Community
Search
Notices
Glow Engines Discuss RC glow engines

LA 65 Gurus!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2010, 07:44 PM
  #1  
on pipe
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
on pipe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LA 65 Gurus!

I bought a 65LA for a bi-plane I have. It has a 72" top- 63" bottom wing, and weighs 8 1/2 lbs. with the engine (19 0z.). Is the 65 big enough or do I need to go to a 90 size? If the OS is ok, what prop should i use? I don't want to go fast with it, it's a scratch built floater. (I don't know if I trust my building capabilities[&o]- too much speed may cause parts to fly off!)[X(] Thanks, Ross
Old 02-14-2010, 07:54 PM
  #2  
estradajae
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: MedellinAntioquia, COLOMBIA
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: LA 65 Gurus!

It sounds pretty big to me for that engine. the LA is not a very powerful engine.

Any more info about the plane, pictures?

Buit as I said, it sounds very big, and it is even a biplane, so you may need certainly a bigger engine. Weight may be o.k but biplanes are pretty draggy.

your engine should be capable of turning a 12x6 to 13x6 props. In the case that your engine would fly your plane, I would use a 13x5 or 13x6 prop.


Jorge
Old 02-14-2010, 08:33 PM
  #3  
on pipe
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
on pipe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: LA 65 Gurus!

Pictures...
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Eb87097.jpg
Views:	18
Size:	120.2 KB
ID:	1379087   Click image for larger version

Name:	Lh18388.jpg
Views:	15
Size:	112.2 KB
ID:	1379088   Click image for larger version

Name:	Fk17423.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	104.8 KB
ID:	1379089  
Old 02-14-2010, 08:59 PM
  #4  
wcmorrison
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Weatherford, TX
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: LA 65 Gurus!

You are going to have problems with fuel feed, the engine is too high. The engine needs to be lowered or a perry pump added. Or you need a pumped engine (quite a bit more expensive than a OS LA 65). Those wheels look like the weigh a ton, really don't look like any of the wheels I see around the field. Is the plane balanced?

I think you need a club member or an flight instructor look your plane over. Let him check out your weight and balance, control set up, engine mounting, etc.. I would hate to see your investment crash on the first flight. They can help you get it correct.

BTW, flying is not a first time experience. It takes awhile to learn.

Cheers,

Chip
Old 02-14-2010, 09:09 PM
  #5  
d_bodary
My Feedback: (85)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: trenton, MI
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: LA 65 Gurus!

It'll fly, actually the 65LA is a decent powered engine.
Old 02-14-2010, 10:56 PM
  #6  
rcdude7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (264)
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Great Mills, MD
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: LA 65 Gurus!


ORIGINAL: d_bodary

It'll fly, actually the 65LA is a decent powered engine.
One of the magazines published a test where the 65LA out performed the 61FX.
Old 02-15-2010, 08:42 AM
  #7  
Hobbsy
My Feedback: (102)
 
Hobbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 20,370
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 25 Posts
Default RE: LA 65 Gurus!

Yes indeed, it bested some very good engines in that test, the Fox .60 bested all the engines in that test. I have an LA .65 and it is totally reliable too.
Old 02-15-2010, 12:24 PM
  #8  
buzzard bait
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default RE: LA 65 Gurus!

Now THAT is something different! Your own design? Is that slender rear fuse going to hold everything together with no twisting? Not criticizing, just asking.

If those wheels ARE heavy, and they do look it, replace them with foam model wheels.

Mount the .65 LA at 90 degrees, i.e., cylinder in 9 o'clock position looking at it from the front, because I agree that fuel draw will be a problem otherwise.

Not sure about the prop, but I think I'd try a 13x4 because I think with all that wing it will fly pretty slow, and big diameter/low pitch will give you the best low end thrust.

Let us know how this works out!

Jim
Old 02-15-2010, 12:49 PM
  #9  
jaka
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Upplands Vasby, SWEDEN
Posts: 7,816
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default RE: LA 65 Gurus!

Hi Pipe!
The OS LA .65 engine can cope with large props. Try 13x5, 13x6 or 14x4W, all APC .

I think you need to look over the plane before you try to fly it!
The engine now sits to high and the lower wing cannot be secured the way it is according to the photos. The rubber bands (at least six ) must sit under the lower wing, not be fastened by hooks...The upper wing struts also need some modifications as they look too weak.
Take contact with a club and get help before you try to fly the plane, there might be some other things that doesn't show in the pictures that need slight modification.
Old 02-15-2010, 07:33 PM
  #10  
on pipe
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
on pipe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: LA 65 Gurus!

Thanks for all the replies... I do need to center the engine on the firewall, I just stuck the engine on with one screw to weigh the plane and check cg. This plane has already flown a few times with a Supertigre 90, but it seemed a little overkill. I want something that vibrates less also. I will give the 65 a try... Ross

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.