1990 OS FS120SP Supercharged 35522
#52
My Feedback: (66)
here is video of the little one racing. i am the guy in the red helmet later in the video not the guy in the first part with yellow plane. during the race the Shaw kid beat in the corners every time as I was flying to long but would catch him down the straight every time lol. cant beat the sound of YS engines on some nitro.
http://www.krcrtv.com/news/sports/re...erson/26612156
http://www.krcrtv.com/news/sports/re...erson/26612156
#54
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Back to this project..
Hello Gentleman!
After a hiatus I'm back to this project. I have made a few decisions regarding how I will be proceeding.
I will indeed run the engine. I will begin breaking it in soon, I look forward to building a test stand and sharing some video clips of the break in. Additionally I have decided that I will put the engine into a Hangar 9 Twist 150 ARF that I picked up last season. I like this choice as it will really show off the engine, the engine mounts upright in this airplane and doesn't have a cowl.
The recommended engine, a Saito 1.8 has a weight of 880g while the OS FS120SP is heavier at 1040g (actual weight on my scale) but with over 1200sq inch of wing area I doubt it will be an issue. The manual says the finish weight for the Twist 150 is between 8.5-10lbs.
So first step is to build a break in stand for the engine.
Thanks for reading and any advice or friendly comment are sure welcome!
Have a great day
After a hiatus I'm back to this project. I have made a few decisions regarding how I will be proceeding.
I will indeed run the engine. I will begin breaking it in soon, I look forward to building a test stand and sharing some video clips of the break in. Additionally I have decided that I will put the engine into a Hangar 9 Twist 150 ARF that I picked up last season. I like this choice as it will really show off the engine, the engine mounts upright in this airplane and doesn't have a cowl.
The recommended engine, a Saito 1.8 has a weight of 880g while the OS FS120SP is heavier at 1040g (actual weight on my scale) but with over 1200sq inch of wing area I doubt it will be an issue. The manual says the finish weight for the Twist 150 is between 8.5-10lbs.
So first step is to build a break in stand for the engine.
Thanks for reading and any advice or friendly comment are sure welcome!
Have a great day
#55
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Still getting ready for this
does anyone one know if the exhaust port threads are the same between the fs91 and the fs120? In other words would an exhaust pipe be interchangeable between the two engines?
does anyone one know if the exhaust port threads are the same between the fs91 and the fs120? In other words would an exhaust pipe be interchangeable between the two engines?
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Potomac,
IL
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tbobflow
No, they are very different. The SP has an unusual steel adapter with male threads on both sides. The threads in the head are much larger than the FS-91.
SandyT
No, they are very different. The SP has an unusual steel adapter with male threads on both sides. The threads in the head are much larger than the FS-91.
SandyT
#58
#60
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Update: I bought a second engine that had already been run so that I can keep my NIB one on the shelf. I set it up in my test stand today and checked it out. I run it with the muffler on it and man it was still loud.
I saw 11krpm with a 13x10 prop and 20% nitro fuel with 170F head temps and glow plug temps over 210F, 250F one time before I added fuel. It spit back once and kicked the prop nut loose, I think my glow plug is too hot, too much ignition timing maybe.
I need to pick up a few extra glow plugs, need to lookup what is prescribed for this.
I still need to work on the idle setting, it looks to have a idle air setting screw on the carb but I'm not sure if that's what I'm looking at or not.
I can tell that there is a lot of energy in this engine, the exhaust note is obviously from a boosted engine.
booston!
I saw 11krpm with a 13x10 prop and 20% nitro fuel with 170F head temps and glow plug temps over 210F, 250F one time before I added fuel. It spit back once and kicked the prop nut loose, I think my glow plug is too hot, too much ignition timing maybe.
I need to pick up a few extra glow plugs, need to lookup what is prescribed for this.
I still need to work on the idle setting, it looks to have a idle air setting screw on the carb but I'm not sure if that's what I'm looking at or not.
I can tell that there is a lot of energy in this engine, the exhaust note is obviously from a boosted engine.
booston!
#63
My Feedback: (11)
We used to run an APC 13.5 x 13.3 propeller on the FS-120SP engine, which was the recommended propeller at the time. The engine would turn around 10K or so with that prop, which was really good. We ran it with regular Omega 15% glow fuel and a #8 glow plug. That engine would usually need about 5 gallons' worth of running before it really came in and would develop its best power and handling.
#67
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting observation about the C14 carb and the advertised power output for the FS120SP. The carb opening is 0.213" diameter. Fully choked (i assumed choked condition at 5 bar differential) flow thru this diameter orifice at std temp and pressure at the inlet is 38cfm, or 2.66 lb/min flow rate of air. This is exactly how much air is required to make 2.5hp, which happens to be the official power rating for the engine.
The engine is completely carb limited to its advertised power level. I have a feeling that the motor will easily make 2x the power if it were not carb flow limited like this. Of course thats not really considering the strength of the parts or at what point parts of the engine simply break.
The engine is completely carb limited to its advertised power level. I have a feeling that the motor will easily make 2x the power if it were not carb flow limited like this. Of course thats not really considering the strength of the parts or at what point parts of the engine simply break.
Last edited by Tbobflow; 05-19-2016 at 01:31 PM. Reason: clarification of conditions
#70
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Bax, I agree that extending the rpm would be a bad idea. The valve springs don't look up to the job and I'm already suspect they are floating at 11krpm. It would be perfect if I could electronically limit rpm with the ignition. Looking into that. Anybody seen a rev limit module that work with the rcexl CDI?