Glow Engines Discuss RC glow engines

bad engines

Reply
Old 01-20-2013, 03:05 PM
  #26
lopflyers
 
lopflyers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,520
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines

Moki, stay away from those. Real PITA.
Saito & OS are the real winners
lopflyers is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 03:11 PM
  #27
MJD
 
MJD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,606
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines


Quote:
ORIGINAL: rcguy59

There's a saying at our field: ''Cox and Fox, leave 'em in the box.'' Good advice.
I might be temped to agree regards Fox, but as to Cox? Sounds like bad grapes from people who can't handle small engines.

As to Hobbsy's comment, I agree 50% but there has been and still is some crap on the market, and I've seen so many instances where the people who got lucky enough to buy good examples of a particular engine swear there is no problem with a brand as if their statistical pool of one or two engines tells the whole story. Like GMS for example - the crowd who have not encountered a bad carb say they're great and that other people are imagining the problem. You get people that own one, and it works, arguing as if they've tested 100 of them.
MJD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 03:29 PM
  #28
hairy46
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sinclair, WY
Posts: 2,183
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines

I like most glow engines but not real fond of super tigre but thats just me. Have a freind that loves em, I would say that OS s my first choice. I am hearing that OS is or will be made in China?
hairy46 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 03:39 PM
  #29
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,914
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines


Quote:
ORIGINAL: rcguy59

There's a saying at our field: "Cox and Fox, leave 'em in the box." Good advice.

Cox in its day was the strongest 1/2A engine out there. The older Fox's need long breakins and the carb tunes diffiently. And yes some models, only a few, were dogs. However, the modern Fox's made today break in easily (Thanks to CNC machining), especially the ABC versions, and have a carb second to none.
Sport_Pilot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 03:55 PM
  #30
rcguy59
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines

No "bad grapes" here. I just never realized how bad the Cox engines were until I got my mitts on some Norvels. Way back when, the Cox's were all we had. That DIDN'T make them good.
rcguy59 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 05:30 PM
  #31
thepamster
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 546
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines

There are no bad engines. Just bad people who attempted to operate them.
There is of course a case of a bad apple once in a while.
thepamster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 05:37 PM
  #32
blvdbuzzard
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: high deserts, CA
Posts: 3,645
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines

Each maker has it's personalities. I have several from most of the popular ones out there. I have a Blue head .61 Super Tigre that has more time on it then I could count. A real old Fox .40, K&B, O.S. OPS. Webra, Rossi, Cox, Magnum, YS, Jet, Traxxas, (not sure who really makes it), Tower Hobbies, Como ( total POS) Ervine, Thunder Tiger, or as they used to be know, Thunder Blunder, QA was iffy at best.

It takes a special breed of person to run Cox engines. You just need to be able to use a lot of dark magic, cauldrons, spells and sacrifices to get them to run well. I have a box of worn out parts.

Of the newer engines I have or have setup. The Magnum .61 and the .46 have been about as easy as it gets. Followed the directions and that has been a pure fun engine. Flip starts easily.

O.S. I have a few, I have had good luck and bad luck. My bad luck was the FX line of engines. Peeled like a sun burned kids back. Yet I have 20 year old FP that run fine.

I would have to say my favorite engines are Super Tigre's. Well the Italian ones any way. I (2) newer, in the past 2 years and they run fine. Easy to break in and good power.

My YS .63 has an amazing amount of power for its size. Seems there are two types of them. Ones that run without any trouble, or ones that have nothing but trouble. Mine has been great. I did have to replace the diaphragm after it started acting up.

Fox, slow to break in, lasts longer then most people. May take gallons of fuel to do it right.

K&B engines, they can run real well or fail miserably. I have not heard of any one running all synthetic oils in them. I always have some in the fuel. The AAC liners can be finicky.

I am surprised at how few people really understand how to tune an engine. I watch as they use a tach to get that last RPM out on the bench and then complain it flames out. They can not figure it out. They do not even know they just did a lean run. Watched one guy try 3 different fuels, 8 glow plugs and then figured the engine was the problem. He was running a 12X7 on a Magnum .46. Could not understand why he could not get any type of RPM out of it.

Most newer engines will serve you well. Each has its own tuning issues. you can not tune a YS like yo do an O.S. nor can you tune an O.S. like you do a Webra.

I have only had one engine I could not get to run. It was an old Como .20. Never ran over 20 seconds. Never did figure out why.


Buzz.
blvdbuzzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 05:38 PM
  #33
rcguy59
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines

That's what they said about Vegas and Yugos, too.
rcguy59 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 06:16 PM
  #34
HoundDog
 
HoundDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Posts: 4,471
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines

Any brand of engine has some that aren't created equal ... Usually the less expensive the grater the chances they will be a LEMON  no mater the make if it gives U trouble just put it on the shelf and obtain another ... Screwing with a motor that doesn't start Idle and run well or consistantly first of all is not worth the frustraion. This hobby is all about FUN. If it ain't FUN it ain't worth doing. 2nd most planes are worth far more than the price of another motor. Until U become an accomplished flyer and willing to learn to keep the plane with gluiding distance of the runway at all times, Dead Sticks can be very unnerving.  But I find them much easier than powered landings ... In fact I usual y make at least 10 touch 'N' Go's per flight and the last landing I take My U'CAN-DO way up and shut it off and do aerobatics all the way down and the proof of a good landing is the least number of steps to retrieve the plane from the runway. Most times I park it right next to where I started ... Yes I brag. but doing that really takes the Pucker factor out of Dead sticks. Ever notice "LETRICS" almost all ways land with the prop stopped ... "DEAD STICK"
  Rember Runway behind U and Altitude  above u and fuel in the bottle  are some of the most useless commidities in this HOBBY?SPORT
HoundDog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 06:36 PM
  #35
tevans55
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,259
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines

So far they're all bad and all good.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Db84300.gif
Views:	28
Size:	271.4 KB
ID:	1842724  
tevans55 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 10:38 PM
  #36
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,914
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines


Quote:
ORIGINAL: rcguy59

No "bad grapes" here. I just never realized how bad the Cox engines were until I got my mitts on some Norvels. Way back when, the Cox's were all we had. That DIDN'T make them good.
Cox put the others out of business. The Norvels were good but not sure they were better than a Tee Dee for raw power. Yet the Tee Dee dates back to 1960. Better controlability for RC for sure, but not sure their 1/2A or .048 is more powerfull.
Sport_Pilot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 11:03 PM
  #37
rcguy59
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines

The Cox engines had their day, but that was long ago and you can't get there from here. A lot of us started on them, and many, such as myself, abandoned them as soon as we could. The Norvels had their quirks, to be sure, but were light-years ahead of Cox in most respects. My Norvels get flown regularly and are no more cantankerous than any of my other engines. That's more than I can say for any Cox engine I ever owned. It's just progress, I guess. As time goes on, things tend to get better and what was once "good" now seems less so compared to more modern offerings.
rcguy59 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 11:46 PM
  #38
guille2006
 
guille2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MaranelloModena, ITALY
Posts: 646
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines

I had a great eXperience with Italian built Supertigre .61 (which I stupidly sold!!); OS and MVVS.
My worst experience was with GMS; a brand that tower hobbies use to sell... I'don't recall to land my poor plane with the engine running...
I have had a decent experience with a chinesse built Supertigre .90; as reliable and powerfull as the Italian 61...

Normally; just stay away from new low price brands, just pay a little bit more and get a good engine... there is my list:

Glow: OS, MVVS, Magnum, YS, Supertigre...
Gas: 3W, SAITO, Mintor, DLE, DA...

... and stay away from electric, those makes your model to become a toy!!! HAHAHAHAHA
guille2006 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 11:52 PM
  #39
jessiej
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: no city, AL
Posts: 2,613
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines


Quote:
ORIGINAL: rcguy59

There's a saying at our field: ''Cox and Fox, leave 'em in the box.'' Good advice.
I have used quite a few engines by both Cox and Fox. They have all performed their tasks in a most satisfactory manner.

It is my observation that in most cases dissatisfaction with an engine is caused by selecting an engine unsuited to the desired use or failing to understand/learn the peculiarities of the engine in question.

Jess
jessiej is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 08:13 AM
  #40
oneaew@msn.com
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: hemet , CA
Posts: 1,148
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines

THERE ARE NOT ANY BAD ENGINES THERE > MAKE SURE THERE IS THE RIGHT FUEL LINE THE RIGHT FUEL AND GO SLOW ON SETTING THE ENGINE CARB>>
oneaew@msn.com is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 08:40 AM
  #41
lopflyers
 
lopflyers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,520
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines

Go to the Dark Side
lopflyers is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 08:44 AM
  #42
NM2K
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ringgold, GA
Posts: 11,488
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines


Quote:
ORIGINAL: rcguy59

No ''bad grapes'' here. I just never realized how bad the Cox engines were until I got my mitts on some Norvels. Way back when, the Cox's were all we had. That DIDN'T make them good.


I had a love/hate relationship with Cox engines, probably because I always tried to run them on 10% nitro model fuel most of the time. Those engines demanded high nitro fuel.

I had the most success with the Cox .049/.051 engines and the least with the Cox Medallion .15. I flew the latter in my control line days, which was before electric starters were popular. I usually can get anything running in short order, but not that Medallion .15. I still have it in a container somewhere downstairs. I think I bought it in 1966, at the Luke AFB hobbyshop.


Ed Cregger
NM2K is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 08:53 AM
  #43
lkruse
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lawton, OK
Posts: 111
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines

You need a new slogan or a new field. Cox and Fox brand engines are both excellent if broken in according to instructions and maintained at least in an average manner.
lkruse is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 09:04 AM
  #44
avidflyguy
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lone Rock, WI
Posts: 108
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines

i know mds engines have a bad rap, they run best on low nitro fuel 0-5% take an extremely long time to break in, i love my mds 68 engine, it flies circles around my os and rossi .61s, i have several other mds engines that have been great performers for me. i have over 100 engines in my collection, i have a liitle bit of everything and i don't have a bad engine in the bunch. some engines can have its quirks and must be addressed before running reliably. there is a guy who posted on this thread stay away from moki, i have never had any issues with mokis, they are amazing engines and the only problem i have with them is running out of fuel. He probably couldn't tune in a radio station anyway if he is bad mouthing a moki
avidflyguy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 09:44 AM
  #45
DISCUS54
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sun City, AZ
Posts: 283
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines

I have had an occasional glow "lemon", but to say that a particular manufacturer is bad or good? There are some better than others...and that is subjective to the point of what one finds to best fill their needs(economy, longevity, performance, ect.). Sure hard to beat O.S. Engines if you are new to the hobby or don't run your engines much. Likewise, once you have gained a little experience and seek optimal performance there is every reason to seek out a YS engine among others. Perhaps economy is more important than performance...nothing wrong with Fox, but you will be spending a lot more time on the break in. Knowledge is key, otherwise you will have a frustrating experience. Be sure to read the directions...yes read ALL of the directions. If the manufacturer omitted critical information (like nitro content, correct plug) a site search here on RCU might yield some good info...but you have to read into the forums a bit. Going to the field and asking for help may work if you ask the right person. Many of the engines mentioned as Bad are only as Bad as the nummy working on it.
DISCUS54 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 09:57 AM
  #46
NM2K
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ringgold, GA
Posts: 11,488
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines


Quote:
ORIGINAL: lkruse
ir
You need a new slogan or a new field. Cox and Fox brand engines are both excellent if broken in according to instructions and maintained at least in an average manner.


I never had a real mechanical problem with a Cox engine. My only problem was getting the .15 hand started. It always started eventually, but sometimes it took a while.

Fox engines always started easily for me, but some of their engines had problems wearing out prematurely in the connecting wrist pin area if you didn't follow their fuel recommendations.


Ed Cregger
NM2K is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 09:58 AM
  #47
83scamp
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Columbia City, IN
Posts: 45
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines


Quote:
ORIGINAL: DISCUS54

I have had an occasional glow "lemon", but to say that a particular manufacturer is bad or good? There are some better than others...and that is subjective to the point of what one finds to best fill their needs(economy, longevity, performance, ect.). Sure hard to beat O.S. Engines if you are new to the hobby or don't run your engines much. Likewise, once you have gained a little experience and seek optimal performance there is every reason to seek out a YS engine among others. Perhaps economy is more important than performance...nothing wrong with Fox, but you will be spending a lot more time on the break in. Knowledge is key, otherwise you will have a frustrating experience. Be sure to read the directions...yes read ALL of the directions. If the manufacturer omitted critical information (like nitro content, correct plug) a site search here on RCU might yield some good info...but you have to read into the forums a bit. Going to the field and asking for help may work if you ask the right person. Many of the engines mentioned as Bad are only as Bad as the nummy working on it.

You absolutely hit this one on the head. In all my years of flying, I've seen all kinds of folks have issues tuning engines. Usually it's the nut turning the needle valve, not the engine itself. As I stated before, I have two old Royal .40's that were given to me because they were "junk". I took them home, cleaned them up, and have put hundreds of hours on both of them. I find they are just as powerful, and just as reliable as an O.S.

People these days want quick gratification. They don't want to take the time to learn anything. If it doesn't run out of the box, then it's junk. Just because an engine takes a little work to break in and tune, doesn't mean it's junk. It just requires a little more knowledge and patience.
83scamp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 10:16 AM
  #48
Hobbsy
 
Hobbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 17,428
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines

I refer to many modern folks as, "button pushin cowboys" if they can't accomplish it by pushing a button they're simply not interested.
Hobbsy is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 12:55 PM
  #49
MJD
 
MJD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,606
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines


Quote:
ORIGINAL: rcguy59

No ''bad grapes'' here. I just never realized how bad the Cox engines were until I got my mitts on some Norvels. Way back when, the Cox's were all we had. That DIDN'T make them good.
Which Coxes do you think are no good? Or is this a general opinion.

The Dragonfly never impressed me, nice idea but the tank/clunk system was a source of headaches. I flew mine a few times until I yanked off the plastic tank and clunk and replaced it with a spare 8cc regular tank, turning it into a Black Widow I guess.

The one Queen Bee .074 I messed with some years ago was a letdown. Not one of the stellar offerings.

But the mainstream stuff - Babe Bee, Pee Wee .020, TD .049, TD .010, Medallion .09, Golden Bee, Black Widow, hmm what else.. I've had a few of each over the years and still do, and never had any complaints about these except for problems that could usually be traced back to me.

I also think more bad advice has been handed out regards handling Cox engines than any other brand, and it still goes on.

TD's are peppy, but I never knew how much power an .049 could really put out until I first ran a VA, then later a Profi combat engine. Holy schlamoley.. what a difference. Difference in price tag too..


83scamp - Regards the nut behind the needle valve - I don't disagree one bit, I've run into dozens of situations like that where the poor engine couldn't really be blamed for anything. But I maintain there have been and still are some lemons on the market - even if the only problem is a reasonably well designed and built engine that suffers from inconsistent quality control, which IMHO is as serious a problem as an inherent design defect, and there is no excuse for it.

One thing I think I know for sure - you sure have to be able to read between the lines when soliciting opinions on engines.



MJD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 01:39 PM
  #50
MTK
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Whippany, NJ
Posts: 5,386
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: bad engines


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Hobbsy

I refer to many modern folks as, "button pushin cowboys" if they can't accomplish it by pushing a button they're simply not interested.
Instant gratification....goes along with so many other current trends in just about every aspect of current society. My political statement for the day.....

Last generation's modelerswere happy to get our paws onto any engine. We figured out how to make it work or simply didn't play because we couldn't. This generation's "button pushers" has so many options available they simply go to the next one.... Thinking ability has taken sabbatical it seems.
MTK is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:38 AM.