RE: FPV SURVEY    Gallery
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
    Search This Thread  
 
Printable Version


Lanier Taylorcraft (1/4) - ARC
Seller:  p38nut
Details:   $250.00   |  6/18/2013   |  Classified Ad
We will rotate YOUR AD in this spot if you select "Forum Featured" when placing or editing your ad!

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> AMA Discussions >> RE: FPV SURVEY
Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 5 [6]

Tower Hobbies Get Coupon Codes Brands  
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: FPV SURVEY - 7/8/2012 10:01 PM   
JohnShe


 

Posts: 273
Score: 107
Joined: 11/19/2010
Last Login: 6/20/2013
From: Round Hill, VA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cj_rumley


quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnShe
The only safe place to fly FPV is at an AMA flying field, and I stand by that statement.



Rubbish.  That's like saying no model airplane should be flown anywhere but at an AMA flying field.




No, you can fly anywhere you want, but the safest place is an AMA club filed.  There because of self imposed responsible behavior, the possibility of accidental damage or injury is minimized.  I still stand by the engineering principle behind this statement.





Hide Signatures

(in reply to cj_rumley)
       Post #: 126

RE: FPV SURVEY - 7/8/2012 11:08 PM  1 votes
Top_Gunn


 

Posts: 902
Score: 134
Joined: 6/27/2005
Last Login: 6/20/2013
From: Granger, IN, USA
Status: offline
quote:

No, you can fly anywhere you want, but the safest place is an AMA club filed. There because of self imposed responsible behavior, the possibility of accidental damage or injury is minimized. I still stand by the engineering principle behind this statement.


Amazing. Yesterday it was FAA regulations, today it's engineering principles. Tomorrow it may be monsters who will pop out from under your bed in the night if you dare to fly elsewhere than at an AMA field.

This is a guy who, in the last couple of months, has told us that (1) Model Aviation isn't allowed to make money because the AMA is a non-profit organization, (2) any dues-paying member of an AMA club can allow non-AMA members to fly at his field a few times, (3) the AMA requires its clubs to adopt a rule providing for expulsion of members who violate the rules, and (4) this stuff about how you can't fly FPV except from an AMA club field. All these claims are false; in each case, they're a badly distorted version of something else. For example, the AMA encourages, but does not require, clubs to adopt a rule expelling rule violators. There's no disgrace in misremebering something you've heard or read. But people really ought to check before posting about things supported by vague memories. Some people may believe the things they read here.

_____________________________

Al Gunn
Ultra Sport Brotherhood No. 9

Hide Signatures

(in reply to JohnShe)
       Post #: 127

RE: FPV SURVEY - 7/8/2012 11:39 PM   
804


 

Posts: 1049
Score: 177
Joined: 9/17/2005
Last Login: 6/20/2013
From: sheridan, IN, USA
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: Top_Gunn

quote:

No, you can fly anywhere you want, but the safest place is an AMA club filed. There because of self imposed responsible behavior, the possibility of accidental damage or injury is minimized. I still stand by the engineering principle behind this statement.


Amazing. Yesterday it was FAA regulations, today it's engineering principles. Tomorrow it may be monsters who will pop out from under your bed in the night if you dare to fly elsewhere than at an AMA field.

This is a guy who, in the last couple of months, has told us that (1) Model Aviation isn't allowed to make money because the AMA is a non-profit organization, (2) any dues-paying member of an AMA club can allow non-AMA members to fly at his field a few times, (3) the AMA requires its clubs to adopt a rule providing for expulsion of members who violate the rules, and (4) this stuff about how you can't fly FPV except from an AMA club field. All these claims are false; in each case, they're a badly distorted version of something else. For example, the AMA encourages, but does not require, clubs to adopt a rule expelling rule violators. There's no disgrace in misremebering something you've heard or read. But people really ought to check before posting about things supported by vague memories. Some people may believe the things they read here.


Well, Top_Gunn,
I can't disagree with what you say, but...
between FAA not talking,
AMA talking much but saying little,
and the regulars here trying to interpret the above, and the new law from Congress,
it's not like there is much on this topic one can believe or disbelieve.
What is true today might be false tomorrow(or whenever FAA decides to speak).

So, what the heck, speculate away folks.
Very entertaining.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Top_Gunn)
       Post #: 128

RE: FPV SURVEY - 7/8/2012 11:48 PM   
Top_Gunn


 

Posts: 902
Score: 134
Joined: 6/27/2005
Last Login: 6/20/2013
From: Granger, IN, USA
Status: offline
Speculation is fine. Posting untrue statements of fact when accurate information is available isn't.

_____________________________

Al Gunn
Ultra Sport Brotherhood No. 9

Hide Signatures

(in reply to 804)
       Post #: 129

RE: FPV SURVEY - 7/9/2012 1:33 AM   
cfircav8r



Posts: 1157
Score: 218
Joined: 7/17/2004
Last Login: 6/19/2013
From: Hampton, IA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnShe


Am I straining your limited reasoning skills.  My statement was well qualified.

The jails should be full of people who cause property damage or injury by flying where they aren't supposed to

 
As I recall, causing property damage or personal injury whether by accident or intention may be subject to local or regional ordinances.

Nevertheless, my expression was only my opinion on the possible consequences of irresponsible behavior.




Causing injury or property damage will have the same results whether you are at an AMA field or your own personal field. If you have a legal right to be there you will be subject to the exact same ordinances and consequences. The assumption that flying "outlaw/rogue" automatically makes you irresponsible and a law breaker is exactly the kind of arrogance/ignorance that is driving potential members away. I have seen every bit as much irresponsible and dangerous behavior at AMA fields as at non AMA fields. Having the AMA card and their blessing at your field does not relieve you of accountability.

You profess to be rule minded, perhaps you should reread the forum rules before you attempt to belittle and degrade others. It doesn't bother me personally, but resorting to childish behavior does take away from the legitimacy of the thread.

_____________________________

The three most useless things to a pilot, the sky above you, the runway behind you, and the fuel on the ground.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to JohnShe)
       Post #: 130

RE: FPV SURVEY - 7/9/2012 2:11 AM   
cj_rumley


 

Posts: 754
Score: 147
Joined: 9/21/2009
Last Login: 6/20/2013
From: Aguanga, CA, USA
Status: offline
Another drift from from the topic I know, but..........

I tried to post a comment on Rich Hanson's Blog on the AMA website re the Alcatraz incident and got this idiotic bot reply:

"Cheating huh

Protected by: AVH First Defense Against Spam - WPMU DEV Version"

What does it take to participate there?   I was signed on to the AMA site and presumed that gave me permission to comment.  Tried to find a link to site admin, but only found admin for the AMA Forums that I do not care to participate in.  Anybody got a good idea?

FWIW, this is what I tried to post,

It is an incident of  real concern that needs addressing  in the interest of protecting our freedom to fly model aircraft, and thanks to Rich for bringing it up here.
One thing in the way of constructive criticism, though.  The 'electric UAS rotorcraft' central to the article referenced was not a model aircraft.  It was a commercial ('civil' in FAA speak) UAS.   It behooves all of us to know what separates us and our model aircraft from regulated (or to be regulated) classes of UAS.


CJ


Hide Signatures

(in reply to cfircav8r)
       Post #: 131

RE: FPV SURVEY - 7/9/2012 9:25 PM   
JohnShe


 

Posts: 273
Score: 107
Joined: 11/19/2010
Last Login: 6/20/2013
From: Round Hill, VA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Top_Gunn

quote:

No, you can fly anywhere you want, but the safest place is an AMA club filed. There because of self imposed responsible behavior, the possibility of accidental damage or injury is minimized. I still stand by the engineering principle behind this statement.


Amazing. Yesterday it was FAA regulations, today it's engineering principles. Tomorrow it may be monsters who will pop out from under your bed in the night if you dare to fly elsewhere than at an AMA field.

This is a guy who, in the last couple of months, has told us that (1) Model Aviation isn't allowed to make money because the AMA is a non-profit organization, (2) any dues-paying member of an AMA club can allow non-AMA members to fly at his field a few times, (3) the AMA requires its clubs to adopt a rule providing for expulsion of members who violate the rules, and (4) this stuff about how you can't fly FPV except from an AMA club field. All these claims are false; in each case, they're a badly distorted version of something else. For example, the AMA encourages, but does not require, clubs to adopt a rule expelling rule violators. There's no disgrace in misremebering something you've heard or read. But people really ought to check before posting about things supported by vague memories. Some people may believe the things they read here.


You do realize that you post is a personal attack and therefore I am in my right to ask that it be removed.  However. I would more enjoy pointing out the error of your ways.


1 - The AMA is formed as a "non-profit"  organization.  And by definition, a "non-profit" is not allowed to make a a profit and distribute that profit to their shareholders (in there are any).  To that end, if the AMA managed their resources well, through the sale of memberships, magazines and other products, any excess money earned must be placed back into the organization.  This has allows the purchase of property in Muncie Indiana and the necessary improvements on that property., such as buildings, flying fields and  runways, RC Car track and many other features.  So yes, they can make Money, just not a profit.

2 - This is a method to promote model aviation. The AAMA calls it the "Introductory Pilot Program". Our club promotes it on their webpage and allows novices to fly, using buddy boxes during many of our public events as well as any time a member shows up with a friend and a qualified instructor is available..  I am told that many clubs do that, apparently your club is closed to new members.  And, like the Shakers may soon become extinct.

3 - It is in the AMA member handbook and in my clubs bylaws.  Apparently your club didn't get the message.  In an AMA document on bylaws the section for disciplinary action is "strongly suggested"  not required, as I may have misspoken.

4 - I never said "you can't fly",  I said it is the safest place to fly.  There is nothing to prevent you from finding a location well away from people and buildings and setting up a buddy box to fly line of sight.  It just the AMA club fields already have all of the amenities necessary.  So why bother?

I have not misremembered anything.







Hide Signatures

(in reply to Top_Gunn)
       Post #: 132

RE: FPV SURVEY - 7/9/2012 9:39 PM   
JohnShe


 

Posts: 273
Score: 107
Joined: 11/19/2010
Last Login: 6/20/2013
From: Round Hill, VA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cfircav8r


quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnShe


Am I straining your limited reasoning skills.  My statement was well qualified.

The jails should be full of people who cause property damage or injury by flying where they aren't supposed to

 
As I recall, causing property damage or personal injury whether by accident or intention may be subject to local or regional ordinances.

Nevertheless, my expression was only my opinion on the possible consequences of irresponsible behavior.




Causing injury or property damage will have the same results whether you are at an AMA field or your own personal field. If you have a legal right to be there you will be subject to the exact same ordinances and consequences. The assumption that flying "outlaw/rogue" automatically makes you irresponsible and a law breaker is exactly the kind of arrogance/ignorance that is driving potential members away. I have seen every bit as much irresponsible and dangerous behavior at AMA fields as at non AMA fields. Having the AMA card and their blessing at your field does not relieve you of accountability.

You profess to be rule minded, perhaps you should reread the forum rules before you attempt to belittle and degrade others. It doesn't bother me personally, but resorting to childish behavior does take away from the legitimacy of the thread.


Apparently I got a little out of hand with my remarks about straining... I therefore humbly apologize.

However, I don't think that you have read all of the words in my sentence.  Did you miss the part that says "where they aren't supposed to"?

I do agree that flying in a safe location, whether an am club field or you own property (provided that you are not so close to other property that you risk damage or injury) is perfectly acceptable.  That is why we have insurance.  Accidents happen all the time, responsible behavior minimizes the risk of accidents, but unfortunately does not always stop them.  I would say though, at least at my club, irresponsible behavior is not tolerated and quickly dealt with.  Occasional lapses are quickly and polity brought to the members attention and repeated lapses are treated harshly.





Hide Signatures

(in reply to cfircav8r)
       Post #: 133

RE: FPV SURVEY - 7/9/2012 10:13 PM   
Top_Gunn


 

Posts: 902
Score: 134
Joined: 6/27/2005
Last Login: 6/20/2013
From: Granger, IN, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnShe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Top_Gunn

quote:

No, you can fly anywhere you want, but the safest place is an AMA club filed. There because of self imposed responsible behavior, the possibility of accidental damage or injury is minimized. I still stand by the engineering principle behind this statement.


Amazing. Yesterday it was FAA regulations, today it's engineering principles. Tomorrow it may be monsters who will pop out from under your bed in the night if you dare to fly elsewhere than at an AMA field.

This is a guy who, in the last couple of months, has told us that (1) Model Aviation isn't allowed to make money because the AMA is a non-profit organization, (2) any dues-paying member of an AMA club can allow non-AMA members to fly at his field a few times, (3) the AMA requires its clubs to adopt a rule providing for expulsion of members who violate the rules, and (4) this stuff about how you can't fly FPV except from an AMA club field. All these claims are false; in each case, they're a badly distorted version of something else. For example, the AMA encourages, but does not require, clubs to adopt a rule expelling rule violators. There's no disgrace in misremebering something you've heard or read. But people really ought to check before posting about things supported by vague memories. Some people may believe the things they read here.


You do realize that you post is a personal attack and therefore I am in my right to ask that it be removed.  However. I would more enjoy pointing out the error of your ways.


1 - The AMA is formed as a ''non-profit''  organization.  And by definition, a ''non-profit'' is not allowed to make a a profit and distribute that profit to their shareholders (in there are any).  To that end, if the AMA managed their resources well, through the sale of memberships, magazines and other products, any excess money earned must be placed back into the organization.  This has allows the purchase of property in Muncie Indiana and the necessary improvements on that property., such as buildings, flying fields and  runways, RC Car track and many other features.  So yes, they can make Money, just not a profit.



2 - This is a method to promote model aviation. The AAMA calls it the ''Introductory Pilot Program''. Our club promotes it on their webpage and allows novices to fly, using buddy boxes during many of our public events as well as any time a member shows up with a friend and a qualified instructor is available..  I am told that many clubs do that, apparently your club is closed to new members.  And, like the Shakers may soon become extinct.


3 - It is in the AMA member handbook and in my clubs bylaws.  Apparently your club didn't get the message.  In an AMA document on bylaws the section for disciplinary action is ''strongly suggested''  not required, as I may have misspoken.


4 - I never said ''you can't fly'',  I said it is the safest place to fly.  There is nothing to prevent you from finding a location well away from people and buildings and setting up a buddy box to fly line of sight.  It just the AMA club fields already have all of the amenities necessary.  So why bother?

I have not misremembered anything.










1. They can make a profit on the magazine. For that matter, they can make a profit overall. True, they can't pay dividends to the "shareholders," and if you had said that, you'd have been right, but irrelevant. But you said they weren't allowed to make a profit, which isn't true.

2. The intro pilot program does not allow any dues-paying member to buddy-box a non member, as you claimed. Only an intro pilot (I've been one myself) can do that. I have no idea where you got the silly idea that my club is closed to new members. You seem to have a remarkable knack for misunderstanding things.

3. Yes, you "may have misspoken."

4. You said this: "you can't fly anywhere without FAA approval, except at an AMA club field." And now you claim you never said it? Fascinating. Claiming never to have said something people can read in your original post is foolish. You should say it was "taken out of context."

So, four out of four statements that were wrong. Pointing this out is not a personal attack.

_____________________________

Al Gunn
Ultra Sport Brotherhood No. 9

Hide Signatures

(in reply to JohnShe)
       Post #: 134

RE: FPV SURVEY - 7/10/2012 2:15 AM   
cfircav8r



Posts: 1157
Score: 218
Joined: 7/17/2004
Last Login: 6/19/2013
From: Hampton, IA, USA
Status: offline
John, Thank you for the apology and I understand your frustration. I can see how it is easy to come to your apples to oranges comparison due to the prevalance of Youtube videos clearly showing a blatant disregard for the safety of others while flying FPV. I took your statements as a more apples to apples comparison and others, that may just be learning about the AMA and the rules of model aviation, may also see it that way. When we write we know what we are thinking and read it that way, however when someone else reads it they can infer a completely different meaning if you are not very specific and complete in your explanations. My motive in this has never been to "call you out" as being wrong, but instead make clear what the rules are, as they stand now, for others that may have also missunderstood your statement and reasoning.

There are enough AMA goosesteppers out there that would love nothing more than to have everyone believe that the AMA card is an actual license and is required to fly models. AMA should never be a regulatory organization, thats what the FAA is for. It is as the name implies a facilitator for like minded individuals to come together to learn to build, fly and experiment with model aircraft. FPV is a new facet of model aeronautics and should be included, using the same standards of safety that has proven the AMA a success. It is only with this attitude that the AMA will live up to its potential as the best and largest organization for model aeronautics. There are many that would rather it be a controlling entity with them in charge. As with the US, the concept is sound its just some of the people are flawed.

_____________________________

The three most useless things to a pilot, the sky above you, the runway behind you, and the fuel on the ground.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to JohnShe)
       Post #: 135

RE: FPV SURVEY - 7/10/2012 3:53 AM   
JohnShe


 

Posts: 273
Score: 107
Joined: 11/19/2010
Last Login: 6/20/2013
From: Round Hill, VA, USA
Status: offline
I agree with everything but the goose stepping business.  I see the AMA as a way to meet the needs of the modeling community by providing safe places to fly with reasonable amenities.  Around here, where I live, there are no other safe places to fly.  It is possible to do park flying on a limited basis, when the parks are vacant, but that requires the rather small airframes that I don't enjoy flying.  I like the big ones.

The AMA rules and regulations are well within the spirit of the goals and purposes  regulatory agencies and good engineering practices to promote safety and fun.  Plus the added value of the insurance makes the AMA a good deal to me.

I also believe that irresponsible behavior should be harshly dealt with because it harms us all.


Hide Signatures

(in reply to cfircav8r)
       Post #: 136

RE: FPV SURVEY - 7/10/2012 4:24 AM   
JohnShe


 

Posts: 273
Score: 107
Joined: 11/19/2010
Last Login: 6/20/2013
From: Round Hill, VA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Top_Gunn



1. They can make a profit on the magazine. For that matter, they can make a profit overall. True, they can't pay dividends to the "shareholders," and if you had said that, you'd have been right, but irrelevant. But you said they weren't allowed to make a profit, which isn't true.

2. The intro pilot program does not allow any dues-paying member to buddy-box a non member, as you claimed. Only an intro pilot (I've been one myself) can do that. I have no idea where you got the silly idea that my club is closed to new members. You seem to have a remarkable knack for misunderstanding things.

3. Yes, you "may have misspoken."

4. You said this: "you can't fly anywhere without FAA approval, except at an AMA club field." And now you claim you never said it? Fascinating. Claiming never to have said something people can read in your original post is foolish. You should say it was "taken out of context."

So, four out of four statements that were wrong. Pointing this out is not a personal attack.


1 - If you want to split hairs then you have a point.  I worked for a non-profit for many years and they never reported a profit.  One year they made more money that they were supposed to so the gave all employees a rather nice bonus to balance the books.  The AMA just spends their extra money on amenities.

2 - I only tersely mentioned the introductory pilot program that my club promotes on their webpage, I didn't know you wanted a legal brief with citations.  Again this is nothing but hair splitting to make a point.

3 - Whatever it is just hair splitting, the AMA went out of its way to made it clear that discipline was important in the club bylaw policy statement.  I just read that bylaws were required and lost sight of the strongly recommended statement.

4 - We have gotten so far from my original response that you may have forgotten that I was responding to a question about the the use of UAVs.  And as I said before, the FAA has not completed or published the rules for sUAS operation.  And, at present they do not permit the use of UAVs, for commercial or recreational purposes, in the NAS.  However R&D and pilot training may be performed at FAA approved and highly restricted locations.  This is current FAA policy and is not expected to change until the sUAS rules are put into effect.  The deadline for this is September 31, 2015 I think.  To that end, you could fly a UAV at a club field if they let you and you obeyed the rules.  If you try to do it anywhere else you risk getting into trouble.  Again, my response to the question was rather succinct because I did not know that all postings had to be legal briefs with extended citations.  Next time I will ask for help from the supreme court.












Hide Signatures

(in reply to Top_Gunn)
       Post #: 137

RE: FPV SURVEY - 7/10/2012 4:40 AM   
cfircav8r



Posts: 1157
Score: 218
Joined: 7/17/2004
Last Login: 6/19/2013
From: Hampton, IA, USA
Status: offline
I in no way consider the AMA as an orginization as goosesteppers but there are some individuals out there trying to shove their view of what the AMA is down everybodies throat. I have been a member off and on since the 80's, and have only had lapses when I was away from model flying due to flight school, flight instructing (ironic) and starting a family. I think its a great organization and encourage others to join, that is why I want to make sure the information is understood correctly, lest some get a bad taste in their mouth abouth the AMA.

Right now there is no real way to punish anyone until there is an incident. The new regulations will now allow for offenders to be punished before an incident, but they have the potential to change the face of model aviation, and not necessarily in a positive way. That is why we need to be proactive and show we can continue with innovation in a safe manner. This will limit the regulations impact on those that will promote safe practices, even when they are pushing technology and expanding our hobby in new and better ways. That is after all what the AMA is supposed to be about.

_____________________________

The three most useless things to a pilot, the sky above you, the runway behind you, and the fuel on the ground.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to JohnShe)
       Post #: 138

RE: FPV SURVEY - 7/10/2012 7:36 PM   
KidEpoxy



Posts: 6681
Score: 431
Joined: 10/14/2004
Last Login: 11/18/2012
From: San Antonio, TX, USA
Status: offline
quote:

Right now there is no real way to punish anyone until there is an incident.

'Right now' the FAA can act on violations of the ASF400/G0801 Civil & Public UAV requirement for cert/coa.
FAA didnt tell the LA Sheriff that their violation was no big deal and let them keep flying their Public UAS.
Should the sheriffs get a fine? Or Jailtime? Lose the aviation license they didnt have in the first place?

Hide Signatures

(in reply to cfircav8r)
       Post #: 139

RE: FPV SURVEY - 7/10/2012 11:07 PM   
cfircav8r



Posts: 1157
Score: 218
Joined: 7/17/2004
Last Login: 6/19/2013
From: Hampton, IA, USA
Status: offline
Yes I should have been more specific, there currently is no FAA regulation that can be used to punish a hobby flyer operating an fpv aircraft for sport/fun.

_____________________________

The three most useless things to a pilot, the sky above you, the runway behind you, and the fuel on the ground.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to KidEpoxy)
       Post #: 140

Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 5 [6]
All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> AMA Discussions >> RE: FPV SURVEY
Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 5 [6]





Jump to:


 
Google 



Search | Marketplace | Event Calendar | Local Clubs | Magazine | Product Ratings | New Products | Discussion Forums

Photo Gallery | Instructor Search | Field|Track|Marina Search

Advertisers | Hobby Vendor Resources | Rate Manufacturers | Sign In/Sign Up

SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

RC Universe is a service of Internet Brands, Inc. Copyright © 2001-2013.

Charities we support that also need your help
Yorkie Rescue | Humane Society | ASPCA | Crohn's-Colitis America


1.014RCU1