|
I need your advice to help save a local flying field. The short story: The Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) is rewriting their official master plan which impacts the Whittier Narrows flying field in El Monte (Southern California). Someone associated with the ACE suggested a blurb in the new plan that limits the R/C and C/L flyers to ELECTRIC-ONLY. They may be softening the blow with a phased-in approach but it is still a blow to the flyers. I am told that the comment period for this issue ends Septmeber 10th, 2011, about 2 weeks from now. See the original email I received at the bottom of this post. I've got one chance to write a letter and provide my comments on the issue so I would like my letter to sound complete, wise, and knowledge. I need FIVE simple things: A) Your Encouragement - Just post a simple "Don't Give Up" - Please don't post "Switch To Electric" I'm almost 50 and trying to get back into the hobby after the long vacation (college-wife-kids) and I'm already trying to learn electric systems and ADD them to my bag but I will NEVER give up on glow! B) Your Wisdom - If you've got an idea for an angle or a bullet-point that might help convince the ACE to allow glow fuel to continue I NEED to hear it. C) Your Grapevine - Please email a link to this thread to your flying buddies, especially the oldest, wisest, and orneriest ones who have all the knowledge and also that kind of treacherous thought process and have some experience dealing with government "stuff", and the ones who don't get on the PC and visit forums all that often. D) Your Knowledge - please answer my questions about glow fuel below if you can. E) Your Help - If you have 2 minutes to send your own email to the ACE please do so (Deborah.L.Lamb at usace.army.mil - replace "at" with @) but please don't be cross with them, they're actually fairly cooperative and helpful most of the time. They're just being misled on this one issue. Regarding item "D" - I need the modelers of the world to help me understand a few things (OK to reply with a LINK to a site or forum or post that provides the answers) Is glow fuel green? I know it's got castor oil which is edible and therefore should be biodegradable, but does the methanol combust completely? What happens to the Nitromethane, does it burn up completely? What is in the exhaust emitted by glow fuel? I have several other ideas try and to make them think twice about eliminating glow fuel such as: Have they even done an analysis of how many glow-powered flyers there are at the field? And how much glow fuel do they go through in a year? Is running an electric-powered model really "greener" than fuel? How much Carbon is produced to run a power-generation plant, needed to run a battery charger, to charge a battery? If they say "electric only" does that rule out Rubber-powered free flight? How about CO2 free-flight? How are kids ever going to grow up to be future generations of (without moving to India) engineers, metalurgists, machinists, mechanics, chemists, etc. if they grow up without the opportunity to: Adjust low and high speed needle valves? Test a glow plug and Change out a burnt glow plug or head? Learn about platinum and how it assists with combustion? Disassemble an engine for cleaning? Add or remove a head shim to compensate for the weather or altitude? Figure out how to mount the fuel tank higher or lower to solve fuel feed problems? Learn the difference between 5% and 30% fuel? Those are just a few things I came up with that you just can't learn from an electric set-up. Please post any others that you can think of. My sincerest thanks in advance to anyone and everyone who helps out. Paul = = = = = Original Email = = = = = Hello to all, Once again, an effort to disrupt our Whittier Narrows Flying site has been brewing and we have just learned of it. This time, the Army Corps of Engineers, (ACE), who own the land and lease it to the LA Co. Parks Dept, has retained an uninformed consultant, who has convinced the ACE that electric power is greener than "gasoline" and that the model airplane facility should be converted to electric only power. See page 97 of the attachment. The term "gas power" obviously has been interpereted to mean gasoline. The consultant is unaware that "gas" is actually methanol, which is already greener than gasoline, and doesn't cause nearly as many fires. The Knights of the Round Circle and the local flyers can take care of providing the correct technical facts to the consultant. What we need from the rest of you is to email a simple statement that you are opposed to the exclusion of glow and diesel models. We have until Sept 10 to make comments. The consultant collecting the comments is: (Deborah.L.Lamb at usace.army.mil - replace "at" with @) No need to be wordy or hostile yet, but be aware that they are counting the number of individual responses, and their decision is based in part on the number of negative responses that they recieve. Thanks for your support. Knights of the Round Circle www.kotrc.org
Hide Signatures
|