RE: URGENT - Huge Battle at AMA  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> AMA Discussions >> RE: URGENT - Huge Battle at AMA
Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: URGENT - Huge Battle at AMA - 12/30/2003 7:20:54 PM   
Sport_Pilot



Posts: 7727
Joined: 1/21/2002
From: Acworth, GA, USA
Status: offline
Sounds like the .9 to 1 thrust rule was to keep you jet boys from doing 3D with your jets. Just wondering if you have reduced your thrust with a dual rate throttle? I know 3D would be hard with the thrust at the rear of the plane, but never say never.

Hee. Hee. Make Mr. Brown sh** in his drawer, touch your tail in 3D flight then blast off to 200+ MPH.

(in reply to mongo)
       Post #: 301

RE: URGENT - Huge Battle at AMA - 12/30/2003 7:26:14 PM   
Sport_Pilot



Posts: 7727
Joined: 1/21/2002
From: Acworth, GA, USA
Status: offline
everyone having to buy and install and maintain a 200 dollar a pop speed limiter on evvery turbine aircraft, reguardless of attainable
quote:

max speed is your idea of nobody going to be seriously affected by this issue????


I sometimes cannot afford a $200 model! Yet I think that dollar figure will not seriously affect the jet modeler. Not with engines starting at $2000 and finished planes costing $10,000 sometimes more than 20 grand! 200 seems rather insignificant. IMO if required and more than one brande is approved or certified then the price will come down.

(in reply to mongo)
       Post #: 302

RE: URGENT - Huge Battle at AMA - 12/30/2003 11:06:05 PM   
Kevin Greene



Posts: 2580
Joined: 3/28/2002
From: Jackson, TN, USA
Status: offline
Jim,

What trap have I fallen in to??? I'm arguing the same point as most of the other jet jockies.

Kevin

(in reply to Jim Branaum)
       Post #: 303

RE: URGENT - Huge Battle at AMA - 12/30/2003 11:28:15 PM   
Jim Branaum


 

Posts: 1669
Joined: 10/22/2002
From: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX, USA
Status: offline
Hey Mongo,

Who said a single word about EVERYONE having to buy that junk? Exactly WHERE and in WHAT LANGUAGE does it say EVERYONE MUST?

Wanna bet that a slow airframe with a low T/W ratio will ever be challenged about it's on board speed limiter?

Prove your assertion.

I have not lost it, you just went a little too far in your assumptions. That is a common problem when folks perceive their ox may be gored.

_____________________________

Jim Branaum AMA 1428

(in reply to mongo)
       Post #: 304

RE: URGENT - Huge Battle at AMA - 12/31/2003 12:13:15 AM   
mongo


 

Posts: 1224
Joined: 12/5/2001
From: Midland, Republic of TEXAS, TX, USA
Status: offline
the new rule make no ref to thrust weight.
it simply states the speed limit and makes no exclusion at all for any turbine, r/c that is.


and are you now in position to make official statements of the AMA position?(ref yer statement about low t/w high drag airframes)
cause, most of us are under the impression that you got soundly trounced in yer misguided bid fer election.

< Message edited by mongo -- 12/31/2003 12:26:22 AM >

(in reply to Jim Branaum)
       Post #: 305

RE: URGENT - Huge Battle at AMA - 12/31/2003 12:31:09 AM   
Ram-bro


 

Posts: 2017
Joined: 1/22/2002
From: Bennington, NE, USA
Status: offline
What everyone fails to realize is that a speed limiter will only affect the turbine. what that means is that the airframe can still exceed 200mph in a dive but the turbine will be spooled back to idle. What do we do then, make a guy put airbrakes on this jet ? Someone answer this question. The speed limiter can only do so much......

(in reply to mongo)
       Post #: 306

RE: URGENT - Huge Battle at AMA - 12/31/2003 12:57:39 AM   
J_R


 

Posts: 4446
Joined: 1/4/2002
From: Corona, CA,
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: G-man-RCU

What everyone fails to realize is that a speed limiter will only affect the turbine. what that means is that the airframe can still exceed 200mph in a dive but the turbine will be spooled back to idle. What do we do then, make a guy put airbrakes on this jet ? Someone answer this question. The speed limiter can only do so much......

Don Lowe has already said that the speedlimit will be airspeed, DB agreed with that. That means that turbines flying with a 30 mph tail wind doing 200 mph airspeed are going to be traveling up to 230 mph. I seriously doubt that any on the TRC, SC, or EC have an illusion that turbines will not exceed 200 mph ground speed. All you have done is add another example. Either the waiver holders will do their best to stay within the rule and show the integrity that they are being given credit for, in being granted a waiver, or they won't.

JR

(in reply to Ram-bro)
       Post #: 307

RE: URGENT - Huge Battle at AMA - 12/31/2003 5:32:39 AM   
Jim Branaum


 

Posts: 1669
Joined: 10/22/2002
From: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX, USA
Status: offline
Mongo,
You seem to be the expert on everything anyone speaks of, so why don't you lecture us all from your superior knowledge. Please explain to us exactly how each and every single rule that exists within the AMA is always followed under threat of expulsion. Jeesh!

For your information (as if you NEEDED any more), I may be misguided from time to time, but I am well and widely known for being honest. In fact, I don't even have to hide my name, except from those checkbook modelers who buy more than they can fly.

_____________________________

Jim Branaum AMA 1428

(in reply to mongo)
       Post #: 308

RE: URGENT - Huge Battle at AMA - 12/31/2003 7:27:21 AM   
mongo


 

Posts: 1224
Joined: 12/5/2001
From: Midland, Republic of TEXAS, TX, USA
Status: offline
having met you a time or 2, hiding yer name, might just be a smart move.

(in reply to Jim Branaum)
       Post #: 309

RE: URGENT - Huge Battle at AMA - 12/31/2003 8:06:57 AM   
Dream_Flyer



Posts: 322
Joined: 10/13/2002
From: PB145, TX, USA
Status: offline
Mongo there is no reason to get personal with anyone here. Now that aside the speed issue does need to be addressed. The Turbine limiter might or might not be a viable solution to what is needed. But where to start? Really I think that if the general populous of the Jet flying community would get together they would come up with a good solution for this problem and submit that to the AMA people that would be in charge of this issue. This would not only benefit the AMA but also the Jet flyers as a whole. As for cost for what solution would be needed it is a hobby of which you will in all hobbies be required to maintain certain standards of safety and compliance to the rules of that hobby. Be it car racing, motorcycles, or anything else that may cause potential hazard to operators or bystanders of operation of an event or recreational acivity. So instead of arguing and finger pointing why not get everyone's heads together and find a solution to the problem at hand and for future enjoyment of the hobby?

(in reply to mongo)
       Post #: 310

RE: URGENT - Huge Battle at AMA - 12/31/2003 8:49:32 AM   
mongo


 

Posts: 1224
Joined: 12/5/2001
From: Midland, Republic of TEXAS, TX, USA
Status: offline
the solution is already in place.
as kg and other jet jocks have stated, folks don't fly the jets at speeds over 200, not because they can't, but because it isn't fun.
a radar gun at ta jet rally will see most speeds under 175, because that is where the planes are responsive and fun to fly.
the only reason to go faster is for the whiz bang ability to say you flew x mph, and once done, there is no reason to do it again, cause it aint fun.

and i didn't start it down the personal track, just continued it.

(in reply to Dream_Flyer)
       Post #: 311

RE: URGENT - Huge Battle at AMA - 12/31/2003 1:40:46 PM   
Sport_Pilot



Posts: 7727
Joined: 1/21/2002
From: Acworth, GA, USA
Status: offline
quote:

The speed limiter can only do so much......


I am sure Mr. Brown is aware of that. He probably thinks it is enough control. I don't think I would mention airbrakes, people may just pick up on that and require that as well.

(in reply to Ram-bro)
       Post #: 312

RE: URGENT - Huge Battle at AMA - 12/31/2003 4:14:10 PM   
J_R


 

Posts: 4446
Joined: 1/4/2002
From: Corona, CA,
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mongo

the solution is already in place.
as kg and other jet jocks have stated, folks don't fly the jets at speeds over 200, not because they can't, but because it isn't fun.
a radar gun at ta jet rally will see most speeds under 175, because that is where the planes are responsive and fun to fly.
the only reason to go faster is for the whiz bang ability to say you flew x mph, and once done, there is no reason to do it again, cause it aint fun.
<SNIP>

mongo

Your opinion was echoed at the EC meeting by the members of the TRC. Unfortunately, all waiver holders do not appear to agree, as evidenced by many of the posts in the Jet Forum in the "Dave Brown" thread. It has also become apparent that the rules that were in place were frequently violated, after the commitment by the jet community to police themselves. This fact is now being used to question the future enforcement of rules. While everyone, including Dave Brown and the EC give the jet community credit for a relatively safe history of operations, questions have been raised. It's a rather long thread, but one that anyone who wants to know more about the waiver holders and their thoughts should take the time to read, in it's entirety.

JR

(in reply to mongo)
       Post #: 313

RE: URGENT - Huge Battle at AMA - 12/31/2003 10:46:28 PM   
Kevin Greene



Posts: 2580
Joined: 3/28/2002
From: Jackson, TN, USA
Status: offline
To add to Mongo's post....In past years, I as well as many others participated in the ducted fan speed wars. It was fun because it was CHALLENGING!!!! After several blown engines and reaching a personal best with a ducted fan of 232 MPH I hung up my speed demon hat. Been there, done that....

Now, everyone can go fast if they desire to with turbine power. The challenge to go fast is gone. Now, high speed passes rarely get a second glance...Most guys would turn their heads to watch....Not because of the thrill of seeing a fast plane but because high speed passes are RARE!!! Unlike ducted fans, speed continues to build in a turbine model if left at full throttle. It is simply not much fun to fly an oval pattern at speed as that is just about all you would be able to do with a really clean plane.

Most guys now are into manueverability, myself included. I now own a Rookie with vectored thrust control and I've got a EuroSport coming as a late Christmas present to myself. (Santa gave me switches and lumps of coal!! ) Now what is cool is to make a rediculously slow high alpha flyby, add power, then point the nose straight up, followed by a couple of snaps, then spinning the model on the downline!!! This would be our version of 3D flying. It takes a LOT of power to fly like this, however, even when overpowered a draggy model like the EuroSport wouldn't go 200 MPH if dropped from Mt. Everest.

The .9:1 T/W rule was designed to prevent models from over speeding. With the incorporation of larger, very light weight, high drag models the .9:1 T/W rule needs a little overhauling. I plan on installing a 27 lb turbine in my 21 lb (dry) EuroSport. Under the rules I would have to either turn down the turbine or use a speed limiter. I don't plan on doing either as this jet will not exceed 200 MPH...As a matter of fact, the EuroSport is a 145-150 MPH jet in this configuration.

Dave Brown is concerned about dropping the T/W limit rule as proposed in the new rules. His concerns are that guys will be going well over 200 MPH---And those concerns are justified, but anyone that has participated in the jet rally circuit knows that for the most part Dave Brown has nothing to worry about. Dropping the T/W ratio rule was intended for jets like the above mentioned EuroSport. Yes, there are guys out there that are "technically" breaking the rules but it is NOT so that they can go fast----It is to gain that awesome manueverability!!!

The guys bent on flying as fast as they can are not doing it at the club fields or at jet rallies. They are at a private strip or out in the desert doing their own thing without AMA coverage. There is nothing anyone can do about these guys anyway, so why worry about them??? I do understand that they are a concern because if they have a catastrophic crash it could put a black eye on jet modeling. Again, there's nothing anyone can do about it. Some guys here like to rip off a high speed pass or two....These passes are usually extremely short in duration, ending by throttling back after the model has passed. Guys simply are not flying as though the throttle is a toggle switch!!!

As I've mentioned a hundred times here on RCU, Dave Brown and the members of the EC need to attend some jet rallies to see first hand how jets are flown.

Kevin

< Message edited by Kevin Greene -- 12/31/2003 10:50:05 PM >

(in reply to mongo)
       Post #: 314

RE: URGENT - Huge Battle at AMA - 1/1/2004 12:28:16 AM   
Jim Branaum


 

Posts: 1669
Joined: 10/22/2002
From: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX, USA
Status: offline
Kevin,
This entire mess has been manufactured over a miscommunication error that was made during the original meeting wher