Community
Search
Notices
Glow Engines Discuss RC glow engines

OS 91 vs. OS 91 Pump

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-13-2002, 12:36 AM
  #1  
ghost-RCU
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (10)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: STEPHENS CITY, VA
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default OS 91 vs. OS 91 Pump

I plan on putting one of these engines inverted in GP's new U -CAN DO 3D. Is the pumped version worth the extra money?. Which is the better engine?. Thanks
Old 08-13-2002, 04:37 PM
  #2  
outssider
Senior Member
My Feedback: (23)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location:
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default OS 91 vs. OS 91 Pump

try saito 100.....lighter... runs as good or better and puts out about 300-400 more rpm
Old 08-13-2002, 04:39 PM
  #3  
jimcork1
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default OS 91 vs. OS 91 Pump

I am gunshy about the OS pump after having a 1.2 II and having it go out.. Parts were hard to get.. Ran great when it worked,, but....................Go saito..1.0 or 1.2
Old 08-13-2002, 06:08 PM
  #4  
ilikeplanes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, OR,
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default OS 91 vs. OS 91 Pump

I need an engine for a Hog Bipe. I was seriously thinking about the Saito 100 but I believe they are terrible fuel hogs. There are a dozen guys in my club with OS 91's. Every one of them runs perfectly and sips fuel. They may be down on power compared to the Saito, but I feel it's a more useful engine for general flying. I'm going with the OS.

BTW, my Saito 72 is also a fuel hog. It runs great but just doesn't give me that "this is a cool engine" feeling. On the other hand, every time I hear one of those pleasant mannered OS 91's fly past, I think "this is a very cool motor". Starts easily, carburates perfectly in every range, and sips fuel. So what if it doesn't get that last 300 rpm. In the whole scope of my flying day, it just doesn't matter.
Old 08-13-2002, 06:19 PM
  #5  
ShempHoward
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default OS 91 vs. OS 91 Pump

Both OS 91 Surpass engines have the same power output with the difference being the pumped version allows you to place the tank on the CG which I think would be ideal for the plane you are consdering. The OS 120 MKII did have some issues but all the OS pumped engines since then run flawlessly and have much simpler pump designs. If you are monting it inverted and want the tank on the CG to avoid trim changes during flight then the answer is the 91 Surpass Pumped version.
Old 08-14-2002, 09:23 AM
  #6  
tinman
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: columbia, TN
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default o.s.

my o.s.120 surpass3 is a pain to get started...ya have to crank it forever it seems. when it does finally start it runs fine though. i have about 12 flights on it now. i will gladly trade it for a ys91fz if any1 is interested. -Tinman-

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.