Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Kit Building
Reload this Page >

Goldberg Skylark 70 Build Question

Community
Search
Notices
Kit Building If you're building a kit and have questions or want to discuss kit building post it here.

Goldberg Skylark 70 Build Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2017, 04:21 PM
  #1  
tapeandglue
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: erie, PA
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Goldberg Skylark 70 Build Question

Hi all...
Well Winter is breathing down my neck and it is time to build something. I am thinking of a Skylark 70 short kit from Laser Works. I have a couple questions...
1. Anyone know of a good build log for this plane ?
2. Because the plane is a little "tame" I am thinking of reducing the dihedral. It looks from what I can see it is 1 1/2 " on each wing. I'm thinking of going to 3/4" to 1" on each wing.
Does anyone have any experience on this ?

Thanks....!!!!
Old 11-12-2017, 06:38 PM
  #2  
Michaelj2k
 
Michaelj2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

A nice looking airplane that never was. The only one I know of has been displayed at Toledo. CG considered kitting the airplane but it never happened so this model was drawn to represent what CG would have produced. It looks to be a nice flyer and easy to build so have at it and start a thread. Eddie produces a nice kit so you should have no problems.
Old 11-13-2017, 01:07 PM
  #3  
KitBuilder
 
KitBuilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have not built one but I can only assume the generous dihedral was to help with stability at the time this was designed. It being a 'low' wing, I wouldn't remove to much but there should be no issue in removing 1\2" on each wing. Also consider removing a bay on each wing. Will increase roll response. Looking at some pics it doesn't look to be 1.5 on each side but that big wing can be deceiving.
Old 11-13-2017, 04:20 PM
  #4  
golf4two
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South, GA
Posts: 230
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

As a relative r/c beginner in the mid 1980's I built and flew the GB Skylark 56. Built exactly per the plans it flew very well.
Excelled at "Sunday aerobatics" and, as I remember I learned a lot flying it. Met it's demise because I foolishly allowed a full scale Air Force pilot to "give it a try". What engine are you considering for it? I've been racking my brain for a winter project and another, but larger, Skylark would bring back some fond memories.
Old 11-13-2017, 06:14 PM
  #5  
Michaelj2k
 
Michaelj2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Here's one by Dave Platt at Toledo a few years ago.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0144.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	1.82 MB
ID:	2245005  

Last edited by Michaelj2k; 11-13-2017 at 06:17 PM.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.