HornetFitter
Posts: 80
Joined: 2/3/2008 From: Cold Lake, AB, CANADA Status: offline
|
I have discovered that on my Hangar 9 Cub (80" wingspan) I put the Cg where H9 reccomended by adding 1 oz. of lead to the tail. I flew it a number of times and it was always really hard to get it back on the ground. It just wanted to hover along very slowly... Last week, I had a less than smooth landing and ended up drifting backwards in a moderate headwind. I kind of panicked and let it down quickly from 2 feet or so by getting off the elevator. It nosed over and I swear it sort of snap stalled at the last second. Also, the tail was sagging much lower and indicates that the angle of attack was very high and was very close to stalling, if it had'nt alredy occurred. I read up on weight & balance to find that it was most likely too far aft. I removed the weight from the tail and test flew it tonight. 3 super smooth landings and zero bounce. It even had some nose down attitude on final, which was opposite to the way it would settle in before. As far as scale flying goes, it was amazing! It was flying at about 10- 15 mph and the tail stayed up on the roll out after landing until there was about 1-2 mph forward speed (winds were calm) ,which was very scale to watch. I am guessing that Cg is better and easier to fly when it is slightly (5-15%) forward of the published datum. The Cub sure does like coordinated rudder/ aileron turns too. Cheerz,
< Message edited by HornetFitter -- 5/10/2008 6:36:34 AM >
|