RE: Bombers    Gallery
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
    Search This Thread  
 
Printable Version


S&W 2-7S LCD Battery Capacity & Checker ***FREE SHIPPING US ONLY*****
Seller:  swgiantscalemodels
Details:   $19.89   |  5/31/2013   |  Classified Ad
We will rotate YOUR AD in this spot if you select "Forum Featured" when placing or editing your ad!

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Giant Scale Aircraft - General >> RE: Bombers
Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Tower Hobbies Get Coupon Codes Brands  
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Bombers - 12/21/2012 6:12 AM   
MaverickRussia


 

Posts: 97
Score: 100
Joined: 11/30/2012
Last Login: 6/15/2013
From: Tver, RUSSIA
Status: offline 		Thanks again to everyone for participating, all the wishes we read, the Russian branch bombers certainly will be, but all at once, we do not have time. We have ambitious plans.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Warbirdguy)
       Post #: 26

RE: Bombers - 12/21/2012 7:54 AM   
algis123


 

Posts: 44
Score: 100
Joined: 1/10/2012
Last Login: 6/18/2013
From: Klaipeda, LITHUANIA
Status: offline 		 the quality of work can be seen here, http://www.facebook.com/rccomposit/photos_albums  we have designed and manufactured more model, as said MavericRussia an ambitious plan ....
If you want to have your favorite airplane model, we designed and built it KIT, write privately algisu555@yahoo.com

< Message edited by algis123 -- 12/21/2012 11:24 AM >

Hide Signatures

(in reply to MaverickRussia)
       Post #: 27

RE: Bombers - 12/21/2012 6:28 PM   
henschel


 

Posts: 245
Score: 105
Joined: 9/21/2005
Last Login: 6/17/2013
From: Sun City, CA, USA
Status: offline 		This one is a little off beat and not really within this topic but nobody has built a B-58 Hustler kit.

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize


Hide Signatures

(in reply to algis123)
       Post #: 28

RE: Bombers - 12/21/2012 9:14 PM   
Chris Nicastro


 

Posts: 1204
Score: 123
Joined: 10/13/2005
Last Login: 6/19/2013
From: Coeur D''''Alene, ID, USA
Status: offline 		Lets throw in a twist... British Lancaster bomber.
Its not modelled often and its also a very significant WW2 bomber.

_____________________________

Like a midget in a urinal I knew I had to stay on my toes...

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Warbirdguy)
       Post #: 29

RE: Bombers - 12/21/2012 10:20 PM   
jrlingrel


 

Posts: 39
Score: 100
Joined: 8/22/2010
Last Login: 6/16/2013
From: Rio Rancho, NM, USA
Status: offline 		If you kit all of the mentioned bombers, I am going to go broke in short order.  Beautiful work that I saw on Facebook.  Keep it up.

John 

_____________________________

Take offs are optional, landings are mandatory.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to MaverickRussia)
       Post #: 30

RE: Bombers - 12/22/2012 1:14 AM   
weazel1


 

Posts: 102
Score: 100
Joined: 10/22/2011
Last Login: 6/19/2013
From: ontario, CA, USA
Status: offline 		i myself would love the b-29 so i can fly it at all our airshows we do

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Warbirdguy)
       Post #: 31

RE: Bombers - 12/22/2012 1:38 AM   
paulrcpilot-RCU


 

Posts: 54
Score: 100
Joined: 2/5/2002
Last Login: 6/19/2013
From: Garretson, SD, USA
Status: offline 		Another vote for a Lancaster, Paul

Hide Signatures

(in reply to weazel1)
       Post #: 32

RE: Bombers - 12/22/2012 1:07 PM   
redskyhawk


 

Posts: 9
Score: 100
Joined: 1/10/2009
Last Login: 5/4/2013
From: La Crosse, WI, USA
Status: offline 		I would like the B-24D.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to paulrcpilot-RCU)
       Post #: 33

RE: Bombers - 12/23/2012 5:16 PM   
MaverickRussia


 

Posts: 97
Score: 100
Joined: 11/30/2012
Last Login: 6/15/2013
From: Tver, RUSSIA
Status: offline 		While the leaders we have a B-24D Liberator and A-26 Invader, also not far behind the B-29.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to redskyhawk)
       Post #: 34

RE: Bombers - 12/24/2012 4:41 AM   
tevans55


 

Posts: 933
Score: 123
Joined: 8/4/2007
Last Login: 6/19/2013
From: Louisville, KY, USA
Status: offline 		My vote would be the B-25B, the one you show in the first post. Most builds are the J version probably due to the fact that almost half of the B-25 total production were J's.

_____________________________

Nothing difficult is ever easy.
Spitfire Brotherhood #44

Hide Signatures

(in reply to MaverickRussia)
       Post #: 35

RE: Bombers - 12/24/2012 11:50 PM   
weazel1


 

Posts: 102
Score: 100
Joined: 10/22/2011
Last Login: 6/19/2013
From: ontario, CA, USA
Status: offline 		a b-25 would also be awsome i would take that too

Hide Signatures

(in reply to tevans55)
       Post #: 36

RE: Bombers - 1/7/2013 9:44 AM   
MaverickRussia


 

Posts: 97
Score: 100
Joined: 11/30/2012
Last Login: 6/15/2013
From: Tver, RUSSIA
Status: offline 		Results of the conference are A-26 4 votes, B-24 7 votes, B-29 2 votes, B-25 2 votes. The winner is the B-24. Thanks to all who participated in the conference, I congratulate all Merry Christmas, and now we need to decide what size to make the plane? I ask you to speak up!

Hide Signatures

(in reply to weazel1)
       Post #: 37

RE: Bombers - 1/8/2013 4:18 PM   
Luft-Gangster


 

Posts: 327
Score: 110
Joined: 12/30/2010
Last Login: 6/10/2013
From: Pinckney, MI, USA
Status: offline 		B-24 in the 100" plus wing span would be my vote.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to MaverickRussia)
       Post #: 38

RE: Bombers - 1/8/2013 6:46 PM   
doolittles


 

Posts: 45
Score: 100
Joined: 8/6/2008
Last Login: 6/17/2013
From: naples, ME, USA
Status: offline 		What about B-17 4engines seaplanes

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Luft-Gangster)
       Post #: 39

RE: Bombers - 1/8/2013 6:49 PM   
MaverickRussia


 

Posts: 97
Score: 100
Joined: 11/30/2012
Last Login: 6/15/2013
From: Tver, RUSSIA
Status: offline 		Aviators have chosen the B-24, now the size chosen.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to doolittles)
       Post #: 40

RE: Bombers - 1/8/2013 8:21 PM   
weazel1


 

Posts: 102
Score: 100
Joined: 10/22/2011
Last Login: 6/19/2013
From: ontario, CA, USA
Status: offline 		110 w/s

Hide Signatures

(in reply to MaverickRussia)
       Post #: 41

RE: Bombers - 1/8/2013 10:54 PM   
paulrcpilot-RCU


 

Posts: 54
Score: 100
Joined: 2/5/2002
Last Login: 6/19/2013
From: Garretson, SD, USA
Status: offline 		110+ ws please

Hide Signatures

(in reply to weazel1)
       Post #: 42

RE: Bombers - 1/9/2013 4:49 AM   
Bob Paris


 

Posts: 1300
Score: 110
Joined: 11/4/2002
Last Login: 6/19/2013
From: Lahaina, HI, USA
Status: offline 		No more then 110" wing span. I would like to see a three piece wing...with outer wing panels removable, w/ailerons (flaps and engines one piece).
Soft Landings Always,
Bob Paris

_____________________________

AMA 15016
Say what you mean, mean what you say...and !#$& it if you can''t take a joke.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to paulrcpilot-RCU)
       Post #: 43

RE: Bombers - 1/9/2013 4:34 PM   
MaverickRussia


 

Posts: 97
Score: 100
Joined: 11/30/2012
Last Login: 6/15/2013
From: Tver, RUSSIA
Status: offline 		Dear Aviators and not too small airplane is? The wingspan of a large and very small it is impossible?




< Message edited by MaverickRussia -- 1/9/2013 7:10 PM >

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Bob Paris)
       Post #: 44

Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Giant Scale Aircraft - General >> RE: Bombers
Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]





Jump to:


 
Google 



Search | Marketplace | Event Calendar | Local Clubs | Magazine | Product Ratings | New Products | Discussion Forums

Photo Gallery | Instructor Search | Field|Track|Marina Search

Advertisers | Hobby Vendor Resources | Rate Manufacturers | Sign In/Sign Up

SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

RC Universe is a service of Internet Brands, Inc. Copyright © 2001-2013.

Charities we support that also need your help
Yorkie Rescue | Humane Society | ASPCA | Crohn's-Colitis America


0.703RCU1