Sport_Pilot
Posts: 7728
Joined: 1/21/2002 From: Acworth,
GA, USA Status: offline
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by J_R Talk to the folks in Nevada. They had no speed limits. The feds stepped in and decided that a 70 mph limit was desirable. Method of implementation? No Federal matching funds unless you comply. Want to guess the speed limit in Nevada? Actually I believe this to be illegal, to my knowledge no one has brought a case to the Supreme Court, though I do recall a similar case in the lower courts. Ever heard of the EPA? They mandate emissions for new vehicles. Guess what they do if you don't comply? Ask for higher standards? The manufacturers tried it. Ever heard of CAFE (corporate average fuel economy). If you don't comply, you pay $ per unit that don't comply. California consistently asks for lower emission standards and gets them from the manufacturers. Want vehicles for your community? Ever notice that some run natural gas? Why? Federal grants. Think emissions are not a federal law? look under your hood for the federally mandated emissions plaque. Felony to remove it. Yep, but that only applies to manufacture and modification of the car. The states enforce the maintenance, if they allow the cars emissions to degrade below Federal Standards they can do so. But then their citizens could be breaking the law in other states, and possibly Federal Law, when they cross state lines. Many states do allow lower emission standards for vehicles which are not to be used outside of private property, the manufactures produce those vehicles also. I don't see that what you say disputes what I said, the Federal Government regulates intrastate commerce, this includes manufacture of goods to certain standards. Bottom line: you can get pretty much what you want from the states if you control the purse strings. If the feds want the air below 500 ft, they will buy it from the states, or.... withhold money. Very effective tool and no limits on how many times it can be used. JR Actually they have tried JR. The above is only true when their isn't enough complaints, or the courts write law from the bench. They tried to regulate ultralights, the manufactures complained. They either threatened court action or the courts decided in their favor, don't remember which. IMO threating the states by withholding money is illegal, even if the Supreme court decided otherwise. I wish they had written an amendment to allow the FAA to control airspace over the states, as it is now a future court could decide to turn over past court rullings. [/QUOTE]
|