model avaition nats coverage.
#1

Thread Starter
My Feedback: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: n miami, FL
Posts: 216

is it the worst coverage ever in model avaition of the NATS, or did i miss where there will be more coverage in the next edition.
#2

My Feedback: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wichita,
KS
Posts: 635

Well, it certainly was not a stellar publication....... [
]
Rick

Rick
#3

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cincinnati,
OH
Posts: 210

Let them know how you feel about the very slight coverage in the National magazine. Contact Jay Smith at jays@modelaircraft.org. He is editor in chief. If we do not let them know then nothing will be done.
T
T
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Over da rainbow,
KS
Posts: 5,084

Think back to the last time they published existing records and newly established record updates in Model Aviation. If it's not a ARF or wimpy powered RC electric model, you need not apply.
#5

My Feedback: (10)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Valdese,
NC
Posts: 9,908

I enjoy the people profiles. The ones on Goldberg and Kaz are the best so far.
The nats coverage was done electronicly in Nats News.
The nats coverage was done electronicly in Nats News.
#6

My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: ft collins , CO
Posts: 7,198

ORIGINAL: vicman
I enjoy the people profiles. The ones on Goldberg and Kaz are the best so far.
The nats coverage was done electronicly in Nats News.
I enjoy the people profiles. The ones on Goldberg and Kaz are the best so far.
The nats coverage was done electronicly in Nats News.
#7

My Feedback: (10)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Valdese,
NC
Posts: 9,908

I like MA, but at this point it is starting to look like an NRA magazine. Trying to protect our right to fly. What I miss the most are the construction articles of original designs.
If you go back to the early 90s MA you will see a similar tone over the frequency issues.
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»