GallopingGhostler
Posts: 729
Score: 133 Joined: 10/26/2004 Last Login: 5/25/2013 From: Clovis,
NM, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: eddieC I enjoyed the original thread, TBH didn't really see the reasons given for closing it down, so thought I'd resurrect it. Please play nice now, or it will meet the same demise as its predecessor. And stay on topic..., Oh, a hangar is for airplanes. Hangers are for clothes. ARFs are sort of a necessary evil IMO, and I admit to owning a few. In fact, two of my favorite planes are ARFs - Extreme Flight profile 3D birds, an Edge 540 and a Chinn Yak. The Yak was briefly available as a kit, so the ARF was my only realistic option. I would prefer to build though. quote:
ORIGINAL: RCKen In most cases a thread is closed because I feel that the members have no intentions of abiding by the rules of RCU and playing nicely. That was the case when I closed down the original thread on this subject. [...] For those that were causing all the problems that got the first thread shut down (and you know who you are), I would suggest that you refrain from participating in this thread.... period. You have already proven that you can't discuss the issue at hand without resorting attacking those that you don't agree with. On the other hand if you do choose to participate in this discussion I would suggest that you make sure you follow all of RCU's rules. [...]For everybody else that wants to discuss this issue, I apologize that I have to make statements like this in public. But unfortunately there are a few here that think they are above the rules and can do whatever they want. quote:
ORIGINAL: essyou35 Let me get this right. He starts the thread again and specifically says that arfs are evil. And you dont see that as the issue of causing the arguments? Thats exactly what the fuss is about, that attitude and I will always rebut it. You can ban me whatever, your are simply taking sides and allowing one group to bash another, and supressing another group from responding. I think essyou35, you are being a little oversensitive. There was definitely abusive language in that previous thread. I cannot quote them as these posts were deleted as a part of the moderation process. There are acceptable ways to rebut disagreements without personal attacks, insults, belittling the character of the poster, etc. I think RCUniverse has been very generous overall in allowing posters to express their opinions, as long as they overall comply with the established rules of the forums. These rules were accepted by the posters ("I accept")) when they applied for access. Following is from the rules: RCU Community Rules - UPDATED April 22, 2009 - 11/23/2002 2:17 AM quote:
INAPPROPRIATE LANGUAGE: The use of inappropriate, offensive language or language substitutions are not permitted on RCUniverse.com. Inappropriate or offensive language includes, but is not limited to, any language or content that is sexually oriented, sexually suggestive or abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, profane, hateful, or that contains racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable material of any kind. We ask that you please be considerate to other members in the forums when posting your messages. RCU is a place that is friendly to members of all ages and that parents know is safe for kids. It continues further to explain what it considers unacceptable as "flaming" posters. So, I didn't see any personal favoritism in this moderation process. Those posts simply did not follow posting rules as established. Regarding ARF's being evil, I think you misread the original intent of the author. He was simply stating that in his case, although he prefers to build, he could only find certain planes modeled as ARF's, and this is hence why he purchased ARF's. These are personal choices by the purchaser. Quality varies of course, depended on the manufacturer and price. I prefer to build, but I found ARF's to be helpful to me when working. The foam aircraft were easy to assemble and get flying in short order. They accepted a good amount of crash damage and were repairable up to a point. Also at the time, they were reasonably priced. I've always loved kit building, but ARF's have a purpose. They are here to stay and won't go away. Ditto with kit and scratch building. I am exploring alternative materials such as poster foam board and sheet foam. These allow quick building of lightweight aircraft. Reasonable construction techniques will ensure a realistic looking aircraft that is pleasing to the eye and also performs well. Experimenting alternative paints and fillers such as acrylic based and fuel proof enamels will help me to explore acceptable ways to finish aircraft at a reasonable cost.
_____________________________
George Hostler Clovis MADS AMA Club, Vintage R/C Society (VRCS)
Hide Signatures
|