Community
Search
Notices
Gas Engines Questions or comments about gas engines can be posted here

Dle 50 rpm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-2016, 04:34 AM
  #1  
dasintex
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (10)
 
dasintex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Displaced Canadian in Central Texas TX
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Dle 50 rpm

First off, this is my first use of Gas Engines going on a 50 Size Warbird; I have a DLE 50 with a Zoar 22X8 Warbird 2 blade Prop, getting 7500 top end on the ground, would this RPM be more than enough?

Thanks
Old 08-08-2016, 05:48 AM
  #2  
Truckracer
My Feedback: (19)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 5,343
Received 44 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

7500 on the ground might be a bit on the high side for the continued health of the engine. Consider that in air RPM will increase quite a bit. I'd move up to a 22-10 and expect to see right around 7000 or so. You'll get a bit higher airspeed in the process.
Old 08-08-2016, 06:48 AM
  #3  
kmeyers
 
kmeyers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: lake in the Hills, IL
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

+1
Old 08-08-2016, 06:51 AM
  #4  
kmeyers
 
kmeyers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: lake in the Hills, IL
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Sure that is a 50? Not a 55?
I don't know if any DLE's are 50's. They were calling themselves just DL when they first came out.
Old 08-08-2016, 07:51 AM
  #5  
dasintex
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (10)
 
dasintex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Displaced Canadian in Central Texas TX
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You are correct, it's a DLE-55, would the same RPM info apply?
Old 08-08-2016, 09:24 AM
  #6  
Truckracer
My Feedback: (19)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 5,343
Received 44 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dasintex
You are correct, it's a DLE-55, would the same RPM info apply?
Yes, same info. What plane is the engine in? Might be able to add some specific prop suggestions.
Old 08-08-2016, 10:29 AM
  #7  
dasintex
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (10)
 
dasintex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Displaced Canadian in Central Texas TX
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Top Flite Giant P-40 ARF
Old 08-08-2016, 11:53 AM
  #8  
kmeyers
 
kmeyers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: lake in the Hills, IL
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I run 23x8 on my DLE 55's.

If you think the plane can take higher speeds then 22x10 is a great Warbird prop. If flying off short fields than a 23x8 is great for acceleration on take off.
Old 08-08-2016, 01:57 PM
  #9  
Truckracer
My Feedback: (19)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 5,343
Received 44 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

+1, can't go wrong with those two prop sizes!
Old 08-08-2016, 03:40 PM
  #10  
dasintex
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (10)
 
dasintex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Displaced Canadian in Central Texas TX
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Appreciate the reply's; can I assume that an on ground RPM of 7000 to 7500 would be more than enough, a couple corrections, my RPM reading was actually 7430 and I believe the prop is actually a 22X10 Zoar Beech Wood Warbird Prop, because I have the 22X8 sitting on the bench; I was thinking that the 7430 wasn't high enough because the manual stated an RPM range up to 8500 and like I said this is my first Gas engine, I'm familiar with the 10k rpm on glow engines; and from the answers a prop range 22X8, 22X10 to 23X8 works with warbirds?

Last edited by dasintex; 08-08-2016 at 04:20 PM.
Old 08-08-2016, 05:45 PM
  #11  
Truckracer
My Feedback: (19)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 5,343
Received 44 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

RPM in the manual us usually the operating range, not ground RPM. Engines pick up considerable speed in the air. I think you are fine to maybe a bit high on the ground (static) RPM but if it were mine, I'd probably just fly it. If it was an aerobatic plane, I'd probably try to stear you towards the 23/8.
Old 08-08-2016, 07:49 PM
  #12  
ccostant
My Feedback: (38)
 
ccostant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hopkinton, MA
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Just tac'd my new DLE 55RA in a Top Flite P-51 GS ARF this weekend, 1350 rpm at idle and 6950 rpm full throttle on the ground. I'm using a Mejzlik 22x10. Great combination! You'd be surprised at how much more rpm it picks up in the air. My P-51 really hauls and has great vertical. So far I'm very impressed with this engine.

The DLE 55 in the Top Flite P-40 is a great combination. Keep your rpm at 7000 rpm and you will be fine. You won't be disappointed.

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0193_v1.JPG
Views:	410
Size:	3.52 MB
ID:	2176270  

Last edited by ccostant; 08-08-2016 at 08:00 PM.
Old 08-09-2016, 01:32 AM
  #13  
Lifer
My Feedback: (1)
 
Lifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,529
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Here's the same plane with a DLE 55 with a 22x8x3 Xoar. Flies a little slower than a 22x10x2 Xoar. Have also used a Beila 20x10x3, and the fastest prop so far is a Mejzlik 20x12x3. The Mejzlik unloads in the air like nothing else I've tried. All test flights were done with a 23x8 for reasons previously stated.

Keep in mind that as you add pitch, the need to apply rudder increases. If you are not yet proficient in the use of rudder, avoid the big P-40 until you are. Sudden left turns and full up to yank it off the ground is not healthy for the big birds.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWZeLN16d9o
Old 08-09-2016, 04:34 AM
  #14  
dasintex
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (10)
 
dasintex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Displaced Canadian in Central Texas TX
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Truckracer
RPM in the manual us usually the operating range, not ground RPM. Engines pick up considerable speed in the air. I think you are fine to maybe a bit high on the ground (static) RPM but if it were mine, I'd probably just fly it. If it was an aerobatic plane, I'd probably try to stear you towards the 23/8.
Appreciate all the Prop suggestions, I'm going to stick with ZOAR WWII Props.

'TRUCKRACER': are you saying if flying Aerobatic go with a 23X8, since I am a scale flying guy would the 22X10 be alright or still switch to the 23X8?

As a matter of information, I have a Top Flite Giant FW 190 & Japanese Zero to finish, both will get DLE55 Engines, I am going to run ZOAR WWII 3 Bladed Props, my thought for size would be 22X10, right size or go with 22X8?

Thanks.

Last edited by dasintex; 08-09-2016 at 04:43 AM.
Old 08-09-2016, 06:20 AM
  #15  
ccostant
My Feedback: (38)
 
ccostant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hopkinton, MA
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Typically when you go to a 3 blade you drop down in diameter and up in pitch. More load on the engine with 3 blades vs 2 blades. A 22x10 3-blade would probably be okay, I'd go with a 20x10 3-blade. It really depends on what you like, availability of 3-balde props, and how each plane/engine/prop combo performs. I've used XOAR props and I like them a lot.

Last edited by ccostant; 08-09-2016 at 06:27 AM.
Old 08-09-2016, 07:08 AM
  #16  
Truckracer
My Feedback: (19)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 5,343
Received 44 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Changing from something like a 22-10 to a 23-8 is kinda like shifting a car or truck to a lower gear. You gain pull or in this case your climb ability increases. At the same time you go a bit slower and get increased prop breaking on the down lines when you pull the throttle back. You'll get very little down line breaking from a 22-10. It's all about your personal preference and how you want the plane to perform. On round cowl engines, increased diameter helps get the prop tips further away from the cowl.
Old 08-09-2016, 07:15 AM
  #17  
dasintex
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (10)
 
dasintex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Displaced Canadian in Central Texas TX
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So if I want to be able to avoid hot landings and slow the plane down for landing, I am better off with the 23-8 prop, right, thanks.
Old 08-09-2016, 07:44 AM
  #18  
Truckracer
My Feedback: (19)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 5,343
Received 44 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Yes, the lower pitch and increased prop disc drag help a bunch on landings.
Old 08-09-2016, 10:57 AM
  #19  
ccostant
My Feedback: (38)
 
ccostant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hopkinton, MA
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

+1
Old 08-09-2016, 01:11 PM
  #20  
dasintex
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (10)
 
dasintex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Displaced Canadian in Central Texas TX
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you guys use a torque wrench to tighten the prop bolts down, how many Inches per pound torque is recommended?

Thanks.
Old 08-09-2016, 04:28 PM
  #21  
kmeyers
 
kmeyers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: lake in the Hills, IL
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Some mechanically challenged and anal guys do use torque wrenchs and these specs from DA:

Steel prop bolts: M5x 50mm 75 in. lbs. / wood props, 90 in. lbs. /carbon props.
Old 08-09-2016, 05:01 PM
  #22  
ccostant
My Feedback: (38)
 
ccostant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hopkinton, MA
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've never used a torque wrench. I tighten all bolts until they're all snug, alternating side to side as I go. Then I tighten each bolt another 1/8 - 1/4 turn. Don't over tighten, you don't want to snap a bolt. Just check them periodically. More often with a wood prop.
Old 08-09-2016, 05:13 PM
  #23  
Truckracer
My Feedback: (19)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 5,343
Received 44 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

I don't use a torque wrench and don't know anyone that does. I believe the main thing is to tighten in a criss cross fashion and if you feel a wood prop yield to the torque, its too tight. Check for the bolts being tight before each flying day. Aftera few retightenings, the prop / bolts will become stable and not require additional tightening but check them often anyway. Carbon props don't yield (compress) like wood but check them often. Never use any kind of thread locker on the prop bolts. Good info anove about torque values if you choose to go that way. Just personal preference whether to measure torque or not.
Old 08-10-2016, 06:33 AM
  #24  
kmeyers
 
kmeyers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: lake in the Hills, IL
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I should have said I never use a torque wrench on my models myself.
Old 08-10-2016, 06:52 AM
  #25  
Lifer
My Feedback: (1)
 
Lifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,529
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Why not use threadlocker on the prop bolts?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.