Go Back  RCU Forums > Glow Engines, Gas Engines, Fuel & Mfg Support Forums > Glow Engines
Reload this Page >

OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

Community
Search
Notices
Glow Engines Discuss RC glow engines

OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2011, 07:18 AM
  #1  
canardlover
Thread Starter
 
canardlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Västervik, SWEDEN
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

Hi out there, changed bearings on an old OS.61 SF the other day and found a strange "recess"(correct word..??) on the crankshaft as shown on pics. Have never seen anything like it before and wonder why this could be.... Anyone out there with an idea of the thought behind this "recess"....???....Cheers/Harald
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Qo38957.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	53.4 KB
ID:	1589539   Click image for larger version

Name:	Fa87237.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	263.3 KB
ID:	1589540   Click image for larger version

Name:	Wb75091.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	188.7 KB
ID:	1589541   Click image for larger version

Name:	Fz74110.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	172.7 KB
ID:	1589542  
Old 04-05-2011, 07:22 AM
  #2  
jeffie8696
Senior Member
 
jeffie8696's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Muscatine, IA
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

My guess is it is a clearance groove for the liner.
Old 04-05-2011, 07:33 AM
  #3  
canardlover
Thread Starter
 
canardlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Västervik, SWEDEN
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

Hi jeffie, I thought so too first but since only the center portion of the counterweight is "grooved" the outer portions would still hit the liner..!!
A groove for the piston then..??...but why on earth go to the length of "grooving" the very hard counterbalance when it would be so much easier to notch the piston skirt instead..??...Cheers/Harald
Old 04-05-2011, 07:46 AM
  #4  
jeffie8696
Senior Member
 
jeffie8696's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Muscatine, IA
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

Not all engineers are created equal?
Old 04-05-2011, 07:48 AM
  #5  
42etus
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
42etus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: La Pine, OR
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

Clearance for the piston skirt, would be my guess. Before you put the back plate on, rotate the crank and see.
Old 04-05-2011, 07:52 AM
  #6  
djlyon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

Material removed for balance.

Denis
Old 04-05-2011, 10:29 AM
  #7  
spaceworm
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Guilford, CT
Posts: 3,950
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?


ORIGINAL: djlyon

Material removed for balance.

Denis
That would be my guess.

Richard
Old 04-05-2011, 07:11 PM
  #8  
earlwb
 
earlwb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Grapevine, TX
Posts: 5,993
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

I'll go with the material removed for balance too. It looks like they were unable to remove enough material from the crankpin side, so they needed to cut a little off the heavy side.

Old 04-05-2011, 10:09 PM
  #9  
DarZeelon
Senior Member
 
DarZeelon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rosh-HaAyin, ISRAEL
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

This recess is clearance for the descending piston's skirt.

The OS.61SF is an under-square engine; i.e. a long-stroke engine. It has a bore of 23 mm and a stroke of 24 mm
The piston at BDC (Bottom Dead Center) descends slightly further than it does, in over-square engines; such as the FSR and FX (both have a 24 mm bore and a 22 mm stroke).

Many engines have a cut-away in the front of their piston's skirt, to clear the crank-web...
In this engine, either this was insufficient, or OS preferred to 'reduce' the counterweight, rather than the length of the piston.
Old 04-06-2011, 05:28 AM
  #10  
Cyberwolf
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Cyberwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Blackfoot , ID
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

Dar is correct and I am thinking that if the material was removed off the piston to clear it, It would leave an open port or I should say the small edge of the exhaust port and it would loose some of the new fuel charge during the cycle.
Old 04-06-2011, 06:54 AM
  #11  
spaceworm
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Guilford, CT
Posts: 3,950
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

ORIGINAL: DarZeelon

This recess is clearance for the descending piston's skirt.

The OS.61SF is an under-square engine; i.e. a long-stroke engine. It has a bore of 23 mm and a stroke of 24 mm
The piston at BDC (Bottom Dead Center) descends slightly further than it does, in over-square engines; such as the FSR and FX (both have a 24 mm bore and a 22 mm stroke).

Many engines have a cut-away in the front of their piston's skirt, to clear the crank-web...
In this engine, either this was insufficient, or OS preferred to 'reduce' the counterweight, rather than the length of the piston.
Since it appears that the cutaway in the crank counterbalance is towards the bearing or to the outside of the piston, does this mean that the the uncut part of the counterbalance actually passes inside the piston skirt at BDC?

Thanks.

Richard
Old 04-06-2011, 08:50 AM
  #12  
canardlover
Thread Starter
 
canardlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Västervik, SWEDEN
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

WOW, thanks all for a very educational thread, there seems to be more to it than I first thought. Unfortunately the engine is not mine and the guy I helped has already mounted it in the plane so opening the rear cover and looking (again) is not so easy. I have one more idea about the rationale for the cutaway but need to make a drawing before presenting it. Keep info flowing meanwhile.........Cheers/Harald
Old 04-06-2011, 08:54 AM
  #13  
Motorboy
 
Motorboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bergen, NORWAY
Posts: 2,234
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

Hello, have someone forgotten the length of connecting rod? To make the engine more compact, the connecting rod is shortened then the height of cylinder is reduced at engine block and the piston can be shortened or make recess on crankshaft to give place for the piston skirt in case the engine is a two stroke engine who need piston skirt to cover the ports in cylinder under two stroke timing period.
Old 04-06-2011, 09:02 AM
  #14  
abachiwing
 
abachiwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Varnamo, SWEDEN
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

Hi,

The discussion has so far been about cutting in the crankshaft balance or cutting in the piston skirt in order to avoid contact between them in this long-stroke engine. Can it instead be so, that the cut in the counterbalance is to avoid the balance from blocking one of the schneurle ports? Maximum gas transfer, from crankcase to cylinder, shall be possible when the counterbalance is in its top position.

That's my suggestion,
Lars
Old 04-06-2011, 09:06 AM
  #15  
DarZeelon
Senior Member
 
DarZeelon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rosh-HaAyin, ISRAEL
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?


ORIGINAL: spaceworm

Since it appears that the cutaway in the crank counterbalance is towards the bearing or to the outside of the piston, does this mean that the the uncut part of the counterbalance actually passes inside the piston skirt at BDC?
Richard,


Strange, but I was thinking of the same thing...

Yes, that's what actually happens.
The piston's skirt is not very thick, but it is curved; so OS even took that into account.
If you look at Harald's photos, you would see the 'bevel' between the cutaway and the 'proud' part of the crank-web...

It is the curvature of the piston skirt, that made this angled cut necessary.


OS cut away from the crank-web, the absolute minimum amount of steel; to retain this engine's more difficult to achieve partial balance.
You probably remember that balancing a single-piston engine, is still only a compromise; between up-down vibrational forces and side-to side vibrational forces...

Old 04-06-2011, 09:19 AM
  #16  
DarZeelon
Senior Member
 
DarZeelon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rosh-HaAyin, ISRAEL
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?


ORIGINAL: abachiwing

Hi,

The discussion has so far been about cutting in the crankshaft balance, or cutting in the piston skirt in order to avoid contact between them in this long-stroke engine. Can it instead be so, that the cut in the counterbalance is to avoid the balance from blocking one of the schneurle ports? Maximum gas transfer, from crankcase to cylinder, shall be possible when the counterbalance is in its top position.

That's my suggestion,
Lars
Lars,


Maximum transfer speed through the bypasses, will likely not occur; when the piston is dwelling at a stand-still at BDC; and the exhaust port is fully open and a still positive pressure residing in the cylinder.

I don't think the rear Schnürle (or Schnuerle - note spelling) port would benefit very much in that state, from giving it that extra 'clearance'.

Old 04-06-2011, 09:27 AM
  #17  
DarZeelon
Senior Member
 
DarZeelon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rosh-HaAyin, ISRAEL
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

Double post... MODERATORS, PLEASE REMOVE THIS.
Old 04-06-2011, 12:47 PM
  #18  
djlyon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

Dar

It's the same spelling. We both know that "ue" ( e added to umlaut vowels) is only used by us that don't have keyboards with umlaut letters.[&o]

Denis
Old 04-06-2011, 01:11 PM
  #19  
DarZeelon
Senior Member
 
DarZeelon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rosh-HaAyin, ISRAEL
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?


ORIGINAL: djlyon

Dar

It's the same spelling. We both know that ''ue'' ( e added to umlaut vowels) is only used by us that don't have keyboards with umlaut letters.[&o]

Denis
Hi, Denis.


My keyboard doesn't have the umlaut letters either...
But when it is necessary, I just to to the ASCII code ([link=http://webdesign.about.com/od/localization/l/blhtmlcodes-de.htm]this site[/link] for instance) and copy-paste the specific character 'ü', or any other.

I remarked regarding the spelling, because Lars spelled 'eu'; instead of 'ue'...
See [link=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schnuerle_porting]the Wiki page for Schnürle porting[/link]. In the part about Adolf Schnürle, it specifically says the 'eu' is a misspelling...
Old 04-06-2011, 01:28 PM
  #20  
djlyon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: OS.61 SF - strange recess on crankshaft..?

AHHH
I missed that Lars had misspelled Schnürle Schneurle

Interesting discussion though. My knee jerk reaction was balance. But after reading more careful thoughts I guess we would need to talk to the guy that made the decision, and he probably can't remember.

Denis

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.