Sig four star 60 engine choice.
#2
Senior Member
RE: Sig four star 60 engine choice.
Well, if you figure a 1.20 four stroke is about equivlent to a 23cc gasser. you are going to need a 17 or 18cc engine. The 23cc gas is going to be way overpowered. The plane will fly very nicely with a 70 four stroke, and will do about anyting you could expect with a 91 four stroke. And, this is bound to cause some response, it won't sound like a wead eater that isn't running very well.
Don
Don
#3
My Feedback: (-1)
RE: Sig four star 60 engine choice.
Gas or glow?? A .61 two stroke glow will fly the plane OK but it will also take a .75 or .91 two stroke. 100 Four stroke is another great choice. There are a couple of new small gas engines but you will have to go into the gas engine forum and read up on what users are saying about them to get an idea of how they compare to glow engines to get a good idea.
#5
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Birmingham, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Sig four star 60 engine choice.
I used a Super Tigre .90 on mine. The logic being that this engine is the same size and weight as many engines in the .60 - .70 range, and so there was no wieght penalty for the extra power.
If you want a gas engine, as apposed to glow then you could consider BME Super Tigre .90 gas conversion - [link=http://www.bmeengine.com/engines.htm]http://www.bmeengine.com/engines.htm[/link].
I don't know how it performs but there are some post on here and other forums about it.
Apparently it can run at full throttle for 3 mins and only burns an ounce of gas! So you'd pay for it pretty quick over burning glow.
Good luck.
If you want a gas engine, as apposed to glow then you could consider BME Super Tigre .90 gas conversion - [link=http://www.bmeengine.com/engines.htm]http://www.bmeengine.com/engines.htm[/link].
I don't know how it performs but there are some post on here and other forums about it.
Apparently it can run at full throttle for 3 mins and only burns an ounce of gas! So you'd pay for it pretty quick over burning glow.
Good luck.
#6
RE: Sig four star 60 engine choice.
I had the 4 star 40 once and would be nice to have a larger version.. I've got a newer OS .61? but it sounds like this wouldn't be enough motor?
#7
RE: Sig four star 60 engine choice.
ORIGINAL: KitBuilder
I had the 4 star 40 once and would be nice to have a larger version.. I've got a newer OS .61? but it sounds like this wouldn't be enough motor?
I had the 4 star 40 once and would be nice to have a larger version.. I've got a newer OS .61? but it sounds like this wouldn't be enough motor?
however if you are building one from a kit many shorten the wings buy chopping the last bay off, gives it a whole new attatude. I've also
seem guys chop the wings of the ARF version also with sucess.
Bill D.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Sig four star 60 engine choice.
Just remember that the 4*60 builds very tail heavy. I used a Saito 100 in mine and still had to add 15oz. of lead to the nose but it flew great! IMO, 2 strokes don't belong in four stars.
#10
Senior Member
RE: Sig four star 60 engine choice.
My 4*60 w/ the ST90 mounted carries no additional weight. The ST90 weighs 28 oz. while the Saito 100 weighs 21 oz. (both weights are mfg. published with OEM mufflers).
I've noticed that SIG kits are shipping with very dense (hard and heavy) balsa. On an LT-40 I removed 3 oz. of weight from the tail by building with lighter balsa. If the 3 oz is 3 feet behind the CG and the firewall is 1 feet in front of the CG it will take 9 oz. at the firewall to counter the heavy tail. If your 4* has a heavy keister and has a 4-stroke I can easily see Gary's 15 oz. of lead to balance.
Bottom line - the 4*60 can handle an addition lb. and still fly nicely.
Gary - I'm just jealous of people that fly at sea level - can you say "horsepower"?
I've noticed that SIG kits are shipping with very dense (hard and heavy) balsa. On an LT-40 I removed 3 oz. of weight from the tail by building with lighter balsa. If the 3 oz is 3 feet behind the CG and the firewall is 1 feet in front of the CG it will take 9 oz. at the firewall to counter the heavy tail. If your 4* has a heavy keister and has a 4-stroke I can easily see Gary's 15 oz. of lead to balance.
Bottom line - the 4*60 can handle an addition lb. and still fly nicely.
Gary - I'm just jealous of people that fly at sea level - can you say "horsepower"?
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Sig four star 60 engine choice.
ORIGINAL: SeamusG
My 4*60 w/ the ST90 mounted carries no additional weight. The ST90 weighs 28 oz. while the Saito 100 weighs 21 oz. (both weights are mfg. published with OEM mufflers).
I've noticed that SIG kits are shipping with very dense (hard and heavy) balsa. On an LT-40 I removed 3 oz. of weight from the tail by building with lighter balsa. If the 3 oz is 3 feet behind the CG and the firewall is 1 feet in front of the CG it will take 9 oz. at the firewall to counter the heavy tail. If your 4* has a heavy keister and has a 4-stroke I can easily see Gary's 15 oz. of lead to balance.
Bottom line - the 4*60 can handle an addition lb. and still fly nicely.
Gary - I'm just jealous of people that fly at sea level - can you say ''horsepower''?
My 4*60 w/ the ST90 mounted carries no additional weight. The ST90 weighs 28 oz. while the Saito 100 weighs 21 oz. (both weights are mfg. published with OEM mufflers).
I've noticed that SIG kits are shipping with very dense (hard and heavy) balsa. On an LT-40 I removed 3 oz. of weight from the tail by building with lighter balsa. If the 3 oz is 3 feet behind the CG and the firewall is 1 feet in front of the CG it will take 9 oz. at the firewall to counter the heavy tail. If your 4* has a heavy keister and has a 4-stroke I can easily see Gary's 15 oz. of lead to balance.
Bottom line - the 4*60 can handle an addition lb. and still fly nicely.
Gary - I'm just jealous of people that fly at sea level - can you say ''horsepower''?
#13
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Joseph,
MO
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Sig four star 60 engine choice.
I used a Super Tigre .90, it would knife edge all day long. Add 3/4 to one inch to the rudder. I would not cut any bays off. I loved mine!
#14
My Feedback: (-1)
RE: Sig four star 60 engine choice.
ORIGINAL: KitBuilder
I had the 4 star 40 once and would be nice to have a larger version.. I've got a newer OS .61? but it sounds like this wouldn't be enough motor?
I had the 4 star 40 once and would be nice to have a larger version.. I've got a newer OS .61? but it sounds like this wouldn't be enough motor?
#15
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: , MA
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Sig four star 60 engine choice.
I have a Thunder Tiger 130 on my Four Star floatplane. It has ample power but I would prefer a YS 1.40 on floats. I'm sure it is a ballistic missle without the floats but I've never taken them off. For weighing 13 lbs with fuel full, I'm shocked how aerobatic she is and well this airplane flies. You would think a 13lb 4 star would be a pig but that's not the case. Best flat spinner I've ever flown with crisp rolls, snaps, knife edge, etc. Really flies nice. The wing loading is perfect for acro at this weight.
Mike
Mike
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Marion,
IA
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Sig four star 60 engine choice.
If you like gas with a four stroke sound, maybe check out Saitos gas engine lineup. I have the FG36on a plane and it saves me $$$$$ ($2.80 to $20.00 for glow fuel). It runs very well, only one deadstick after probably about 25 flights because I ran out of gas. They are quite a little engine.
#22
My Feedback: (-1)
RE: Sig four star 60 engine choice.
ORIGINAL: WhiteRook
in the .90 to 120 size
in the .90 to 120 size
Due to the cost of the Saito gas engine {I'm just guessing but that seems to be what has been mentioned at the field} I still haven't seen anyone with one of there gassers. That is a big outlay of cash for just a sound. I'm still waiting to see one though. With all the nice running engines that have come out of China I doubt I ever will though but I keep hoping. I'm still looking forward to seeing some of the new small gassers too.
#23
Senior Member
RE: Sig four star 60 engine choice.
I've flown two 4*60s with a Magnum 91 four stroke. My prop of choice was an APC14x4W. You could lift off a go near vertical with that setup. The plane weighed in at around 9 lbs, including a half pound of nose weight. I would think more power would not be much better and could lead to some evil ground handling issues. I've got a Twist 150 with a Saito 180 in it and it is really way to much power. I know, there is a throttle stick in the TX, but my tendency is to get up flight speed then go full throttle before lift off.With the Twist, and a couple other over powered planes, that has presented quite a problem.
Don
Don
#24
My Feedback: (-1)
RE: Sig four star 60 engine choice.
ORIGINAL: Campgems
I've flown two 4*60s with a Magnum 91 four stroke. My prop of choice was an APC 14x4W. You could lift off a go near vertical with that setup. The plane weighed in at around 9 lbs, including a half pound of nose weight. I would think more power would not be much better and could lead to some evil ground handling issues. I've got a Twist 150 with a Saito 180 in it and it is really way to much power. I know, there is a throttle stick in the TX, but my tendency is to get up flight speed then go full throttle before lift off. With the Twist, and a couple other over powered planes, that has presented quite a problem.
Don
I've flown two 4*60s with a Magnum 91 four stroke. My prop of choice was an APC 14x4W. You could lift off a go near vertical with that setup. The plane weighed in at around 9 lbs, including a half pound of nose weight. I would think more power would not be much better and could lead to some evil ground handling issues. I've got a Twist 150 with a Saito 180 in it and it is really way to much power. I know, there is a throttle stick in the TX, but my tendency is to get up flight speed then go full throttle before lift off. With the Twist, and a couple other over powered planes, that has presented quite a problem.
Don
#25
Senior Member
RE: Sig four star 60 engine choice.
ORIGINAL: Gray Beard
You big girl, I have an idea or two for that 180!!!! It's big and long, pink purple and white. ??????? Kinda sounds girlie doesn't it!!!!![&o] Just tested an APC 15X8 and plan on trying the 15X6 next time out. Road trip to NICE this week for stuff.
ORIGINAL: Campgems
I've flown two 4*60s with a Magnum 91 four stroke. My prop of choice was an APC14x4W. You could lift off a go near vertical with that setup. The plane weighed in at around 9 lbs, including a half pound of nose weight. I would think more power would not be much better and could lead to some evil ground handling issues. I've got a Twist 150 with a Saito 180 in it and it is really way to much power. I know, there is a throttle stick in the TX, but my tendency is to get up flight speed then go full throttle before lift off.With the Twist, and a couple other over powered planes, that has presented quite a problem.
Don
I've flown two 4*60s with a Magnum 91 four stroke. My prop of choice was an APC14x4W. You could lift off a go near vertical with that setup. The plane weighed in at around 9 lbs, including a half pound of nose weight. I would think more power would not be much better and could lead to some evil ground handling issues. I've got a Twist 150 with a Saito 180 in it and it is really way to much power. I know, there is a throttle stick in the TX, but my tendency is to get up flight speed then go full throttle before lift off.With the Twist, and a couple other over powered planes, that has presented quite a problem.
Don
Don