Giant Scale Aircraft - 3D & Aerobatic Discuss all your 3D & Aerobatic giant scale airplanes right here!

Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

Reply
Old 01-30-2010, 10:00 AM
  #26
blikseme300
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mission, TX
Posts: 1,105
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

Pulled the trigger and ordered the Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12S.

The AUW of 19-20lbs does not concern me too much because if I want to prop hang I fly foamies.[>:] Currently bipes in my stable: 37% BME Ultimate, GP 160 Ultimate, Sig Sundancer and 2 H9 electric foamies. (Here are some pics: http://bliksemseplek.com/aviation.html)

I dithered choosing between the Aeroworks Python and the GP M-12. The completed aircraft cost difference is negligible and played no role in the decision. I have owned multiple planes from both companies and both make good products. The looks of the GP M-12 grabbed me more.

The only thing that concerns me is the composite landing gear. If it is anything like the GP 160 Ultimate then this part will be a weak point. TNT landing gear can fix that though....

I am planning to use either a DLE55 or a 3W55 for power. Most likely use 8611's throughout as I have a bunch of new ones gathering dust.

I will post updates here as things progress.

Bliksem
blikseme300 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 09:33 PM
  #27
pkevinb
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Meadville, PA
Posts: 334
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

I am ready to buy it but am concerned about the covering after reading all of the problems with MonoKote lately.
pkevinb is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 10:00 PM
  #28
blikseme300
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mission, TX
Posts: 1,105
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

Quote:
I am ready to buy it but am concerned about the covering after reading all of the problems with MonoKote lately.
New problems? I am not aware of this, but won't be surprised if this is so. I used to be an avid kit & scratch builder but starting about +-6 years ago the quality of Monokote went south in that it was a beeatch to get to stick and shrink well compared to the stuff manufactured before.

I always spend quite some time re-ironing covering on ARF's before I even start any assembly. If all else fails, I will recover.

Bliksem
blikseme300 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 10:10 PM
  #29
Sessholvlaru
 
Sessholvlaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: West Caldwell, NJ
Posts: 1,657
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

Although I can't speak for the Pitts, my Great Planes Su-31 has the best factory covering job (MonoKote) that I have ever seen.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Xv64118.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	114.3 KB
ID:	1368390  
Sessholvlaru is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2010, 10:26 AM
  #30
iflywhenican
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 907
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

I agree with the Monokote problems. I recently did a repair job for a friend and I had all sorts of problems. Hard to get it to shrink and when it finally did, even though I had over a quarter inch of overlap, the seams pulled loose. The new stuff is nothing like the old.
iflywhenican is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2010, 01:04 AM
  #31
kochj
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Victoria, MN
Posts: 3,933
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

...
kochj is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2010, 02:48 AM
  #32
kochj
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Victoria, MN
Posts: 3,933
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

I went through the Manual and there is NO WAY this plane will come in at 20lbs!,,,
I could see 17lbs easy...
There is less wood than in the Aeroworks pitts....
but the GP pitts looks larger...in the Fuse and rear rudder....
The wings look lightweight, and they have CF rods for support...
Has a really nicely done fiberglass cowl, and included baffling..but not scale...
but then it looks like all the other top manufactures so no complaints there...
really nice color scheme...

cons...
If you look at the close up shots of the plane, the covering isn't perfect but looks pretty good...
But that was done on a prototype, so we will see
The aeroworks pitts looks like it has ALL the details and all the little things covered in the Manual...
and the AW has nice details....like a pretty convincing radial engine baffling...
kochj is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2010, 08:25 PM
  #33
blikseme300
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mission, TX
Posts: 1,105
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D


Apologies to everybody that I offended with my previous post, especially kochj.

Monkote will be discussed elsewhere, if needed.

Bliksem
blikseme300 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 12:06 AM
  #34
kochj
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Victoria, MN
Posts: 3,933
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

picts
kochj is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 04:46 PM
  #35
iflywhenican
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 907
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

In all due respect to Monokote AND it's respective users, whether there IS an issue with it or NOT, this is NOT the thread to be discussing it.
iflywhenican is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 05:17 PM
  #36
drbyrnes
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sellersville, PA
Posts: 55
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

Yes, I agree. This thread was supposed to be about the new Great Planes Pitts M-12s. This is where I am anticipating a building thread about that plane from another member on this thread. Maybe we could talk about Monocote on another thread?? (By the way I've used it for years, and never had any problems.)
drbyrnes is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 08:18 PM
  #37
kochj
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Victoria, MN
Posts: 3,933
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

Agreed....

I really want to know about this plane....



ANY PICTS OF THE PITTS???
WOULD LOVE TO SEE IT>>..
kochj is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 08:27 PM
  #38
drbyrnes
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sellersville, PA
Posts: 55
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
drbyrnes is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 09:58 PM
  #39
BTerry
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Silverdale, WA
Posts: 1,398
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

I seal the edges of trim colors no matter what it is. That seems to eliminate most of the problems.

This new plane looks great, I can't wait to hear more feedback on it. I have a light 80cc engine on the shelf...
BTerry is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 09:44 AM
  #40
kochj
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Victoria, MN
Posts: 3,933
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

what engine??
I think the biplanes beeny from larger engines....they have more drag....
This one has a larger fuse than the aeroworks... (I think...not possitive)
kochj is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 03:04 PM
  #41
BTerry
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Silverdale, WA
Posts: 1,398
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

ZDZ80rv. With a pitts muffler it weighs about the same as a piped/canister-ed 50cc engine, but swings a 26" prop at similar RPM's the piped 50cc can turn a 23" prop.

This is a SIGNIFICANT increase in thrust, nearly on the order of doubling it (likely closer to a 70% increase)...
BTerry is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 11:08 AM
  #42
kochj
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Victoria, MN
Posts: 3,933
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

Just go back and delete the previous posts....No big deal guys.....

WE NEED PICTS!!
kochj is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 08:38 PM
  #43
kochj
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Victoria, MN
Posts: 3,933
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

Quote:
ORIGINAL: BTerry

ZDZ80rv. With a pitts muffler it weighs about the same as a piped/canister-ed 50cc engine, but swings a 26'' prop at similar RPM's the piped 50cc can turn a 23'' prop.

This is a SIGNIFICANT increase in thrust, nearly on the order of doubling it (likely closer to a 70% increase)...
Although it will have more power, a Cf pipe/50cc combo will weigh less than the 80 with a pitts.
Unfortionately, this plane hasn't provisions for cans or pipes...[][:-]
kochj is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 10:01 PM
  #44
BTerry
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Silverdale, WA
Posts: 1,398
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

Well then maybe this is the wrong plane for that comparison.

I was looking at people complaining about 19-20# on a 50cc engine, 1570 sq in wing area (as big as some 75cc planes), and thinking, "This would be AWESOME with an 80cc engine in it..."
BTerry is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2010, 07:24 AM
  #45
pkevinb
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Meadville, PA
Posts: 334
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

Do you think a 50cc would be ok if you didn't plan on any 3D flying?
pkevinb is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2010, 01:35 AM
  #46
kochj
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Victoria, MN
Posts: 3,933
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

Quote:
ORIGINAL: BTerry

Well then maybe this is the wrong plane for that comparison.

I was looking at people complaining about 19-20# on a 50cc engine, 1570 sq in wing area (as big as some 75cc planes), and thinking, ''This would be AWESOME with an 80cc engine in it...''

THere wouldn't be much work to do it, so I think it absolutely pertains to this aircraft...
IT wouldn't take that much work, as there appears
to have the neccesary room from the firewall, to the bottom of the fuse.
Yes, a 80cc would make it move....
kochj is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2010, 01:55 AM
  #47
kochj
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Victoria, MN
Posts: 3,933
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

Quote:
ORIGINAL: pkevinb

Do you think a 50cc would be ok if you didn't plan on any 3D flying?
It would do well even if you DID do 3D flying...


Keep the gadgets out of this one, use a pop bottle fuel tank and get some light weight wheels and or CF main gear, and you should be
flying great...

Gp looks like they did there homework on this plane....
I don't think it will let you down.....

kochj is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2010, 02:18 AM
  #48
kochj
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Victoria, MN
Posts: 3,933
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

I looked at the video (2nd one on the web page) and the fact that ...the Wind is wipping along at
12-15 mph....I thought it did very well..... and the 50cc engine was plenty for 3D....
There webpage talks about how it will fly like a pattern plane and 3D with the best of them.

I think it will do just that, with the recomended engine...

It appears to be visual copy of QQ's m12's that he had made with Kimball ent..

[sm=redface.gif]THis thread is worthless without PICTS!!!
kochj is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2010, 02:22 AM
  #49
kochj
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Victoria, MN
Posts: 3,933
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D


Quote:
ORIGINAL: blikseme300

I am planning to use either a DLE55 or a 3W55 for power. Most likely use 8611's throughout as I have a bunch of new ones gathering dust.

I will post updates here as things progress.

Bliksem
yeah yeah...... 3W55.......

Seen that one run, and it is ammazing power.... and lightweight to boot!
kochj is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010, 07:08 PM
  #50
SMALLFLY-
 
SMALLFLY-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 2,156
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Great Planes 25% Pitts M-12s 3D

For what it's worth I emailed great planes and they did verify real weights of 19-20 lbs, bummer I really wanted one, but 19.5 lbs on a 50 is just to much for real 3d
SMALLFLY- is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:35 AM.