|
Leroy Gardner -> RE: Tiger 60 Aileron changes (11/13/2012 5:36 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Leroy Gardner quote:
ORIGINAL: jester_s1 You'd still have enough control, but you won't be improving the flutter characteristics. The negative with going to the barndoor ailerons is that in a stall you're more likely to lose aileron control. If you're worried about it a couple of mass balancers on each aileron will raise the flutter frequency so your plane won't ever be able to make it happen. Hi jester, You are talking about something over my head here, mass balancers, lost aileron control, frequency ? I have never had flutter problems on my planes, I know for the most part what causes it. I may have missled led you some by stating the problem someone else has had. What I was really looking for was what if any differences would it make by changing the aileron design and not changing the flight charateristics in the process. These long plank ailerons may be fine on smaller planes but as they get bigger and the loads get greater it just makes sence that you can carry that design so far. The Super Sportster and Cherokee wing is almost the same wing thats on the Tiger except for ailerons and the Cherokee has flaps and aileron design as I mentioned above So these two planes fly just great with out board 1/2 wing ailerons and recover from any thing you can do with them. So where do you get the idea of losing aileron control in a stall, if that were the case there would be planes of all sorts going into the ground no matter what and put those makers out of business. Maybe you know something I don't and subsuquent others. Please explain as I may have miss understood what you said. Thanks Leroy I think I figured out what you were trying to say. A tip stall is the result of not useing the rudder while takeing off and landing in most cases and has nothing to do with flutter and, I just found out what a mass ballancer is so it's been a day of learning
|
|
|
|