Glow Engines Discuss RC glow engines

Welcome to Club SAITO !

Reply

Old 11-27-2018, 08:27 PM
  #38076  
Hyjinx
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 57
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by the Wasp View Post
Super cool!
Low fly bys against the city skyline. Super cool!
Hyjinx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2018, 04:29 AM
  #38077  
kgwoodring@comcast.net
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 9
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default Saito FG-11 Gas Four Stroke

Greetings. I am getting ready to purchase this engine to install in a Tower Super Kaos 60 in order to practice pattern. Does anyone of have any experience with this engine. I have not owned a four stroke or gas r/c engine previously.
I have read many of the posts...appears that I will enjoy the Saito brand. I know I want a four stroke for this plane, just not sure about gas versus glow as well as the size. Thanks in advance!
kgw
kgwoodring@comcast.net is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2018, 04:35 AM
  #38078  
Hobbsy
My Feedback: (101)
 
Hobbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 18,788
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

I have that engine, it is a slightly stretched Saito 62 making it a 66, it starts easily, runs smoothly, idles slowly. Here is your gasoline to oil ratio: I have to write it out, it won't copy and paste correctly.

20 to 1 ratio===6.4 oz. oil to one gallon or 128 oz of gasoline.

Last edited by Hobbsy; 11-29-2018 at 04:43 AM.
Hobbsy is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2018, 12:15 PM
  #38079  
the Wasp
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: VT
Posts: 3,244
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by kgwoodring@comcast.net View Post
Greetings. I am getting ready to purchase this engine to install in a Tower Super Kaos 60 in order to practice pattern. Does anyone of have any experience with this engine. I have not owned a four stroke or gas r/c engine previously.
I have read many of the posts...appears that I will enjoy the Saito brand. I know I want a four stroke for this plane, just not sure about gas versus glow as well as the size. Thanks in advance!
kgw
it's nice to see you here on the Saito page !

but before I answer your questions first things first, and I think most Saito owners would agree with me here> you should buy 2 Saitos, ,,, even if the 2nd one is used, you should buy 2 Saitos LOL

as for your question,
A) brake it in on the bench for at-least 1/2 gallon, better yet 1 full gallon,
B) I would run it richer than you would for a glow 2 stroke, for 2 reasons,
1) because gas burns hotter than alcohol,
2) because a 4 stroke's Head can run hotter than a 2 stroke's.

welcome to Club Saito !

Jim
the Wasp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2018, 01:08 PM
  #38080  
Hobbsy
My Feedback: (101)
 
Hobbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 18,788
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Jim, if he breaks it in for a gallon it will take him a year although he'll get to enjoy the joyful Saito sound for a year and it's the season for joyful sounds, Double good advice.
Hobbsy is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2018, 03:28 PM
  #38081  
triumphman49
My Feedback: (149)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 425
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Hi, was just wondering if the FG11 would be enuf for the 60 sz KAOS? Maybe a FG14? 60sz usually would want a larger 4-stroke and gas is a little less efficient than NITRO . Just wondering what ya'll thought.
triumphman49 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2018, 03:45 PM
  #38082  
JimO
My Feedback: (7)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 780
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

I would you with the 14. The would not have enough power to really pull the Kaos. Bigger is better and you can always throttle back.
JimO is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2018, 09:30 PM
  #38083  
the Wasp
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: VT
Posts: 3,244
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by Hobbsy View Post
Jim, if he breaks it in for a gallon it will take him a year although he'll get to enjoy the joyful Saito sound for a year and it's the season for joyful sounds, Double good advice.
LOL Dave, I didn't think about that LOL

Jim
the Wasp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2018, 09:46 PM
  #38084  
the Wasp
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: VT
Posts: 3,244
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by triumphman49 View Post
Hi, was just wondering if the FG11 would be enuf for the 60 sz KAOS? Maybe a FG14? 60sz usually would want a larger 4-stroke and gas is a little less efficient than NITRO . Just wondering what ya'll thought.
I agree with JimO, the FG11 will fly it, but it's a 60 size plane, and usually a plane that calls for a 60 size 2 stroke calls for a larger 4 stroke, and remember you will have to pull around the ignition and extra battery and extra on/off switch, so I would buy the FG14c (82), it's only $30 more than the FG11, I think you will get more for the money too

Jim
the Wasp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2018, 12:19 AM
  #38085  
Rudolph Hart
 
Rudolph Hart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 4,152
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by kgwoodring@comcast.net View Post
Greetings. I am getting ready to purchase this engine to install in a Tower Super Kaos 60 in order to practice pattern. Does anyone of have any experience with this engine. I have not owned a four stroke or gas r/c engine previously.
I have read many of the posts...appears that I will enjoy the Saito brand. I know I want a four stroke for this plane, just not sure about gas versus glow as well as the size. Thanks in advance!
kgw
KG as a guide gas saito fourstrokes make about 25% less peak power than their same size nitro brothers do,so a 60 size two stroke kit needs an fa91 or fa100 i use an fa115 on my 60 size midget mustang.Factory needle settings are very close so unless you want to run the engine in with a bigger than benchmark recommended prop i'd leave them alone for now until you start flying it.Gas engines have very fine fuel screen filters in them and it causes long term tuning problems which can be frustrating because they quickly begin to clog up the filter screens if you don't religiously strain your fuel properly.Buy a brand new plastic fuel container and a big packet of coffee filters from the supermarket.Pour 500ml of fresh pump gasoline through the coffee filter if you can and you'll see what i mean.

Most saito's,but not all seem to settle down for max rpm after a gallon or two,as dave said you could go on a long holiday,come back,and it's still running.

ps saito says hello (woof woof) to those fortunate souls who are fa125less
Rudolph Hart is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2018, 03:34 AM
  #38086  
Hobbsy
My Feedback: (101)
 
Hobbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 18,788
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

I am not so pessimistic about the four stroke power, with a well matched prop the four strokes have just about the same Flying Power. The exaggerated paper two stroke power doesn't provide much more of that.
Hobbsy is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2018, 04:59 AM
  #38087  
Jesse Open
 
Jesse Open's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Just North of Canadian border
Posts: 851
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

The gasoline fuel also makes a bit less power than methanol. IIRC, the gasoline version also sports a reduced compression ratio.
The FG-14 would be my choice, but then again ,I would convert it to run methanol instead of gasoline.
Jesse Open is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2018, 02:48 PM
  #38088  
triumphman49
My Feedback: (149)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 425
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Are you suggesting a FA82 with maybe a CH ignition set up . . . or would you prefer the FG pumped carb ? (glow fuel w\spark plug to run less oil, better idle, and increased top end). With spark ign, some do run stock carb for glow or gas fuel.
triumphman49 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 03:47 AM
  #38089  
Rudolph Hart
 
Rudolph Hart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 4,152
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by Hobbsy View Post
I am not so pessimistic about the four stroke power, with a well matched prop the four strokes have just about the same Flying Power. The exaggerated paper two stroke power doesn't provide much more of that.
Dave pessimistic is one of those big words like wheelbarrow,marmalade and rhubarb,i agree with what you are saying re flying power for saito fourstrokes in the air you can see the difference in initial acceleration of the plane.Similar size two stroke power delivery in the air seems quite soft by comparison tho they go like a bat out of hell when you get em wound up.

ps aaagh...ch ignitions and methanol,i can feel a severe case of sr telemaster coming.I hope he's finished his mauser 7x57mm
Rudolph Hart is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 04:07 AM
  #38090  
Hobbsy
My Feedback: (101)
 
Hobbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 18,788
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Some modern day two strokes come with larger prop recommendations, but folks still resist those recommendations.
Hobbsy is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 10:49 AM
  #38091  
Hyjinx
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 57
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by rudolph hart View Post
dave pessimistic is one of those big words like wheelbarrow,marmalade and rhubarb,i agree with what you are saying re flying power for saito fourstrokes in the air you can see the difference in initial acceleration of the plane.similar size two stroke power delivery in the air seems quite soft by comparison tho they go like a bat out of hell when you get em wound up.

Ps aaagh...ch ignitions and methanol,i can feel a severe case of sr telemaster coming.i hope he's finished his mauser 7x57mm
🤗🤗🤗👍👍👍👍👍👍😁😁😁😁;
Hyjinx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 10:50 AM
  #38092  
Hyjinx
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 57
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by Hyjinx View Post
🤗🤗🤗👍👍👍👍👍👍😁😁😁😁;
Best quote ever
Gotta love this stuff!!!!!!
Hyjinx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 12:08 PM
  #38093  
Hobbsy
My Feedback: (101)
 
Hobbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 18,788
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by Hyjinx View Post
Best quote ever
Gotta love this stuff!!!!!!
Jinx, I was very clear in what I said, now, what did you say?
Hobbsy is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 01:57 PM
  #38094  
the Wasp
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: VT
Posts: 3,244
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

hey Dave, I have that Saito 82 (and thank you and Captain again for that),, and you know what else I have, well I have a brand spanking new RcX ignition that came with my Z G20 that I was going to use in my heli,,

any hoo, in my link is a plane (kit) I have been wanting, I would like to round all wings and change the tail to make it look like a early 30s plane,, the 82 would with the ignition would be cool in it..

photo,,
Click image for larger version

Name:	Old-School-Models-Sky-Ranger-40-Kit107799-9302_th.jpg
Views:	11
Size:	17.2 KB
ID:	2262824


once in this link scroll down to see photos of the plane,,
https://www.radicalrc.com/category/Kits-145

Jim
the Wasp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 03:15 PM
  #38095  
Hyjinx
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 57
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by Hobbsy View Post
Jinx, I was very clear in what I said, now, what did you say?
Your P ess.
Smartist, pragmatic, positive, humorous, spot on comment I have seen on a forum.
I smiled ear to ear as I read it.
And had to agree laughingly whole heartedly👍

Gas to glow to glow to gas and repeat. Forever.😁
Hyjinx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 05:08 PM
  #38096  
Hobbsy
My Feedback: (101)
 
Hobbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 18,788
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default



BTE Venture 60
I see, I think.

That looks pretty cool Jim, I had a Saito 72 on a BTE Venture 60 a very similar sized plane. It flew like it was on rails.

Last edited by Hobbsy; 12-01-2018 at 05:11 PM. Reason: Add picture
Hobbsy is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 05:20 PM
  #38097  
Hobbsy
My Feedback: (101)
 
Hobbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 18,788
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by Rudolph Hart View Post
Dave pessimistic is one of those big words like wheelbarrow,marmalade and rhubarb,i agree with what you are saying re flying power for saito fourstrokes in the air you can see the difference in initial acceleration of the plane.Similar size two stroke power delivery in the air seems quite soft by comparison tho they go like a bat out of hell when you get em wound up.

ps aaagh...ch ignitions and methanol,i can feel a severe case of sr telemaster coming.I hope he's finished his mauser 7x57mm

It would be nice if Dan still hung out here, he has a lot of good numbers and info on the glow to ignition/glow subject. It's appreciated by most.
Hobbsy is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 10:29 PM
  #38098  
the Wasp
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: VT
Posts: 3,244
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Dave, I like the plane, but I didn't realize how lite that plane is, the 82 with battery, and ignition is too heavy

Jim
the Saito engine, the better chance
the Wasp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2018, 04:18 AM
  #38099  
Rudolph Hart
 
Rudolph Hart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 4,152
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by Hobbsy View Post
It would be nice if Dan still hung out here, he has a lot of good numbers and info on the glow to ignition/glow subject. It's appreciated by most.
Not me dave dang it! good numbers or no it's like going back to church and sitting through a whole hour of fire and brimstone preaching...
Rudolph Hart is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2018, 04:20 AM
  #38100  
Hobbsy
My Feedback: (101)
 
Hobbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 18,788
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Here is an interesting option since that plane is very Stick like. With the Eureka kit you need to choose and buy most of your own hardware and get the plans printed some where.. The 82 would be perfect on it though.

Ugly Stick 60
Hobbsy is online now  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service