difference in prop types
01-19-2013, 06:47 PM
#1
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (12)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Yellow Springs,
OH
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
difference in prop types
not sure if this is the right forum to put this in but what is the difference between all the different types of wooden props. I have seen type a, c, d, and e. I was wanting to order a new prop for my os 70 4 stroke and wasnt sure the difference between all the props.
thanks
Jeff
thanks
Jeff
01-19-2013, 07:12 PM
#2
Senior Member
RE: difference in prop types
Not all props are created equal to put it simply. In general wide bladed props work best with 4 stroke engines while narrow blades work well with screaming 2 strokes. However it seems there are no hard rules, I prefer to grab a handful of props in the general size range and fly each one then decide.
01-20-2013, 07:43 AM
#5
Senior Member
RE: difference in prop types
Depending on the drag factor of the airframe the engine is to be used in, I prop about 700-1500 RPM less (static) than the maximum RPM of the engine.
If the engine is to be installed in a WW-I biplane start W/the smaller spec'ed props. If it's going into a P-51 Mustang, go W/the larger spec'ed props.
If the engine is to be installed in a WW-I biplane start W/the smaller spec'ed props. If it's going into a P-51 Mustang, go W/the larger spec'ed props.
01-20-2013, 09:05 AM
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Garland, TX
Posts: 6,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: difference in prop types
I like a 13x6 Master Airscrew K Series on my 70 four stroke. As already stated, try a few to see what you like.
edit
the K series is plastic, didn't read the original post very well
edit
the K series is plastic, didn't read the original post very well
01-22-2013, 08:42 AM
#7
Senior Member
RE: difference in prop types
Iuse 10,000 rpm as a limit for static rpms on any prop for mid sized 4S engines.
In other words I ground test any prop I am interested in trying and if it turns over 10,000 static it might over rev the engine and cause wear, stress on the engine.
I allow slightly higher rpm limits on smaller 4S engines.
In other words I ground test any prop I am interested in trying and if it turns over 10,000 static it might over rev the engine and cause wear, stress on the engine.
I allow slightly higher rpm limits on smaller 4S engines.
01-22-2013, 11:11 AM
#8
Senior Member
RE: difference in prop types
ORIGINAL: jeffie8696
I use 10,000 rpm as a limit for static rpms on any prop for mid sized 4S engines.
In other words I ground test any prop I am interested in trying and if it turns over 10,000 static it might over rev the engine and cause wear, stress on the engine.
I allow slightly higher rpm limits on smaller 4S engines.
I use 10,000 rpm as a limit for static rpms on any prop for mid sized 4S engines.
In other words I ground test any prop I am interested in trying and if it turns over 10,000 static it might over rev the engine and cause wear, stress on the engine.
I allow slightly higher rpm limits on smaller 4S engines.
My CDI fired Saito FA91S was spinning a 15 x 4 @ 10,300, a bit more than I liked.
I went to a 15 x 5 & the revs dropped to 9,700, a bit more cushion against overreving in the air.
01-22-2013, 04:11 PM
#9
RE: difference in prop types
ORIGINAL: SrTelemaster150
That's a good bench mark for medium sized 4-strokes.
My CDI fired Saito FA91S was spinning a 15 x 4 @ 10,300, a bit more than I liked.
I went to a 15 x 5 & the revs dropped to 9,700, a bit more cushion against overreving in the air.
ORIGINAL: jeffie8696
I use 10,000 rpm as a limit for static rpms on any prop for mid sized 4S engines.
In other words I ground test any prop I am interested in trying and if it turns over 10,000 static it might over rev the engine and cause wear, stress on the engine.
I allow slightly higher rpm limits on smaller 4S engines.
I use 10,000 rpm as a limit for static rpms on any prop for mid sized 4S engines.
In other words I ground test any prop I am interested in trying and if it turns over 10,000 static it might over rev the engine and cause wear, stress on the engine.
I allow slightly higher rpm limits on smaller 4S engines.
My CDI fired Saito FA91S was spinning a 15 x 4 @ 10,300, a bit more than I liked.
I went to a 15 x 5 & the revs dropped to 9,700, a bit more cushion against overreving in the air.
01-22-2013, 04:36 PM
#10
Senior Member
RE: difference in prop types
ORIGINAL: 1QwkSport2.5r
Whats the typical rev range for the average OS or Saito 4-stroke?
ORIGINAL: SrTelemaster150
That's a good bench mark for medium sized 4-strokes.
My CDI fired Saito FA91S was spinning a 15 x 4 @ 10,300, a bit more than I liked.
I went to a 15 x 5 & the revs dropped to 9,700, a bit more cushion against overreving in the air.
ORIGINAL: jeffie8696
I use 10,000 rpm as a limit for static rpms on any prop for mid sized 4S engines.
In other words I ground test any prop I am interested in trying and if it turns over 10,000 static it might over rev the engine and cause wear, stress on the engine.
I allow slightly higher rpm limits on smaller 4S engines.
I use 10,000 rpm as a limit for static rpms on any prop for mid sized 4S engines.
In other words I ground test any prop I am interested in trying and if it turns over 10,000 static it might over rev the engine and cause wear, stress on the engine.
I allow slightly higher rpm limits on smaller 4S engines.
My CDI fired Saito FA91S was spinning a 15 x 4 @ 10,300, a bit more than I liked.
I went to a 15 x 5 & the revs dropped to 9,700, a bit more cushion against overreving in the air.
Mine idles @ 1700 RPM W/CDI firing things off 11* BTDC @ idle.
Initial full advance timing setting is 35* BTDC.
