replacing piston & sleevenew sleeve is really tight
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Las Vegas,
NV
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
replacing piston & sleevenew sleeve is really tight
Hello. I'm replacing the sleeve in my o.s. max .77 vrm. The sleeve is really tight. going in. are there any tips out there to make it easier. I had to heat the block in order to remove the old sleeve. Should I do the same to install the new one? Thanks
#2
Make sure you cleaned all the gunk out of the crankcase that was holding the old liner in before. Oil gets between the liner and crankcase that varnishes a bit and if not cleaned out makes it hard to get the new liner back in. Clean clean clean and the liner should slide in with a light interference fit. You *may* need to heat the case to get the liner in, but you shouldn't have to IMO.
Last edited by 1QwkSport2.5r; 06-04-2015 at 03:26 PM. Reason: Changed wording.
#3
My Feedback: (3)
The heat gun should be enough to heat up the crankcase enough to get the sleeve to drop in. You could drop the sleeve in a bowl of ice for a few minutes too.
The parts will have this fit problem from engine to engine unless they are handpicked and hand fitted. Hand fitting was the major expense of the OS Hanno high performance engine made many years ago.
I'm not saying OS does this, but one of the moderators wife worked around an assembly line and she said the parts that had problems were tossed into boxes to be sold as spare parts. Something to think about........
The parts will have this fit problem from engine to engine unless they are handpicked and hand fitted. Hand fitting was the major expense of the OS Hanno high performance engine made many years ago.
I'm not saying OS does this, but one of the moderators wife worked around an assembly line and she said the parts that had problems were tossed into boxes to be sold as spare parts. Something to think about........
Last edited by blw; 05-25-2015 at 09:08 AM.
#4
If you can get the liner started in the hole, a bit of lapping in a figure eight pattern may get you the right clearance. Even without lapping compound. If you know about a thorough cleaning afterwords and between checking the fits you should have no probs. Sometimes it will stick if you push in too hard and it can ruin your day. Sometimes there is a burr on the outside of the ports that hangs up, which can be carefully filed off too. You will notice this if the liner goes in nicely, and stops half way.
#6
My Feedback: (11)
It's not unusual for the crankcase/liner fit to be a bit tight on some of the high-performance engines. We've found that mild heating of the case will allow the liner to slide right in. Some engines had a tight-enough fit that you could never remove or replace the liner without heating the case. When the liner is in place and everything's at room temperature, you'll be fine. The main thing is how the engine runs. With an engine like the O.S. Max .77 VR-M, you'll want to run it just rich of peak RPM. Use a good fuel with no less than 18% oil content and at least 50% of the oil being castor, and you'll do well. Run the engine too rich, and it will never come in. ABC-type engines need lubrication and need to be run lean of the "2-4 break". Lean to just rich of peak RPM as soon as the engine will accept the needle.
#9
In reality, you shouldn't need heat to install a liner if the crankcase is clean. If the liner doesn't slide in, something is wrong. A true high performance engine (like Jett for example) has a slip fit of the liner. I should say; I've never had to beat a crankcase to install a liner provided the crankcase was cleaned of all old oil and varnish deposits.
Last edited by 1QwkSport2.5r; 06-04-2015 at 03:28 PM. Reason: Edited content.
#10
My Feedback: (3)
Tim, parts fit on an OS is a different animal than a Jett! I agree with what you said about any Jett, but not OS, Saito, etc. The hand fitting parts just for the Hanno racing engines at OS is a good example of how this is true. Cutting on Monday may be a little off from cutting parts on Friday.
In hindsight, maybe I would want a tighter fit when it comes to liners.They have to be real snug everywhere to transfer heat. I wish I knew where my picture is that the late Pe Rievers took of a gas engine liner that had been run too hot. The heat colorations showed the heat patterns well. It is very interesting what gets hot and where. I'll try and dig up that old pic that is on some computer around here.
In hindsight, maybe I would want a tighter fit when it comes to liners.They have to be real snug everywhere to transfer heat. I wish I knew where my picture is that the late Pe Rievers took of a gas engine liner that had been run too hot. The heat colorations showed the heat patterns well. It is very interesting what gets hot and where. I'll try and dig up that old pic that is on some computer around here.
Last edited by blw; 05-30-2015 at 07:54 AM.
#11
Tim, parts fit on an OS is a different animal than a Jett! I agree with what you said about any Jett, but not OS, Saito, etc. The hand fitting parts just for the Hanno racing engines at OS is a good example of how this is true. Cutting on Monday may be a little off from cutting parts on Friday.
In hindsight, maybe I would want a tighter fit when it comes to liners.They have to be real snug everywhere to transfer heat. I wish I knew where my picture is that the late Pe Rievers took of a gas engine liner that had been run too hot. The heat colorations showed the heat patterns well. It is very interesting what gets hot and where. I'll try and dig up that old pic that is on some computer around here.
In hindsight, maybe I would want a tighter fit when it comes to liners.They have to be real snug everywhere to transfer heat. I wish I knew where my picture is that the late Pe Rievers took of a gas engine liner that had been run too hot. The heat colorations showed the heat patterns well. It is very interesting what gets hot and where. I'll try and dig up that old pic that is on some computer around here.
I don't think it's realistic to compare an air cooled gasoline engine to a water cooler marine engine. Two completely different operating environments with two completely different operating temperatures. Apples and oranges there.
Last edited by 1QwkSport2.5r; 06-04-2015 at 03:33 PM. Reason: Rephrased post.
#12
My Feedback: (3)
Tim, you are getting off into some areas I have no idea what you are talking about- marine engines??? You need to read Clarence Lee's examination and explanation of the Hanno engines. Interesting stuff about hand fitted engines vs assembly line engines. And, people who work on assembly lines will say the same things.
Look- I'm talking about new engines. Never run. Now, if we were talking about engines already run, broken in, run hard, etc like you suddenly brought up just now then I agree with you. it should be a slip fit. I don't know about crankcase distortion since we were talking about liners. I would agree with cylinder head distortion, or a bad case of unequal heating on the liner.
The path of this debate could lead someone to think parts fit is the only advantage Jett has for high performance, which isn't so.
Look- I'm talking about new engines. Never run. Now, if we were talking about engines already run, broken in, run hard, etc like you suddenly brought up just now then I agree with you. it should be a slip fit. I don't know about crankcase distortion since we were talking about liners. I would agree with cylinder head distortion, or a bad case of unequal heating on the liner.
The path of this debate could lead someone to think parts fit is the only advantage Jett has for high performance, which isn't so.
#13
Tim, you are getting off into some areas I have no idea what you are talking about- marine engines??? You need to read Clarence Lee's examination and explanation of the Hanno engines. Interesting stuff about hand fitted engines vs assembly line engines. And, people who work on assembly lines will say the same things.
Look- I'm talking about new engines. Never run. Now, if we were talking about engines already run, broken in, run hard, etc like you suddenly brought up just now then I agree with you. it should be a slip fit. I don't know about crankcase distortion since we were talking about liners. I would agree with cylinder head distortion, or a bad case of unequal heating on the liner.
The path of this debate could lead someone to think parts fit is the only advantage Jett has for high performance, which isn't so.
Look- I'm talking about new engines. Never run. Now, if we were talking about engines already run, broken in, run hard, etc like you suddenly brought up just now then I agree with you. it should be a slip fit. I don't know about crankcase distortion since we were talking about liners. I would agree with cylinder head distortion, or a bad case of unequal heating on the liner.
The path of this debate could lead someone to think parts fit is the only advantage Jett has for high performance, which isn't so.
Make sense now? If I am off base, let me know.
#16
My Feedback: (20)
Not trying to be a jerk. Just want the right (or as right as an inept person like myself can muster) info getting to the OP in the hope he gets his engine assembled and running properly. Then again, some think I should put my engines away until I master assembly/reassembly. I guess take it at face value.
I was incredibly wrong for bringing up anything Jett related in an OS thread. The quality difference between OS and Jett is staggering.
I was incredibly wrong for bringing up anything Jett related in an OS thread. The quality difference between OS and Jett is staggering.
Last edited by Broken Wings; 05-31-2015 at 03:52 AM.
#17
#18
My Feedback: (20)
Buy and fly what you want. I do.
#20
Well, you can buy parts if you need them....some engine manufacturers are thriving. Others have been forced out of the market by manufacturers that make better products. Fox comes to mind. Gas/Glow it didn't matter, no one was buying it. No one is buying the spew that continues to dribble out of the mouths of the banned...
Buy and fly what you want. I do.
Buy and fly what you want. I do.
#22
#24