RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum    Gallery
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
    Search This Thread  
 
Printable Version

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> AMA Discussions >> RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum
Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15   next >   >>  

Tower Hobbies Get Coupon Codes Brands  
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/27/2012 6:13 PM   
bradpaul



Posts: 662
Score: 138
Joined: 1/2/2002
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: Apopka, FL, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf


quote:

ORIGINAL: bradpaul


quote:

ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf

To Brad

Do you believe there really was a ''group of users'' reporting posts that didn't break rules over there? If so, were you one of the group?


I think that ctrout has you chassing a ''red herring''.

Got to give him credit it sure has got a discussion going................................

The question should be did users over there report posts ''THAT DID BREAK THE RULES''?  .....      www.rcuniverse.com="" forum="" js="" fckeditor="" editor="" images="" smiley="" msn="" src="" />      

Brad  


You give him to much credit.

In this very string is a perfect example of the problem... Its perfectly fine and acceptable to name the people that were reported inappropriately for violations that weren't violations but withhold who was doing the inappropriate reporting... Can't anyone see how unfair that is? Why is that accepted? The answer to that question will give you an insight that is bust-proof.


So which online forum discloses who reports a post?????????????????, not AMA, not RCG and not RCU............... well at RCG you can get points for "inappropriate reporting" ?  .........  don't think AMA or RCU have that.

Brad









Hide Signatures

(in reply to littlecrankshaf)
       Post #: 201

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/27/2012 6:14 PM   
Arbo


 

Posts: 307
Score: 100
Joined: 4/6/2003
Last Login: 10/1/2012
From: hometown, AZ, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf
In this very string is a perfect example of the problem... Its perfectly fine and acceptable to name the people that were reported inappropriately for violations that weren't violations but withhold who was doing the inappropriate reporting... Can't anyone see how unfair that is? Why is that accepted? The answer to that question will give you an insight that is bust-proof.


Within the limits of the forum rules here on RCU, it seems that it is ok to name people that did not do wrong, but naming those that 'went after them' would be calling them out, and most often, would be found to be a 'personal attack'.     There's nothing to it other than that.

FWIW, I have never seen ctrout do any 'inappropriate' reporting.   Genenerally if he reporting something it was a violation, and if it wasn't it was just due to misinterpretation of a post.    Never saw any of the blatent abuse of reporting from him as I did from some others. 



Hide Signatures

(in reply to littlecrankshaf)
       Post #: 202

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/27/2012 6:15 PM   
littlecrankshaf



Posts: 4101
Score: 259
Joined: 12/9/2001
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: here
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bradpaul




I think that ctrout has you chassing a ''red herring''.





I think you found yours...LOL


_____________________________

Wow! Another epiphany…that is why the suckups suckup. Super sucking protection power. Yea baby.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to bradpaul)
       Post #: 203

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/27/2012 6:21 PM   
littlecrankshaf



Posts: 4101
Score: 259
Joined: 12/9/2001
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: here
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arbo


quote:

ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf
In this very string is a perfect example of the problem... Its perfectly fine and acceptable to name the people that were reported inappropriately for violations that weren't violations but withhold who was doing the inappropriate reporting... Can't anyone see how unfair that is? Why is that accepted? The answer to that question will give you an insight that is bust-proof.


Within the limits of the forum rules here on RCU, it seems that it is ok to name people that did not do wrong, but naming those that 'went after them' would be calling them out, and most often, would be found to be a 'personal attack'.     There's nothing to it other than that.

FWIW, I have never seen ctrout do any 'inappropriate' reporting.   Genenerally if he reporting something it was a violation, and if it wasn't it was just due to misinterpretation of a post.    Never saw any of the blatent abuse of reporting from him as I did from some others. 



Actually the correct way to have done that would have been to phrase it along these lines... "There are members that incessantly report a select few of the others even though thier posts did not brake any of the forum rules."

_____________________________

Wow! Another epiphany…that is why the suckups suckup. Super sucking protection power. Yea baby.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Arbo)
       Post #: 204

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/27/2012 6:36 PM   
Arbo


 

Posts: 307
Score: 100
Joined: 4/6/2003
Last Login: 10/1/2012
From: hometown, AZ, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf
Actually the correct way to have done that would have been to phrase it along these lines... "There are members that incessantly report a select few of the others even though thier posts did not brake any of the forum rules."


Well, when you are a moderator, feel free to phrase it however you'd like.    Neither way will bother me. 



Hide Signatures

(in reply to littlecrankshaf)
       Post #: 205

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/27/2012 6:41 PM   
littlecrankshaf



Posts: 4101
Score: 259
Joined: 12/9/2001
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: here
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arbo


quote:

ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf
Actually the correct way to have done that would have been to phrase it along these lines... '' members that incessantly report a select few of the others even though thier posts did not brake any of the forum rules.''


Well, when you are a moderator, feel free to phrase it however you'd like.    Neither way will bother me. 



Now for clarity, was there AMA forum members that incessantly reported a select few of the others even though thier posts did not brake any of the forum rules?

_____________________________

Wow! Another epiphany…that is why the suckups suckup. Super sucking protection power. Yea baby.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Arbo)
       Post #: 206

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/27/2012 6:53 PM   
littlecrankshaf



Posts: 4101
Score: 259
Joined: 12/9/2001
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: here
Status: offline 		I think I need to reform the question...


Now for clarity, was there a group of AMA forum members that incessantly reported a select few of the others even though the particular posts reported did not brake any of the forum rules?

_____________________________

Wow! Another epiphany…that is why the suckups suckup. Super sucking protection power. Yea baby.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to littlecrankshaf)
       Post #: 207

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/27/2012 7:00 PM   
phlpsfrnk



Posts: 500
Score: 101
Joined: 1/7/2009
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: Spring Hill, FL, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arbo


quote:

ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf
In this very string is a perfect example of the problem... Its perfectly fine and acceptable to name the people that were reported inappropriately for violations that weren't violations but withhold who was doing the inappropriate reporting... Can't anyone see how unfair that is? Why is that accepted? The answer to that question will give you an insight that is bust-proof.


Within the limits of the forum rules here on RCU, it seems that it is ok to name people that did not do wrong, but naming those that 'went after them' would be calling them out, and most often, would be found to be a 'personal attack'.     There's nothing to it other than that.

FWIW, I have never seen ctrout do any 'inappropriate' reporting.   Genenerally if he reporting something it was a violation, and if it wasn't it was just due to misinterpretation of a post.    Never saw any of the blatent abuse of reporting from him as I did from some others. 



You have my permission to post any and all posts that you think I reported "inappropriately" or was "blatent abuse" of the system. In fact I insist.

Regards
Frank

_____________________________

It is not possible to write in such a way that cannot be misinterpreted by a reader determined to do so.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Arbo)
       Post #: 208

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/27/2012 8:17 PM   
Arbo


 

Posts: 307
Score: 100
Joined: 4/6/2003
Last Login: 10/1/2012
From: hometown, AZ, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: phlpsfrnk

You have my permission to post any and all posts that you think I reported "inappropriately" or was "blatent abuse" of the system. In fact I insist.

Regards
Frank


Oh, you INSIST.  Oh well, let me get right on that.

Or not. 



Hide Signatures

(in reply to phlpsfrnk)
       Post #: 209

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/28/2012 2:45 AM   
ctrout


 

Posts: 96
Score: 100
Joined: 1/27/2011
Last Login: 9/19/2012
From: , MD, USA
Status: offline 		Baaaaaaaaaaaaaad CTrout ~


Hide Signatures

(in reply to Arbo)
       Post #: 210

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/28/2012 11:17 AM   
phlpsfrnk



Posts: 500
Score: 101
Joined: 1/7/2009
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: Spring Hill, FL, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arbo


quote:

ORIGINAL: phlpsfrnk

You have my permission to post any and all posts that you think I reported ''inappropriately'' or was ''blatent abuse'' of the system. In fact I insist.

Regards
Frank


let me get right on that.

While you are at it, if you have any more of those selective screen captures that have my signature phlpsfrnk, partial or full name please do not redact them. If you are going to imply wrong doing on my part lets see some proof of it or any and all correspondance with HQ regarding my violations. If you did not understand my last post let me be clear. You have my permission to post anything with my name on it, including any PMs of mine from the AMA Website forum.

Regards
Frank

_____________________________

It is not possible to write in such a way that cannot be misinterpreted by a reader determined to do so.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Arbo)
       Post #: 211

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/28/2012 1:42 PM   
Arbo


 

Posts: 307
Score: 100
Joined: 4/6/2003
Last Login: 10/1/2012
From: hometown, AZ, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: phlpsfrnk

While you are at it, if you have any more of those selective screen captures that have my signature phlpsfrnk, partial or full name please do not redact them. If you are going to imply wrong doing on my part lets see some proof of it or any and all correspondance with HQ regarding my violations. If you did not understand my last post let me be clear. You have my permission to post anything with my name on it, including any PMs of mine from the AMA Website forum.



That's nice.



Hide Signatures

(in reply to phlpsfrnk)
       Post #: 212

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/28/2012 1:50 PM   
phlpsfrnk



Posts: 500
Score: 101
Joined: 1/7/2009
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: Spring Hill, FL, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arbo


quote:

ORIGINAL: phlpsfrnk

While you are at it, if you have any more of those selective screen captures that have my signature phlpsfrnk, partial or full name please do not redact them. If you are going to imply wrong doing on my part lets see some proof of it or any and all correspondance with HQ regarding my violations. If you did not understand my last post let me be clear. You have my permission to post anything with my name on it, including any PMs of mine from the AMA Website forum.



That's nice.



Glad you like it.

_____________________________

It is not possible to write in such a way that cannot be misinterpreted by a reader determined to do so.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Arbo)
       Post #: 213

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/28/2012 1:59 PM   
bradpaul



Posts: 662
Score: 138
Joined: 1/2/2002
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: Apopka, FL, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ctrout

Baaaaaaaaaaaaaad CTrout ~



Just what is the connection between a ctrout and a red herring?




Hide Signatures

(in reply to ctrout)
       Post #: 214

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/28/2012 2:00 PM   
TheEdge



Posts: 645
Score: 101
Joined: 12/29/2001
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Bonita, CA, USA
Status: offline 		If this is anything like the way in which the AMA forum carried on,,then it's all very apparant.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to phlpsfrnk)
       Post #: 215

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/28/2012 2:21 PM   
phlpsfrnk



Posts: 500
Score: 101
Joined: 1/7/2009
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: Spring Hill, FL, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arbo


quote:

ORIGINAL: phlpsfrnk

While you are at it, if you have any more of those selective screen captures that have my signature phlpsfrnk, partial or full name please do not redact them. If you are going to imply wrong doing on my part lets see some proof of it or any and all correspondance with HQ regarding my violations. If you did not understand my last post let me be clear. You have my permission to post anything with my name on it, including any PMs of mine from the AMA Website forum.



That's nice.



Paul,
I have another request. You claim to have all the posts and threads that you have removed since you became a moderator. You removed several of my threads for rule violations that you would never tell me the specifics of. Repost those threads here and state what rule/s was/were violated. I can assure the moderator here that none of those deleted threads will violate any RCU rules here.

Regards
Frank

_____________________________

It is not possible to write in such a way that cannot be misinterpreted by a reader determined to do so.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Arbo)
       Post #: 216

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/28/2012 2:30 PM   
Arbo


 

Posts: 307
Score: 100
Joined: 4/6/2003
Last Login: 10/1/2012
From: hometown, AZ, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: phlpsfrnk

Paul,
I have another request. You claim to have all the posts and threads that you have removed since you became a moderator. You removed several of my threads for rule violations that you would never tell me the specifics of. Repost those threads here and state what rule/s was/were violated. I can assure the moderator here that none of those deleted threads will violate any RCU rules here.



No insisting this time?   Bummer. 



Hide Signatures

(in reply to phlpsfrnk)
       Post #: 217

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/28/2012 2:31 PM   
Arbo


 

Posts: 307
Score: 100
Joined: 4/6/2003
Last Login: 10/1/2012
From: hometown, AZ, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheEdge

If this is anything like the way in which the AMA forum carried on,,then it's all very apparant.


Nope, this sort of petty bickering was not allowed there.    Which is what has so many that use that style of 'converstion' so upset over the moderation there.    



Hide Signatures

(in reply to TheEdge)
       Post #: 218

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/28/2012 2:58 PM   
littlecrankshaf



Posts: 4101
Score: 259
Joined: 12/9/2001
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: here
Status: offline 		These last few exchanges reminds me of when Barney used the squad car to take Thelma Lou out... He was the man!

_____________________________

Wow! Another epiphany…that is why the suckups suckup. Super sucking protection power. Yea baby.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Arbo)
       Post #: 219

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/28/2012 3:01 PM   
littlecrankshaf



Posts: 4101
Score: 259
Joined: 12/9/2001
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: here
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arbo


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheEdge

If this is anything like the way in which the AMA forum carried on,,then it's all very apparant.


Nope, this sort of petty bickering was not allowed there.    Which is what has so many that use that style of 'converstion' so upset over the moderation there.    



Yea! Only the moderators could get by with that stuff!

_____________________________

Wow! Another epiphany…that is why the suckups suckup. Super sucking protection power. Yea baby.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Arbo)
       Post #: 220

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/28/2012 3:09 PM   
littlecrankshaf



Posts: 4101
Score: 259
Joined: 12/9/2001
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: here
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bradpaul


quote:

ORIGINAL: ctrout

Baaaaaaaaaaaaaad CTrout ~



Just what is the connection between a ctrout and a red herring?




Lips???

_____________________________

Wow! Another epiphany…that is why the suckups suckup. Super sucking protection power. Yea baby.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to bradpaul)
       Post #: 221

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/28/2012 3:13 PM   
phlpsfrnk



Posts: 500
Score: 101
Joined: 1/7/2009
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: Spring Hill, FL, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arbo


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheEdge

If this is anything like the way in which the AMA forum carried on,,then it's all very apparant.


Nope, this sort of petty bickering was not allowed there.    

TheEdge,
Not much of any thing else either. If it was not 100% pro AMA or if Paul did not like it, it got axed.

_____________________________

It is not possible to write in such a way that cannot be misinterpreted by a reader determined to do so.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Arbo)
       Post #: 222

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/28/2012 3:28 PM   
Arbo


 

Posts: 307
Score: 100
Joined: 4/6/2003
Last Login: 10/1/2012
From: hometown, AZ, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: phlpsfrnk

Not much of any thing else either. If it was not 100% pro AMA or if Paul did not like it, it got axed.


This statement has been disproven many times.   Anyone can read this thread and see that.    But this sort of outright lie is allowed to continue. 



Hide Signatures

(in reply to phlpsfrnk)
       Post #: 223

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/28/2012 3:36 PM   
TheEdge



Posts: 645
Score: 101
Joined: 12/29/2001
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Bonita, CA, USA
Status: offline 		Both sides are spending an incredible amount of time finger pointing. No matter who's right and who's wrong, it's still plain to see how guilty you all are of not being responsible enough to be able to be the better person and to just pull away and move on.
How much wasted time and energy must have been lost that cannot be reclaimed.
Is it really that much a of a priority in your lives?

Hide Signatures

(in reply to phlpsfrnk)
       Post #: 224

RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum - 8/28/2012 3:43 PM   
Arbo


 

Posts: 307
Score: 100
Joined: 4/6/2003
Last Login: 10/1/2012
From: hometown, AZ, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheEdge

Both sides are spending an incredible amount of time finger pointing. No matter who's right and who's wrong, it's still plain to see how guilty you all are of not being responsible enough to be able to be the better person and to just pull away and move on.
How much wasted time and energy must have been lost that cannot be reclaimed.
Is it really that much a of a priority in your lives?


How do you feel about people that have a history of a grudge against you, spreading 100% lies about you?

In this case, they have been called on it, shown enough to prove their false accqsations for what they are.   A few seconds here and there doesn't add up to a load of time out of my life. 



Hide Signatures

(in reply to TheEdge)
       Post #: 225

Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15   next >   >>  
All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> AMA Discussions >> RE: AMA to close the AMA Discussions Forum
Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15   next >   >>  




Jump to:


 
Google 



Search | Marketplace | Event Calendar | Local Clubs | Magazine | Product Ratings | New Products | Discussion Forums

Photo Gallery | Instructor Search | Field|Track|Marina Search

Advertisers | Hobby Vendor Resources | Rate Manufacturers | Sign In/Sign Up

SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

RC Universe is a service of Internet Brands, Inc. Copyright © 2001-2013.

Charities we support that also need your help
Yorkie Rescue | Humane Society | ASPCA | Crohn's-Colitis America


0.578RCU1