Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Crash & Rebuild
Reload this Page >

They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

Community
Search
Notices
Crash & Rebuild Post your crash stories, pictures and if you want to document your rebuild you can do that here too!

They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-18-2007, 05:28 PM
  #1  
UkerDuker
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
 
UkerDuker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hendersonville, TN
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

Here are some pictures I finally found. It was an DuraPlane Aerobat 40 Kit. These were taken the Fall of 2001 on a disposable camera that I lost, and recently found. Aircraft verses water tower, water tower is areah by one point. Take note of the non-rebuildable engine. It was an OS 46FX.

Mike

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Gd93722.jpg
Views:	15
Size:	31.6 KB
ID:	828793   Click image for larger version

Name:	Xs59142.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	27.0 KB
ID:	828794   Click image for larger version

Name:	Lq38679.jpg
Views:	18
Size:	33.8 KB
ID:	828795  
Old 12-18-2007, 07:02 PM
  #2  
LeeHop
Senior Member
 
LeeHop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aurora, OR
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

Mike -

I have an Aerobat that has been through several crashes and continues to survive (with a few patches here and there). Your post inspired me to look up the word "virtually" - it means "almost"
Cheers -
Grasshopper
Old 12-18-2007, 07:36 PM
  #3  
meaden
Senior Member
 
meaden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Decatur, GA
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

If you hit something hard enough to do that to the engine...I think you went past "virtually."
Old 12-18-2007, 07:58 PM
  #4  
UkerDuker
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
 
UkerDuker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hendersonville, TN
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

I would have to agree with that meaden. It was pretty spectactular when it hit. It looked like I was throwing myself a "ticker-tape" parade. Parts and pieces went everywhere.

The sad story behind it....

This was my second plane(maiden flight). I had just took off and I knew I had a problem. After alot of practice on the simulator, I recognized my engine was running too rich. I remained calm, I had practiced this many times on my G2 Sim. I started a shallow left turn for the downwind leg. As I was ready to turn base, this huge red/white water tower jumped out and hit my plane with its guide wires. My son (roughly 2 at the time) gave the best response, "UH OH!!!"

I practiced everything except how to avoid the obvious. When I was walking to the remains, I kept thinking, "this is a virtually indestructible plane, this rebuild should be a snap, if there is any damage at all." It took nearly 20 mins to find all the big pieces.

I hope someone can learn a lesson from this. Watch out for the things that seems like a "non-issue". I never thought I would hit that tower.

Mike

Old 12-18-2007, 09:41 PM
  #5  
Jburry
Senior Member
 
Jburry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cape Spencer, NB, CANADA
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

Ya know, lookin' at the photos, alot of the plane looks rebuildable..... For all the damage that engine took (that's the worst I ever saw, actually), the fuse and wing didn't fair so badly!

I've sure seen alot of more conventional models look alot less repairable after an encounter with much softer obstacles!

Nice job, tho, all the same. Takes quite a hit to shear the entire cylinder from the crank case!

Poor little engine.

J
Old 12-18-2007, 10:06 PM
  #6  
UkerDuker
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
 
UkerDuker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hendersonville, TN
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

Well, being as new to the hobby as I was, I didnt have the skills to rebuild. Now years later, I see exactly what you are saying. I probably could have replace the PVC fuselage and mounted a new eng. Oh well, I'm glad I got to preserve this memory of my early flying skills. I thought I had lost these pictures.

Now I look back and laugh.

Mike
Old 12-19-2007, 09:16 PM
  #7  
Jon.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Brockville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

J-B WELD!!!
Old 12-20-2007, 02:28 PM
  #8  
RCBruski65
My Feedback: (44)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saginaw,MI
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

That's a virtually unrepairable engine for sure. Had a couple of the durabats they actually flew pretty good.
Old 12-22-2007, 12:52 AM
  #9  
UkerDuker
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
 
UkerDuker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hendersonville, TN
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

Now, the one thing I did leave out...... This is a great plane. I was just very in-experienced when I destroyed this one. In any crash, you have to evaluate what happened. I recognized the problem and tried to take the correct action. I was doing everything right except watching where I was going. I simply took too wide of a turn.

I would still recommend this plane to beginner pilots.

Mike

Old 12-27-2007, 10:37 PM
  #10  
victorzamora
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

As long as they fly far away from jumping water towers, right? Too many times have I had (or seen) a tree jump, a wall move, a line swerve, or the ground catch my plane. In tennis, I'm sure that the ball would've been in if the line wouldn't have moved. The wall moved, causing my brother to wreck the car. A tree grew instantaneously behind the same car just so I could wreck it. Plenty of times has that attempt at a nice, low harrier been thwarted by my arch-nemesis (and best friend): the ground!

I'll tell ya, those things jump. It's all part of a conspiracy though, the balsa gods are out to get us and no one wants us knowing[:-]
Old 12-28-2007, 08:12 AM
  #11  
CGRetired
My Feedback: (1)
 
CGRetired's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Galloway, NJ
Posts: 8,999
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

Yes... and mother wind has helped destroy a couple of mine. That and the lack of experience when I first started combined to make my Skylark 56 a pile of balsa. The wind was down the center line.. good.. so I came in for a landing and retarted the throttle to idle. Bad move. The strong wind just flipped that thing over and actually made it climb, inverted, to about 100 feet and head in the opposite direction. I was to inexperienced to realize that all I really needed to do was hit the throttle, right it, turn it around, and come back in, this time with more thorttle. But.. noooo... I never even added throttle. I just watched this thing going away from me and tried to fly it without adding throttle.. [:@] next thing I knew, it headed straight down in a fast spiral and I heard it hit from about 300 yards away. Pain!!!!

Same thing happened later, about three years later.. after I gained all that experience.. to my Venus 40. Taking off, the crosswind caught it, vaned it to turn right into the flight line.. no good, so I reacted with left rudder.. right? Well, that's what was supposed to happen. In my case, a tad bit of dislexia hit and I used the right hand instead.. you guessed it. Aileron roll to inverted while climbing out on take off at full throttle with an OS 50 FX. Instantly upside down and smack.. right into the ground. The wing popped off and was just fine. Upon first observation, I thought I was ok.. it looked intact.. but when I picked it up, all the balsa and ply in the fuselage was broken. The only thing holding it together was the covering.

CGr
Old 01-04-2008, 03:16 AM
  #12  
SFMMcoasters
Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: La Verne, CA
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

My durabat 40 has been a gift from god in all my experience. I crashed that plane into telephone wires, had the wing and body separate and each freefall down about 70 feet straight onto concrete. Flew the plane about 10 minutes later after adding some new rubber bands, and fixing the hinges on the rudder.
Old 01-04-2008, 07:51 AM
  #13  
UkerDuker
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
 
UkerDuker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hendersonville, TN
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

I agree, this is a great little plane. My piloting skills just got the better of me on the maiden flight. I would still recommend this plane to new and upcoming pilots.

Mike
Old 01-29-2008, 08:04 PM
  #14  
smithth
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

For all those who would like to see the tower that Mike hit, here it is. Just so happens that I hit that same tower and this was all that was left of my plane. Mike I think you were there when I had my incident. I never found the radio or battery and only found 2 servos. One of which was ruined. Engine actually survived. Makes for a funny story.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Zw69581.jpg
Views:	19
Size:	44.1 KB
ID:	864826   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ez83418.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	55.1 KB
ID:	864827  
Old 01-29-2008, 08:06 PM
  #15  
UkerDuker
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
 
UkerDuker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hendersonville, TN
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

Those were the good old days!!!
Old 01-29-2008, 08:33 PM
  #16  
Jim_Purcha
My Feedback: (8)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

Nice photo. What's that green and brown stuff on the ground. Oh yeah, .... grass. I forgot it's not covered in "SNOW and ICE!!!

Jim
49th Parallel
Old 02-21-2008, 02:01 PM
  #17  
Thumprding
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fulton, MO
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: They Claim its "virtually indestructible"....WRONG!!!

For a normal crash they are, but for tangling with a water tower, hmmm I thinks the tower is going to win.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.