Community
Search
Notices
Glow Engines Discuss RC glow engines

"Smoked" glow engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-2011, 06:36 PM
  #26  
earlwb
 
earlwb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Grapevine, TX
Posts: 5,993
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: RE:

ORIGINAL: blw
ORIGINAL: earlwb
So you might have 20% to 25% or more oil in the fuel for a small engine whereas in a big 30cc or larger glow engine you only needed 10% to 12% and even 8% may work OK in some cases. I think he had worked out the optimum oil percentages needed by engine displacement too.
Dave Gierke and Clarence Lee pretty much agreed with it as well as they used to quote his article as a reference in their articles too.
Clarence Lee must have had more than one article because I recently read one where he was recapping previous information. He did have the calculations and I'll go back and try to find them. He said the same things the MAN article did. All was very interesting.
I think Dave Gierke and Clarence Lee have both been recapping their articles on it. They both quote each other and Mr Fox too.
The MAN article that Dave did, as mentioned above with a link has the engine oil percentage formulas detailed in it too.

Old 12-31-2011, 07:43 AM
  #27  
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE:

I still think a twenty-fold difference is oil requirement (100:1 versus 20%) is very significant and amazes me. ED...interesting article....seems to support that there is a lot of over-oiling in modern fuels...which may go along with a inflated fear of lean runs(or maybe not)

The 100 to 1 ratio is only for the larger gas engines with ball or roller bearings throughout and only after well broken in.  Even then some say you should not go past 50 to 1.
Old 12-31-2011, 08:14 AM
  #28  
Max_Power
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Max_Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Savage, MN
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE:

I've been running my 23CC predator gas heli on 100:1 amsoil and coleman camp fuel for years trouble free, as have many. I even stick a boroscope in on a regular basis and the engine looks new inside. Like you say it IS a roller bearing engine...but its not huge.

Honestly, This is about what I figured I'd get from this thread . Definitly not trying to Bust B@lls or anything, But we have a bunch of "some say" , "have been know to" yadda yadda...but the intention of my post was to see if anyone had any pictures or had done any tachometer research,etc. Plenty of pics of crashed planes for the curious, but not many of burnt up engines. You won't find one person who will tell you its a GOOD thing to do. Again, don't take this the wrong way I'm just a bit skeptical that a modern engine with castor in the lube would be all that easy to damage with what I consider fairly low temps. Not trying to disprove anyone, just really interested for my own knowledge in seeing what kind of margin there is? Looks like the only way to get a answer is to do some research on my own with a unwanted engine and take some tach and temp readings and repeatedly run it lean to the point of quitting...like peak it then 1 click in every 5-10 seconds till it stops.
Old 12-31-2011, 09:01 AM
  #29  
spaceworm
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Guilford, CT
Posts: 3,950
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: RE:


ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot

I still think a twenty-fold difference is oil requirement (100:1 versus 20%) is very significant and amazes me. ED...interesting article....seems to support that there is a lot of over-oiling in modern fuels...which may go along with a inflated fear of lean runs(or maybe not)

The 100 to 1 ratio is only for the larger gas engines with ball or roller bearings throughout and only after well broken in. Even then some say you should not go past 50 to 1.
Not to start another "oil war". There are oils designed for higher gas to oil ratios, BUT, you had better be sure you have at least that oil in the gas mix or you are likely to have trouble. But, why risk it when it appears there is no real advantage to 100:1 over 50:1?
Old 12-31-2011, 09:58 AM
  #30  
blw
My Feedback: (3)
 
blw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Opelika, AL
Posts: 9,447
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: RE:

Actually, there have been some excellent comments. The people who have destroyed engines are probably not reading this thread today. We would all like to hear back from your experiments though. Periodic boroscoping would be great.
Old 12-31-2011, 11:01 AM
  #31  
Max_Power
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Max_Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Savage, MN
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE:

I'm absolutely not discounting the value of the knowledge or comments, I appreciate them all! Its simply that what I'm looking for are detailed specific accounts or photos, to satisfy my curiousity. I thank all for their input! My scope won't fit through a glow plug hole...But I'm sure I can get some pics with the head off and through the exhaust port when I decide to do the testing. Thanks again!
Old 12-31-2011, 11:04 AM
  #32  
NM2K
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ringgold, GA
Posts: 11,488
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: RE:

I have been using 100:1 Amsoil in my lawn/utility engines for years now. Still no probblems, but I am careful to keep the fan housings free of debris.


Ed, NM2K
Old 12-31-2011, 02:23 PM
  #33  
Broken Wings
My Feedback: (20)
 
Broken Wings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Cocoa, FL
Posts: 2,090
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default RE:

I found this to be an interesting read...

http://dirtbike.off-road.com/dirtbik...ios-20502.html
Old 12-31-2011, 03:50 PM
  #34  
cutaway
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Worth, FL
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: RE:

When the UCON synth first came out, I wasted a new Series 71(??) Torp .35. The P/L became scrap before it was broken in. That was a lapped iron/steel P/L though. The crank survived fine, but that was on ball bearings.
Old 12-31-2011, 06:13 PM
  #35  
NM2K
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ringgold, GA
Posts: 11,488
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: RE:

I think a lot of us scrapped an engine or two before we figured out that the lapped piston/iron sleeve engines preferred castor oil.

My wife's OS Max .35S R/C used to smoke for a few minutes after we landed her Andrews A-Ray back in the late sixties. We were burning K&B 500 fuel. I figured if they sold it as model fuel and it came from a notable fuel maker, it had to be good. Anyway, the OS actually survived the abuse and provided a few years of service before we got tired of it and moved up to ball bearing forties.


Ed, NM2K

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.