Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Kit Building
Reload this Page >

Who else has failed on their first build?

Community
Search
Notices
Kit Building If you're building a kit and have questions or want to discuss kit building post it here.

Who else has failed on their first build?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2012, 02:37 PM
  #1  
70x7
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Elon, NC
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Who else has failed on their first build?

Am I the only one?

I bought a kit from StevensAERO. The kit (IMO) was extremely well constructed. Every piece went together with no extra sanding or trimming, I was impressed. I took my time, made a few mistakes, but thought I had all the mistakes corrected (except for a few aesthetic ones)but the plane flies like a paper plate. I don't even know what the problem is. It fights me to turn to the left. When I force it to make a right bank, it stalls and does a nosedive. It is very unpredictable. After 5 minutes in the air, it now has broken landing gear.

I'm sure this is not the fault of the kit.

Everything to my eye looks straight, except for the tiniest warp in one wing where it meets the fuselage. It seems very small to metoo small to cause such erratic flying as this, but what do I know.

AnywayI'm frustrated and disappointed. Anyone else been there? How many people give up after a start like this?
Old 09-05-2012, 02:58 PM
  #2  
dignlivn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Deland, FL
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?




Not sure,

Could be thrust angle, incidence off, Need more info,
Your first kit? How long you have been flying? Was it
balanced both ways ?

Bob
Old 09-05-2012, 03:01 PM
  #3  
R8893
My Feedback: (20)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati, OH,
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?

I suspect the guys who have given up are not watching the forum, so you're going to get responses from a bunch of hard headed types who have stuck it out through all sorts of challenges.

I know I have had some models that did not fly up to my expectations.

You don't say how much flying experience you have, so forgive me if it is more than my next comment assumes. Get somebody else, perhaps an experienced pattern flyer if there is one around, and have him check the model, fly it and trim it. A second set of eyes may pick up on something you missed.

Chuck
Old 09-05-2012, 04:12 PM
  #4  
N1EDM
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brockton, MA
Posts: 4,290
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?

Other things to consider are (1) whether you might have added additional weight while building, perhaps beefing it up here and there, etc.; (2) is the CG correct, or (3) is the engine above or below the recommended size??

Just my $.02

What Chuck says is also true... get someone else to fly it and see what their opinion is. But, whatever you do, don't give up and don't stop building. We've all been there.

Bob
Old 09-05-2012, 04:25 PM
  #5  
SeamusG
Senior Member
 
SeamusG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Arvada, CO
Posts: 3,919
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?

Do a search out in WWW land for "Dean Pappas trimming from the ground up". There is a set of 3 pdf files that help you understand how get things sorted out.

Btw, I was really nervous on the maiden of my 1st build, so much in fact, that I got an experienced club member to do the maiden for me. There are sooooo many little things that can bite a nice "build" squarely in the arse. Have a local builder do a "tech inspection" of your plane. You'd be surprised what we overlook 'cause we've been looking at it for a long time.

Sit back with an adult beverage and ...
    [*]Make doubly sure that all of the throws are within spec. [*]Are all control surfaces tight? No slack when you grab the surface with your fingers and try to move it against the servo's resistance (off or on)
    [*]CG? A tad nose heavy is a good start.[/list]
    Oh, thanks for reference to Stevens - they are just down the road from me in "the Springs". I like to keep my $$$$ local.

Old 09-05-2012, 04:36 PM
  #6  
70x7
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Elon, NC
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?

I've been flying maybe a year (on and off). I'm not expert by any stretch, but I am very comfortable with 4 channel foamies. Not to say I don't have any unplanned landings anymore, but they mostly do what I want. Unplanned landings are mostly now the result of me trying to fly in too much wind or trying to do something new.  This was a 3 channel balsa kit, so I felt like the required flying skills were way within my comfort zone.

Motor and electronics are all as spec by the plans.

CG is slightly tailheavy. I knew that going in, and tried to adjust by moving the battery a little forward. The problem is not that it wants to climb, but that it wants to fall, particularly in right turns.

It is slightly heavier than the plans. I had to upgrade wheels because the only place I have to land is a gravel driveway. It is the small pea gravel, but it still needs wheels a little larger than the 1" ones that came with the kit. So a little larger foam wheels, plus a larger tailwheel to match.

The kit is spec'ed at 1.5 ounces. I cannot weigh anything that small, but I feel like it's still under 2 ounces.


Old 09-05-2012, 04:44 PM
  #7  
jkpape
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: LaGrange, KY
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?

Over weight & tail heavy is not good, even if it's just a little.
Old 09-05-2012, 04:56 PM
  #8  
Top_Gunn
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Granger, IN
Posts: 2,344
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?


ORIGINAL: jkpape

Over weight & tail heavy is not good, even if it's just a little.
Right, but (depending somewhat on the model) overweight may not hurt much. Tail heavy always hurts. Add weight to the nose, even though this will make it heavier. And make sure your throws, especially elevator, are within specs.
Old 09-05-2012, 04:56 PM
  #9  
eddieC
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
eddieC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Jackson, MI
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?

Which kit/motor combo? More info please. 

I've built two of SA's kits, and they fly very well. 
Old 09-05-2012, 05:03 PM
  #10  
70x7
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Elon, NC
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?

As I said, I'm convinced this is not the problem of the kit. I was so impressed with it's quality that I'm sure that it's something in my build that went wrong, I just need to figure out what.

It is the Piper Vagabond, PA-15. Parkzone motor (the same one in the ultra micro Trojan). I'm using a 1 cell, 160mah battery. I used the Solite covering that Stevens recommends. Standard prop. What other information would be helpful?

As for weight, I could take the larger wheels off, but I'd be limited to hand launches and grass landings (not very exciting).
Old 09-05-2012, 05:17 PM
  #11  
70x7
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Elon, NC
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?


ORIGINAL: SeamusG

Do a search out in WWW land for "Dean Pappas trimming from the ground up". There is a set of 3 pdf files that help you understand how get things sorted out.
Wow, tons of good info there. Thanks Seamus

Old 09-06-2012, 05:51 AM
  #12  
Lamoilleriver
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: northern, VT
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?

I don't see being a little overweight as a problem, being tail heavy, even as you say a little bit is no good, no good at all. Add/shift weight to the nose and be a little bit nose heavy is preferable, especially on a new plane.
Old 09-06-2012, 05:53 AM
  #13  
eddieC
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
eddieC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Jackson, MI
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?

Sounds like it still has a slight warp in the wing. If so, use a heat gun at low temp (I lay mine on the workbench with the switch clamped or rubber-banded on), gently twist against the warp and pass the wing in front of the gun slowly a few times. Keep holding while it cools. It may take a few tries, but go slowly and it should straighten. 
Make sure the motor has the correct right thrust if called for. Easily corrected with shims or washers. 
The smaller the ship, the greater the impact of small changes. 
Old 09-06-2012, 07:17 AM
  #14  
Radical Departure
My Feedback: (13)
 
Radical Departure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Fayetteville, Arkansas AR
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?

Know what you mean. Been flying for 9 yrs., small micro flyers to 1/3rd scale. I have attempted to build somewhere around 5 kits or more, and have a big barrel full of balsa for the effort. Heck, they didn't even make it as far as being fully framed up. So you've done better than I have! But... kept after it, and finally have my first plane framed up and am in process of covering it. Its in the same vein as yours, the e'moth from retrorc.com. For all I know it'll last a grand total of 3 seconds in the air. If thats the case so beit, I'll have still learned something and WILL figure this building stuff out. Stevens has several kits am wanting, good looking stuff, not complicated etc... not exactly big-boy kits, but dang, if it means building some small flyers, that actually make it to flight, to move on to bit bigger, then bit bigger, etc.. than I'm all for it! Just don't give up..
Old 09-06-2012, 07:19 AM
  #15  
Gray Beard
My Feedback: (-1)
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hemderson, NV
Posts: 14,396
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?

That is a small little plane too and no mater how well the kit was cut or how well you built it that little plane can be a hand full with even minor incidence being off, even a slight warp in any of the surfaces. Being tail heavy will create all kinds of problems for you. These small light weight electrics can be a real hand full no mater how good of a pilot you are too.
This season I did a review on the AeroWorks Extra 260-E and assembled it and measured every surface. {That was a thrill using a Robart Meter on it} I lined it out and did the CG dead on to what AW showed then moved it to a slight nose heavy CG. Talk about a hand full on maiden!!!!! Hand full doesn't cover it, I was lucky to get it down at all in one piece. The shown CG on that plane is way too far back, even for 3-D flying, maybe a pro 3-D pilot would like it there, not me. That day I maidened two of those planes, the second one was even worse then mine and I came inches, maybe 2 from stuffing that other plane. All due to the tail heavy CG. I would bet money and give odds that if you place the CG a lot more to the nose you will have a better flying plane.
Old 09-06-2012, 08:22 AM
  #16  
rgburrill
 
rgburrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dallas, Tx CT
Posts: 2,865
Received 76 Likes on 67 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?

Spend some money and build a real model.  1.5oz?  Really??  Talk about a butterfly effect.
Old 09-06-2012, 08:33 AM
  #17  
70x7
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Elon, NC
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?


ORIGINAL: rgburrill

Spend some money and build a real model. 1.5oz? Really?? Talk about a butterfly effect.
You must make a lot of friends on this forum.

Old 09-06-2012, 09:17 AM
  #18  
eddieC
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
eddieC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Jackson, MI
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?

Lol, he can't read, either: "Please resist the urge to curse, flame, DEGRADE..." .

Right now I have 4 below 2 oz., two helis and two planes. They fly great. Also building the E-Moth previously mentioned. 

 Keep at it, you'll sort it out and learn along the way. 
Old 09-06-2012, 09:30 AM
  #19  
JohnShe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Round Hill, VA
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?

Hey 70x7, don't be discouraged. My first build, a Great Planes Spectra flew like a rock and broke it's back on the first try. I built a second one and corrected a few of my mistakes. The first Spectra was way overweight and dragged down by an extra heavy low power NiCd pack. So I watched the weight as I built it and found a much lighter and more powerful LiPo pack. This time it flew, but could have been better,

My next try was a Great Planes PT-60 that I electrified. It flew beautifully, no trim issues, perfect balance and fun to fly.

Yep it may take a few tries but if you enjoy building, like I do, it will be worth it. Just try to learn from your experiences.


Old 09-06-2012, 09:37 AM
  #20  
70x7
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Elon, NC
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?


ORIGINAL: JohnShe

Hey 70x7, don't be discouraged. My first build, a Great Planes Spectra flew like a rock and broke it's back on the first try. I built a second one and corrected a few of my mistakes. The first Spectra was way overweight and dragged down by an extra heavy low power NiCd pack. So I watched the weight as I built it and found a much lighter and more powerful LiPo pack. This time it flew, but could have been better,

My next try was a Great Planes PT-60 that I electrified. It flew beautifully, no trim issues, perfect balance and fun to fly.

Yep it may take a few tries but if you enjoy building, like I do, it will be worth it. Just try to learn from your experiences.


Thanks for the help.

Here's what I'm thinking now. My experience up to this point has been small foamies that flew like a charm. I have done many modifications on them; bigger wheels, lights, flattening our dihedrals, etc. Those planes were always very forgiving in the air. Sometimes I could tell that they didn't like what I did, but they'd always fly. Maybe that has led me to think that all planes will be as forgiving as foamies. I guess that's not always true, especially with as many variables as go into a balsa build.

Old 09-06-2012, 09:38 AM
  #21  
Zor
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario, ON, CANADA
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?





ORIGINAL: rgburrill



Spend some money and build a real model. 1.5oz? Really?? Talk about a butterfly effect.


You must make a lot of friends on this forum.




This forum is to help each other.
Lots of social forums to make friends.

Zor

Old 09-06-2012, 09:40 AM
  #22  
70x7
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Elon, NC
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?


ORIGINAL: Zor





ORIGINAL: rgburrill



Spend some money and build a real model. 1.5oz? Really?? Talk about a butterfly effect.


You must make a lot of friends on this forum.




This forum is to help each other.
Lots of social forums to make friends.

Zor

...and it really helps others to embarass them for the amount of money they DON'T spend on a hobby. real helpful.

Old 09-06-2012, 09:47 AM
  #23  
PropsnWings
My Feedback: (9)
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Murray, IA
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?

In all my years in the hobby, I have had a couple models not come out like I thought.  One reason or another, and after several attempts to correct the issue, just had to make em a hangar queen.   Its part of the hobby, and I enjoy trying to figure out issues that arise.  

If it makes a person give up that easy, this hobby is truly not going to fulfill your wants or needs.  If a person cannot fully accept that when they go out to fly, they may come back with a re-kitted plane, then that too is an indication this is not a hobby for you.

We had one such member in the club a few years back, he built a Pete n Poke, and even after several us asked if he balanced it, he never truly gave an answer, we also recommended he redo a couple of linkages.  Never the less, he took it up for its maiden, where it continued to to a loop right after take off, planting the new motor into the dirt. He threw his Tx in a tantrum... left and never saw him again. 


Gotta take each part of the hobby as a fun learning experience, to learn and grow. 
Old 09-06-2012, 10:49 AM
  #24  
tony0707
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Inverness, FL
Posts: 963
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?

Do your very best to get all warps out of the flying surfaces
Get the CG correct and balance front back and left right
I hang the plane with a cord around the engine hubfor left right balance
Old 09-06-2012, 11:26 AM
  #25  
acdii
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Capron, IL
Posts: 10,000
Received 97 Likes on 88 Posts
Default RE: Who else has failed on their first build?

A little trick I learned for getting the balance down all at one time. Find the exact CG point on the plane, and the exact center line of the plane. Put a hook at that point, and hang it from the hook. You will see both the fore-aft balance and lateral balance and can adjust both at the same time.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.