What is the word I am looking for?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lakeland,
FL
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is the word I am looking for?
I need some of those connectors that connect a control rod to the "top" of the servo arm. You push it into the arm, then route the push rod through a hole and tighten down a screw. It allows the control rod to not bind against servo arm itself during rotation.
What are these called?
What are these called?
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lakeland,
FL
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: What is the word I am looking for?
What is the best way to connect a threaded rod (like those that come with the semi flex pushrod systems) to a servo arm? Just a standard clevis? I got a four armed servo arm and cut off 3 of them so I only had one out there so the others didn't bind. It might work, has yet to be seen.
Also, the exiting side of the control rod comes out of the fuse at a slight angle and the control horn is parallel with the fuse. I don't think the angle will cause much problem. However, what is the "correct" fix for this issue? The push rod I am using has a 4-40 threaded rod inside it (standard GP rod kit). Should I bend the rod a bit? There is only 2 or 3 inches from the fuse exit hole to the control horn. Not much room to work with.
Also, the exiting side of the control rod comes out of the fuse at a slight angle and the control horn is parallel with the fuse. I don't think the angle will cause much problem. However, what is the "correct" fix for this issue? The push rod I am using has a 4-40 threaded rod inside it (standard GP rod kit). Should I bend the rod a bit? There is only 2 or 3 inches from the fuse exit hole to the control horn. Not much room to work with.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Berthoud,
CO
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: What is the word I am looking for?
Yes, a standard clevis can be used to connect a threaded rod to a servo arm. Make sure to use a piece of fuel tubing to secure the clevis.
As for the angle, yes, you can bend a control rod to eliminate the stress caused. It needs to be a solid rod, not a threaded rod. Trying to bend a threaded rod will cause it to crack. If you do bend the rod, bend it first at an angle and then again back so that the rod 'jogs' to the control horn but is actually moving straight. That may sound complicated but it isn't. Also, try never to bend a rod more than 45 degrees. You can also try using a ball link connector to the control horn
As for the angle, yes, you can bend a control rod to eliminate the stress caused. It needs to be a solid rod, not a threaded rod. Trying to bend a threaded rod will cause it to crack. If you do bend the rod, bend it first at an angle and then again back so that the rod 'jogs' to the control horn but is actually moving straight. That may sound complicated but it isn't. Also, try never to bend a rod more than 45 degrees. You can also try using a ball link connector to the control horn
#8
My Feedback: (1)
RE: What is the word I am looking for?
E-Z connectors should be avoided on any control other than throttles. They can and do become disconnected from servo arms. The best way is to have a Z- bend at the servo horn and then a threaded clevis at the control horn on the control surface itself. The ball links pictured are also a good option at the surface and can eliminate binding.
#10
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
RE: What is the word I am looking for?
You CAN (and I DO) use EZ connectors on control surfaces.
I much prefer them to Z or L bends.
However, you MUST use them properly.
First, use the metal retainer to join them to the servo are, not the plastic one.
Second, add a drop of thread lock to the set screw.
Third, hold the pushrod or the connector body with a pair of pliers while tightening and make the set screw good and tight.
I have used them for over 20 years and never had a failure in planes up to 120 size
I much prefer them to Z or L bends.
However, you MUST use them properly.
First, use the metal retainer to join them to the servo are, not the plastic one.
Second, add a drop of thread lock to the set screw.
Third, hold the pushrod or the connector body with a pair of pliers while tightening and make the set screw good and tight.
I have used them for over 20 years and never had a failure in planes up to 120 size
#11
My Feedback: (1)
RE: What is the word I am looking for?
ORIGINAL: MinnFlyer
You CAN (and I DO) use EZ connectors on control surfaces.
I much prefer them to Z or L bends.
However, you MUST use them properly.
First, use the metal retainer to join them to the servo are, not the plastic one.
Second, add a drop of thread lock to the set screw.
Third, hold the pushrod or the connector body with a pair of pliers while tightening and make the set screw good and tight.
I have used them for over 20 years and never had a failure in planes up to 120 size
You CAN (and I DO) use EZ connectors on control surfaces.
I much prefer them to Z or L bends.
However, you MUST use them properly.
First, use the metal retainer to join them to the servo are, not the plastic one.
Second, add a drop of thread lock to the set screw.
Third, hold the pushrod or the connector body with a pair of pliers while tightening and make the set screw good and tight.
I have used them for over 20 years and never had a failure in planes up to 120 size
#14
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
RE: What is the word I am looking for?
ORIGINAL: vertical grimmace
Lots of opportunity to fail there.
Lots of opportunity to fail there.
When I am doing a review, I am responsible for the completion of that review, which includes performing several flights and shooting pictures and video of some of those flights.
If the plane crashes, I am still responsible to get that review done (even if it means buying a new plane out of my own pocket), so I never take unnecessary chances until the pics and video are complete.
But I have used these things for over 20 years and never had a failure. If used properly, they are as good as any other connection.
#15
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Upplands Vasby, SWEDEN
Posts: 7,816
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
RE: What is the word I am looking for?
Hi!
Problem with Ez connectors is the needed play....
If there is not enough play between the servo arm and the Ez connector the EZ connector will bind. If there is play, it is very easy to get too much play ...and if soo you get a tilting movement of the EZ connector which render in more play at the flying surface.
That's why a Z bend or a metal/plastic clevis is better!
Problem with Ez connectors is the needed play....
If there is not enough play between the servo arm and the Ez connector the EZ connector will bind. If there is play, it is very easy to get too much play ...and if soo you get a tilting movement of the EZ connector which render in more play at the flying surface.
That's why a Z bend or a metal/plastic clevis is better!
#16
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
RE: What is the word I am looking for?
There is no play.
The metal keeper holds the connector snug to the servo arm. The connector easily rotates against the plastic exactly the same as they way that a ball link rotates against its plastic cup - no play there either.
I'm sorry, but every argument I have heard against EZ Connectors over the years points to one of two things:
1 - Someone installed them carelessly and instead of blaming themselves they blame the connector
or
2 - Someone heard THAT person's story and took it for gospel
The metal keeper holds the connector snug to the servo arm. The connector easily rotates against the plastic exactly the same as they way that a ball link rotates against its plastic cup - no play there either.
I'm sorry, but every argument I have heard against EZ Connectors over the years points to one of two things:
1 - Someone installed them carelessly and instead of blaming themselves they blame the connector
or
2 - Someone heard THAT person's story and took it for gospel
#17
My Feedback: (1)
RE: What is the word I am looking for?
When doing a review you should use all of the supplied hardware. Especially since it is notoriously junk with the ARF's. It is getting better though. I am not doing reviews and I am flying competition aircraft worth several thousands of dollars. Like I said, to each thier own, I will not use them. Better safe than sorry and a Z bend is free and fail safe.
#18
Senior Member
RE: What is the word I am looking for?
Unless you can tolerate a lot of slop and wear, steer away from Z-bends. They are notorious for wallowing out the holes in the servo arms or horns and eventually contributing to slop and possible source for flutter. Now there are devices that will help a simple L bend instead of the sloppy Z-bend that keep the bend area from wallowing out the holes as it spaces the bend area away from the holes and holds the wear down. The short story, Z-bends for anything but crude controls is not a good choice.
#19
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
RE: What is the word I am looking for?
ORIGINAL: vertical grimmace
When doing a review you should use all of the supplied hardware. Especially since it is notoriously junk with the ARF's.
When doing a review you should use all of the supplied hardware. Especially since it is notoriously junk with the ARF's.
In this case, putting an "L" or "Z" bend in the wire would mean having to remove the nylon clevis on the control surface should I ever need to remove the pushrod, so I chose to use the EZ connector to avoid trapping the pushrod at that end.
#20
My Feedback: (1)
RE: What is the word I am looking for?
Model aviation has a fabulous article this month on the preservation of your aircraft. It is authored by the owner of Don's hobbies and has some very valuable info. Mainly it touches on how we "think" about our airplanes and the philosophy behind how and why we choose to set them up a certain way. The article is very relevant to the discussion here.
#22
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
RE: What is the word I am looking for?
Rodney-
Unless you can tolerate a lot of slop and wear, steer away from Z-bends. They are notorious for wallowing out the holes in the servo arms or horns and eventually contributing to slop and possible source for flutter. Now there are devices that will help a simple L bend instead of the sloppy Z-bend that keep the bend area from wallowing out the holes as it spaces the bend area away from the holes and holds the wear down. The short story, Z-bends for anything but crude controls is not a good choice.
Unless you can tolerate a lot of slop and wear, steer away from Z-bends. They are notorious for wallowing out the holes in the servo arms or horns and eventually contributing to slop and possible source for flutter. Now there are devices that will help a simple L bend instead of the sloppy Z-bend that keep the bend area from wallowing out the holes as it spaces the bend area away from the holes and holds the wear down. The short story, Z-bends for anything but crude controls is not a good choice.
Brian
#23
My Feedback: (1)
RE: What is the word I am looking for?
ORIGINAL: Ilikebipes
Worth while to hear again- IMO.
Brian
Rodney-
Unless you can tolerate a lot of slop and wear, steer away from Z-bends. They are notorious for wallowing out the holes in the servo arms or horns and eventually contributing to slop and possible source for flutter. Now there are devices that will help a simple L bend instead of the sloppy Z-bend that keep the bend area from wallowing out the holes as it spaces the bend area away from the holes and holds the wear down. The short story, Z-bends for anything but crude controls is not a good choice.
Unless you can tolerate a lot of slop and wear, steer away from Z-bends. They are notorious for wallowing out the holes in the servo arms or horns and eventually contributing to slop and possible source for flutter. Now there are devices that will help a simple L bend instead of the sloppy Z-bend that keep the bend area from wallowing out the holes as it spaces the bend area away from the holes and holds the wear down. The short story, Z-bends for anything but crude controls is not a good choice.
Brian
Regardless, I very much enjoyed the article as it was accurate in that poor set up techniques get to be SOP and accepted as acceptable when they are not. Especially with new pilots. As a flight instructor, I see this often. Just because the model comes with the hardware and you are instructed to use it, does not mean that you should. Imagine if full scale aircraft manufacturers skimped on control surface terminations?
#25
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
RE: What is the word I am looking for?
ORIGINAL: vertical grimmace
Not really, because this complaint about z bends is not accurate. If bent properly, and the hole is sized correctly in the servo horn, this will not be any more of an issue than any other type of connector, other than maybe a ball link.
Regardless, I very much enjoyed the article as it was accurate in that poor set up techniques get to be SOP and accepted as acceptable when they are not. Especially with new pilots. As a flight instructor, I see this often. Just because the model comes with the hardware and you are instructed to use it, does not mean that you should. Imagine if full scale aircraft manufacturers skimped on control surface terminations?
Not really, because this complaint about z bends is not accurate. If bent properly, and the hole is sized correctly in the servo horn, this will not be any more of an issue than any other type of connector, other than maybe a ball link.
Regardless, I very much enjoyed the article as it was accurate in that poor set up techniques get to be SOP and accepted as acceptable when they are not. Especially with new pilots. As a flight instructor, I see this often. Just because the model comes with the hardware and you are instructed to use it, does not mean that you should. Imagine if full scale aircraft manufacturers skimped on control surface terminations?
I believe the key to your statement lays in your words: "If bent properly..." I don't hear Rodney saying Z Bends are intrinsically a bad thing. I do hear him saying, in his comment, that they are commonly bent poorly and thus are "notoriuosly" wallowing out holes and creating slop. Ths method tends to be inconsistant accross the board. This is what I have seen, and can confirm his statement through experience.
Rodney -
Unless you can tolerate a lot of slop and wear, steer away from Z-bends. They are notorious for wallowing out the holes in the servo arms or horns and eventually contributing to slop and possible source for flutter. Now there are devices that will help a simple L bend instead of the sloppy Z-bend that keep the bend area from wallowing out the holes as it spaces the bend area away from the holes and holds the wear down. The short story, Z-bends for anything but crude controls is not a good choice.
Unless you can tolerate a lot of slop and wear, steer away from Z-bends. They are notorious for wallowing out the holes in the servo arms or horns and eventually contributing to slop and possible source for flutter. Now there are devices that will help a simple L bend instead of the sloppy Z-bend that keep the bend area from wallowing out the holes as it spaces the bend area away from the holes and holds the wear down. The short story, Z-bends for anything but crude controls is not a good choice.
Brian