J_R
Posts: 4446
Joined: 1/4/2002 From: Corona, CA, Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: jrjohn <SNIP> Yes they tell you on the web page, but what good is it to know the policy limit if you don't know the policy conditions, definitions and exclusions? 2.5 million for what???? Mustang, you are totally correct, the AMA needs to get it's act together and start helping we the members. If we go elsewhere, they have nothing but I nice expensive building with a pond out front. The AMA is definatly leaving the door open, my guess is that somebody will walk through sometime in the future John John There is a list of exclusions. It is called the Safety Code. Look at what it says immediately below the title of Safety Code. You keep beating the same horse. Why not call Carl back and see if you can talk to him rather than debate him. I know for a fact that he has the type of personality that can cause him to get his back up and be less than helpful when you take what he perceives as an adversarial approach. Your a salesman, sell him on the fact that you need help. It's not too amazing that people get their back up when the get challenged. It happens all the time. Carl is no exception. When he knows he is right, and you insist that you are, such as in the case of being entitled to a copy of the policy, your not going to get very far. If you have blown up the bridge with Carl, you still have recourse. Carl is an employee of HQ. There is an Executive Director. The Executive Director is responsible to the EC, and you have a VP. You have other ways to go at this. Now, if you are demanding a copy of a policy that is not yet in the possession of the AMA, that is an unreasonable request. For the other readers who are not as familiar with the process, I ask if the farmer you described in another post was bound by his policy before you delivered it to him? If the $5 for a policy is THE major issue, I have seen situations where a VP spent a few dollars of his District Budget to keep a member happy. I can't promise it, but I know it has happened. If you contact these people with a adversarial approach, I suspect you are not going to get very far. That's human nature and you, as a salesman, should know better. You seem to have lost sight of a rather simple fact. You refer to we and them. As long as you are an AMA member, you, and we, is them. If, on the other hand, your only purpose is to continue to rant and not to resolve the issue, say so and I will back off. JR
|