RE: bad engines    Gallery
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
    Search This Thread  
 
Printable Version


Moki 2.10
Seller:  thunderbolt-RCU
Details:   $250.00   |  5/18/2013   |  Classified Ad
We will rotate YOUR AD in this spot if you select "Forum Featured" when placing or editing your ad!

All Forums >> Glow Engines, Gas Engines, Fuel & Mfg Support Forums >> Glow Engines >> RE: bad engines
Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>  

Tower Hobbies Get Coupon Codes Brands  
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: bad engines - 2/24/2013 1:48 PM   
earlwb


 

Posts: 4542
Score: 584
Joined: 8/6/2009
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Grapevine, TX, USA
Status: offline
The dark side of electrics brings in a whole new round of bad electronic speed controls, flaky battery eliminator circuits, bad voltage regulators, bad motors, and flaky or bad battery packs too.  "Slag" gets to be a whole new thing with real meltdowns. Plus it gives realistic examples of crash and burn when the plane catches fire when a ESC burns up in the air.

But going with gasoline engines is more complicated that glow engines. Not for a beginner. There is a whole new issue with huge numbers of bad or flaky gas engines coming out of China with questionable quality control and little to no support and no parts. A beginner won't be able to rebuild or repair a bad new motor. Plus if the engine breaks there is no warranty or parts to get to repair it either. Beginners invariably go with the cheaper gas engine when they should have stayed with the big name brands which are more expensive of course. Except the cheap engine usually doesn't work and the beginner has no idea as to what to do about it.







_____________________________

Club Saito #722, Sig Kadet Brotherhood #80
AMA # 928076

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Mr Cox)
       Post #: 176

RE: bad engines - 2/24/2013 2:01 PM   
aspeed


 

Posts: 896
Score: 105
Joined: 7/14/2011
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Ruthven, ON, CANADA
Status: offline
Some people are changing over their gas motors to glow to save weight and for more simplicity, while others are changing glow to gas to save $$ on fuel.  I like electric for gliders, but have like 100 glow motors to use up, so will stick to them for a while.  MDS and CS I will agree are sketchy.  My CS piped .049 wouldn't  even turn over but after lapping and fiddling it is good.  Out of 3 MDS .15's two are great and one was a bear to start because of a leaky head surface.  All of them had stone age screws in and some thread holes were tight because of the sand in the castings.  I bet they were mad at the factory when making them and having to change taps every few motors.  They are fast after a fairly major going over, but the two piped .15's leak  out way too much at the front bearing.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Mr Cox)
       Post #: 177

RE: bad engines - 2/24/2013 2:03 PM   
GallopingGhostler



Posts: 721
Score: 133
Joined: 10/26/2004
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Clovis, NM, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr Cox
quote:

ORIGINAL: lopflyers Go to the dark side:ELECTRICS
For more problematic motors?

May be someone in the electric power forum can start a thread on bad electric motors, esc's, etc.

_____________________________

George Hostler
Clovis MADS AMA Club, Vintage R/C Society (VRCS)

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Mr Cox)
       Post #: 178

RE: bad engines - 2/24/2013 2:21 PM   
earlwb


 

Posts: 4542
Score: 584
Joined: 8/6/2009
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Grapevine, TX, USA
Status: offline
Yeah a bad motor or Esc thread.





_____________________________

Club Saito #722, Sig Kadet Brotherhood #80
AMA # 928076

Hide Signatures

(in reply to GallopingGhostler)
       Post #: 179

RE: bad engines - 2/24/2013 2:43 PM   
larryak


 

Posts: 74
Score: 105
Joined: 12/29/2009
Last Login: 3/24/2013
From: Lake Havasu City, AZ, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rcguy59

There's a saying at our field: "Cox and Fox, leave 'em in the box."  Good advice.


Could,nt have said it better myself!!!! Lost a lot of good flying time with Cox engines. My advice after all these years is go Saito. A learning curve, yes, hundreds of enjoyable (and stress free) flying hours , yes. OS reliables the .46 and 4st..56. Both bullet proof.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to rcguy59)
       Post #: 180

RE: bad engines - 2/24/2013 2:54 PM  1 votes
earlwb


 

Posts: 4542
Score: 584
Joined: 8/6/2009
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Grapevine, TX, USA
Status: offline
Fox engines are one of the best engines around. I can get many years of use out of them. I am still flying a old Fox .60 Blue head head that was made back around 1967. A few years ago I put in new piston rings on the engine.  I have several airplanes with Fox engines on them right now that I fly from time to time too.

Unfortunately, for some odd reason people had trouble adjusting the carburetors on the earlier Fox engines. I suspect that they never read the instructions. The current Fox engines all come with a much better carburetor on them that is easier for newbie users to handle. But Fox engines still require a good run in or break in period and people seem to prefer a engine that doesn't need a break in for that instant gratification feeling.

Fox engines don't have those pesky bearing problems that some other brands are having either.





_____________________________

Club Saito #722, Sig Kadet Brotherhood #80
AMA # 928076

Hide Signatures

(in reply to larryak)
       Post #: 181

RE: bad engines - 2/24/2013 3:07 PM   
landeck


 

Posts: 1616
Score: 137
Joined: 11/6/2007
Last Login: 5/19/2013
From: Sandy Springs, GA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: earlwb

Fox engines are one of the best engines around. I can get many years of use out of them. I am still flying a old Fox .60 Blue head head that was made back around 1967. A few years ago I put in new piston rings on the engine.  I have several airplanes with Fox engines on them right now that I fly from time to time too.

Unfortunately, for some odd reason people had trouble adjusting the carburetors on the earlier Fox engines. I suspect that they never read the instructions. The current Fox engines all come with a much better carburetor on them that is easier for newbie users to handle. But Fox engines still require a good run in or break in period and people seem to prefer a engine that doesn't need a break in for that instant gratification feeling.

Fox engines don't have those pesky bearing problems that some other brands are having either.







+1 I have been using Fox engines for years, first in control line and then in RC. I have a Fox Eagle IV .74 with the new carb that is a real power house and I have a 40 year old Fox Eagle I .60 that still is as solid as the day I bought it.

Bruce

_____________________________

Bruce L. AMA# 54227
Ultra Sport Brotherhood #15

Hide Signatures

(in reply to earlwb)
       Post #: 182

RE: bad engines - 2/24/2013 3:37 PM   
GallopingGhostler



Posts: 721
Score: 133
Joined: 10/26/2004
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Clovis, NM, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: larryak
quote:

ORIGINAL: rcguy59 There's a saying at our field: ''Cox and Fox, leave 'em in the box.''  Good advice.
Couldn't have said it better myself!!!! Lost a lot of good flying time with Cox engines. My advice after all these years is go Saito.

Will a Saito power my 36" (914mm) span Q-Tee?

Never had problems with the Cox reed valves. They were easy starting, easy break-in. On all Castor oil fuel, I had to occasionally disassemble and devarnish the cylinder to restore it to peak running condition. Mind you though these were not the Estes era engines that some have expressed difficulty with.

quote:

A learning curve, yes, hundreds of enjoyable (and stress free) flying hours , yes. OS reliables the .46 and 4st..56. Both bullet proof.

Gee, I dunno, I'd say the same of my Cox reed valve engines (except for the .074 Queen Bee).

_____________________________

George Hostler
Clovis MADS AMA Club, Vintage R/C Society (VRCS)

Hide Signatures

(in reply to larryak)
       Post #: 183

RE: bad engines - 2/24/2013 4:08 PM   
HoundDog


 

Posts: 819
Score: 178
Joined: 10/31/2003
Last Login: 5/19/2013
From: Oconomowoc, WI, USA
Status: offline

Asking this question is like asking a bunch of drunks what beer is best ... There just isn't a logical answer ... If a person has been in this hobby for any length of time they will have Opinions on every thing from Engines, Radios, ,Planes,Kits,ARFs, and even  their fellow club members.



_____________________________

Remember ... Every one of these Things we fly has a Termination date, The more expensive The bigger the tears.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to NM2K)
       Post #: 184

RE: bad engines - 2/25/2013 2:11 AM   
dinodigger II


 

Posts: 5
Score: 100
Joined: 1/28/2006
Last Login: 5/11/2013
From: Painted post, NY, USA
Status: offline
Has anyone had experience with SE engines? Good or bad.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to NM2K)
       Post #: 185

RE: bad engines - 2/25/2013 3:44 AM   
GallopingGhostler



Posts: 721
Score: 133
Joined: 10/26/2004
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Clovis, NM, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: earlwb Yeah a bad motor or Esc thread.

Yup, nothing like turning a stick model into kindling.

_____________________________

George Hostler
Clovis MADS AMA Club, Vintage R/C Society (VRCS)

Hide Signatures

(in reply to earlwb)
       Post #: 186

RE: bad engines - 2/25/2013 4:54 AM   
1QwkSport2.5r



Posts: 3723
Score: 155
Joined: 10/15/2006
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Cottage Grove, MN, USA
Status: offline
I wouldn't feel so bad if it were an ARF... If it was a kit I built, I'd . Then again, it wouldn't have been electric in the first place...

I have yet to meet an engine that wasn't of good quality.

_____________________________

*Real* glow fuel is made with Methanol, Nitromethane, and Castor oil.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to GallopingGhostler)
       Post #: 187

RE: bad engines - 2/25/2013 7:35 AM   
NoOneFlysAtMyClub


 

Posts: 373
Score: 100
Joined: 11/7/2003
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Forest Grove, OR, USA
Status: offline
HoundDog,

WELL SAID!!!!!!

Hide Signatures

(in reply to 1QwkSport2.5r)
       Post #: 188

RE: bad engines - 2/25/2013 12:48 PM   
GallopingGhostler



Posts: 721
Score: 133
Joined: 10/26/2004
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Clovis, NM, USA
Status: offline
I've never seen a nitro plane catch fire like that, even with a BAD engine.

A future build will be a Hobby Shack (now Hobby People) The Real Thing, powered by my Enya .19-VI TV. Now that is a bad engine.

_____________________________

George Hostler
Clovis MADS AMA Club, Vintage R/C Society (VRCS)

Hide Signatures

(in reply to NoOneFlysAtMyClub)
       Post #: 189

RE: bad engines - 2/25/2013 1:21 PM   
AA5BY


 

Posts: 1961
Score: 153
Joined: 9/7/2006
Last Login: 5/19/2013
From: White Oak, TX, USA
Status: offline
Hey George.... I've also got one of those bad Enya .19 VI engines still in use. Wish the thing would wear out so it could be replaced.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to GallopingGhostler)
       Post #: 190

RE: bad engines - 2/25/2013 1:38 PM   
1QwkSport2.5r



Posts: 3723
Score: 155
Joined: 10/15/2006
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Cottage Grove, MN, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AA5BY
Wish the thing would wear out so it could be replaced.

Better keep wishin'! Buying an Enya is like getting married to the hobby... except your Enya isn't going to tell you to take out the trash..

_____________________________

*Real* glow fuel is made with Methanol, Nitromethane, and Castor oil.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to AA5BY)
       Post #: 191

RE: bad engines - 2/25/2013 1:39 PM   
jester_s1


 

Posts: 3796
Score: 233
Joined: 12/17/2006
Last Login: 5/18/2013
From: Fort Worth, TX, USA
Status: offline
The only truly bad engine I've ever had was one of the first run Evolutions. IIRC it is a .46 NT which they replaced the next year after they hit the market. There were lots of threads of people having trouble with them, so it wasn't just me. Out of the box, it wouldn't tune with anything approaching a consistent response to the needles, so I figure out it had a bad front bearing. I replaced that which fixed the air leak and made it respond to the needles as it should. But it never stopped having random deadsticks in the air. I could run it tuned 500 rpm rich, 1000 rpm rich, 300 rpm rich, and it made no difference. The engine could not be trusted to run at full throttle without suddenly quitting maybe once every 3-4 flights. It's in the garage now waiting to be given to someone who's a glutton for punishment.

_____________________________

For me, an ARF is an airplane that someone else just crashed.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to AA5BY)
       Post #: 192

RE: bad engines - 2/25/2013 1:53 PM   
AA5BY


 

Posts: 1961
Score: 153
Joined: 9/7/2006
Last Login: 5/19/2013
From: White Oak, TX, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jester_s1

The only truly bad engine I've ever had was one of the first run Evolutions. IIRC it is a .46 NT which they replaced the next year after they hit the market. There were lots of threads of people having trouble with them, so it wasn't just me. Out of the box, it wouldn't tune with anything approaching a consistent response to the needles, so I figure out it had a bad front bearing. I replaced that which fixed the air leak and made it respond to the needles as it should. But it never stopped having random deadsticks in the air. I could run it tuned 500 rpm rich, 1000 rpm rich, 300 rpm rich, and it made no difference. The engine could not be trusted to run at full throttle without suddenly quitting maybe once every 3-4 flights. It's in the garage now waiting to be given to someone who's a glutton for punishment.

I've a YS I've tried to give away... only one guy so far was willing to take, but required a bottle of aspirin ta boot.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to jester_s1)
       Post #: 193

RE: bad engines - 2/25/2013 2:33 PM   
Sport_Pilot



Posts: 12476
Score: 233
Joined: 1/22/2002
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Acworth, GA, USA
Status: offline
Losing the pinch does not mean it is worn out.  I have engines that have lasted with no pinch and ran better with no pinch than before with.   This usually is only applicable to some sport engines made to break in quickly and have little pinch to begin with.

_____________________________

“I Saw Elvis at 1000 Feet” John Force

Hide Signatures

(in reply to modeltronics)
       Post #: 194

RE: bad engines - 2/25/2013 3:00 PM   
Sport_Pilot



Posts: 12476
Score: 233
Joined: 1/22/2002
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Acworth, GA, USA
Status: offline
quote:

while others are changing glow to gas to save $$ on fuel.


With methanol selling for less than gas and the large gas engines needing 5% or less oil in methanol, then maybe they should consider converting their gas engines to glow?

_____________________________

“I Saw Elvis at 1000 Feet” John Force

Hide Signatures

(in reply to aspeed)
       Post #: 195

RE: bad engines - 2/25/2013 3:03 PM   
freefall2907


 

Posts: 8
Score: 100
Joined: 3/3/2012
Last Login: 4/11/2013
From: Ottumwa IA, USA
Status: offline
well everybody has their opinions!!!!but i think when it comes down to it some glow engines need to be broken in properly,my Super tigre engines are awsome even the new chinese  versions,they take a little time to break in and get the low end set but after break in i have no trouble,i have been given a few tigers,that the owners have cursed,break them in and no trouble,had fox engines to that run amazing,not all engines are bolt on and fly.i am not knocking any engines on the market,every engine i buy is an investment and i just follow the manufacturers directions for break in,,,just my nickeles worth

_____________________________

Sig Kadet brotherhood #55

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Sport_Pilot)
       Post #: 196

RE: bad engines - 2/25/2013 3:06 PM   
Sport_Pilot



Posts: 12476
Score: 233
Joined: 1/22/2002
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Acworth, GA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GallopingGhostler

quote:

ORIGINAL: larryak
quote:

ORIGINAL: rcguy59 There's a saying at our field: ''Cox and Fox, leave 'em in the box.''  Good advice.
Couldn't have said it better myself!!!! Lost a lot of good flying time with Cox engines. My advice after all these years is go Saito.

Will a Saito power my 36" (914mm) span Q-Tee?

Never had problems with the Cox reed valves. They were easy starting, easy break-in. On all Castor oil fuel, I had to occasionally disassemble and devarnish the cylinder to restore it to peak running condition. Mind you though these were not the Estes era engines that some have expressed difficulty with.

quote:

A learning curve, yes, hundreds of enjoyable (and stress free) flying hours , yes. OS reliables the .46 and 4st..56. Both bullet proof.

Gee, I dunno, I'd say the same of my Cox reed valve engines (except for the .074 Queen Bee).



Only problem I have had with the Cox reedies were that I kept flooding them.  It only takes a few drops of primer and I never could seem to get just a few drops in.

_____________________________

“I Saw Elvis at 1000 Feet” John Force

Hide Signatures

(in reply to GallopingGhostler)
       Post #: 197

RE: bad engines - 2/25/2013 3:10 PM   
j.duncker



Posts: 2510
Score: 121
Joined: 6/22/2004
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: At anchor, , ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot


quote:

ORIGINAL: GallopingGhostler

quote:

ORIGINAL: larryak
quote:

ORIGINAL: rcguy59 There's a saying at our field: ''Cox and Fox, leave 'em in the box.''  Good advice.
Couldn't have said it better myself!!!! Lost a lot of good flying time with Cox engines. My advice after all these years is go Saito.

Will a Saito power my 36'' (914mm) span Q-Tee?

Never had problems with the Cox reed valves. They were easy starting, easy break-in. On all Castor oil fuel, I had to occasionally disassemble and devarnish the cylinder to restore it to peak running condition. Mind you though these were not the Estes era engines that some have expressed difficulty with.

quote:

A learning curve, yes, hundreds of enjoyable (and stress free) flying hours , yes. OS reliables the .46 and 4st..56. Both bullet proof.

Gee, I dunno, I'd say the same of my Cox reed valve engines (except for the .074 Queen Bee).



Only problem I have had with the Cox reedies were that I kept flooding them.  It only takes a few drops of primer and I never could seem to get just a few drops in.


Get a 1 cc or smaller syringe solves the problem even on an 010.


_____________________________

The dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Sport_Pilot)
       Post #: 198

RE: bad engines - 2/25/2013 3:14 PM   
Sport_Pilot



Posts: 12476
Score: 233
Joined: 1/22/2002
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Acworth, GA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 1QwkSport2.5r


quote:

ORIGINAL: AA5BY
Wish the thing would wear out so it could be replaced.

Better keep wishin'! Buying an Enya is like getting married to the hobby... except your Enya isn't going to tell you to take out the trash..



Nor will it run away with another engine!  Probably a Fox or OS.  Proof of that is you never see any baby OSya's or Foxya's.

_____________________________

“I Saw Elvis at 1000 Feet” John Force

Hide Signatures

(in reply to 1QwkSport2.5r)
       Post #: 199

RE: bad engines - 2/25/2013 3:38 PM   
1QwkSport2.5r



Posts: 3723
Score: 155
Joined: 10/15/2006
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Cottage Grove, MN, USA
Status: offline
Haha, no doubt! =D

_____________________________

*Real* glow fuel is made with Methanol, Nitromethane, and Castor oil.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Sport_Pilot)
       Post #: 200

Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>  
All Forums >> Glow Engines, Gas Engines, Fuel &amp; Mfg Support Forums >> Glow Engines >> RE: bad engines
Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>  





Jump to:


 
Google 



Search | Marketplace | Event Calendar | Local Clubs | Magazine | Product Ratings | New Products | Discussion Forums

Photo Gallery | Instructor Search | Field|Track|Marina Search

Advertisers | Hobby Vendor Resources | Rate Manufacturers | Sign In/Sign Up

SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

RC Universe is a service of Internet Brands, Inc. Copyright © 2001-2013.

Charities we support that also need your help
Yorkie Rescue | Humane Society | ASPCA | Crohn's-Colitis America


1.078RCU1