may not be very strong. Like to know if one layer of CF cloth is sufficient. If so, how heavy should the CF cloth be?
Thanks.
#120
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
RE: Plettenberg Advance 30-10 Inrunner Test Data!
ORIGINAL: nonstoprc
Two slightly different questions on the topic of mounting.
The prop shaft of the Advance, where the backplate of spinner and the prop are mounted, has a length of 11.33mm. At this length, I figure the prop can not go all the way to the shaft. Just like to know at what extent a portion of the prop can be off the tip of the shaft.
A consequence of short prop shaft is that the motor needs to be mounted very close to the nose, where the fuse may not be very strong. Like to know if one layer of CF cloth is sufficient. If so, how heavy should the CF cloth be?
Thanks.
Two slightly different questions on the topic of mounting.
The prop shaft of the Advance, where the backplate of spinner and the prop are mounted, has a length of 11.33mm. At this length, I figure the prop can not go all the way to the shaft. Just like to know at what extent a portion of the prop can be off the tip of the shaft.
A consequence of short prop shaft is that the motor needs to be mounted very close to the nose, where the fuse may not be very strong. Like to know if one layer of CF cloth is sufficient. If so, how heavy should the CF cloth be?
Thanks.
Question 2: I have never added additional carbon to the nose where the advance mounts. The Xigris is carbon, maybe 3 oz (not 5.7 for sure), probably with light glass on each side. If you use the front and rear mounts it should not be an issue as you wont have the bending forces that you would if you front mount only.
#121
My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Plettenberg Advance 30-10 Inrunner Test Data!
The Chad designed mount by F3A Unlimited is now shipping with the "V2" back support which has slots for the mounting bolts to allow for easier thrust angle adjustments. This mod was made as a result of input from our customers. Thanks for helping us improve our product line!
#124
RE: Plettenberg Advance 30-10 Inrunner Test Data!
Hi Chris,
Another suggestion for a mod to the mounting plates - Ihave one of the slightly earlier ones. I could not use stand-offs to mount the front ring as they would have had to be at an angle to miss the rear support. If you designed the rear support to allow stand-offs to pass through would that work?
Peter
Another suggestion for a mod to the mounting plates - Ihave one of the slightly earlier ones. I could not use stand-offs to mount the front ring as they would have had to be at an angle to miss the rear support. If you designed the rear support to allow stand-offs to pass through would that work?
Peter