Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 178

  1. #101

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Spring Hill, FL
    Posts
    281
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash


    Bucket of Popcorn - $5.00
    Large Pepsi - $4.00
    Snowcaps - $4.00

    Watching this thread - PRICELESS
    Taz Hobbies

  2. #102

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Spring Hill, FL
    Posts
    281
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash


    ORIGINAL: Neverlost1

    If your great grandfather was on the Mayflower (1620), that would mean you are about 300 years old
    LOL! Oh man.... Who the HELL is going to replace my keyboard? RC cola thru the nose and right on the keyboard! TooFunny!
    I am callingDell to see if they'll replace this button sticking defective keyboard. No protection against RC Cola... THISISBSman....

    Taz Hobbies

  3. #103

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    manorville, NY
    Posts
    131
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash

    here we go. Who said i knew the bolt was wobbly when I took off?   I only found out it was wobbly after the crash when i inspected the  bolts in both wings. My conclusion was   gee why arent these bolts  snugger fit? than i inspected  how much area there was  in wing nut to  catch the bolt. And to my suprise it was very little. and when did I say I need more than 1 bolt in each wingTAZ?

  4. #104

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    manorville, NY
    Posts
    131
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash

    What would GRAND PA SAY??????????????? throw them over board

  5. #105

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Spring Hill, FL
    Posts
    281
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash


    ORIGINAL: comanche260c

    here we go. Who said i knew the bolt was wobbly when I took off? I only found out it was wobbly after the crash when i inspected the bolts in both wings. My conclusion was gee why arent these bolts snugger fit? than i inspected how much area there was in wing nut to catch the bolt. And to my suprise it was very little. and when did I say I need more than 1 bolt in each wingTAZ?
    You said it here -

    ORIGINAL: comanche260c

    come on what happened to redundancy..
    I know I only worked at the Department of Redundancy Department for a short while, but it seems you were eluding to their being more than one wing bolt with your comment, no?

    Taz Hobbies

  6. #106

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    1,197
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash


    ORIGINAL: comanche260c

    TRUCK RACERΒ*Β* my bolt isΒ* like yours wasΒ* before you changed yours. ITΒ* fits in wopplyΒ* .
    Sorry, I was assuming you meant before you flew. Who would argue it was wobbly after it was stripped and had just destroyed their plane?
    Nothing difficult is ever easy.
    Spitfire Brotherhood #44

  7. #107
    gofast53's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    PUKEKOHE, NEW ZEALAND
    Posts
    243
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash

    I am glad the full size planes you fly don't have wing bolts underwise you would be in the s@#t

  8. #108

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    manorville, NY
    Posts
    131
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash

    wrong taz read it again

  9. #109

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    manorville, NY
    Posts
    131
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash

    by saying redundancy I  was refering to the amount of thread in the bolt.   I was hoping in the design there would be   much more thread  to catch the wing bolt. I would of like to see like  1/2 inch or more to catch that threaded bolt . If I saw that amount in the wing bolt  this would of never happened. Thank You   you  hit the nail on the head , this is my argument and the weak point.  And this is soely the week ling and why I am holding them responsible because there was so little thread in the  wing nut allowing tremendous pressure on that soft nylon bolt. yippie I  oh you hit  the nail on the head and you are pointing at  my argument

  10. #110

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    manorville, NY
    Posts
    131
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash

    sorry  i meant weak link

  11. #111

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Spring Hill, FL
    Posts
    281
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash


    ORIGINAL: comanche260c

    wrong taz read it again
    "Okay, let me rephrase the question your honor..."
    "In your previous comments about redundancy, are you not implying that the design should have more than 1 wing bolt with at least more than 3 or 4 threads of contact?"


    Taz Hobbies

  12. #112

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    1,197
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash

    Great Grandpa is 20 in 1620 and lives to be 100...1700
    Grandpa lives to be 100...1800
    Father lives to be 100...1900
    You live to 112...2012

    Of course your forefathers had to bear children the year they died for this to work out this well.

    Hmmmm...

    Good Luck with Horizon.
    Nothing difficult is ever easy.
    Spitfire Brotherhood #44

  13. #113

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Spring Hill, FL
    Posts
    281
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash


    ORIGINAL: comanche260c

    by saying redundancy I was refering to the amount of thread in the bolt. I was hoping in the design there would be much more thread to catch the wing bolt. I would of like to see like 1/2 inch or more to catch that threaded bolt . If I saw that amount in the wing bolt this would of never happened. Thank You you hit the nail on the head , this is my argument and the weak point. And this is soely the week ling and why I am holding them responsible because there was so little thread in the wing nut allowing tremendous pressure on that soft nylon bolt. yippie I oh you hit the nail on the head and you are pointing at my argument
    WHAT pressure on the wing bolt?
    Doesn't that plane have a wing tube?

    Taz Hobbies

  14. #114

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    manorville, NY
    Posts
    131
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash

    see you tomorrow  I ate all the  pop corn   chips and  all the dip. no more soda either. Love ya all EDDIE

  15. #115

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Spring Hill, FL
    Posts
    281
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash


    ORIGINAL: comanche260c

    see you tomorrow I ate all the pop corn chips and all the dip. no more soda either. Love ya all EDDIE
    Again, what pressure on the wing bolts?
    That plane NOT only has a wing tube that supports the flight loads, it also has wing struts.

    Any excessive pressure on those wing bolts was applied by the guy who assembles her. I have sat and watched a 128" Span / 150cc Extra 300 do things in the air that defy the laws of physics. Two (2) 1/4 x 20 NYLON wing bolts hold eash wing panel in place.... The Wing tube/spar carries the load. The wing bolts just hold the wing to the fuse, just about zero lateral load.
    Taz Hobbies

  16. #116
    GTMUSTANGCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Bakersfield, CA
    Posts
    70
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash

    Simple fix. Do not buy an airplane that was assembled in China. Build it from a kit yourself. Then you know its right. How is it said..... If you want something done right......

  17. #117

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    1,197
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash


    ORIGINAL: GTMUSTANGCS

    Simple fix. Do not buy an airplane that was assembled in China. Build it from a kit yourself. Then you know its right. How is it said..... If you want something done right......
    Wow! Another tired issue that has been beaten to death in the forums of RCU!
    Nothing difficult is ever easy.
    Spitfire Brotherhood #44

  18. #118

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
    Posts
    2,742
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash

    I've had a couple of ARF's where the supplied wing bolts were suspect. I've enquired in each of those cases about replacements and each time the answer is something like " we build to the highest standards and qc blah blah blah" yet there it is in front of me bolts thats don't fit into the threaded nut or threads that were not rolled onto control rods properly.

    there is always one or two ARF's, BNF's that will be a dud and its sounds like comanche bought it. I think he is well within his rights to request a replacement.

    I Once bought a chess set for my nephew at TrU and there was a rook missing. I took it back and they replaced it with a new set. Not finding a Rook and mailing it to me, a new set.
    Since BNF,ARF even kit airplanes are also toys, defective goods shodbe replaced by the distributor. These toys are not exempt from cunsumer protection laws.

  19. #119
    Stickbuilder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Leesburg, FL
    Posts
    8,556
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash

    I ain't gonna say it.............I ain't gonna say it.......................

    Bill, Waco Brother #1
    Its easy, just glue all the pieces together, and sand off everything that doesnt look like an airplane.

  20. #120

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Spring Hill, FL
    Posts
    281
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash


    ORIGINAL: TimBle

    I think he is well within his rights to request a replacement.
    After assembling and disassembling it many times AND flying it several times? WOW... Just Wow....

    Taz Hobbies

  21. #121

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    manorville, NY
    Posts
    131
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash

    4 times assembling It  ismany times?   THAT SAYS IT ALL TAZ

  22. #122

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Geneva, GA
    Posts
    16
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash

    I owned one of the original ARF's, and I do not know how the design differs if at all from the BNF. I do not understand how the wing moved outboard enough for the anti-rotational pins to move out of their holes if the wing struts were attached. Typically there has to be a lot of high G maneuvers for the wing to move laterally. Go to you tube and search for the video of Mac Hodges B29 crash where the wing bolts were left out. The plane went through most of the routine and was in a flat spin when you watch the wing begin to pill away from the side of the fuselage. If my memory serves me correct, this is with NO bolts put in the wings and NO struts to hold the wing in place. As others have stated, most of my planes are designed with this system and all I do is a simple snug of the bolt. For me, it's still difficult to see how the wing can slide outboard enough on the tube for the pins to become disengaged if the struts are properly attached. In your analysis of the crash, do you think you may have overlooked another possible cause somewhere else?

  23. #123

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Toronto, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    453
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash


    ORIGINAL: comanche260c

    so you are telling me i have to check all there designs. And I have to eat it because they hireΒ* poopy designers thatΒ* dontΒ* have a brain that functions well ???
    Absolutely.

    It's just another BARF.

    When will you guys ever learn? BARF=rubbish. There is not one in the world that can be put into service without re-engineering and rebuilding prior to use if you want to prevent this sort of thing.

    Would you accept that kind of crap when you purchase a new (take your pick, other than a BARF)? I doubt it. So why do you keep buying these things? As long as you do., that's the level of quality that you'll get.

    Live and learn. BARFs are built to a price - to generate a profit. That means leaving things out and doing things on the cheap to maximize profits. And you, the unwitting consumer, loses.

    So sad, too bad.

  24. #124
    rgburrill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Trumbull, CT
    Posts
    909
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash


    ORIGINAL: comanche260c



    $135.00 was for packing of 2 boxes.. Seems high doesnt it?Horizon paid the shipping of 2 boxes at $30.00per box =$60.00 and I paid foe 2 boxes they wraped it at $65.00 for first box and $60.00 for second box plus tax was $135.79 just for the packing. So $135.79 plus $60.00for shipping is total of $195.79. Dam whats this world coming To

    So you are saying you didn't save the boxes it came in? I even saved the boxes my throw away $120 RTF foamie came in.

  25. #125

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Norwalk, CT
    Posts
    101
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Taylorcraft crash

    Hi Guys,

    I Understand your frustration Comanche. That stinks, and I am sorry for your loss. Horizon should do something for you, but the fault is not entirely Horizon's.

    Like with any well manufactured ARF, there are things that need to be changed, and things that are outright not sufficient to fly.

    Great example.

    Great Plains makes BEEFY ARF's as compared to Horizon's Hangar 9. Hangar 9's quality is superb, but they tend to lack in the beef department and usually require a bit more care when handling.

    My personal example is the Giant Super Sportster (which was my choice or replacement when I crashed my H9 Taylorcraft for doing hammer heads too close to the ground, too tail heavy).

    They rate this airframe as a 32cc airframe.

    The tail comes COMPLETELY unsupported. The tail wheel is lacking at best. The area just forward of where the stock tailwheel is installed is very lacking in beef, required 3/8" aircraft ply and about a half ounce of epoxy to beef up. The linkages that come with the airframe are BARELY sufficient for glow power. There are videos available on YouTube that show, in flight BTW, that the linkages oscillate with the vibes of a DLE 30. But best of all, with a gas engine the manual says to use CA hinges. AMAZING. Totally not good....here is the actual run down.

    The ARF cost was 350. Linkages made of Carbon Fiber and Titanium ends = $36. Sullivan Tail Flying Wire kit = 33 from LHS, Dubro Inflatable Wheels, 4.5" = $22, Heavy Duty Tail Wheel = 30, Great PLanes bulk pack medium pinned hinges (ailerons) 8.50. Robart Bulk pack of 3/16" hinges and drill jig= $22 from LHS. Gasoline stopper = 3. So, the math comes out to...just about 550 for the ARF built with necessary upgrades. NOT including the engine or radio system.

    The responsibility is on you to make it withstand the type of flight you will be using. This was in the manual for the GSS, as well.

    After all, I am sorry for your loss. I know the pain. Get a Giant Super Sportster if Horizon wont help you out. You'll love it. I do .


    Best,

    Chris


Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:46 AM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.