Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Results 1 to 12 of 12

  1. #1
    Ernie Misner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Tacoma, WA
    Posts
    5,001
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    G90 and mousse can test today... WOW

    I finally got to the G90 with mousse can test today and it blew me away. I used the same 3 props that I used the other day and with the 14x4W APC, gained 700 rpm, and with the 13x6 APC gained 800 rpm. In the previous test the muffler had the baffle removed.

    The biggest difference with the mousse can today is the WAY it ran. The throttle response is really fast and clean. It may still have been barely rich in the midrange with the mousse can, but when going from 1/2 throttle to full, it was right now with no hesitation or having to clean itself out like with the stock muffler. I was amazed and had a big smile on my face. Looks like it would work just fine for 3D to me. Next week I will get it in the air and we'll see.

    The first runs were with the Mac's header at the full 9" length. I cut 1" off and tried it again. There was a slight increase in rpms with the two smaller props, about 300. I was tempted to keep shortening the header and testing, but it ran so good that I just left it at 8". At this length it is ALWAYS on the pipe with instantaneous throttle response, almost like my little Webra. It became obvious that the stock muffler (with baffle removed) is a very, very short tuned pipe of sorts. At WOT it ran good but was pretty sick at the lower rpms compared to the header and mousse can. With the can, the needle had a nice broad range, not touchy at all which felt different. Anyway, here's the figures with stock muffler and then with the mousse can. The can is a little larger than 46 size, about 2" by 7".

    13x6 MA 12.600 ......... with mousse can 13,400
    14x4 W APC 12,000 ........ with mousse can 12.700
    15x4 W APC 10,600 ........ with mousse can 11,000

    Ernie
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Sq47449.jpg 
Views:	1 
Size:	54.1 KB 
ID:	466200  

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Pinon Hills, CA
    Posts
    13,772
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: G90 and mousse can test today... WOW

    Ernie....

    ....what is the diameter of the outlet you soldered onto the mouse can, compared
    to the stock outlet on the original pipe ?

    Dave.
    An engineer says.... "That will not work".
    A mechanic says..."Oh yeah, watch this".
    Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill.
    Revver Bro #4.

  3. #3
    rainedave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Greensboro, NC
    Posts
    6,320
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: G90 and mousse can test today... WOW

    That's impressive. Is it much quiter than the stock muffler? Also, is that a Tower engine with a Super Tigre carb in the background?

  4. #4
    Ernie Misner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Tacoma, WA
    Posts
    5,001
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: G90 and mousse can test today... WOW

    Dave, the outlet on the stock G90 is a loose 5/16" and the outlet on the Tower muffler I have here is a tight 5/16". The hole in the stinger I soldered into the can is 21/64" which is one drill size up from the 5/16".

    At one time the mousse can came loose and blew off leaving just the header pipe. The rpms dropped by a couple hundred. Boy was it loud.

    Raine, it is quieter with the mousse can than the stock (baffle removed) muffler. There's a lot more volume inside of the header and can, so the crackle is a lot softer, not as raspy or harsh. Our field is noise sensitive (ask Dave when he was here last summer) and I think it will be fine.

    Yes, good eye. That Tower engine in the background has the ST carb on it and the G90 has the Tower carb on it at the moment. They have the same mount and ventui size and seem to give the same results. With the stock muffler I thought the Tower carb might have been a little less rich in the midrange, but with the mousse can it's a moot point, they're both good.

    Ernie

  5. #5
    Not24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Gloucester, VA
    Posts
    999
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: G90 and mousse can test today... WOW

    Your test makes me think that perhaps the stock muffler is still too restrictive. Are the outlets on both mufflers the same size? If it's a plain exhaust tuning issue, you're making me want to try that on the 2300. I can't find a header for it anywhere, so I may have to make one.

    Duh, just reread the post explaining exit size. My bad. I'd like to see an 800 rpm gain. That would be sweet!
    Fly it till you break it!

  6. #6
    Ernie Misner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Tacoma, WA
    Posts
    5,001
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: G90 and mousse can test today... WOW

    Not 24, it is not necessarily the amount of restriction, but it is the tuned length from exhaust port to the end of the can or muffler. As the exhaust charge enters the expansion chamber it will suck the remainder of the exhaust gasses out of the engine, and as the charge hits the back of the can or muffler it will send a high pressure wave back to the (still open) exhaust port that will tend to block the loss of the fresh charge of fuel that has entered the combustion chamber. The length of the system will tune it to a frequency or harmonic that controls the timing of when these things occur. In a system that is way too long or short (especially) the timing of these return waves are off and not in sync with what the engine and exhaust port is doing. I've probably slaughtered the engineering badly here. Maybe Dar or someone can explain it better.

    Ernie

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Auckland, NEW ZEALAND
    Posts
    1,324
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: G90 and mousse can test today... WOW

    Ernie,

    Nice piece of testing. Thanks for documenting the results for us.

    It looks like you may have isolated one of the causes of the ST rich midrange issue.

    They look like pretty competitive figures for a .90 two-stroke. Do you have an APC 12x8 handy? It would be interesting to see what she pulls with that prop. For comparison, my Jett .90L peaks at 13,200.

  8. #8
    Ernie Misner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Tacoma, WA
    Posts
    5,001
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: G90 and mousse can test today... WOW

    I have the test setup torn down for now and I'm actually getting ready to get it in the air next week on an Ultra Stick 60 that will be easy to mount the can onto. With the engine mounted horizontally, the pipe and can will come down inside of the gear.

    Not likely that a ST will outpull your Jett. I'll take a look at my props for next time though. Yes, the carb(s)? still probably go a bit rich in the midrange. I wonder why they don't give is 3 needles like on the helis?

    Ernie

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    The Great Midwest
    Posts
    162
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: G90 and mousse can test today... WOW

    That was some great reading Earnie, good job!
    I love to read posts like this.
    Dr Nitro

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Weatherford, TX
    Posts
    1,275
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: G90 and mousse can test today... WOW


    ORIGINAL: Dr Nitro

    That was some great reading Earnie, good job!
    I love to read posts like this.
    Amen!

    Cheers,

    Chip

  11. #11
    bob27s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    5,556
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: G90 and mousse can test today... WOW

    Nice report Ernie.... and some good results too.

    The ST90 with the Jett-Stream muffler performs similar. Keeping in that 11K to 13K rpm band is a good approach. So it looks like you are in about the right ball park. As you have seen, with a good exhaust system with good pressure balance, the engine does everything very well.

    What you might want to do, when time permits, is see how the engine runs with a 15x6. I've found the torque curve slide is pretty respectable. Dont change the length of the system. Just add prop until it doesn't run right or show any gain. You can probably get good results pulling down closer to 10K rpm.

    Keep in mind, it may seem like just a little at 200-700 rpm gain, but at those prop sizes, those increases corresponds to a large increase in HP.

    Bob
    Bob Brassell
    Jett Engineering - Engine Mfg Support Forum Host
    rjbrassell@gmail.com or bob27s@hotmail.com
    RB-78

  12. #12
    m.gramling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Atoka, TN
    Posts
    1,788
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: G90 and mousse can test today... WOW

    I build a moosecan for Paul Swanson, he's here on RCU, and the www.the******************.com a few years ago for his ST G.90, I used a 2"x10" can. I don't remember what the stinger O.D. was. But it made his throttle response perfect. I think it picked up his RPM by around 900-1000RPM
    Everybody wants to go to heaven, but nobody wants to die...


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:54 AM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.