What would you use to fly out over the Ocean long distance with GoPro
#26
My Feedback: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mesa,
AZ
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The OP has been an active contributing member at RCG for years using the same name. Checking his history this bizarre and urgent spamming across several threads (and now sites) about this subject is very recent. Makes me wonder if someone other than the real gtx has control of the account?
#27
My Feedback: (11)
15 miles out, and return... so aircraft would be in the air 30 minutes at 60mph.. that would kind of limit the electric options. You should have reserve for those extra windy days too. I would want power for 60 minutes. 60oz of fuel??? you would have to test to determine.
Ok... I would go with large gasoline powered plane to keep the fuel cost down. 50cc engine. I would go with a large telemaster or cub style high wing plane. The problem you have with gas or glow is the vibration, so you would need isolation and a camera gimbal. The three axis stabilization is offered in several packages. You are going to need an autopilot with GPS navigation capability maybe a pixhawk from 3D Robotics.
Single engine plane over water is always going to be a problem with engine out... so you need to be thinking about this.... maybe a push pull twin engine aircraft.
Ok... I would go with large gasoline powered plane to keep the fuel cost down. 50cc engine. I would go with a large telemaster or cub style high wing plane. The problem you have with gas or glow is the vibration, so you would need isolation and a camera gimbal. The three axis stabilization is offered in several packages. You are going to need an autopilot with GPS navigation capability maybe a pixhawk from 3D Robotics.
Single engine plane over water is always going to be a problem with engine out... so you need to be thinking about this.... maybe a push pull twin engine aircraft.
#29
My Feedback: (278)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: fuquay varina,
NC
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, if "thousands are doing it" then why not ask them???
I'm so glad you are "working to keep it safe."
I'm also so glad that your brother and his friends are pilots. Whew, that takes all the worry out of it for the rest of us.
But better yet and as previously suggested, go down to your local FSDO and run your idea past them, and get their advise.
I mean, REALLY! Are you nucking futs!!??
But if you also want to do this three times a day, I have to ask ... Who are you stalking?
If you want to "just observe" what's out in the ocean, then get in a real plane and look for yourself. A Cessna 152 could fly slow enough for you. Then you could see whatever you want and even circle around for another look if you like what you see.
Here's what you will see ... and lots of it.
Now go find something else to do with your spare time.
I'm so glad you are "working to keep it safe."
I'm also so glad that your brother and his friends are pilots. Whew, that takes all the worry out of it for the rest of us.
But better yet and as previously suggested, go down to your local FSDO and run your idea past them, and get their advise.
I mean, REALLY! Are you nucking futs!!??
But if you also want to do this three times a day, I have to ask ... Who are you stalking?
If you want to "just observe" what's out in the ocean, then get in a real plane and look for yourself. A Cessna 152 could fly slow enough for you. Then you could see whatever you want and even circle around for another look if you like what you see.
Here's what you will see ... and lots of it.
Now go find something else to do with your spare time.
LOL! well put!
#35
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Hither & Yonder, USA
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd suggest, for a flight that far out and back, that a good 4 meter glider, would do the trick, with some modifications, of course. That way, you wouldn't have to solely rely on motor driven propulsion, alone, but make use of the air currents, to save battery life.
#37
#38
My Feedback: (26)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: El Paso,
TX
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Proud CCP Card Carrier...
Last edited by Prop_Washer2; 01-15-2015 at 03:54 PM.
#39
My Feedback: (2)
You're not going to find what you're looking for here. This is a site pertaining to the HOBBY, not UAS operations. There are several sites and forums for your interest, this just isn't one of them. www.auvsi.org is a good place to begin. The fact that you joined just a week ago and are asking a question that would seem to try and implicate folks on this forum is boring and lame. Gentlemen this person is likely, what do guys call them, a troll. Cheers
#40
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, we don't like YOUR kind around here Kid!
Maybe he can mount a camera on a balloon, and tie them to his fish.
Maybe he can mount a camera on a balloon, and tie them to his fish.
Last edited by smeckert; 01-15-2015 at 06:23 PM. Reason: Add word spacing
#42
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Too funny, Some seem paranoid! While outrageous acts of RC are threatening the hobby (by that I mean the onset of regulations) I think the question was quite simple and interesting. What kind of readily available hdwre. is used to achieve such a range?
That's it!
That's it!
#43
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Radio no problem as long as no telemetry involved. Simple VHF can achieve many more times that distance as long as curvature of Earth is compensated for with height.
Even telemetry could be simplified come to think of it. I have 5 w hand held VHF radios that will TX for long time/dist
Even telemetry could be simplified come to think of it. I have 5 w hand held VHF radios that will TX for long time/dist
Last edited by Gadgeter; 01-15-2015 at 08:53 PM.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 4,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#49
He got a much friendlier reception to the same question over on RCG. Good to see at least some people in this hobby still trying to be helpful.
Gerry
#50
My Feedback: (19)
He got a much friendlier reception to the same question over on RCG. Good to see at least some people in this hobby still trying to be helpful.