Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Kit Building
Reload this Page >

Building a scale 1/4 scale Super Cub from Balsa J3 kit

Community
Search
Notices
Kit Building If you're building a kit and have questions or want to discuss kit building post it here.

Building a scale 1/4 scale Super Cub from Balsa J3 kit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2015, 06:21 AM
  #926  
ArcadeAir
Member
 
ArcadeAir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Western New York
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Great idea using the dsub connectors!
Old 02-24-2015, 07:23 AM
  #927  
acerc
 
acerc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Sunshine state, when it's not raining!
Posts: 8,131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John_M_
Thats interesting bird, the one that was originally in my sig 1/4 cub was 4 years old with no problems... don't get me wrong, it was a concern but I never experienced any leakage, I always checked to make sure the pintel was seated, and never an issue in those 4 years... even after I converted the 130 to CDI, I still ran it on Glow fuel and used the same fueler

The Fuel valve you see in the above image, was the Great Planes "Easy Fill" valve.


Anyways I wouldn't want to steer Leroy wrong, so by all means thoroughly test it, or go with the fuel dot.


***EDIT***

This is the fuel dot I have now, made from a PL-259 coax connector.. but its the traditional J3 nose tank configuration, the super cub had wing tanks, but you could discreetly hide the fuel dot within the cowl area.




***EDIT***EDIT***

Just out of curiosity I dug out the original GP Easy Fill valve I had... its well over 15 years old and the seal is still intact... it seals, and holds a vacuum when both lines are plugged.... much greater vacuum than would be developed while the engine is running, or even with an exhaust pressure fitting back to the tank.




John M,
The older Easy Fills had better rubber seals than they use now a days, I guess we can thank the EPA for that.
Old 02-24-2015, 07:33 AM
  #928  
rt3232
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: hastings, MN
Posts: 5,953
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Pilotbum, Leroy. Bigbird3, Jhom_m

I did not mean to start a brew ha ha, or distract from Leroy's build thread. So I will add a bit , way back when I first started using gas engines, I had all kinds pf problems and found that 99% of it was due to the gas, ie pump gas, and the ethanol. So My buddy and I switched to ave/gass 100 and yes it is 4 to 6 a gallon depending on witch airport you go to get it. after that we just watched the fuel barbs for berrs or sharp edges. The other advantage of ave/gass is it does not smell or soure if you leave it in your field can over the winter.
That said, We all have to use what we are comfortable, and works for us. Have I ever had a bad experience with a product YES, due I try it again generally it depends on coast.

Sorry about the rant

Cheers Bob T
AMA13377
Corsair Brotherhood #6
Old 02-24-2015, 08:36 AM
  #929  
FlyerInOKC
My Feedback: (6)
 
FlyerInOKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 14,145
Received 271 Likes on 236 Posts
Default

I use a metal bracket to mount my DuBro fuelers at the bottom of the firewall. It allows quick access and its out of site. I have had no leaks as of yet but if I do I'll replace the "O" ring and that should do the trick.
Old 02-24-2015, 09:11 AM
  #930  
Leroy Gardner
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rt3232
Pilotbum, Leroy. Bigbird3, Jhom_m

I did not mean to start a brew ha ha, or distract from Leroy's build thread. So I will add a bit , way back when I first started using gas engines, I had all kinds pf problems and found that 99% of it was due to the gas, ie pump gas, and the ethanol. So My buddy and I switched to ave/gass 100 and yes it is 4 to 6 a gallon depending on witch airport you go to get it. after that we just watched the fuel barbs for berrs or sharp edges. The other advantage of ave/gass is it does not smell or soure if you leave it in your field can over the winter.
That said, We all have to use what we are comfortable, and works for us. Have I ever had a bad experience with a product YES, due I try it again generally it depends on coast.

Sorry about the rant

Cheers Bob T
AMA13377
Corsair Brotherhood #6
Why be sorry for what rant. Someone makes a statement about a product you are using that could be a problem and I want to hear about it. So far most of what I have heard is not bad. Like the fuel stoppers being made for gas or nitro I would like to think likewise has been done to the fuel valves, I'm not aware that they are serviceable as FlyerinOKC suggests, the only thing I know about them is it takes very little pressure to open them and the valve seams to float around prior to seating and some mix oil on the fill hose chuck sure wouldn't hurt the seal. I'll test it as much as can be on the engine stand, it's obvious that the filler hose end needs to be kept clean.

Thanks for your input, that's part of why we are here, Leroy
Old 02-24-2015, 10:10 AM
  #931  
FlyerInOKC
My Feedback: (6)
 
FlyerInOKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 14,145
Received 271 Likes on 236 Posts
Default

Anything mechanical can fail sometimes it just comes down to luck of the draw. I wonder if there is a collation between the location, orientation, and how it is mounted to whether you have leaks or not with a fueler? "O" ring materials do vary from manufacturer to manufacturer as well as where and when they were made. I still like to hear about a product I use that someone else has had some bad luck using. Its a great way of learning what to look for if/when you do have a problem. When it comes to building we all build to suit ourselves but if we weren't interested in how others do something we wouldn't be here!
Old 02-24-2015, 10:44 AM
  #932  
John_M_
 
John_M_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by acerc
The older Easy Fills had better rubber seals than they use now a days, I guess we can thank the EPA for that.
While this is true, especially with the gasoline version... I took the one I showed above apart... there is a second, smaller O-ring deep down inside that seals the port to the carb when you insert the fueling nipple... surprising the spring tension is very small, but the shape of the pintle is "cone" shaped and centers itself in the top and bottom O-ring seals


Great Planes Easy Fill







John M,
Old 02-24-2015, 11:49 AM
  #933  
FlyerInOKC
My Feedback: (6)
 
FlyerInOKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 14,145
Received 271 Likes on 236 Posts
Default

I just peeked and DuBro # 334 is the Fueler rebuilding kit for glow. The rebuilding kit for gasoline is DuBro # 335. Both can be used to covert an existing value to use whichever fuel type is desired, glow to gas or gas to glow. The picture below shows the parts Tower prices both kits at $4.09 about the same as my LHS.

Mike

Old 02-24-2015, 12:15 PM
  #934  
rt3232
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: hastings, MN
Posts: 5,953
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Mike

The pic would not open, but your written description is correct, and when I check my birds out for the next spring flying season I all ways take the fuel line off at the carb and use a Robart air pump with a gage and put a little pressure into the system and look for leaks and pressure drop, vary easy to do, and save a lot of head ache's at the field
And I do keep a kit available in my shop, the repair is easy to do.

Cheers bob T
Old 02-24-2015, 12:18 PM
  #935  
FlyerInOKC
My Feedback: (6)
 
FlyerInOKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 14,145
Received 271 Likes on 236 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rt3232
Mike

The pic would not open, but your written description is correct, and when I check my birds out for the next spring flying season I all ways take the fuel line off at the carb and use a Robart air pump with a gage and put a little pressure into the system and look for leaks and pressure drop, vary easy to do, and save a lot of head ache's at the field
And I do keep a kit available in my shop, the repair is easy to do.

Cheers bob T
try this one:

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	DuBro rebuild Kit.jpg
Views:	123
Size:	7.0 KB
ID:	2076022  
Old 02-24-2015, 12:22 PM
  #936  
pilotbum
 
pilotbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So this is exactly my point... rebuild kits, some fail, some don't, keeping spare parts and rebuild kits for when they do fail. It all seems like a lot of maintenance for something that can all be solved by using a fuel dot instead. So, what am I missing? Why use them? I'm sure its largely personal preference and all this is why my preference is the dot. Now I'm curious what y'all feel the advantages of these type filler valves are? I know we're beating a horse to death, but my curiosity is killing me...
Old 02-24-2015, 12:29 PM
  #937  
acerc
 
acerc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Sunshine state, when it's not raining!
Posts: 8,131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Both O rings can be bought from ACE for less than a buck. But it was the hassle of when it would leak and the replacing that I bailed on.
Old 02-24-2015, 12:30 PM
  #938  
FlyerInOKC
My Feedback: (6)
 
FlyerInOKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 14,145
Received 271 Likes on 236 Posts
Default

I think its a matter of preference. I feel more comfortable having a valve on the bottom facing down than I would with a fuel dot. Their is no definitive answer as to which is the better product.
Old 02-24-2015, 12:38 PM
  #939  
pilotbum
 
pilotbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerInOKC
I think its a matter of preference. I feel more comfortable having a valve on the bottom facing down than I would with a fuel dot. Their is no definitive answer as to which is the better product.
totally agree there is no definitive answer. I'm just curious what other's have thought of that I did not. Helps make more informed decisions.

The valve on the bottom prevents any negative/positive pressure to the carb while fueling/de-fueling, right? That's why I just install a second clunk strictly for fueling/de-fueling.
Old 02-24-2015, 01:21 PM
  #940  
rt3232
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: hastings, MN
Posts: 5,953
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerInOKC
I think its a matter of preference. I feel more comfortable having a valve on the bottom facing down than I would with a fuel dot. Their is no definitive answer as to which is the better product.
Your spot on, but I have had more leaks in lines, fittings and tanks than in my fueler's

Cheers Bob T
Old 02-24-2015, 01:21 PM
  #941  
rt3232
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: hastings, MN
Posts: 5,953
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Sorry about the double post

Last edited by rt3232; 02-24-2015 at 01:38 PM.
Old 02-24-2015, 02:04 PM
  #942  
acerc
 
acerc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Sunshine state, when it's not raining!
Posts: 8,131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pilotbum
totally agree there is no definitive answer.
Sure there is, one likes them until they leak, then one does not like them. That is what happened to me, I liked them and now I don't.
LOL.. Couldn't resist!!
Old 02-24-2015, 02:24 PM
  #943  
John_M_
 
John_M_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pilotbum
So this is exactly my point... rebuild kits, some fail, some don't, keeping spare parts and rebuild kits for when they do fail. It all seems like a lot of maintenance for something that can all be solved by using a fuel dot instead. So, what am I missing? Why use them? I'm sure its largely personal preference and all this is why my preference is the dot. Now I'm curious what y'all feel the advantages of these type filler valves are? I know we're beating a horse to death, but my curiosity is killing me...
Well for my particular application, it made it easy to fill the tank without unplugging a bunch of fuel lines... the way I had the tank setup was with two lines, one feed with the clunk to the Easy Fill valve, and the other was a vent.. the vent went to the exhaust pressure fitting on one of the exhaust pipes... to fill the tank, all I had to do was insert the fueler nipple into the Easy Fill valve, and fill the tank until the fuel started to run out the one exhaust pipe... back then, there were no fuel dots, all there was was two dangling fuel lines and a couple of 4-40 allen head screws as fuel line plugs... when they introduced the Easy Fill valves, it was all the rage, just like when the fuel dots were first introduced ... trust me, if I had issues with the fuel filler valves, I would have chucked it in the trash years ago... but you also have to take into consideration how often they were used... I would get maybe 3-4 flights on one day out of a weekend, so it wasn't used excessively.


John M,

Last edited by John_M_; 02-24-2015 at 03:45 PM.
Old 02-24-2015, 02:26 PM
  #944  
bigbird3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Williamstown, VT
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John_M_
Thats interesting bird, the one that was originally in my sig 1/4 cub was 4 years old with no problems... don't get me wrong, it was a concern but I never experienced any leakage, I always checked to make sure the pintel was seated, and never an issue in those 4 years... even after I converted the 130 to CDI, I still ran it on Glow fuel and used the same fueler

The Fuel valve you see in the above image, was the Great Planes "Easy Fill" valve.


Anyways I wouldn't want to steer Leroy wrong, so by all means thoroughly test it, or go with the fuel dot.


John M,


Perhaps mine is an isolated case but most of my problems were when I disconnected the probe, the pintel stuck crossways and was difficult to reset. It never recovered and I finally went to the black plastic one mentioned in this discussion. But, if you want to simplify it, use the fuel dot! No moving parts!!!!
bird.
Old 02-24-2015, 03:36 PM
  #945  
Leroy Gardner
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Thank you John_m_ and FlyerinOKC for posting the inners of this little valve and the available repair kit, it's easy to see it's just a manually operated shuttle valve who's biggest enemy is dirt and lack of lube, a cover or cap would be a good Idea and I'm sticking with it. It's a good fit for what I did and solves a plumbing issue with it's use and gets it where I wanted it. Servicing it is no problem for me, I have every seal pick on the planet and have worked on a lot smaller valves than this one. I will get a kit in the event I ever need one

This is good stuff to know and it's nice to see guys come together the way you did with this one, I sure appreciate it and learned something else I didn't know.

Leroy
Old 02-24-2015, 04:46 PM
  #946  
geoardsog5
My Feedback: (31)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tinley Park, IL
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Leroy, I hate to say it, but the fuel filler forward of the windshield,(ala J-3) would be very non-scale. On the Pa-18 Super Cub, the fwd.fuse. support cluster, goes right where fuel tank is on the Piper J-3. I waded thru hundreds of photo's on Airliners.Net and they all had fuel tanks mounted in the wings. i faked the fuel tank covers and filler caps recently, on a PA-22 (Tri-Pacer) that I completed recently.They are similar to the PA-18. I'll post or email pics, if interested.
I've used the fuel quick-fills,over the years, and they always ended up leaking fuel, or sucking air - due to o-rings or crap, under the valve seat.now i just go with a fuel fill line, out the bottom of the cowl - close to the wirewall. Cap it with a removable plug (fuel dot style) I leave extra line, so it can be pulled away from the belly for easy access. No leakage,spillage or valve maintenance. You can only have problems, if you forget to put the plug back in. John R.
Old 02-24-2015, 05:22 PM
  #947  
John_M_
 
John_M_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bigbird3
Perhaps mine is an isolated case but most of my problems were when I disconnected the probe, the pintel stuck crossways and was difficult to reset. It never recovered and I finally went to the black plastic one mentioned in this discussion. But, if you want to simplify it, use the fuel dot! No moving parts!!!!
bird.

A little observation on my part... it may suggest that the Dubro brand may have an issue with the pintel cocking when pushed in with the fueler nipple... if you notice in the rebuild kit photo, the spring is larger in diameter at the bottom than it is at the top... that could allow the pintle to cock and the small end get trapped at an angle between the two O-ring seals.... on the Great Planes version the spring is straight, and does not allow the pintle to tip to one side.. that maybe why I went with the GP Easy Fueler, its been a long time since, and can't recall




John M,
Old 02-24-2015, 07:01 PM
  #948  
acerc
 
acerc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Sunshine state, when it's not raining!
Posts: 8,131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

That makes perfect sense John and mine was a Dubro. I always wondered why others at my field had such good luck with them.
Old 02-24-2015, 08:39 PM
  #949  
John_M_
 
John_M_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Well here's another bit of revelation if you will... Duro makes a larger version of their Kiwk Fueler valves for large scale aircraft... the rebuild kits for those show a straight spring rather than the cone shaped spring... they are much larger than their STD size fuel valves, I'm mean they fill the palm of your hand, they are quite big... I wonder if they may have seen something in their original design that needed refinement.


Dubro Large Scale Fuel Valve Rebuild Kits




John M,
Old 02-25-2015, 08:58 AM
  #950  
Leroy Gardner
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Well the more I hear about this whole affair the less I like it, I think I need to find out if gas can be pumped through the carburetor diaphragm when filling the tank flooding the engine especially an inverted engine, I think that was the main reason for that fill valve. If I go with a separate fill line I'm going to be pressurizing the first tank in order to force gas into the second tank and at this point I don't know if that's enough pressure to flood my engine. I may have opened up my own can of worms. I have to admit that one speck of dirt can cause plenty of trouble aside from it not belonging where I put it.

Right now it's all set up on the engine run stand the same way it is in the plane so I can test the whole system I just need to dress up the reed box first. More to come.

Leroy


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.