Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Results 1 to 13 of 13

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    2
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Composite ARF Vs. Krill Model

    Hey guys I need some help. I decided to purchase a 33% plane and I can't decide which one to get. I need your help. Both these airplanes are pretty expensive and I don't want to make the wrong decision. I was looking to get -

    -Composite ARF Extra 300SX 2.6m, Fantasy red/yellow scheme or
    -Krill Model Katana S 33% colour scheme RAZOR EDGE

    If anyone has these planes can you tell me the good and bad things about these planes.

    Thanks!

  2. #2
    gene6029's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    wilson, NC
    Posts
    1,159
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Composite ARF Vs. Krill Model

    I cant speak for the Krill models, but I own and have assembled several comp arf models includeing the Extra and can say you would not be dissapointed with the 2.6 C-Arf Extra. Just go to any IMAC event and you will probably see several people flying them, and you can see for yourself. There are several build threads here and on other sites on the 2.6 C-Arf, if you want to see from start to finish whats involved putting one together. I fly in the Northern-SE section and their are lots of people flying C-Arfs but I cant think off hand of anyone with a Krill that you could ask questions to. Only thing negative i can say is ( the C-Arfs) cost so ?+!! much. Good luck with whatever you decide on.........Gene

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Calgary Alberta, AB, CANADA
    Posts
    389
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Composite ARF Vs. Krill Model

    I have both comp arfs and the krill the krill is a much better kit and comes with more for your money. Both fly very well the krill kit is just much better quality I'm not saying the comp arf is bad, just that the krill is better. Just my .02

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    W.R.,
    Posts
    153
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Composite ARF Vs. Krill Model

    . Krill flies better too. Sold the composite arf after I started to fly the krill.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    , MA
    Posts
    131
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Composite ARF Vs. Krill Model

    Does anyone know how the 33% Krill Velox II compares with the 33% Katana for IMAC? I like the looks of the Velox and the fact that it seems a good match for a DA-85 at 22 lbs. If I read the Krill site correctly, it looks like the 33% Katana may need a DA-100 due to its weight of 26 lbs. Nonetheless, I'd prefer to get which ever is better suited to IMAC flying.

    Tony

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Calgary Alberta, AB, CANADA
    Posts
    389
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Composite ARF Vs. Krill Model

    I don't think one will be better than the other I think it is in the way you set your plane up both should be great IMAC planes.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    W.R.,
    Posts
    153
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Composite ARF Vs. Krill Model


    ORIGINAL: RBACONS

    Does anyone know how the 33% Krill Velox II compares with the 33% Katana for IMAC? I like the looks of the Velox and the fact that it seems a good match for a DA-85 at 22 lbs. If I read the Krill site correctly, it looks like the 33% Katana may need a DA-100 due to its weight of 26 lbs. Nonetheless, I'd prefer to get which ever is better suited to IMAC flying.

    Tony
    Tony... I've owed both. Not sure an 85 cc would work. The altitude you fly at will make a differance. Either models will be awsume for IMAC. They build light, There is a little work work to a Krill than a stick plane but I think it is worth it.
    I put DA 100's in both because we fly at 6000 ft. above sea level.
    Greg

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    , MA
    Posts
    131
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Composite ARF Vs. Krill Model

    Greg,

    Any insight you can give me as to how the Velox and Katana compare, both from quality standpoint as well as IMAC-type flight characteristics. I like precise planes with low coupling and good yaw stability. Also, I'm at sea level so if the Velox really builds out at 22 lbs, I would think the DA-85 ought to haul it around with authority. The Krill website is not the clearest so its a little hard to be sure but it looked like the Katana was several pounds heavier than the Velox. Is that what you found?

    Thanks, Tony

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    W.R.,
    Posts
    153
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Composite ARF Vs. Krill Model

    Tony.. The Velox is a smaller air plane than the Katana. Sitting next to each other it is very noticeable. Both planes flew the same, same amounts of coupling ect. I still have two of the Katanas. It would be my first choice. But in no way would I try to talk you out of the Velox. If you are dead set on a 85cc do not get the Katana. It is to big. I hope this helps, keep asking question. It will really help you make the right decision. Either way you are on the right path with the Krills.
    Greg

  10. #10
    Scoubidou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boisbriand, QC, CANADA
    Posts
    1,592
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Composite ARF Vs. Krill Model

    I have both comp arfs and the krill the krill is a much better kit and comes with more for your money. Both fly very well the krill kit is just much better quality I'm not saying the comp arf is bad, just that the krill is better. Just my .02
    Hello cygnet
    Do you have a contact for Krill in Canada or USA?
    Seneca Engineering
    http://www.seneca.ca/

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Calgary Alberta, AB, CANADA
    Posts
    389
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Composite ARF Vs. Krill Model

    Sorry no I just ordered mine from Europe worked out great came right to Calgary and they paid the freight

  12. #12

    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Silverdale, WA
    Posts
    1,397
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Composite ARF Vs. Krill Model


    ORIGINAL: Scoubidou

    Hello cygnet
    Do you have a contact for Krill in Canada or USA?
    Skyline Aviation is the contact for Krill in North America. http://www.skylineaviationonline.com/

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    102
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Composite ARF Vs. Krill Model

    Hi,
    I have both a Yak Comp Arf and a Krill Velox. Building wise, the Comp Arf is a little easier to put together since items are clearly marked. If you have experience, both planes will be straight forward to build. The Krill comes with 300 pictures on a cd that you should study before assembly. Landing gear on a Krill is much better than a Comp Arf. Fire wall and tail assembly is better on a Comp Arf. The Krill is lighter and takes a large variety of engines and has space for them. If you are running cans, the Comp Arf is better since they run on the outside which I like.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:09 AM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.