RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ?    Gallery
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
    Search This Thread  
 
Printable Version


MBA Tornado V3
Seller:  Modellbau USA
Details:   $380.00   |  5/11/2013   |  Classified Ad
We will rotate YOUR AD in this spot if you select "Forum Featured" when placing or editing your ad!

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Jets >> RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ?
Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]

Tower Hobbies Get Coupon Codes Brands  
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ? - 10/24/2012 9:47 AM   
David Gladwin



Posts: 2849
Score: 110
Joined: 2/5/2002
Last Login: 5/19/2013
From: CookhamBerkshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Status: online
Goose, doesn't really surprise me that the F16 has so many power supplies, FBW+ no power= no control and I guess some of those backups are designed to cope with battle damage and still get you home, or even stay in the fight !
Sid, entirely agree but I could go further and say even small GT models should have dual batteries. My little Savex L39 with a Wren 44 is so light I can lift it with one finger, but it, too, has twin Rx batteries !Weight gain is insignificant. Its a bit of a tester too, one battery is a Duralite Lithium Ion the other is a Lipo, both seem to discharge at about the same rate. Both feed the Weatronics 8 channel Smart receiver via Mini Hobby Turbo regulators and JR HD switches, and the log shows DEAD stable voltage, 5.4v, on the rx bus.

Just as interest my larger models are all fitted with Weatronics 12-22 receivers for probably the ultimate in secure power supplies:

1. Twin batteries, one main, one standby.
2. Automatic load test of BOTH batteries on EVERY switch on (7amps for .5 second) An audio visual warning is triggered if the volttage drop exceeds the value YOU set, dependant on battery health and capability, on the software.
3. 8 Regulators distributed ober the servo outputs, all rated at 5 amps continuous, very large heatsink.
4. Battery connection is an electronically "latched contactor" so that switch failure/disconnection leaves power connected.
5. Real time audio/visual alert of battery voltage drop/changeover via the telemetry downlink.

Difficult to know how that could be improved on in any significant way. But, never say never, well hardly ever ..... !

Morning coffee finished , back to my SG Hawk.

Regards, (and thank you for your supportive comments , guys, nice to know I am not just a lone voice in the wilderness)

David.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to gooseF22)
       Post #: 101

RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ? - 10/24/2012 12:19 PM   
BaldEagel



Posts: 9340
Score: 118
Joined: 10/12/2005
Last Login: 5/19/2013
From: Wychling, Kent, UNITED KINGDOM
Status: offline
Yeah thanks for your support everyone its nice to know that everyone has followed my lead and are using twin A123's

Mike

_____________________________

No matter what anyone says 100% is the maximum you can get.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to David Gladwin)
       Post #: 102

RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ? - 10/24/2012 8:35 PM   
gooseF22


 

Posts: 1739
Score: 103
Joined: 8/13/2006
Last Login: 4/30/2013
From: Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Status: offline
Ok,... Im out of popcorn...

_____________________________

Goose
Wren Turbines USA, Fromeco

Hide Signatures

(in reply to BaldEagel)
       Post #: 103

RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ? - 10/24/2012 10:25 PM   
BaldEagel



Posts: 9340
Score: 118
Joined: 10/12/2005
Last Login: 5/19/2013
From: Wychling, Kent, UNITED KINGDOM
Status: offline


_____________________________

No matter what anyone says 100% is the maximum you can get.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to gooseF22)
       Post #: 104

RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ? - 12/6/2012 5:56 PM   
abelard


 

Posts: 67
Score: 100
Joined: 11/13/2007
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Aurora, CO, USA
Status: offline
quote:

I have been using A123's since they first came out

Possibly not much longer...

http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2012/12/06/a123-goes-on-the-auction-block-heres-how-it-got-this-bad/?single_page=true

Hide Signatures

(in reply to BaldEagel)
       Post #: 105

RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ? - 12/6/2012 6:03 PM   
BarracudaHockey



Posts: 18350
Score: 280
Joined: 7/13/2003
Last Login: 5/17/2013
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Status: offline
Nothing to do with our hobby batteries

_____________________________

Andy - Helicopter Forum Moderator
AMA 77227 Leader Member- Contest Director
www.JaxRC.com

Hide Signatures

(in reply to abelard)
       Post #: 106

RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ? - 12/13/2012 10:12 PM   
BlueBus320



Posts: 731
Score: 100
Joined: 3/26/2002
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: New York, NY, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Gladwin

Goose, doesn't really surprise me that the F16 has so many power supplies, FBW+ no power= no control and I guess some of those backups are designed to cope with battle damage and still get you home, or even stay in the fight !
Sid, entirely agree but I could go further and say even small GT models should have dual batteries. My little Savex L39 with a Wren 44 is so light I can lift it with one finger, but it, too, has twin Rx batteries !Weight gain is insignificant. Its a bit of a tester too, one battery is a Duralite Lithium Ion the other is a Lipo, both seem to discharge at about the same rate. Both feed the Weatronics 8 channel Smart receiver via Mini Hobby Turbo regulators and JR HD switches, and the log shows DEAD stable voltage, 5.4v, on the rx bus.

Just as interest my larger models are all fitted with Weatronics 12-22 receivers for probably the ultimate in secure power supplies:

1. Twin batteries, one main, one standby.
2. Automatic load test of BOTH batteries on EVERY switch on (7amps for .5 second) An audio visual warning is triggered if the volttage drop exceeds the value YOU set, dependant on battery health and capability, on the software.
3. 8 Regulators distributed ober the servo outputs, all rated at 5 amps continuous, very large heatsink.
4. Battery connection is an electronically ''latched contactor'' so that switch failure/disconnection leaves power connected.
5. Real time audio/visual alert of battery voltage drop/changeover via the telemetry downlink.

Difficult to know how that could be improved on in any significant way. But, never say never, well hardly ever ..... !

Morning coffee finished , back to my SG Hawk.

Regards, (and thank you for your supportive comments , guys, nice to know I am not just a lone voice in the wilderness)

David.

How did you set up an auto load test on every switch? I'm doing a setup now & would like to set this up. Also, the dual swithch guys with chargeports. Are you charging your batteries inside your models through the charge ports?
thanks

_____________________________

Call Sign blocked.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to David Gladwin)
       Post #: 107

RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ? - 12/14/2012 1:12 AM   
roger.alli



Posts: 472
Score: 104
Joined: 8/26/2008
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Sydney NSW , AUSTRALIA
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: BlueBus320


quote:

ORIGINAL: David Gladwin

Goose, doesn't really surprise me that the F16 has so many power supplies, FBW+ no power= no control and I guess some of those backups are designed to cope with battle damage and still get you home, or even stay in the fight !
Sid, entirely agree but I could go further and say even small GT models should have dual batteries. My little Savex L39 with a Wren 44 is so light I can lift it with one finger, but it, too, has twin Rx batteries !Weight gain is insignificant. Its a bit of a tester too, one battery is a Duralite Lithium Ion the other is a Lipo, both seem to discharge at about the same rate. Both feed the Weatronics 8 channel Smart receiver via Mini Hobby Turbo regulators and JR HD switches, and the log shows DEAD stable voltage, 5.4v, on the rx bus.

Just as interest my larger models are all fitted with Weatronics 12-22 receivers for probably the ultimate in secure power supplies:

1. Twin batteries, one main, one standby.
2. Automatic load test of BOTH batteries on EVERY switch on (7amps for .5 second) An audio visual warning is triggered if the volttage drop exceeds the value YOU set, dependant on battery health and capability, on the software.
3. 8 Regulators distributed ober the servo outputs, all rated at 5 amps continuous, very large heatsink.
4. Battery connection is an electronically ''latched contactor'' so that switch failure/disconnection leaves power connected.
5. Real time audio/visual alert of battery voltage drop/changeover via the telemetry downlink.

Difficult to know how that could be improved on in any significant way. But, never say never, well hardly ever ..... !

Morning coffee finished , back to my SG Hawk.

Regards, (and thank you for your supportive comments , guys, nice to know I am not just a lone voice in the wilderness)

David.

How did you set up an auto load test on every switch? I'm doing a setup now & would like to set this up. Also, the dual swithch guys with chargeports. Are you charging your batteries inside your models through the charge ports?
thanks


What David is referring to here (point 2). Every time the receiver is switched on, the Weatronics 12xx receivers do an automatic load test of the batteries. This is a pre programmed function of these receivers.



Roger

Hide Signatures

(in reply to BlueBus320)
       Post #: 108

RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ? - 12/14/2012 2:02 AM   
BlueBus320



Posts: 731
Score: 100
Joined: 3/26/2002
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: New York, NY, USA
Status: offline
oh, ok thanks

_____________________________

Call Sign blocked.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to roger.alli)
       Post #: 109

Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Jets >> RE: Cons for installing redundant receiver batteries ?
Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]





Jump to:


 
Google 



Search | Marketplace | Event Calendar | Local Clubs | Magazine | Product Ratings | New Products | Discussion Forums

Photo Gallery | Instructor Search | Field|Track|Marina Search

Advertisers | Hobby Vendor Resources | Rate Manufacturers | Sign In/Sign Up

SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

RC Universe is a service of Internet Brands, Inc. Copyright © 2001-2013.

Charities we support that also need your help
Yorkie Rescue | Humane Society | ASPCA | Crohn's-Colitis America


0.719RCU1