Aristo Craft Curtiss Goshawk F-11C-2
#1
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (16)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Iowa Park,
TX
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aristo Craft Curtiss Goshawk F-11C-2
Hi, I just purchased an Aristo Craft Curtiss Goshawk F-11C-2. It is the control line version. I want to convert to RC. I was wondering if anyone had plans and instructions for the RC version they could copy and send. Wondering how different they are from the C/ L version. Thanks.
#4
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (16)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Iowa Park,
TX
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes it would. I have been thinking about it and I do have experience and a few ideas for the build. I was just hoping someone may have done it and would share their ideas/ experience. I was also curious of the changes from the U-control kit and RC version.
#5
But I don't mean to say that the kit is a waste of time. The balsa quality is quite good, part fit is excellent, and the planes come out plenty light. You just need to be a somewhat experienced builder to bring the model up to 21st century standards.
And I might add that both the PT-17 and the F3F turned out to be excellent flyers.
Dick
#6
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (16)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Iowa Park,
TX
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Haven't done the F-11C, but I have built the PT-17 and the Grumman F3F from that same kit series. Both of my builds were from R/C kits. The kit designs reflect 1950's mentality with regard to control surfaces, wing dihedral, wing & tail incidence, etc. For instance, the plans show extreme wing dihedral, rudder (but not aileron) control, and excessive wing incidence. The little instruction booklet advises the builder to lay several 4X8 sheets of plywood in a row for a takeoff surface. There is little in the way of useful information regarding radio or servo installations. Even the engine installation is sort of hokey. So even if you have the R/C plans, you will need to do a lot of improvising.
But I don't mean to say that the kit is a waste of time. The balsa quality is quite good, part fit is excellent, and the planes come out plenty light. You just need to be a somewhat experienced builder to bring the model up to 21st century standards.
And I might add that both the PT-17 and the F3F turned out to be excellent flyers.
Dick
But I don't mean to say that the kit is a waste of time. The balsa quality is quite good, part fit is excellent, and the planes come out plenty light. You just need to be a somewhat experienced builder to bring the model up to 21st century standards.
And I might add that both the PT-17 and the F3F turned out to be excellent flyers.
Dick
Paul