Community
Search
Notices
RC Car General Discussions This forum is for all general discussions related to radio control cars. Check forums below for more specific categories if applicable.

Associated Reedy 540-SL 6100kV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2013, 07:29 AM
  #1  
jwalk33
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Waterloo, IA
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Associated Reedy 540-SL 6100kV

Any one know if this motor can handle a 120A ESC on a 4000-5000mah 3s lipo? Associated Reedy 540-SL 6100kV Brushless Motor

I'm looking for a 2 pole brushless motor that that can handle 3s lipos and 120A ESC for speed runs. The ESC can only run 2 pole. The motor needs to be under $60 which is probably not possible.


Thanks guys!
Jwalk33
Old 06-03-2013, 11:20 AM
  #2  
EXT2Rob
My Feedback: (1)
 
EXT2Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 3,227
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Associated Reedy 540-SL 6100kV

I believe it's the other way round....can the ESC handle the MOTOR?  I don't see why not.  120 amps is a boat-load of power.  A 6100kv motor is gonna pull more current than a 4000kv motor.  But I think both should be fine together.
Old 06-03-2013, 02:46 PM
  #3  
Foxy
Senior Member
 
Foxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kingston UK, but living in Athens, GREECE
Posts: 18,082
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: Associated Reedy 540-SL 6100kV

Its a question of rpm and frequency. Can the ESC pulse fast enough to exceed (6100*12v fully charged) 73,000rpm? Can the motor stay in one piece at that speed? I dunno. Maybe?
Old 06-07-2013, 11:21 AM
  #4  
Scottgir
Senior Member
 
Scottgir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Manchester, CT
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Associated Reedy 540-SL 6100kV

Short answer....YES.

The 6100 is a standard motor. You'll be lucky if you pull 70 amps with that motor, and I'm being VERY generous.

The XP 450 ESC Reedy made to go with that motor is a 45 amp esc and is rated to handle that motor on 2S max.
Old 06-07-2013, 05:18 PM
  #5  
Foxy
Senior Member
 
Foxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kingston UK, but living in Athens, GREECE
Posts: 18,082
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: Associated Reedy 540-SL 6100kV

Scott, I don't think the issue is going to be power, I think it's going to be rpm. 73,000. That's a fair spin.
Old 06-07-2013, 05:30 PM
  #6  
t-max97
Senior Member
My Feedback: (9)
 
t-max97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: White, GA
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Associated Reedy 540-SL 6100kV

The motor can handle a 10,000,000,000,000,000,000 amp esc, the amp rating isn't what the esc sends to the motor, it's the max amps the motor can draw from the esc. You need to see how many amps the motor draws at max draw and get an esc that rated a little higher to be safe.
Old 06-07-2013, 06:10 PM
  #7  
Sixtysixdeuce
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Associated Reedy 540-SL 6100kV

The motor can handle a 10,000,000,000,000,000,000 amp esc, the amp rating isn't what the esc sends to the motor, it's the max amps the motor can draw from the esc. You need to see how many amps the motor draws at max draw and get an esc that rated a little higher to be safe.
This ^^^^

Think of it this way: Your car has a 500-800A battery (maybe more), but no wire/cable in your vehicle can handle that many amps (not even 4/0 cable can take that much). They don't need to, though. Your highest draw is your starter, probably 120-140A if it's working properly. Therefore you do not need cable or a power distribution center that can handle the battery's max amps. Each circuit is designed around the max draw under normal conditions, and fused/breakered in case that draw is exceeded by a faulty component or short to gound.

In short, the amps consumed are dictated solely by the unit being powered, and if the unit is drawing more than the circuit can handle (assuming power source can match that demand), you'll let the smoke out.

Conversely, if the power requirement of the unit is more than the rest of the circuit (including power source) can provide, you may damage the device. Try running a power saw on 300' of homeowner grade 18ga extension cord; you'll burn up the motor in no time (wire length increases resistance)
Old 06-08-2013, 12:29 AM
  #8  
Foxy
Senior Member
 
Foxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kingston UK, but living in Athens, GREECE
Posts: 18,082
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: Associated Reedy 540-SL 6100kV

Old 07-07-2013, 07:48 PM
  #9  
jwalk33
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Waterloo, IA
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Associated Reedy 540-SL 6100kV

Ok,

I have 5000 mAh 45-90c burst/discharge lipo, 6100kv Reedy brushless motor, and 120A brushless ESC. However the battery seems to drain exremly fast in about 5-10 minues. Prior to this setup, I was running the same battery and ESC with a 4370kv brushless motor and the run times were much longer, about 45 minutes.

I am charging the battery at 5A as I've always have and it takes about 50-90 minutes to fully charge depending on how much it has been drained, I am basically running the car on the street/parking lot as I've done always.

Can someone please explain to me why this might be? Also, it appears that the Turingy 4370kv motor "looks" as if it was a bit faster than the 6100kv Reedy which is a shock to me. Maybe the Turingy motor just has insane torque due to lower turns because I can literally pull wheelies at will while hitting speeds at about 50mph and possibly faster. Shredded about 4 sets of tires with the Turnigy motor easily, not so much with the Reedy motor.

I raced a Jato 3.3 with 2speed transmission that's blazingly fast and beat it more times than not running the length of a street block. I honestly only loose because I can keep the front wheels down even wih the wheelie bar so low that the wheels on it drag on tthe ground, spin out, or having to ease on the throttle too gradual which gives a really slow start and I have to catch the Jato later on down the lot while on 2 wheels lol but serious. Thinking I will need foams

I have the same gearing as before too.


Thanks All!
Jwalk33
Old 07-08-2013, 11:55 AM
  #10  
cumquat
Senior Member
 
cumquat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 6,812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Associated Reedy 540-SL 6100kV

you kind of answered your own question. you installed a more demanding motor, so your runtimes will drop. you pull 55 amps pretty much continuously from a 5 amp battery and it'll go flat in 10 minutes. your 4370 likely pulled less current at peak and because it wasnt tasked as much so it wasnt pulling it's peak for very long meaning longer runtimes.
Old 07-08-2013, 12:58 PM
  #11  
jwalk33
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Waterloo, IA
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Associated Reedy 540-SL 6100kV

Some what makes sense and basically what I was guessing. Would charging at lower amps give more run time? Does this also explain why the Reedy motor doesn't seem faster because the battery isn't able to produce the needed power?


Thanks,
jwalk33
Old 07-08-2013, 03:49 PM
  #12  
cumquat
Senior Member
 
cumquat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 6,812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Associated Reedy 540-SL 6100kV

charging at lower amps will just take longer to charge, it wont effect the runtime. when you switched motors, did you change gearing? if you didnt, that'd be the reason it seems slower. the motor probably doesnt have to power to move the vehicle beyond a certain speed and it'll definitely take longer to reach that speed. what vehicle are you running?
Old 07-08-2013, 08:49 PM
  #13  
jwalk33
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Waterloo, IA
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Associated Reedy 540-SL 6100kV

I am running a MRP Ripper II with an all metalBrushlessDuratrax Evader gearbox/transmission; my gearing is 32p 16t pinion and 56t spur. I went with this pitch because I was chewing up spurs using 48p.

Guess I'll have to wait to test different gearing because these are the only 32p gears I have on hand for testing and they've hold up very very well to my surprise so far.


Thanks,
jwalk33
Old 07-08-2013, 10:08 PM
  #14  
cumquat
Senior Member
 
cumquat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 6,812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Associated Reedy 540-SL 6100kV

presuming you're running 4 inch tires your old motor had a theoretical top speed of 63MPH, this new motor's theoretical top speed is 88MPH. neither speed accounts for ballooning which can add 10MPH or more pretty easily. i would switch to foam tires front and rear and swap out to a 20t pinion. this puts theoretical speed at just under 72MPH and should cut way down on rotational mass, meaning it should be reachable.
Old 07-08-2013, 10:14 PM
  #15  
jwalk33
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Waterloo, IA
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Associated Reedy 540-SL 6100kV

Will do and post back with results, thanks cumquat!


jwalk33

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.