An Unofficial NMPRA Discussion forum
08-21-2002, 05:05 PM
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Monroe,
NC
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An Unofficial NMPRA Discussion forum
Crash Bevil and Sam San have made comments in a couple of debate threads that the passionate discussions are troublesome to them.
One reason I partnered with Marc Vigod and RCUnverse.com to create these forums was because Marc has a lot of experience with network administration. I am proud of myself for forming this alliance because RCU has proven to be the most reliable R/C bulletin board on the web, and our forums are almost always available.
The NMPRA forum has not been staying up on a regular basis. Is anyone in favor of having an Unofficial NMPRA Discussion forum here, so that we don't have NMPRAus commicatus interruptus, and so that we can keep the Q-500 and Q-40 forums for informational purposes only, and keep the debates going in a separate area?
If you have an opinion that you want to be private, plase email me at [email protected].
One reason I partnered with Marc Vigod and RCUnverse.com to create these forums was because Marc has a lot of experience with network administration. I am proud of myself for forming this alliance because RCU has proven to be the most reliable R/C bulletin board on the web, and our forums are almost always available.
The NMPRA forum has not been staying up on a regular basis. Is anyone in favor of having an Unofficial NMPRA Discussion forum here, so that we don't have NMPRAus commicatus interruptus, and so that we can keep the Q-500 and Q-40 forums for informational purposes only, and keep the debates going in a separate area?
If you have an opinion that you want to be private, plase email me at [email protected].
08-21-2002, 08:28 PM
#2
Member
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: La Plata,
MD
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An Unofficial NMPRA Discussion forum
While it might be convenient to have the NMPRA forum on RCU, it's a bad idea. It would be "Unofficial ", so what's the point. Best to keep the separation between NMPRA an PylonWorld as wide as possible. You have made enough people apprehensive as it is. 
08-21-2002, 09:55 PM
#3
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Monroe,
NC
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An Unofficial NMPRA Discussion forum
Regis,
The point was to separate the rules discussions, debates, etc out of the Q-500 and Q-40 forums.
Ok, then, how about a forum called Pylon Hanger Discussion or Pylon Clubhouse Discussion for the above?
I don't know why people would be apprehensive. I started the 424 Unification thread, and in my opinion good things are coming out of it.
As I've said, I'm about consensus, not my own opinions. I tend to be able to get people to open up on things that they want to talk about, and bring their experience and knowledge to the table. There should be nothing scary about that. Corporations pay big bucks for people that can do that. I'm doing it for the pylon world for free.
The point was to separate the rules discussions, debates, etc out of the Q-500 and Q-40 forums.
Ok, then, how about a forum called Pylon Hanger Discussion or Pylon Clubhouse Discussion for the above?
I don't know why people would be apprehensive. I started the 424 Unification thread, and in my opinion good things are coming out of it.
As I've said, I'm about consensus, not my own opinions. I tend to be able to get people to open up on things that they want to talk about, and bring their experience and knowledge to the table. There should be nothing scary about that. Corporations pay big bucks for people that can do that. I'm doing it for the pylon world for free.
08-22-2002, 11:46 PM
#4
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Monroe,
NC
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An Unofficial NMPRA Discussion forum
Stan,
Not to worry. When I made the suggestion I forgot that some people are overly sensitive to the use of the acronym.
I just want to separate the "Hot Pylon Topics" from the regular content. And that's probably what I'll call the new section.
I don't have to spend any time monitoring RCU to make sure it is up. Marc Vigod and a whole crew do that. All I have to do in monitor the postings. People seem to like the organization of the forums, as well as some topics I start, too.
My web site is also up 99%+ of the time. And very low in cost. If you're spending time on keeping sites up and running versus creating content, you might want to consider a strategy change. I spend most of my time on content and answering emails.
Not to worry. When I made the suggestion I forgot that some people are overly sensitive to the use of the acronym.
I just want to separate the "Hot Pylon Topics" from the regular content. And that's probably what I'll call the new section.
I don't have to spend any time monitoring RCU to make sure it is up. Marc Vigod and a whole crew do that. All I have to do in monitor the postings. People seem to like the organization of the forums, as well as some topics I start, too.
My web site is also up 99%+ of the time. And very low in cost. If you're spending time on keeping sites up and running versus creating content, you might want to consider a strategy change. I spend most of my time on content and answering emails.
