Magnum
#6
My Feedback: (540)
RE: Magnum
PHASE,
I have a Jett .50 & muffler on mine, had to add some tail weight.
I Put it on the tail end of the fuse AND put a square battery behind the elevator servo!
If you go with a headder and pipe less/no tail weight required.
Also I used a base loaded mini whip antenna.
Additional: Use a trim solvent to seal the edges, the "carbon fibre" blew off the wings on mine.
Bob
I have a Jett .50 & muffler on mine, had to add some tail weight.
I Put it on the tail end of the fuse AND put a square battery behind the elevator servo!
If you go with a headder and pipe less/no tail weight required.
Also I used a base loaded mini whip antenna.
Additional: Use a trim solvent to seal the edges, the "carbon fibre" blew off the wings on mine.
Bob
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Hope Mills,
NC
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Magnum
Thanks for the heads up airfarme is together going outside to put the engine on the stand and run it at 17,000 for awhile. Will let you know how it balances. Daniel
#10
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Helena,
AL
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Magnum
I think www.SMTDISTRIBUTING.com carries them.Daniel you need to hurry bout got my mini-magnum together with a Novarossi R26CR ready.
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Hope Mills,
NC
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Magnum
I have spoke with SMT over the phone a few times, they are going to a event in GA shortly and will have the engines on stands to do side by side comparisons to other brand speed engines ( As all of you know I'm new to the speed bug don't know the tech name of the devise used to measure trust ) I'm going to try a few of them out although I may not be the most qualified to give test result I will be honesty about myresults good or bad
#15
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
RE: Magnum
Static thrust measurements for speed engines aren't real ......valuable.
If they are selling a .45-55 engine with a tuned pipe I'd like to know what size props @ what rpm it runs .
Speed engines with high exhaust timing have a very narrow range of props they can turn at resonance...[AKA "hitting the pipe"]. The properly matched load will have an explosive jump in rpm, but high timing sacrifices torque until the revs are able to reach the magic rpm level that the exhaust is tuned for. With too much load [such as with typical sport props] the magic isn't going to happen.
Sport engines with low to medium exhaust timing can produce more "dynamic compression" [pushing force against the load] so they have a much broader range of props they can turn reasonably well. These engines have broader appeal to the sport flyers and are still capable of impressive speed on the right plane.
With the high timed speed engines there are way fewer "right planes" to match them up with.
It'll be interesting to see what Novarossi has cooking for such low prices....??
If they are selling a .45-55 engine with a tuned pipe I'd like to know what size props @ what rpm it runs .
Speed engines with high exhaust timing have a very narrow range of props they can turn at resonance...[AKA "hitting the pipe"]. The properly matched load will have an explosive jump in rpm, but high timing sacrifices torque until the revs are able to reach the magic rpm level that the exhaust is tuned for. With too much load [such as with typical sport props] the magic isn't going to happen.
Sport engines with low to medium exhaust timing can produce more "dynamic compression" [pushing force against the load] so they have a much broader range of props they can turn reasonably well. These engines have broader appeal to the sport flyers and are still capable of impressive speed on the right plane.
With the high timed speed engines there are way fewer "right planes" to match them up with.
It'll be interesting to see what Novarossi has cooking for such low prices....??
#17
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
RE: Magnum
ORIGINAL: phase5
I have spoke with SMT over the phone a few times, they are going to a event in GA shortly and will have the engines on stands to do side by side comparisons to other brand speed engines ( As all of you know I'm new to the speed bug don't know the tech name of the devise used to measure trust ) I'm going to try a few of them out although I may not be the most qualified to give test result I will be honesty about my results good or bad
I have spoke with SMT over the phone a few times, they are going to a event in GA shortly and will have the engines on stands to do side by side comparisons to other brand speed engines ( As all of you know I'm new to the speed bug don't know the tech name of the devise used to measure trust ) I'm going to try a few of them out although I may not be the most qualified to give test result I will be honesty about my results good or bad
How would you compare a .50 that is tuned for peak horsepower at 17k rpm, to one tuned for peak horsepower at 21k? Would you put the same prop on them, for example a 10-6, and compare? The higher timed engine might spin it more slowly than the other - but, prop it for peak rpm and it may develop more power than the lower timed engine.
Speed comes from horsepower - not torque alone, not rpm alone - the product of the two, PLUS - a prop matched to the engine and appropriate for the airframe at the same time. Put 200hp in a Honda Civic and you can gear it for 150mph, but put 200hp in a pickup truck and you can't run the same gearing. But they will both do the same amount of work in the same time.
A good example might be an OS .50-whatever to a West .50 - bolt an 11-6 to each and see what happens.. my guess is the OS wins the static thrust battle. So which one can fly your airplane faster..? Which one has the highest peak horsepower?
You can make a somewhat meaningful comparison between engines designed for similar operating rpm by running a common prop on each. In that case, rpm is the litmus test.
I'm not pooh-poohing the test stand comparison, but I am suggesting that you be thoughtful about how you evaluate. Honest as they may be, there are many ways to set up a side-by-side comparison to make your products look good. That said, I am quite sure they are great running, high quality engines. Will be fun to see the demo.
#19
My Feedback: (27)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Findlay, OH
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Magnum
Wow......I wasn't aware that these were still around.....as it makes me miss mine. I sold it on a whim and have regretted it ever since. They are great flying planes and are very easy to get fast.
#23
My Feedback: (31)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tinley Park,
IL
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Getting ready to test fly a Magnum with evolution .52.& macs pipe muffler. I am confused about the C.G. the booklet sez to balance from wing root. Do they mean to balance from leading edge of wing root? Anybody got an answer.
#24
Yes they mean from the leading edge at the wing root. Check with Vic or Smokin they could give you some tips about the CG of the Mags, they are both familiar with them, I recall something about an error in some of the manuals as far as the COG.
Last edited by iron eagel; 08-25-2013 at 10:42 AM.
#25
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
The factory CG range goes from Extremely nose heavy to really nose heavy to nose heavy. Many people find joy at around 160-165mm from the LE at the root, but there are others who have gone up to 190-195mm and report everything is peachy. Start towards the rear of the factory range - it is not a "rearward CG".
iron eagel is bang on with how it is measured - always at the root where it meets the fuselage.
iron eagel is bang on with how it is measured - always at the root where it meets the fuselage.