Community
Search
Notices
Control Lines For all you fly-by-wire fanatics!

Cox Hyper Viper

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-2005, 04:43 PM
  #26  
Old Sourdough
Senior Member
 
Old Sourdough's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ruksakinmakiak, AK
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Cox Hyper Viper

The following is reprinted from a comprehensive review and discussion of the HyperViper at another site.

See:

[link=http://www.clstunt.com/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=show_thread&om=136&forum=DCForumID9&viewmode=all]HyperViper Early Reports[/link]


"I don't know about your atmospheric conditions or altitude, but I will say that the three of us that fly them together here have had only minor problems. The stock plane flies well, with good line tension throughout the flight hemisphere. We are using the stock engines running Byron 1/2a fuel (25% Nitro, 20% all castor, 55%methanol) and using the supplied Cox prop, although we all have several of the Cox recommended APC props to try. The three of us are all using the supplied dacron lines and handles, as well, but all of us have 35'x .008" cables that we'll be using soon, as the dacron is becoming oil soaked and sticky. The only modifications (?) we've made are:

1. Add a Nickel (5¢) to the weight hole on the bottom of the outboard wing for a bit more tip weight and cover the hole with a piece of 2" wide clear tape.

2. Install the leadouts one hole to the rear of the position suggested in the plans.

The other problems we have had are:

1. Two of the three fuel tanks were improperly joined to the point that air would not exit the tank when blowing into the fuel outlet. Cox/Estes replaced the tanks with no problem. We were not the first to have this problem, and we checked the tanks before assembling the planes.

2. One plane lost its canopy on every flight until the owner taped the front to the fuselage. We're going to find some "Goop" to fix that problem permanently.

We decided, contrary to the stereotypical male image, to read and follow the directions that came in the box. The only reason we installed the leadouts/lines about 1/16" to the rear of the position indicated in the directions was that one of us already had a HyperViper and had flown it at his winter home in Reno (at a much higher elevation than here) with good results. He found that variance to be worthwhile while flying there. He also discovered the advisability of that Nickel more tip weight at that time.

We also broke the engines in a bit, again following the break-in instructions with the plane, by running three tanks on the ground, leaning the mixture on all three runs until the engine would hold a strong, high RPM. None of us are engine gurus or designers, but this process works!! The engines have continued to gain power with additional runs while flying.

On none of the flights I've watched or flown have I seen any of the problems you and other folks have described. We are not expert level fliers, but we do know a fairly decent airplane when we see or fly one. While I'm certain that the mods done by Larry and others will provide better performance, the plane does pretty well stock.

Did you read Larry Renger's review? It's the first post in this thread. In it, he wrote, "...Don't even dream of trying to fly with .012 lines, unless you just want to climb, dive, and fly level I also found that I needed extra tip weight (everyone seems to be finding the same), and it has now been added....." This might be your biggest problem so far. Has your engine been properly broken in?

I admire the excellent TD .049 installation shown here as well, but I'm not convinced that it is needed. As far as replacing tail feathers and sealing the bottom of the fuselage with balsa, I would ask, "Why?" If one is going to all that trouble, why not go all the way and throw away everything but that foam wing and possibly the landing gear and build the rest of the plane from appropriately sized balsa. That's what I would do if I wanted the ultimate in performance from that wing.

Finally, as I wrote previously, I'm not an expert flyer who would be able to obtain the performance you might be seeking, but for my money ($40.00 at the LHS) the HyperViper is a good machine as it comes from the factory. I have 1/2a planes that I've built that fly much better, as they are larger and much lighter, but when I consider the cost of balsa, finishing materials, tank, engine, wheels and all the other bits required, to say nothing of my time (if I considered it as a cost), those probably cost at least double, if not considerably more, the price of the HyperViper."
The entire thread is well worth reading. It includes other folks modifications as well as what seems to be a very sanitary of stuffing a Tee Dee .049/.051 or Norvel into the nose. The fellow who wrote about the latter included pictures.

Old 06-27-2008, 01:31 AM
  #27  
mcwk1992
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: vancouver, WA
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Cox Hyper Viper

i have one of these and not so good. iguess it is for beginers.
but dose anybody know where to get parts for these
Old 06-27-2008, 02:29 AM
  #28  
jcervantes11
My Feedback: (8)
 
jcervantes11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 850
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Cox Hyper Viper

Actually all the years I've been flying years back of ucontrol. I flown many stunt planes. But cox hyper is actually more touchy for some reason. And it gets me more dizzy
then my other stunt ucontrol airplanes. There .40 size. But it has longer wire and stuff. I don't know who has parts for cox hyper. But I bet atleast ebay does. Check it out.
Also if you want run ur plane with 30-35 percent of trexxas racing fuel. You'll see a huge difference.
Old 07-27-2008, 10:04 AM
  #29  
bogateer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Cox Hyper Viper

For anyone still following this thread....I've got my project "Frankenviper" still underway. I bought an "old-style" Killer Bee...the high-performance version...not the recent renamed Baby-Bees in the hopes that the added performance will cure the woes seemed to be cause by the soemwhat anemic Surestart engines. When I get it flying I'll send a report. One modification I did was to the horizontal stabilizer. The "pinned" arrangement seemed to bind and not move smoothly at all so I removed it and reattached the elevator with good old fashioned cloth hinges....moves smooth as silk now. I am planing on covering the wing with whatever the lightest film I can get is to add some strength...which may push it over the edge power wise but I have a spare wing just in case to try if that doesn't work.
Old 08-24-2008, 08:59 PM
  #30  
mathison205
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: las vegas, NV
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Cox Hyper Viper

i have a profi .049 installed in mine with bladder pressure still it does not fly as well as it looks.
Old 10-30-2008, 02:45 PM
  #31  
Bill Rademacher
My Feedback: (77)
 
Bill Rademacher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Rineyville, KY
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Cox Hyper Viper

I have a norvel mounted on a texas timer mount.

flys pretty darn good. It's a beast.

billrad
Old 04-16-2009, 06:03 AM
  #32  
jcervantes11
My Feedback: (8)
 
jcervantes11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 850
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Cox Hyper Viper

Hi, do you still fly this thing? How did you did you're mod? Got pics of it?
Old 04-16-2009, 05:24 PM
  #33  
lousyflyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: garden city, GA
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Cox Hyper Viper

I bought a hyper viper about two years ago. The engine ran great after about two tanks. It is fast in level flight, but kind of shaky in maneuvers. It's on the wall in the living room now. If past experience with cox planes has taught me anything, it's that they degrade from fuel exposure after a few months of inactivity. I doubt if I will fly it again. I personally think the older super chipmunk was a better out of the box flyer.
I remember at the Lake Charles Nats in the late seventies the Cox people brought an 18 wheeler full of planes and they would let anyone that was interested take a stab at flying them. I've never seen so many crashed planes in one pile in my life!
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ig13660.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	58.4 KB
ID:	1181570  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.