Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
#102
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hillsborough,
CA
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
Well yes. All i needed to fix the clutch prob was get a vented 12 tooth cb. With the 12 tooth vented, I've been running the stock clutch shoes and springs for 2 gallons straight!!!
#103
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
Rotating mass (the difference between 1, 2 and 3 speed) in one of these engines and drive train has virtually no effect on performance. It would be similar to throwing a blade of grass in a running lawnmower's blades and saying that it effected performance. Therfore, the benefits of having a 2 or 3 speed tranny versus a single far "outweighs" the drawback of "rotating mass".
#104
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hillsborough,
CA
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
Actually it has a much larger effect on performance than you have stated. It's like this. A simple way of putting it is that a truggy race tire will allow an engine to prool up much faster than a set of beadlocks with jumbo kongs. The effect is just a little less than that in the 2-3 speed gears. Read the xrc test on it.
#105
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
ORIGINAL: bigairlife
A simple way of putting it is that a truggy race tire will allow an engine to prool up much faster than a set of beadlocks with jumbo kongs.
A simple way of putting it is that a truggy race tire will allow an engine to prool up much faster than a set of beadlocks with jumbo kongs.
#107
Senior Member
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
rotating mass plays a huge role in acceleration..........generally a Truggy will accelerate faster then a MT, alot faster........... even though a Truggy is a single speed and "stuck in second" it has a center diff which allows a motor to spool up and get into powerband much faster then a 2 speed setup....
here is a video of a lightened CF Savage and my Mugen MBX5T both with modded STS 30's... as you can see the Truggy is the faster machine, bottom and top
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?doc...97284940363929
here is a video of a lightened CF Savage and my Mugen MBX5T both with modded STS 30's... as you can see the Truggy is the faster machine, bottom and top
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?doc...97284940363929
#110
Senior Member
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
Losi8Tboy, Do you even own an 8T?
Yea supertib I see a diffrence. but only in bottem end really.. I can't really see much dirffrence in top because you neve gave the mugen a full speed run without letting off.
#111
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hillsborough,
CA
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
See. I was right. HAHAHA!!! lol. A truggy will accelerate faster than a mt with a 2 speed because of the extra weight the 2 speed gears carry as they spool up. [&:]
I told u so. lol
I told u so. lol
#112
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hillsborough,
CA
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
There is a pretty big difference on the bottom end and a small difference on the top end.
#114
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: leongatha,VIC, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 3,735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
there is a huge difference here, think about it, how fast are the tranny gears in a savage spinning compared to the tires? at least 3-4 times faster, add it up and the added rotating mass will slow you down a lot more then you might expect, there so little rotating mass in a truggy drive train compared to a monster truck it's not funny, i know my 8ight T is much faster then both my revo and LST2, revo with an RB TM 523 and LST2 and 8ight with the mach 427..
#115
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: hatboro, PA
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
Guys click here to give your opinion in another thread:
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_6762930/tm.htm
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_6762930/tm.htm
#116
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hillsborough,
CA
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
Ya. U guys who didn't believe me before, you dont know what you are talking about. Ttoks (spelling?) is completely right. There is a HUGE difference in the accelerating capabilities of a truggy vs. MT
#117
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
Ok Ok BigAirHead is right I give up. No benefit to multiple speed set ups. hehehe. Maybe you all should try and change the world. Or just tell John Force and Mario Andretti that they could have ruled the world had they used ONE gear/speed. Later.
#118
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hillsborough,
CA
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
Ya. very funny. It's imposible in full scale cars because they dont rev high enough. I'm just arguing what is true. I just dont want people to believe something thats not true.
#119
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Amarillo,
TX
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
bigairlife: all I have to say on the topic is this. monster trucks and truggies aren't designed to run the same.... find me a truggy that weighs exactly what my savvy is, give it a 1 speed center diff, and the exact same gear ratios that my savage has, and we'll line up the savage and the truggy.
gear ratios and everything else play into that, claiming that there's an obvious advantage because of less rotational mass when dealing with a minute amount of weight when the gear ratios in the vehicles you're using to try to prove the point aren't the same, the tires aren't the same, and the weight and such aren't the same, is subjective, and in no way hard proof.
if you want to shut us all up on the 1 speed vs 2 or 3 speed, get a savvy, and lock it into 2nd gear, then take a savvy with functional 2 speed and run them, see which one beats the other, obviously if HPI's making 3 speeds and now a high speed 3rd gear kit, there's got to be some valid reason as to why they're doing it, since, as you say, the minute amount of rotational mass makes the truck slower....
gear ratios and everything else play into that, claiming that there's an obvious advantage because of less rotational mass when dealing with a minute amount of weight when the gear ratios in the vehicles you're using to try to prove the point aren't the same, the tires aren't the same, and the weight and such aren't the same, is subjective, and in no way hard proof.
if you want to shut us all up on the 1 speed vs 2 or 3 speed, get a savvy, and lock it into 2nd gear, then take a savvy with functional 2 speed and run them, see which one beats the other, obviously if HPI's making 3 speeds and now a high speed 3rd gear kit, there's got to be some valid reason as to why they're doing it, since, as you say, the minute amount of rotational mass makes the truck slower....
#120
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bay Shore,
NY
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
"Accelerating Capabilities of A truggy vs. MT" If I ever have to do another science project it with be on this lol.[sm=lol.gif]
#121
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: noyb
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
i agree with dhyde79
it sounds like you all are trying to compare apples and oranges
identical vehicles need to be compared side-by-side with the transmission gearing being the only difference for any valid conclusions to be drawn
past that it's all he said/she said, so to speak
it sounds like you all are trying to compare apples and oranges
identical vehicles need to be compared side-by-side with the transmission gearing being the only difference for any valid conclusions to be drawn
past that it's all he said/she said, so to speak
#122
Senior Member
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
ORIGINAL: rafa26
Please dude, with all respect "less drag ???" at 40mph that will never make a difference.
ORIGINAL: gravediggerracing
You are forgetting that the GST weighs how much? It has a few pounds on the Revo and that will give a better power to weight ratio to the Revo. The Revo has better aerodynamics as well as it sits a bunch lower to the ground, is more "compact" and that means it punches a smaller hole in the atmosphere (less drag). But this is bench racing, anything is possible I suppose in the real world.
Oh yeah, I love the GST and it's massiveness, so don't think I'm bagging on it.[8D]
ORIGINAL: rcnitrohead
Like Python said before, the order is: GST 7.7, LST 2, Revo 3.3, Savage 4.6, and MGT.... Even though the 3.3 is "higher revving", the GST has a large amount of torque, and coupled to its short ratio 3 speed it can take off pretty fast. The Revo has a little wider ration 2 speed, so it takes a small bit longer.. IMO the LST2/Revo 3.3/ and Savae 4.6 would be very close to each other in a drag... Bone stock everything of course...
Like Python said before, the order is: GST 7.7, LST 2, Revo 3.3, Savage 4.6, and MGT.... Even though the 3.3 is "higher revving", the GST has a large amount of torque, and coupled to its short ratio 3 speed it can take off pretty fast. The Revo has a little wider ration 2 speed, so it takes a small bit longer.. IMO the LST2/Revo 3.3/ and Savae 4.6 would be very close to each other in a drag... Bone stock everything of course...
Oh yeah, I love the GST and it's massiveness, so don't think I'm bagging on it.[8D]
Please dude, with all respect "less drag ???" at 40mph that will never make a difference.
#123
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hillsborough,
CA
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
If you lock a savage in 2nd gear, it will be slower not because of the gear ratio, but also because of all the other gears in the tranny still have to spin, which creats rotational mass [&:] Stock, my muggy was heavier than a savage, and I still beat it even tho the savage had a 3 speed and a f 4.6 [>:]
#124
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: IC, IA
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Which one would win a 0-40mph contest ? Click to see candidates...
ORIGINAL: bigairlife
If you lock a savage in 2nd gear, it will be slower not because of the gear ratio, but also because of all the other gears in the tranny still have to spin, which creats rotational mass [&:] Stock, my muggy was heavier than a savage, and I still beat it even tho the savage had a 3 speed and a f 4.6 [>:]
If you lock a savage in 2nd gear, it will be slower not because of the gear ratio, but also because of all the other gears in the tranny still have to spin, which creats rotational mass [&:] Stock, my muggy was heavier than a savage, and I still beat it even tho the savage had a 3 speed and a f 4.6 [>:]
hey bud, why don't you go and stack you truggy with some extra weight to match the savage and run it, then we'll talk. if you haven't yet then you've no argument so you might as well shut yer yap