Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 30 of 30

  1. #26
    Hooked-On-RC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Surrey, BC, CANADA
    Posts
    839
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: reinforcing motorbox/firewall

    Metallica,
    I am not sure what kind of pilot you are or how you fly your panes, but let me reassure you that an engine box reinforced with tri stock made of balsa or spruce, will handle pretty much everything you could throw at it...IF it is done correctly. The addition of carbon fiber or fiberglass is added weight and not really necessary...an insurance policy perhaps, but not really necessary.
    Hooked-On-RC
    \"I am not rich enough to buy cheap stuff\"
    \"You are only 10% complete when you hit the covering stage\"

  2. #27

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Valley Springs, CA
    Posts
    18,600
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: reinforcing motorbox/firewall

    I tend to agree. What I don't agree with is reinforcing the inside of the engine box. As I stated before, the load is outwards, not inwards. If you didn't have a ply overhang on the outside of the firewall to fill with some tri stcok a couple of small (3/4" x3/4" x3") pieces of aluminum 90 degree angle bolted on the outside would be better than adding a bunch of wood inside. It used to be a pretty common method of setting engine boxes before arfs were the rage. You could do the same at the engine box to forward fuselage bulkhead if you truly thoght you needed it.

    More than one way to do the job, but all of the better ways will be done at the outside of the box. Think about that and the stress forces a little before debating it. All you have working for you on the inside is the strength of the glue. The balsa does nothing.

    However you decide to fly YOUR plane, enjoy to the best of your ability. The other guys won't be there to help build or fly, so do however you want to and have fun.
    Never lie, and never minimize or gloss. Tell it like it is and let the pieces fall where they may. The truth always wins.

  3. #28
    MetallicaJunkie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Donna, TX
    Posts
    5,430
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: reinforcing motorbox/firewall

    thank you Pat, and everyone else with helpful input, now i have a better idea of what we are going to do. [sm=thumbs_up.gif]
    \"Propellers are notorious for inflicting serious bodily harm while vigorously defending their space\" George Aldrich

  4. #29
    bodywerks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    3,178
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: reinforcing motorbox/firewall


    ORIGINAL: Pat Roy

    I tend to agree. What I don't agree with is reinforcing the inside of the engine box. As I stated before, the load is outwards, not inwards. If you didn't have a ply overhang on the outside of the firewall to fill with some tri stcok a couple of small (3/4" x3/4" x3") pieces of aluminum 90 degree angle bolted on the outside would be better than adding a bunch of wood inside. It used to be a pretty common method of setting engine boxes before arfs were the rage. You could do the same at the engine box to forward fuselage bulkhead if you truly thoght you needed it.

    More than one way to do the job, but all of the better ways will be done at the outside of the box. Think about that and the stress forces a little before debating it. All you have working for you on the inside is the strength of the glue. The balsa does nothing.

    However you decide to fly YOUR plane, enjoy to the best of your ability. The other guys won't be there to help build or fly, so do however you want to and have fun.
    I agree.
    I think the SD planes already used aluminum angle wrapped around the outside of the box on both sides. If not, then that is definitely an option for a bulletproof box.
    Regardless, I have yet to rip a box apart on any of my recent giant scale ARFs and I fly my stuff hard sometimes, too. I don't think Metallicajunky really needs to do anything above and beyond what SD recommends, even or his flying style, whatever that may be. I would be more worried about snapping wings apart WAY before ripping an engine box apart.
    STRAIGHTEN UP AND FLY LIGHT!!!

  5. #30
    bodywerks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    3,178
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: reinforcing motorbox/firewall


    ORIGINAL: Pat Roy

    I tend to agree. What I don't agree with is reinforcing the inside of the engine box. As I stated before, the load is outwards, not inwards. If you didn't have a ply overhang on the outside of the firewall to fill with some tri stcok a couple of small (3/4" x3/4" x3") pieces of aluminum 90 degree angle bolted on the outside would be better than adding a bunch of wood inside. It used to be a pretty common method of setting engine boxes before arfs were the rage. You could do the same at the engine box to forward fuselage bulkhead if you truly thoght you needed it.

    More than one way to do the job, but all of the better ways will be done at the outside of the box. Think about that and the stress forces a little before debating it. All you have working for you on the inside is the strength of the glue. The balsa does nothing.

    However you decide to fly YOUR plane, enjoy to the best of your ability. The other guys won't be there to help build or fly, so do however you want to and have fun.
    I agree.
    I think the SD planes already used aluminum angle wrapped around the outside of the box on both sides. If not, then that is definitely an option for a bulletproof box.
    Regardless, I have yet to rip a box apart on any of my recent giant scale ARFs and I fly my stuff hard sometimes, too. I don't think Metallicajunky really needs to do anything above and beyond what SD recommends, even or his flying style, whatever that may be. I would be more worried about snapping wings apart WAY before ripping an engine box apart.
    STRAIGHTEN UP AND FLY LIGHT!!!


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:26 AM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.