Ignition question
#52
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bristol, CT
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maiden flight went perfectly. Very un eventfull. Sorry I forgot the camera but I'll bring it tomorrow to our picnic/fun fly and get some footage. Thanks again for the help.
#54
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Tan Valley,
AZ
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dirtybird, one more post and I may abandon this subject forever! You can do all the tests you want but real world experience and observation is really the only thing that matters here. Simple fact, there are just too many documented examples of ignition related interference, even with 2.4 radios to ignore that it can happen. The most common being caused by leaving a Rcexl or DA type cap slightly loose where it doesn't make a good ground / shield connection. It happens and that's all I have to say about that.
I say this: the only way you are going to affect a 2.4 system is cover the entire band with noise and then the receiver will simply go into failsafe.-not cause servo to hunt.
OK Trucker I have made 1 more post.
Goobye
#55
My Feedback: (6)
Have you tried such atest? I believe those "documented facts" could be explained if the document er looked further..
I say this: the only way you are going to affect a 2.4 system is cover the entire band with noise and then the receiver will simply go into failsafe.-not cause servo to hunt.
OK Trucker I have made 1 more post.
Goobye
I say this: the only way you are going to affect a 2.4 system is cover the entire band with noise and then the receiver will simply go into failsafe.-not cause servo to hunt.
OK Trucker I have made 1 more post.
Goobye
And I'm no electronics genius but I believe electrical sparks pretty much cover the entire band of RF.
AV8TOR
Last edited by av8tor1977; 08-15-2014 at 07:54 PM.
#56
My Feedback: (5)
Don’t leave now dirtybird we’re trying to save one of your planes. I fly 1 ½ hours a session once a week. If I live another ten years I will need 780 hours of interference free flying. Your tests have been run for a few minutes. That’s not long enough for me. In order to do this right, you would have to analyze the spectrum of the spark and test it in an anechoic chamber and analyze the susceptibility of your receiver to any RF and then do the same testing. Some manufacturers may be doing it but it is very expensive. Your best bet is to just avoid the possibility in the first place and follow good RF techniques. Dan.
#57
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Tan Valley,
AZ
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don’t leave now dirtybird we’re trying to save one of your planes. I fly 1 ½ hours a session once a week. If I live another ten years I will need 780 hours of interference free flying. Your tests have been run for a few minutes. That’s not long enough for me. In order to do this right, you would have to analyze the spectrum of the spark and test it in an anechoic chamber and analyze the susceptibility of your receiver to any RF and then do the same testing. Some manufacturers may be doing it but it is very expensive. Your best bet is to just avoid the possibility in the first place and follow good RF techniques. Dan.
According to most experts a spark has frequencies all over the band. Even to light. So if you can see it then you dont need a spectrum analyser to examine it..
I dont fly my airplanes in an anechoic chamber. Do you? I have tested a few satellites in one of those though.
susceptibility of the receiver? I believe you mean sensitivity. I have tested mine. Its -104dbm according to my tests.
I use good RF techniques. I just dont use those developed in the 70's on an antique system
#58
My Feedback: (19)
A person probably shouldn't say forever though as none of us rcer's can keep our opinions to ourselves that long!
#59
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Tan Valley,
AZ
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am going to set up a test.
I will drive the cheapie ignition system from my function generator ,equipped with a non resistor spark plug. I will sit it next two two receivers,one XPS the other Tatanis. I can transmit to both receivers simultaneously using the Taranis. .I will connect a servo to each receiver, one digital one analog.
I will also connect my oscilloscope to channel 8 on one receiver and program the Taranis to put the rudder on channel 8.
I will take pictures but I am unable to make a movie.
Any other suggestions?...
I will drive the cheapie ignition system from my function generator ,equipped with a non resistor spark plug. I will sit it next two two receivers,one XPS the other Tatanis. I can transmit to both receivers simultaneously using the Taranis. .I will connect a servo to each receiver, one digital one analog.
I will also connect my oscilloscope to channel 8 on one receiver and program the Taranis to put the rudder on channel 8.
I will take pictures but I am unable to make a movie.
Any other suggestions?...
#60
My Feedback: (19)
While maintaining my no discussion policy, I might still suggest you try one test with the plug threaded in an engine but just leave the cap loose where it doesn't make good contact with the plug on the shield side. You might also add some long servo leads, etc. to duplicate a real installation in a large airplane.
#61
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Tan Valley,
AZ
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can easily add long servo leads but I can't simulate a loose cap without running an engine. I really don't want to do that as it would likely destroy the Hall sensor..
I think some of the loose cap interference issues wer caused by miss fireing of the engine that caused an increase in vibration. This could cause a servo to hunt. Make the cap secure and the motor smoothes out and the excess vibration goes away. Then the servo stops hunting and you think it was interference
I think some of the loose cap interference issues wer caused by miss fireing of the engine that caused an increase in vibration. This could cause a servo to hunt. Make the cap secure and the motor smoothes out and the excess vibration goes away. Then the servo stops hunting and you think it was interference
Last edited by dirtybird; 08-16-2014 at 01:40 PM.
#62
My Feedback: (19)
I can easily add long servo leads but I can't simulate a loose cap without running an engine. I really don't want to do that as it would likely destroy the Hall sensor..
I think some of the loose cap interference issues wer caused by miss fireing of the engine that caused an increase in vibration. This could cause a servo to hunt. Make the cap secure and the motor smoothes out and the excess vibration goes away. Then the servo stops hunting and you think it was interference
I think some of the loose cap interference issues wer caused by miss fireing of the engine that caused an increase in vibration. This could cause a servo to hunt. Make the cap secure and the motor smoothes out and the excess vibration goes away. Then the servo stops hunting and you think it was interference
Sounds like you're just rationalizing to me trying to validate your point without proving it.
#63
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Tan Valley,
AZ
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The reason a loose cap bothered the old 72 systems is it caused a spark to occur outside of the engine. As an.engineer I can safely tell you tyere is no difference between a plug spark spark and one that occurs in the cap.
I think you are just looking for an excuse to say my tests are not valid. That is your privilege. It does lower my opinion of you however..
I think you are just looking for an excuse to say my tests are not valid. That is your privilege. It does lower my opinion of you however..
#64
My Feedback: (19)
Yes, as described, I believe your tests may not be valid. They may validate your point of view but not answer the greater question of whether a 2.4 GHz. radio "system" can be interfered with by spark energy. By system, i mean both the 2.4 GHz front end / radio link and the low frequency back end that includes all the wiring, servos, switches, batteries and decoder / processor part of the receiver.
I could easily set up a controlled test that would simulate the loose cap condition. But then, I'm not the one wanting or needing validation of statements I have made. I'm satisfied with what I have seen in the real world and that is "good enough" for me.
I could easily set up a controlled test that would simulate the loose cap condition. But then, I'm not the one wanting or needing validation of statements I have made. I'm satisfied with what I have seen in the real world and that is "good enough" for me.
#65
My Feedback: (6)
In the case of my 50cc Extra that I mentioned in an earlier post, it wasn't just a random servo wiggle. When I got in front of the plane with the radio, so that the bad plug/cap was between the transmitter and the airplane electronics, ALL of the servos went into wild oscillations. And the engine was running perfectly; no excess vibration.
Once again, Hitec Aurora 9 system, 2.4, Hitec 9 channel receiver, and all high dollar Hitec servos in the plane. The interference was real, I didn't dream about it.... (But now I wish I had a movie of it!)
AV8TOR
Once again, Hitec Aurora 9 system, 2.4, Hitec 9 channel receiver, and all high dollar Hitec servos in the plane. The interference was real, I didn't dream about it.... (But now I wish I had a movie of it!)
AV8TOR
#66
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Tan Valley,
AZ
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK I figured out how to simulate your test. I have an Edge 540 set up with the receivers like I proposed. I can just take tyhe spark plug out of the DLE 30 on it and spin it with the starter. Then i can loosen the cap as you ask.
Unfortunately I will have to go out to the field and have others help me. Since I just got out of the hospital with a pacemaker implant I will not be able to drive for awhile.
But you seem to have a closed mind maybe there is no point in it.
Unfortunately I will have to go out to the field and have others help me. Since I just got out of the hospital with a pacemaker implant I will not be able to drive for awhile.
But you seem to have a closed mind maybe there is no point in it.
#67
My Feedback: (19)
Yes, you are correct, on this subject my mind is probably well decided as like av8tor1977, I have seen the problem happen first hand and on more than one occasion. The engine was running perfectly at the time with no excessive vibrations. The only symptom was the servos moving out of control.
dirtybird, I hope you understand that I mean no disrespect to you in this matter. Quite the contrary actually! I treat this just as I would if we were carrying on a conversation in person. I believe we just share an honest difference of opinion on how spark energy can affect our radio systems and once again emphasizing the word systems. Frankly, I believe you are as closed minded about the matter as I am.
If good installation practices are followed, 99+% of the time, there is no problem! So few people really care much about this anyway. Just an FOG and FOG in training discussing something nobody else cares about.
dirtybird, I hope you understand that I mean no disrespect to you in this matter. Quite the contrary actually! I treat this just as I would if we were carrying on a conversation in person. I believe we just share an honest difference of opinion on how spark energy can affect our radio systems and once again emphasizing the word systems. Frankly, I believe you are as closed minded about the matter as I am.
If good installation practices are followed, 99+% of the time, there is no problem! So few people really care much about this anyway. Just an FOG and FOG in training discussing something nobody else cares about.
#68
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Tan Valley,
AZ
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes my mind is closed on this subject. I spent several months checking out the command system for the Iridium spacecrafts That system was very similar to are systems. the only difference is it is on 3.0GHZ and they change the code every day. I satisfied myself that noise simply will not cause interference to such a system.
The problem you have is you see a result and you chock it up to interference. There are many other things that could cause the problem. You need to eliminate those first.
I have decided there is no further test I could perform that will prove what I say to you
I have given you a simple test you could perform yourself and you have chosen to ignore it.
So I will depart this thread.
The problem you have is you see a result and you chock it up to interference. There are many other things that could cause the problem. You need to eliminate those first.
I have decided there is no further test I could perform that will prove what I say to you
I have given you a simple test you could perform yourself and you have chosen to ignore it.
So I will depart this thread.
#69
My Feedback: (29)
I am going to set up a test.
I will drive the cheapie ignition system from my function generator ,equipped with a non resistor spark plug. I will sit it next two two receivers,one XPS the other Tatanis. I can transmit to both receivers simultaneously using the Taranis. .I will connect a servo to each receiver, one digital one analog.
I will also connect my oscilloscope to channel 8 on one receiver and program the Taranis to put the rudder on channel 8.
I will take pictures but I am unable to make a movie.
Any other suggestions?...
I will drive the cheapie ignition system from my function generator ,equipped with a non resistor spark plug. I will sit it next two two receivers,one XPS the other Tatanis. I can transmit to both receivers simultaneously using the Taranis. .I will connect a servo to each receiver, one digital one analog.
I will also connect my oscilloscope to channel 8 on one receiver and program the Taranis to put the rudder on channel 8.
I will take pictures but I am unable to make a movie.
Any other suggestions?...
Correct me if I am wrong but I think a function generator puts out cleaner DC voltage then batteries? Especially batteries that are in our environment?
Even so I personally have not seen a single 2.4 lockout that could be linked directly to an ignition. I have seen an ignition spill enough RF to be picked up by the servo leads. No matter what side of the fence you are on with this topic, common sense should prevail. Does, twisted wires, non metallic throttle pushrods, component separation, ect have any adverse affects on the radio system? Of course not, there is some evidence that they all may be a benifit so why not err on the safe side and stick with the old school tried and true methods? Granted it would be different if we were putting things into space and we wanted to farther the tech but reality we are playing with toy airplanes that have the potential to do people harm.
#70
My Feedback: (19)
Yes my mind is closed on this subject. I spent several months checking out the command system for the Iridium spacecrafts That system was very similar to are systems. the only difference is it is on 3.0GHZ and they change the code every day. I satisfied myself that noise simply will not cause interference to such a system.
The problem you have is you see a result and you chock it up to interference. There are many other things that could cause the problem. You need to eliminate those first.
I have decided there is no further test I could perform that will prove what I say to you
I have given you a simple test you could perform yourself and you have chosen to ignore it.
So I will depart this thread.
The problem you have is you see a result and you chock it up to interference. There are many other things that could cause the problem. You need to eliminate those first.
I have decided there is no further test I could perform that will prove what I say to you
I have given you a simple test you could perform yourself and you have chosen to ignore it.
So I will depart this thread.
I really should not have come back to this thread as it really is like banging ones head against the wall and no, it doesn't feel very good.
#72
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bristol, CT
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's all I'm doing. I had an issue, asked a question, got an answer, and fixed the problem. Now, I fly. I learned a lot in the mean time and I thank you all for that. Maybe I should have worded the original question differently and not called it " interference" but I am no expert on the matter and am not ashamed to say that. Truth be told, I know just about as much as most who fly these. I turn on the radio, turn on the RX, either it works or it doesn't. It now works flawlessly and my question has been answered so, with that, I say good by and happy landings.
#74
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bristol, CT
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, I'm really not sure what to make of this, except that the ignition is suspect. I have about 20 awesome flights now, all without any sign of the previous issue. Then, at startup for flight 21, the engine starts surging at idle. Fine at WOT. So, I'm scratching my head, thinking maybe the low speed needle got bumped or something, and I notice it. The same thing as before. Servos jumping or hunting, or what ever it's called. Weather it's the problem or not, I am ordering a new ignition. This one looks old, so I'm figuring that's the problem. Just glad it didn't start doing that in the air. Without going into debate, any thoughts?