Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 126

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    4,555
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    Just a single question,


    Can u tell me just a bit about your experience with these engines ?

    Actually, they should have made huge progress since some OS engineers joined them a few years ago... What's your feeling about this ?
    ProBro #2077
    http://image2-0.rcuniverse.com/e1/forum/upfiles/57402/Nl29490.jpg

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Springfield, IL
    Posts
    276
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    TT

    The TT-46 Pro is the only one I have had any experience with. It was/is a great little engine and trouble free. We are using it in my grandson's trainer and it gives superior performance. What a bargain.
    Steve
    AMA#4939

    Puckett Model Aviation

  3. #3
    apalsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Coffs Harbour NSW, AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    2,299
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    I have a TT 91 FS in one of my planes.
    It's still new-ish and still a bit hard to start as I run it quite rich.
    There are several posts here saying that they take long to break in properly and I agree with that.
    Apart from that, a great little engine.
    More powerful than other engines I have seen in the same class and very reliable.
    I would not hesitate to buy another one.

  4. #4
    FLYBOY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    9,035
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    I have been running the TT 70 in my heli for a few years. Great engine. Had my first real auto this weekend since I bought it. You would think they would be able to make the damn thing keep running when you run out of fuel but it quit anyway. Great engines.
    Fly it till the wings come off.

  5. #5
    Ugo Ferrari 's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Ft.Walton Bch.|, FL
    Posts
    439
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    I have five (5) TT .46 Pros and two (2) TT .61's ! All are a joy !
    The .46's are in a GP Stick and Avistar... The .61's are in a Astro Hog and a U-Can- Do. I run them all on 10% fuel. Idle is great ,and excellent transition to high blow .
    If I were O.S.,... I'd be worried !!

    And the price is RIGHT !

    Ugo
    Ugo Ferrari
    Fort Walton Beach,
    Florida

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    4,555
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    I've compared the TT Pro 46 and the OS46 Fx. I'm really astonished by the mass gap. Why is there such a gap ?
    46Fx : 1.59 @ 16,000 (374 grams)
    46LA: 1.2 @ 16,000 (270 grams)
    TT46 Pro : 1.43 @ 16,000 (449 grams)
    ProBro #2077
    http://image2-0.rcuniverse.com/e1/forum/upfiles/57402/Nl29490.jpg

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Pensacola, FL
    Posts
    735
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    You can not go by the manufacturer's specs. The mass gap is definately due to the fact that OS reports the mass of their engines without a muffler. This is a pretty useless way of reporting the mass because you have to use the muffler to run the engine. I own both the TT pro 46 and the FX 46 and they are similar in weight and size. The difference in power is around 100 rpm with the FX having the slight edge in most cases. The user friendlyness of the two engines are about the same. I do like the sweep needle valve on the TT better than the remote needle of the OS version. Due to the thick and harder alloy of metal used in the TT engines liner I believe the TT is going to outlast the OS. We will see in a couple of years. Both are good running engines.
    Hind site is always 20/20.

  8. #8
    George E.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Medford, NJ
    Posts
    1,066
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    Strykaas

    Your weight for the OS is without the muffler and your weight for the TT includes the muffler.

    I have both and they weigh the same within a half ounce. Both engines are equally user friendly and make the same power; I tached both to within 200rpms using Tower Mufflers and identical props.

    Both come with equally lousy mufflers that kill their performance. Try a tower muffler or drill out the stock one; at least remove the baffle.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    4,555
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thanks for your replies :)

    Thank you guys for having shed new lights on these engines.

    This confirms what I've heard elsewhere. Hope OS engines will get even tougher competition, which will decrease prices for us, end users, definitely.

    BTW, these TT engines are ABC or ABN ?
    ProBro #2077
    http://image2-0.rcuniverse.com/e1/forum/upfiles/57402/Nl29490.jpg

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Pensacola, FL
    Posts
    735
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    Both the OS and the TT are ABN liners. The TT has a thicker, harder nickel plateing than OS. TT has never had any peeling problems to date I am aware of.
    Hind site is always 20/20.

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    4,555
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    Good news nickel plating is better than OS's. How about break in ?

    BTW, do u know why they have switched from chrome to nickel ? I've heard that It was merely to reduce costs, given that chrome waste disposal is quite expensive in some countries. What a pity, chrome was a good material from our point of view, and paying some extra dollars for it wouldn't have bothered me either...
    ProBro #2077
    http://image2-0.rcuniverse.com/e1/forum/upfiles/57402/Nl29490.jpg

  12. #12
    Gene Chernosky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Sinton, TX
    Posts
    506
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Break-in, etc.

    TT ABN engines need a HOT break-in. DON'T do the rich run routine or you could possibly ruin the engine! Don't run them full lean at first, but definitely past the rich/lean break. Typical break-in for a TT PRO .46 is to run it up with a 10x6 to get the needle set to run lean...this is a short as possible run...let it cool afterwards. Then put a 9x6 on it and take it to 16.5K RPM and hold it there for two minutes...let it cool a LONG time. Then put an 11x5 on it (this engine's favorite prop IMO) and run it through 3-4 eight ounce tanks at full throttle just leaner than the rich/lean break...let it cool well between tanks. After that put it on a plane and go fly it...it will just keep getting better. BTW, all props are APC.

    The ONLY thing that upsets me with Thunder Tiger presently is that their part support is VERY little to be desired. Typically, a lot of items are on back order and there is no idea when they will be available. I hope this situation changes soon!

    Further, I've owned just about every engine they make except the .07, .61 & 1.20 two-cycle ones. They are inexpensive and do the job quite nicely IMO...particularily if you are a 'sport' flier. Currently I own 2-GP.15's, 2-GP.25's, 2-PRO .36's, 1-GP.42, 10-PRO.46's and 2-FS.91's. No, they aren't all in use...but I'm a packrat.
    Eugene S. Chernosky
    "I'm the person your parents warned you about"
    RCU ID#146

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Sumter, SC
    Posts
    17

    Thunder Tiger engines

    You can't go wrong with a PRO .46!!!!! It was my first engine and I knew absolutely nothing about maintaining it (I was only 12) and after all those years of abuse it still runs better than an OS right out of the box!!!!!

  14. #14

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    4,555
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Re: Break-in, etc.

    Originally posted by Gene Chernosky
    TT ABN engines need a HOT break-in. DON'T do the rich run routine or you could possibly ruin the engine! Don't run them full lean at first, but definitely past the rich/lean break. Typical break-in for a TT PRO .46 is to run it up with a 10x6 to get the needle set to run lean...this is a short as possible run...let it cool afterwards. Then put a 9x6 on it and take it to 16.5K RPM and hold it there for two minutes...let it cool a LONG time. Then put an 11x5 on it (this engine's favorite prop IMO) and run it through 3-4 eight ounce tanks at full throttle just leaner than the rich/lean break...let it cool well between tanks. After that put it on a plane and go fly it...it will just keep getting better. BTW, all props are APC.

    The ONLY thing that upsets me with Thunder Tiger presently is that their part support is VERY little to be desired. Typically, a lot of items are on back order and there is no idea when they will be available. I hope this situation changes soon!

    Further, I've owned just about every engine they make except the .07, .61 & 1.20 two-cycle ones. They are inexpensive and do the job quite nicely IMO...particularily if you are a 'sport' flier. Currently I own 2-GP.15's, 2-GP.25's, 2-PRO .36's, 1-GP.42, 10-PRO.46's and 2-FS.91's. No, they aren't all in use...but I'm a packrat.

    What exactly do you call a "rich/lean break" ?
    ProBro #2077
    http://image2-0.rcuniverse.com/e1/forum/upfiles/57402/Nl29490.jpg

  15. #15
    Gene Chernosky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Sinton, TX
    Posts
    506
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Rich/Lean Break

    When your engine is running rich and then by turning the needle valve IN (or leaner) it 'breaks' into a clean two-cycle run...that is a rich/lean break.
    Eugene S. Chernosky
    "I'm the person your parents warned you about"
    RCU ID#146

  16. #16

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    20
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    Also called the 4-cycle/ 2-cycle break. When extremely rich, 2-cycle engines will skip firing every other time, hence the term, "4-cycling." they run waaay cold when doing this, so the upper cylinder doesn't expand sufficiently, and you could literally wear the engine out instead of wearing it in!

  17. #17

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Alpharetta, GA
    Posts
    734

    Thunder Tiger engines

    I have a 46Pro and 2 TT91fs and than all have run great from the start. Good value for the money.

  18. #18

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    4,555
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    Thanks
    ProBro #2077
    http://image2-0.rcuniverse.com/e1/forum/upfiles/57402/Nl29490.jpg

  19. #19

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Perth, AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    1,880
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    HAs anyone had any experience with pro 120??

    I'm thinking of Jamming one into an Ultimate.
    Go knife edge your cub!

  20. #20

    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Schoonhoven, NETHERLANDS
    Posts
    652
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    Originally posted by Rendegade
    HAs anyone had any experience with pro 120??
    I'm thinking of Jamming one into an Ultimate.
    Very good engine.
    8500 - 8700 / 16*8 APC / with the standard muffler / low nitro
    9500 / 16 * 8 On the genesis one piece muffler (which is also 100gr lighter than the original muffler)
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	104522_6871.jpeg 
Views:	36 
Size:	13.8 KB 
ID:	58287  

  21. #21

    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Sulphur, LA
    Posts
    455
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    I have two TT.36's VERY good power. It's the only TT with a chrome liner.
    The .46 pro = GREAT bang for your buck engine.
    The .42GP is an OS.FP clone. very good little plain bearing engine. That's the only TT engine I can talk about first hand.
    Ragin Cajun Combat Squadron
    my email raptorcombat@yahoo.com

  22. #22

    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Aberdeen, AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    17
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    I have two TT 1.20 pro

    Luv em.

    Mine needed a perry pump when running a pitts muffler.

    Starts great. Runs well on 5-10% nitro. Will take off your finger trying to start it if you try 15%. Just my observations.

    I have one on a U can do.


    Mat

  23. #23

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    4,555
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    Could you feel any real difference between nickel and chrome liners ?
    ProBro #2077
    http://image2-0.rcuniverse.com/e1/forum/upfiles/57402/Nl29490.jpg

  24. #24

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    southport, UNITED KINGDOM
    Posts
    443
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    I have a .15mx and it is a great little runner. it actualy made my universal joint in my boat expload. i had a small prop aswell as it isn't even run-in yet. i got it for 30 at a model boat show. is a bit hard to start when rich but is a great runner even at running-in.
    I have no insurance. No really I don\'t. Also known as N00B @ h4xor.net http://www.h4xor.net

  25. #25

    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Sulphur, LA
    Posts
    455
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Thunder Tiger engines

    Chrome is more durable than nickel and I wanted to do some timing work on the .36's that's why I was pleased to see the chrome liner. I was also very suprized to see a VERY good piston and liner fit. The porting and liner was also a perfect match, you don't see that very often in an engine in that price range. Both of my .36's are now out pulling my Jett.30's.
    Ragin Cajun Combat Squadron
    my email raptorcombat@yahoo.com


Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:10 PM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.