Prop Performance Question    Gallery
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
    Search This Thread  
 
Printable Version

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Questions and Answers >> Prop Performance Question
Page: [1]

Tower Hobbies Get Coupon Codes Brands  
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Prop Performance Question - 2/2/2012 6:20 PM   
dasintex



Posts: 2012
Score: 126
Joined: 9/27/2004
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Central Texas, TX, USA
Status: offline
I will be running a Magnum 91 2 stroke on a Plane I just put together; the Engine Manual calls for 13X6 to 14X8 size Props; before I fly it, I am trying different size and style props on the test stand; so far the best performance was Master Air Screw S-2 14X6 at 12,000 rpm and Bolly Clubman 12.5X8 with the same rpm; what performance can I expect on a APC 14X5 Narrow Pattern Prop and a APC 14X4 Wide Fun Fly Prop; the reason I ask, I haven't used these 2 APC Props and are still in the unopened packages, I am happy with the other Props and I'd rather just return the 2 APC Props if their not going to any better.

Thanks, Doug.

_____________________________

P-40 Brotherhood #3
Spitfire Brotherhood #29

Hide Signatures
       Post #: 1

RE: Prop Performance Question - 2/2/2012 6:32 PM   
gaRCfield



Posts: 6429
Score: 156
Joined: 5/20/2008
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Mason, OH, USA
Status: offline
What are you looking for in performance, and what are you measuring?

APC props tend to use a little more energy, but return more than that in performance. The Wide blade will spin slower, put more load on the engine, and give you a lot of instantaneous thrust, or torque. The Narrow will give more revs.

Just measuring the RPM doesn't tell you much about performance, but it does let you know if a prop is too much or too little for the motor.

If you're happy with the props you have, that's all that matters. Totally up to you if you want to experiment; you will never know what you like until you try it.

_____________________________

Joe Marri
Enjoying all things aviation.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to dasintex)
       Post #: 2

RE: Prop Performance Question - 2/2/2012 7:57 PM   
JohnBuckner



Posts: 8309
Score: 342
Joined: 12/23/2001
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Kingman, AZ, USA
Status: offline
In full support or gaRCfield here it is impossible to select any given prop based simply on max static RPM. What you need is a PropWall for every displacement class and engine type you fly.

My suggestion is go ahead and open those props and have them ready when flying commences along with a reasonable selection.

If You are new to that displacement class having primarily always done other sizes or types its time to start on that 90-120 class Prop wall

John

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize


_____________________________

"Keep your controllines tight"

Hide Signatures

(in reply to gaRCfield)
       Post #: 3

RE: Prop Performance Question - 2/3/2012 3:19 PM   
jaka


 

Posts: 7182
Score: 158
Joined: 12/11/2001
Last Login: 5/19/2013
From: Upplands Vasby, SWEDEN
Status: offline
Hi!
First of all forget about what rpm you get! It isn't rpm that is meaning full, it's what prop that works best in the air that counts!
APC is superior to MA at least when you compare MA white-blade -tiped -props, but that doesn't mean APC is superior to all other brands.
Graupner "Cam-prop" series or Graupners still newer G-Sonic props (resemble APC) are good too, as are the British RAM series of props.
MA Scimitar series are rather good too! But avoid the MA white tipped props, noisy and no good performancevice!

_____________________________

Jan Karlsson - Supplier MVVS Products

Hide Signatures

(in reply to dasintex)
       Post #: 4

RE: Prop Performance Question - 2/8/2012 12:36 AM   
garyr1


 

Posts: 41
Score: 100
Joined: 11/7/2008
Last Login: 1/23/2013
From: Ottawa, ON, CANADA
Status: offline
Wow!
I'm loving that prop wall!
Guess I'm just jealous!

Hide Signatures

(in reply to jaka)
       Post #: 5

RE: Prop Performance Question - 2/8/2012 1:13 AM   
HighPlains


 

Posts: 4595
Score: 152
Joined: 3/2/2003
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Over da rainbow, KS, USA
Status: offline
I'm with John, you can't have too many props. I don't put too many on the wall, because I don't have that much wall space. But I have maybe 5 or 6 hundred props (maybe more) in boxes, drawers, and also a wall. Most are Rev-Up or APC.

I have to disagree about the statements that static RPM is unimportant. Nothing could be further from the truth. You need to operate the engine at the rpm where it makes it power. So find out where it is rated to make it maximum power and target a ground RPM several thousand down from that spec figure. This allows the engine to unload in flight, operate at it's peak and make horsepower. Then you find the selection of props that puts you at that ground RPM +/- a thousand by changing diameter or pitch.

_____________________________

- Supplementary insipid innocuous inane vacuous proclamation

Hide Signatures

(in reply to garyr1)
       Post #: 6

RE: Prop Performance Question - 2/10/2012 7:13 PM   
Stick 40


 

Posts: 829
Score: 103
Joined: 6/7/2003
Last Login: 11/21/2012
From: quincy, MI, USA
Status: offline
last spring I had a plane and engine combination , that I felt that I had to get the most pull out of the engine.

I put a fish scale on the tale of the plane and measured the pull of each prop gave. It worked great, found the prop that gave max pull.

I used a second safety line to make sure it did not take off, be careful

I can't say it was accurate , but it was a good and easy way to select a prop.

sticks

_____________________________

"born to fly, bound to crash"

Hide Signatures

(in reply to HighPlains)
       Post #: 7

RE: Prop Performance Question - 2/10/2012 7:32 PM   
Gray Beard


 

Posts: 12546
Score: 314
Joined: 4/21/2003
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Hemderson, NV, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Stick 40

last spring I had a plane and engine combination , that I felt that I had to get the most pull out of the engine.

I put a fish scale on the tale of the plane and measured the pull of each prop gave. It worked great, found the prop that gave max pull.

I used a second safety line to make sure it did not take off, be careful

I can't say it was accurate , but it was a good and easy way to select a prop.

sticks

Someone at the field I fly at made up a very cool thrust gauge sort of like you just mentioned. We tried several different planes with different engines and props then recorded the findings. It was placed in the club web site. Thrust on the ground tells you a bunch more then RPM but in flight prop testing is the only way to find the prop that will fly the plane the way the PILOT wants it to fly. RPM means nothing to me at all. I like a slower flying plane with a lot of thrust for vertical so I tend to use longeer props with smaller pitch. That's just me, another pilot may want the same plane to fly differently.
I have never had a wall of props like John. I have had around 30 props in the sizes I know work on the engines I have on hand and use. Most of them from 13 to 20 inches. The smaller props I have had I have given away to guys at the field. I was going to load up on more props at the club swap meet but the guy with the van full of props and stuff didn't show up this year. Swap meets are a good place to find props for very cheap. I think it was John that reminded me of that?

_____________________________

Drinking and driving are illegal, why do bars have parking lots
Daisy Air Guns, keeping kids off your lawn for 100 year

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Stick 40)
       Post #: 8

RE: Prop Performance Question - 2/10/2012 10:20 PM   
Bozarth


 

Posts: 1022
Score: 156
Joined: 4/30/2004
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Aurora, CO, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: gaRCfield

...
APC props tend to use a little more energy, but return more than that in performance....


Please elaborate on how they "use more energy." Thank you.

Kurt


Hide Signatures

(in reply to gaRCfield)
       Post #: 9

RE: Prop Performance Question - 2/11/2012 12:38 AM   
speedracerntrixie


 

Posts: 2374
Score: 189
Joined: 6/7/2010
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bozarth


quote:

ORIGINAL: gaRCfield

...
APC props tend to use a little more energy, but return more than that in performance....


Please elaborate on how they "use more energy." Thank you.

Kurt



APC props need a little more power to turn the same RPM as a same size Zinger on the same engine but because they are designed better will actually give better performance, pull and speed.



Hide Signatures

(in reply to Bozarth)
       Post #: 10

RE: Prop Performance Question - 2/11/2012 8:28 AM   
Bozarth


 

Posts: 1022
Score: 156
Joined: 4/30/2004
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Aurora, CO, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: speedracerntrixie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bozarth


quote:

ORIGINAL: gaRCfield

...
APC props tend to use a little more energy, but return more than that in performance....


Please elaborate on how they ''use more energy.'' Thank you.

Kurt



APC props need a little more power to turn the same RPM as a same size Zinger on the same engine but because they are designed better will actually give better performance, pull and speed.




So they're more efficient.

Kurt

Hide Signatures

(in reply to speedracerntrixie)
       Post #: 11

RE: Prop Performance Question - 2/11/2012 12:49 PM   
Stick 40


 

Posts: 829
Score: 103
Joined: 6/7/2003
Last Login: 11/21/2012
From: quincy, MI, USA
Status: offline
I have heard that APC's are efficient and if they are I wonder if we can or do use a little less throttle . If so we may use the same amount of fuel or even less?

As to the thrust measurement and the fish scale, I don't think its the last word on selecting a prop. I think it just give a good measurement on pulling power and a place to start.

It did help me get an idea as to the engine and prop I had being able to fly a heavy plane. I used the prop that pulled the most and it did very well, even with our field being small for big planes ( corn did not help ) I was able to pull it off with room to spare.

sticks

_____________________________

"born to fly, bound to crash"

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Bozarth)
       Post #: 12

RE: Prop Performance Question - 2/11/2012 2:42 PM   
Scar



Posts: 3050
Score: 126
Joined: 10/2/2002
Last Login: 5/17/2013
From: Peoria Hts, IL, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dasintex

I will be running a Magnum 91 2 stroke on a Plane I just put together; the Engine Manual calls for 13X6 to 14X8 size Props; before I fly it, I am trying different size and style props on the test stand; so far the best performance was Master Air Screw S-2 14X6 at 12,000 rpm and Bolly Clubman 12.5X8 with the same rpm; what performance can I expect on a APC 14X5 Narrow Pattern Prop and a APC 14X4 Wide Fun Fly Prop; the reason I ask, I haven't used these 2 APC Props and are still in the unopened packages, I am happy with the other Props and I'd rather just return the 2 APC Props if their not going to any better.

Thanks, Doug.

Doug,

Here's my take on props for a .91.

I tried the 13x8, 14x7, 14x6 and 15x6, all APC. The plane that helped me decide was an old Cermark Sukhoi, used for aerobatics, no hovering.

I found a happy medium with the 14x6. It provides a little braking, to slow the plane for landing, better than the 13X8 or 14x7. The 15x6 was also good, but I found the braking to be excessive.

For me, the 13x8 and 14x7 were faster, but I didn't need fast. I needed straight, strong uplines. The 6 pitch props seemed to pull the plane straight up a little better than the others.

If you're looking to hover, you'll probably want a 4 or 5 pitch prop. For racing, one of the higher pitch props might be better.

Just my 2¢ worth,
Dave Olson

_____________________________

The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him GKChesterton

Hide Signatures

(in reply to dasintex)
       Post #: 13

Page:   [1]
All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Questions and Answers >> Prop Performance Question
Page: [1]





Jump to:


 
Google 



Search | Marketplace | Event Calendar | Local Clubs | Magazine | Product Ratings | New Products | Discussion Forums

Photo Gallery | Instructor Search | Field|Track|Marina Search

Advertisers | Hobby Vendor Resources | Rate Manufacturers | Sign In/Sign Up

SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

RC Universe is a service of Internet Brands, Inc. Copyright © 2001-2013.

Charities we support that also need your help
Yorkie Rescue | Humane Society | ASPCA | Crohn's-Colitis America


0.906RCU1