?'s on 2.4 Diversity Systems
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: St George,
UT
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
?'s on 2.4 Diversity Systems
Im setting up a new photo and video platform and thought the new 2.4 diversity radios were slick and seem to be. But now after checking out digital monitor systems and video systems most of the digital camera monitor ones that are compatable with video so I dont need to set up a whole new system for video seem to be 2.4 ghz.
To make me question even longer the Futaba is a diversity radio if I use a diversity setup for photo and video can I use this on the same palne or am I going to have conflicts. I have been searching the the various forums but have not seen much on this. Any input is greatly apperciated.
Thanks
Steve
To make me question even longer the Futaba is a diversity radio if I use a diversity setup for photo and video can I use this on the same palne or am I going to have conflicts. I have been searching the the various forums but have not seen much on this. Any input is greatly apperciated.
Thanks
Steve
#2
My Feedback: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Islamorada,
FL
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: ?'s on 2.4 Diversity Systems
Im not sure what you are asking exactly....
IF you are asking if you can use a 2.4 GHZ RC radio along with a 2.4 GHZ video link in the plane, the answer is a definate NO, the video transmitter will wipe out the RC receiver every time, no matter what the advertisements say about finding a clear channel. The problem is, with a 2.4 GHZ video transmitter close to one of those Spektrum receivers, the ENTIRE band is wiped out for the RC receiver, there will be no clear channel for it to find. If you want to send video to the ground with 2.4 GHZ, stick with a good old 72 MHZ RC radio.
JettPilot
IF you are asking if you can use a 2.4 GHZ RC radio along with a 2.4 GHZ video link in the plane, the answer is a definate NO, the video transmitter will wipe out the RC receiver every time, no matter what the advertisements say about finding a clear channel. The problem is, with a 2.4 GHZ video transmitter close to one of those Spektrum receivers, the ENTIRE band is wiped out for the RC receiver, there will be no clear channel for it to find. If you want to send video to the ground with 2.4 GHZ, stick with a good old 72 MHZ RC radio.
JettPilot
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: st Loius Park,
MN
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: ?'s on 2.4 Diversity Systems
i'm not so sure about that the 2.4 radios are spread sectrum and the TX RX are bound togather when you bind the TX RX
so I'm not sue they would interfere the video feed is on one fixed channel
Link to My Videos
www.putfile.com/mbren
so I'm not sue they would interfere the video feed is on one fixed channel
Link to My Videos
www.putfile.com/mbren
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: St George,
UT
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: ?'s on 2.4 Diversity Systems
Thanks for the replys Jettpilot Ive seen your stuff real cool give me your opinion would you go with the 72 MHz radio & 2.4 diversity video or would you go with 2.4 ghz radio and 900mhz video.
Thanks
Thanks
#5
My Feedback: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Islamorada,
FL
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: ?'s on 2.4 Diversity Systems
ORIGINAL: moogly
i'm not so sure about that the 2.4 radios are spread sectrum and the TX RX are bound togather when you bind the TX RX
so I'm not sue they would interfere the video feed is on one fixed channel
Link to My Videos
www.putfile.com/mbren
i'm not so sure about that the 2.4 radios are spread sectrum and the TX RX are bound togather when you bind the TX RX
so I'm not sue they would interfere the video feed is on one fixed channel
Link to My Videos
www.putfile.com/mbren
RC flyers are generally dont know that much about RF and how it behaves, I have warned people about this since issue the first specktrum 2.4 RC radios were introduced, but almost everyone buys the "scan for a clear channel" marketing hype. The channel hopping works very well for signals generated from more than a few yards away but the recievers were never designed to work with another 2.4 GHZ transmitter running within a couple feet of the reciever. Many have tried, and they all end in fialure and going back to 72 MHZ.
JettPilot