SLASHES GONE WILD!
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin,
TX
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLASHES GONE WILD!
New spec class at the local track, the SLASH. Lots o' fun.
video enjoy....
http://www.pro****-racing.org/NCRC621-qual.html
video enjoy....
http://www.pro****-racing.org/NCRC621-qual.html
#4
RE: SLASHES GONE WILD!
WOW..That just looks so realistic like 1:1...that video really makes me want to buy one of those or the losi version..
You like this but want something alittle different just sit pretty and wait for the Slayer. You'll be saying "Losi who?" or " Lucy.....You got som splaining to do"
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Shanklin, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: SLASHES GONE WILD!
Lol, at 22.3 inches long, how much bigger do the trucks have to be to be considered 1/8th? The Slayer is just a Revo with different arms, and is actually slightly shorter than the slash.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin,
TX
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: SLASHES GONE WILD!
ORIGINAL: Lilredmachine
Lol, at 22.3 inches long, how much bigger do the trucks have to be to be considered 1/8th? The Slayer is just a Revo with different arms, and is actually slightly shorter than the slash.
Lol, at 22.3 inches long, how much bigger do the trucks have to be to be considered 1/8th? The Slayer is just a Revo with different arms, and is actually slightly shorter than the slash.
#12
RE: SLASHES GONE WILD!
Lol, at 22.3 inches long, how much bigger do the trucks have to be to be considered 1/8th? The Slayer is just a Revo with different arms, and is actually slightly shorter than the slash.
I also checked out Revo specs and the 3.3, 2.5r, and platnum. Seems Slayer WB is between the 3.3 and the 2.5r. It probably uses the 3.3 chassis. With your caster angle....cutting the a-arms down will bring the WB in is my guess.
SCALE? If you go by scaling the CORR Regulations Max and Min WB....the Slayer would have to add about 2 inches to WB to be a true 1/8 scale, but buy tooking at the Required Track Width it is sitting at 1/8 scale. Regs say 93 inch TW divided by 8 is 11.6 inches which is about right. I think by these standard if Traxxas would have used the Platnum chassis it would qualify as 1/8 scale. Now all this is in respect to WB an TW and accual body size hasn't been considered here.
#14
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: , VA
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: SLASHES GONE WILD!
It looks actaully right on with the 2.5 revo chassis. And if they made it with the 3.3 chassis it probably wouldnt jump correctly. It has to do with the smaller tries used on the slayer compared to the larger on the revo's. With less rotating mass you get less pull in the front end. I know with my revo exerience if your not on throttle with lower speeds the revo will nose dive with the longer 3.3 chassis. The bigger tires help stablize the front end with a longer chassis.
The slayer would need a bigger body anyways to fit the 3.3 chassis and I am sure it would be hard to keep the nose up.
The slayer would need a bigger body anyways to fit the 3.3 chassis and I am sure it would be hard to keep the nose up.
#15
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Norwood,
OH
Posts: 22,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: SLASHES GONE WILD!
Wonder how hard the Slayer is gonna take off...and if that robitronics truck would be a competitor...
And with the size of the Slayer, how far behind is Traxxas with a Revo-based 1/8 buggy with a TRX 3.5?
And with the size of the Slayer, how far behind is Traxxas with a Revo-based 1/8 buggy with a TRX 3.5?