View Poll Results: A poll
Voters: 191. You may not vote on this poll
Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
#26
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Haltom,
TX
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
I have 2 options that I like to use.
1. servo operated choke.
2. optical kill switch. Look to the upper right side of the cockpit for the light. (it is off and engine will not start).
Redundancy although not needed is nice because you never know when you will need it.
Glenn Williams
1. servo operated choke.
2. optical kill switch. Look to the upper right side of the cockpit for the light. (it is off and engine will not start).
Redundancy although not needed is nice because you never know when you will need it.
Glenn Williams
#28
My Feedback: (9)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Schaumburg,
IL
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
WRC Wike R/C Products Optical Gas Ignition Cutoff
From Troy built models. I have it in three of my planes. No problems here.
From Troy built models. I have it in three of my planes. No problems here.
#29
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
No optical ignition switches....anymore. When you've done this stuff for as long as I and some others have, you find or invent ways of making your set ups reliable enough that they don't warrant an "OH SH*T" button.
As a former retailer I did install and use them (multiple manufacturers), I felt I should use what we sold to prove others could confide in them. I've always felt they were an unnecessary added complexity that could in itself cause the desire for the aforementioned button. For me a throttle kill is all that has ever been needed and all that I use anymore.
If one hasn't the knowledge, experience, or desire to build their set ups in a manner that makes optical ignition switches redundant then I do support their use. If I were forced by rule to have a second means of remotely shutting down my engine I would use a choke servo.
As a former retailer I did install and use them (multiple manufacturers), I felt I should use what we sold to prove others could confide in them. I've always felt they were an unnecessary added complexity that could in itself cause the desire for the aforementioned button. For me a throttle kill is all that has ever been needed and all that I use anymore.
If one hasn't the knowledge, experience, or desire to build their set ups in a manner that makes optical ignition switches redundant then I do support their use. If I were forced by rule to have a second means of remotely shutting down my engine I would use a choke servo.
#31
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
LMAO, I remember us both watching a similaroccurrence a couple years back in Saint Helens involving an.........optical ignition switch!
It was the most beautiful dead stick hammer head from 30 ft.above the runwayI've ever seen.
#32
My Feedback: (7)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: La Porte,
IN
Posts: 2,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
ORIGINAL: jedijody
No optical ignition switches....anymore.
No optical ignition switches....anymore.
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10708251
ORIGINAL: jedijody
I fly Airtronics SD10-G, I have three 50cc planes with 8 ch, 92824 Rx's in them and one 100cc plane with the 10 ch Rx. All have optical ignition switches plugged into ch 5. Three of the four are Rcexl switches, the other is a 42% Products switch, all work flawlessly. Look at this test done at the Rcexl factory, http://www.rccdi.com/news/Accessories/10.html
Not sure what the problem might be, these switches are extremely reliable.
I fly Airtronics SD10-G, I have three 50cc planes with 8 ch, 92824 Rx's in them and one 100cc plane with the 10 ch Rx. All have optical ignition switches plugged into ch 5. Three of the four are Rcexl switches, the other is a 42% Products switch, all work flawlessly. Look at this test done at the Rcexl factory, http://www.rccdi.com/news/Accessories/10.html
Not sure what the problem might be, these switches are extremely reliable.
If one hasn't the knowledge, experience, or desire to build their set ups in a manner that makes optical ignition switches redundant then I do support their use.
regardless of the negative views of a few against them. Those of us using these ign kills have reasons just as valid for their
useage, as those who think otherwise.
I have all my gassers setup whereby I don't NEED ign kills, yet I still have & use them.
It's simply a matter of personal choice!
#33
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
[quote]ORIGINAL: a1pcfixer
ORIGINAL: jedijody
No optical ignition switches....anymore.
No optical ignition switches....anymore.
[quote]
Only the high lighted portion is no longer valid, everything else still is.
[quote]ORIGINAL: a1pcfixer
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10708251
ORIGINAL: jedijody
I fly Airtronics SD10-G, I have three 50cc planes with 8 ch, 92824 Rx's in them and one 100cc plane with the 10 ch Rx. All have optical ignition switches plugged into ch 5. Three of the four are Rcexl switches, the other is a 42% Products switch, all work flawlessly. Look at this test done at the Rcexl factory, http://www.rccdi.com/news/Accessories/10.html
Not sure what the problem might be, these switches are extremely reliable.
I fly Airtronics SD10-G, I have three 50cc planes with 8 ch, 92824 Rx's in them and one 100cc plane with the 10 ch Rx. All have optical ignition switches plugged into ch 5. Three of the four are Rcexl switches, the other is a 42% Products switch, all work flawlessly. Look at this test done at the Rcexl factory, http://www.rccdi.com/news/Accessories/10.html
Not sure what the problem might be, these switches are extremely reliable.
[quote]
Didn't yank them out, I carefully removed them.
#34
My Feedback: (11)
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
(added fourth method)
I like having a optical throttle kill switch AND a choke servo... in fact I just had installed a choke servo on a WWI warbird (no ignition kill though).
I like during the initial start of being able to choke it a bit then turn off the choke with ability to immediately choke a bit more. I really like being able to shut down the engine using the kill switch... no throttle trim adjustments, just pull the switch. Yes I am aware of the switch potentially being a problem in the air. I am careful with the dual rate switches to avoid this. I wish the radios would come with a switch with an arming cover to prevent accidentally shutting down.
I have my engine "properly" set up and can shut it down in four ways. In preferred order of shutdown I use 1.) kill switch, 2.) Manual ignition switch, 3.) throttle trim, and 4.) Choke. No throttle springs (spring remains on carb) or stop screws (never again). I use the PSP Manuf servo arms to put the carburetor connection exactly where it makes for the simplest connection to my servos. I keep all of my throttle/choke linkages as simple as possible. I have the radio fail safe settings set and working.
I also drill my muffler socket bolt heads and wire the heads to prevent a muffler coming loose. A muffler coming loose or falling off can cause a run away engine condition.
It has taken a while to arrive at this scheme... complex?? I don't think so... redundancy?? Yes x3, but these engines are capable of doing a lot of damage.
I would much rather spend money for these items than explain why I lost control of my plane and injured someone. I probably spend as much on safety as some spend on an entire plane. So Be It.
I like having a optical throttle kill switch AND a choke servo... in fact I just had installed a choke servo on a WWI warbird (no ignition kill though).
I like during the initial start of being able to choke it a bit then turn off the choke with ability to immediately choke a bit more. I really like being able to shut down the engine using the kill switch... no throttle trim adjustments, just pull the switch. Yes I am aware of the switch potentially being a problem in the air. I am careful with the dual rate switches to avoid this. I wish the radios would come with a switch with an arming cover to prevent accidentally shutting down.
I have my engine "properly" set up and can shut it down in four ways. In preferred order of shutdown I use 1.) kill switch, 2.) Manual ignition switch, 3.) throttle trim, and 4.) Choke. No throttle springs (spring remains on carb) or stop screws (never again). I use the PSP Manuf servo arms to put the carburetor connection exactly where it makes for the simplest connection to my servos. I keep all of my throttle/choke linkages as simple as possible. I have the radio fail safe settings set and working.
I also drill my muffler socket bolt heads and wire the heads to prevent a muffler coming loose. A muffler coming loose or falling off can cause a run away engine condition.
It has taken a while to arrive at this scheme... complex?? I don't think so... redundancy?? Yes x3, but these engines are capable of doing a lot of damage.
I would much rather spend money for these items than explain why I lost control of my plane and injured someone. I probably spend as much on safety as some spend on an entire plane. So Be It.
#35
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: san jose,
CA
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
I've recently purchased a spark switch from duralite. Has a cool feature that requires a switch sequence to kill the engine. That will prevent those accedential kills due to dumb thumbs. I haven't actually flown it yet. Additionally there was an update to this product...
I've also had good luck with wike's product.
https://duraliteflightsystems.com/in...product_id=282
I've also had good luck with wike's product.
https://duraliteflightsystems.com/in...product_id=282
#36
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Blackfoot ,
ID
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
I don't see what the issue is about adding the kill switch to a spring loaded switch, if you hit it release it before the engine stops turnig and your back in business.
Most newer radios has such a switch that can be programed to work on about any extra channel.
I also have 3 ways of shutting down my gasser engines, the one main thing nobody has said a word about is interference, and yes it can happen on the very best of the best 2.4 systems. All this talk about landing or flying a deador runaway plane down is great providing you still have control over the plane, but in a case of RF chances are you won't then what ??
You can't control the plane what makes one think they can shut off the engine by a return spring, or a choke servo almost every RF hit I have seen the throttle went wide open not closed.
Chances are less with a 2.4 but still can happen, I had a plug cap start to work a little bit and bang I was getting hit big time, lucky enough I was able to stut it down and land W/O any issues.
Buying the best of the best does improve on ones confidence, but in no way does it rule out component failures with can happen to any and all. And alot goes to be said about good setups also I still set up a plane on 72 and if alls well then go to PCM or 2.4
Nuff said.
Most newer radios has such a switch that can be programed to work on about any extra channel.
I also have 3 ways of shutting down my gasser engines, the one main thing nobody has said a word about is interference, and yes it can happen on the very best of the best 2.4 systems. All this talk about landing or flying a deador runaway plane down is great providing you still have control over the plane, but in a case of RF chances are you won't then what ??
You can't control the plane what makes one think they can shut off the engine by a return spring, or a choke servo almost every RF hit I have seen the throttle went wide open not closed.
Chances are less with a 2.4 but still can happen, I had a plug cap start to work a little bit and bang I was getting hit big time, lucky enough I was able to stut it down and land W/O any issues.
Buying the best of the best does improve on ones confidence, but in no way does it rule out component failures with can happen to any and all. And alot goes to be said about good setups also I still set up a plane on 72 and if alls well then go to PCM or 2.4
Nuff said.
#37
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Haltom,
TX
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
My personal opinion is that the optical kill switch was fine until Airtronics came out with their bulletin about it being the cause of interference and then later determined that it was not the optical kill switch.
Listen my 2 pennies in this debate are real simple. If you build your airplane to have a kill switch you ought to know what switch you have it programmed on in the first place. If you inadvertantly hit the kill switch that you programmed it for then maybe you ought to get to know your radio better. Just saying.
I firmly believe in safety and as such adding redundancy to your aircraft is a good thing. Many times over the years we have all heard the same song and dance of "nope dont need it" in some form or fashion. Only to have something go amiss later on. It happens on full scale aircraft and it happens on RC aircraft.
I also believe that anything worth doing is worth doing right and a 15.00 switch is worth it;s weight in gold when you need it and dont have it.
Again this is my opinion and to each his own. However as for me and my aircraft it will have 4 means of being able to kill the engine. 3 in the air and 1 on the ground.
1. throttle trim
2. Choke
3. Ooptical kill switch
4. Ignition switch (ground operated)
Regards
Glenn Williams
Listen my 2 pennies in this debate are real simple. If you build your airplane to have a kill switch you ought to know what switch you have it programmed on in the first place. If you inadvertantly hit the kill switch that you programmed it for then maybe you ought to get to know your radio better. Just saying.
I firmly believe in safety and as such adding redundancy to your aircraft is a good thing. Many times over the years we have all heard the same song and dance of "nope dont need it" in some form or fashion. Only to have something go amiss later on. It happens on full scale aircraft and it happens on RC aircraft.
I also believe that anything worth doing is worth doing right and a 15.00 switch is worth it;s weight in gold when you need it and dont have it.
Again this is my opinion and to each his own. However as for me and my aircraft it will have 4 means of being able to kill the engine. 3 in the air and 1 on the ground.
1. throttle trim
2. Choke
3. Ooptical kill switch
4. Ignition switch (ground operated)
Regards
Glenn Williams
#38
My Feedback: (211)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sun City,
AZ
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
To each their own. I have not witnessed an occasion where redundancy was not worth it with gasoline engines and/or large models. Having seen firsthand throttle servos fail, throttle linkages fail, throttle springs fail, engine box failures, ect. I use an optical kill with my gassers. I don't recall ever having an optical switch failure...perhaps many years ago...no, I can't recall a failure, ever. We all know how efficient gasoline engines are, so do you feel like flying it till the tank is dry? Really? That scenario is far more likely than an optical switch failure.
#40
My Feedback: (79)
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
But keep in mind that not all carbs can kill with just the throttle!! Some carb butterflys have a notch cut in them and it wolnt allow you to kill it with the throttle..So you would have to use the choke and or the opto kill unit.. But like said above unless it's a weed eater You will probley not even have to worry about doing the carb kill mod..
#41
My Feedback: (7)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: La Porte,
IN
Posts: 2,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
ORIGINAL: willig10
.........................................
Listen my 2 pennies in this debate are real simple. If you build your airplane to have a kill switch you ought to know what switch you have it programmed on in the first place. If you inadvertantly hit the kill switch that you programmed it for then maybe you ought to get to know your radio better. Just saying.
.........................................
Listen my 2 pennies in this debate are real simple. If you build your airplane to have a kill switch you ought to know what switch you have it programmed on in the first place. If you inadvertantly hit the kill switch that you programmed it for then maybe you ought to get to know your radio better. Just saying.
I haven't (yet) done that, but those having such issues can easily prevent such by simply marking that switch somehow.
I firmly believe in safety and as such adding redundancy to your aircraft is a good thing. Many times over the years we have all heard the same song and dance of ''nope dont need it'' in some form or fashion. Only to have something go amiss later on. It happens on full scale aircraft and it happens on RC aircraft.
#43
My Feedback: (79)
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
I have the 7c 2.4.. I have all of my rates on The G switch.. I call it the git er done switch.. I then have my ignition kill on the A switch I say to my self ARMED. My choke in on my E switch..Engine..I memorize it by heart on every plane I have.. So I dont throw the wrong swith in flight.. I always use the 3 spot switch for my rates.. But sometimes it can get confuseing.. Just know your plane and your work..
#44
My Feedback: (7)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: La Porte,
IN
Posts: 2,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
ORIGINAL: Cyberwolf
All this talk about landing or flying a deador runaway plane down is great providing you still have control over the plane, but in a case of RF chances are you won't then what ??
All this talk about landing or flying a deador runaway plane down is great providing you still have control over the plane, but in a case of RF chances are you won't then what ??
If NO such ign kill, then about the time your model yard darts into the ground, you'll be wishing ya had an ign kill.
You could also setup your Tx/Rcv for F/S on the throttle channel.
Lots of choices available to us.
You can't control the plane what makes one think they can shut off the engine by a return spring, or a choke servo almost every RF hit I have seen the throttle went wide open not closed.
In such cases, that return spring will close the throttle plate so that in the majority of cases the engine will die.
At the very least it'll go to a bare idle.
Buying the best of the best does improve on ones confidence, but in no way does it rule out component failures with can happen to any and all....................
#45
Senior Member
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
Agreed on the Tech Aero Ultra IBEC. I've touted its benefits for 2 years. All I use and recommend
#46
Senior Member
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
Agreed on the Tech Aero Ultra IBEC. I've touted its benefits for 2 years. All I use and recommend
OOOOPs duplicate
OOOOPs duplicate
#47
Thread Starter
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
ORIGINAL: willig10
My personal opinion is that the optical kill switch was fine until Airtronics came out with their bulletin about it being the cause of interference and then later determined that it was not the optical kill switch.
Listen my 2 pennies in this debate are real simple. If you build your airplane to have a kill switch you ought to know what switch you have it programmed on in the first place. If you inadvertantly hit the kill switch that you programmed it for then maybe you ought to get to know your radio better. Just saying.
I firmly believe in safety and as such adding redundancy to your aircraft is a good thing. Many times over the years we have all heard the same song and dance of ''nope dont need it'' in some form or fashion. Only to have something go amiss later on. It happens on full scale aircraft and it happens on RC aircraft.
I also believe that anything worth doing is worth doing right and a 15.00 switch is worth it;s weight in gold when you need it and dont have it.
Again this is my opinion and to each his own. However as for me and my aircraft it will have 4 means of being able to kill the engine. 3 in the air and 1 on the ground.
1. throttle trim
2. Choke
3. Ooptical kill switch
4. Ignition switch (ground operated)
Regards
Glenn Williams
My personal opinion is that the optical kill switch was fine until Airtronics came out with their bulletin about it being the cause of interference and then later determined that it was not the optical kill switch.
Listen my 2 pennies in this debate are real simple. If you build your airplane to have a kill switch you ought to know what switch you have it programmed on in the first place. If you inadvertantly hit the kill switch that you programmed it for then maybe you ought to get to know your radio better. Just saying.
I firmly believe in safety and as such adding redundancy to your aircraft is a good thing. Many times over the years we have all heard the same song and dance of ''nope dont need it'' in some form or fashion. Only to have something go amiss later on. It happens on full scale aircraft and it happens on RC aircraft.
I also believe that anything worth doing is worth doing right and a 15.00 switch is worth it;s weight in gold when you need it and dont have it.
Again this is my opinion and to each his own. However as for me and my aircraft it will have 4 means of being able to kill the engine. 3 in the air and 1 on the ground.
1. throttle trim
2. Choke
3. Ooptical kill switch
4. Ignition switch (ground operated)
Regards
Glenn Williams
#48
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calimesa,
CA
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
As for hitting the wrong switch and killing the engine, you could go this route http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_10727092/tm.htm
Also, I can't tell you how many times I have seen guys at the field make a beautiful landing, taxi back to the engine shut down area, shut off the engine, and then retract the landing gear. This is usually followed by a few choice four letter words.
And to answer your pole, I just use the engine cut off button.
Also, I can't tell you how many times I have seen guys at the field make a beautiful landing, taxi back to the engine shut down area, shut off the engine, and then retract the landing gear. This is usually followed by a few choice four letter words.
And to answer your pole, I just use the engine cut off button.
#49
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
RE: Emergency Engine Kill... Choke Servo or Opto-Ignition Kill from Transmitter
Anyone in this thread EVER consume an alcoholic beverage, or other intoxicating item, and then drive a motor vehicle? Kind of shoots all the allusions to safety in the foot, doesn't it?
I know better than to believe all the people in this thread conduct every aspect of their lives in an entirely safe manner. The real point is a lot of people are scared to death of using a gas engine, and for some reason thing they are more dangerous than a glow engine where they've spent most of their hobby time, where all they have is the idle trim cut off on their transmitters. I'm surprised some of you don't have a 10'x10' wire cage built around your lawnmowers and push it along from outside the cage. Probably lock your kids in the bathroom while the yard is getting mowed. Lord knows how you manage to deal with a weed eater.
For the record, if you encounter radio interference how will you deal with the kinetic energy released during the impact of a plane that's out of control? Figured out a way to mitigate that yet?
Ya'll can call it an increased level of safety if you want but there are more than a few out there that call it fear mongering and capitalism. I also fly full scale. You know how we kill that great big fan up front? We cut the fuel. Period. If people lack the knowledge and ability to install components correctly, or too cheap to purchase quality components that will perform effectively and efficiently, they should not be doing anything with a model plane. It's above their level.
OK, everyone can return to hiding from the blue sky now.
I know better than to believe all the people in this thread conduct every aspect of their lives in an entirely safe manner. The real point is a lot of people are scared to death of using a gas engine, and for some reason thing they are more dangerous than a glow engine where they've spent most of their hobby time, where all they have is the idle trim cut off on their transmitters. I'm surprised some of you don't have a 10'x10' wire cage built around your lawnmowers and push it along from outside the cage. Probably lock your kids in the bathroom while the yard is getting mowed. Lord knows how you manage to deal with a weed eater.
For the record, if you encounter radio interference how will you deal with the kinetic energy released during the impact of a plane that's out of control? Figured out a way to mitigate that yet?
Ya'll can call it an increased level of safety if you want but there are more than a few out there that call it fear mongering and capitalism. I also fly full scale. You know how we kill that great big fan up front? We cut the fuel. Period. If people lack the knowledge and ability to install components correctly, or too cheap to purchase quality components that will perform effectively and efficiently, they should not be doing anything with a model plane. It's above their level.
OK, everyone can return to hiding from the blue sky now.